Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:37:21.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moving beyond the Child Support Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Ann Laquer Estin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , Spring 2001 , pp. 505 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

American Law Institute. 1997. Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution: Analysis and Recommendations, Tentative Draft No. 3, Part II. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.Google Scholar
Argetsinger, Amy. 2000. Court Opens Door to New Paternity Challenges. Washington Post, 29 June, A1.Google Scholar
Braver, Sanford L. 1999. The Gender Gap in Standard of Living after Divorce: Vanishingly Small Family Law Quarterly 33:111–34.Google Scholar
Blumberg, Grace Ganz. 1999. Balancing the Interests: The American Law Institute's Treatment of Child Support. Family Law Quarterly 33:39–110.Google Scholar
Census Report Finds 2 Million Deadbeats. 2000. Houston Chronicle, 13 Oct., 4.Google Scholar
Chambers, David L. 1982. The Coming Curtailment of Compulsory Child Support. Michigan Law Review 80:1614–34.Google Scholar
Chambers, David L. 1995. Fathers, the Welfare System, and the Virtues and Perils of Child Support Enforcement. Virginia Law Review 81:2575–2605.Google Scholar
Chan, Sewell. 2000. Child Support Amnesty Finds Fathers, Stories, Some Cash. Washington Post, 17 Sept.Google Scholar
Elrod, Linda Henry. 1990. The Federalization of Child Support Guidelines. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers 6:103–30.Google Scholar
Estin, Ann Laquer. 1998. Federalism and Child Support. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law 5:541–601.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. 1995. The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family, and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Michael. 2000. Gore Details Child Support Escrow Plan. Los Angeles Times, 3 June, A11.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Irwin. 1992. Assuring Child Support: An Extension of the Social Security System. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Irwin McLanahan, Sara S., Daniel, R. Meyer, and Seltzer, Judith, eds. 1999. Fathers under Fire: The Revolution in Child Support Enforcement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Garrison, Marsha. 1998. Autonomy or Community? An Evaluation of Two Models of Parental Obligation. California Law Review 86:41–116.Google Scholar
Garrison, Marsha 1999. Child Support Policy: Guidelines and Goals. Family Law Quarterly 33:157–89.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Charley. 2000. Law Halts Child Support if Test Disproves Paternity. Cleveland Plain Dealer, 27 Oct., 2B.Google Scholar
Hansen, Drew D. 1999. Note, The American Invention of Child Support: Dependency and Punishment in Early American Child Support Law. Yale Law Journal 108:1123–53.Google Scholar
Harris, Deborah. 198788. Child Support for Welfare Families: Family Policy Trapped in Its Own Rhetoric. New York University Review of Law and Social Change 16:619–51.Google Scholar
Harris, Leslie Joan. 1999. The Proposed ALI Child Support Principles. Willamette Law Review 35:717–59.Google Scholar
Havemann, Judith. 1999. Child Support Recovery Has Gone up 20 Percent. Washington Post, 2 April.Google Scholar
Hayes, Margaret Campbell, ed. 1994. Child Support Guidelines: The Next Generation. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Child Support Enforcement.Google Scholar
Healy, Melissa. 1999. House Hopes to Boost Poor by Teaching Fatherhood. Los Angeles Times, 11 Nov., A1.Google Scholar
Henry, Ronald K. 1999. Child Support at a Crossroads: When the Real World Intrudes upon Academics and Advocates. Family Law Quarterly 33:235–64.Google Scholar
James, Joni. 2000. High Court to Rule if DNA Tests Can End Child Support Payments. Wall Street Journal, 23 Aug.Google Scholar
Johnson, Earl S., Levine, Ann, and Fred Doolittle, C. 1999. Fathers' Fair Share: Helping Poor Men Manage Child Support and Fatherhood. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Josephson, Jyl J. 1997. Gender, Families, and State: Child Support Policy in the United States. Lanham Md: Roman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Krause, Harry D. 1990. Child Support Reassessed: Limits of Private Responsibility and the Public Interest. Family Law Quarterly 24:1–34.Google Scholar
Kreck, Carol. 2000. Dads Get a Hand with Child Support. Denver Post, 16 June, B2.Google Scholar
Legler, Paul. 1996 The Coming Revolution in Child Support Policy: Implications of the 1996 Welfare Act. Family Law Quarterly 30:519–63.Google Scholar
Levesque, Roger J.R. 1994. Targeting “Deadbeat” Dads: The Problem with the Direction of Welfare Reform. Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy 15:1–53.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Joseph I. 1986. Child Support in America: Practical Advice for Negotiating—and Collecting—a Fair Settlement. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, Caroline E., and Jacqueline Salmon, L. 2000. Problems at Child Support, Inc. Washington Post, 18 May, B1.Google Scholar
Melli, Marygold S. 1999. Guideline Review: Child Support and Time Sharing by Parents. Family Law Quarterly 33:219–34.Google Scholar
Morgan, Laura W. 1996. Child Support Guidelines: Interpretation and Application. New York: Aspen Law and Business.Google Scholar
Morgan, Laura W. 1999. The Federalization of Child Support: A Shift in the Ruling Paradigm: Child Support as outside the Contours of “Family Law. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers 16:195–221.Google Scholar
Morgan, Laura W., and Mark Lino, C. 1999. A Comparison of Child Support Awards Calculated under States' Child Support Guidelines with Expenditures on Children Calculated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Family Law Quarterly 33:191–218.Google Scholar
O'Harrow, Jr., Robert, . 1999. Big Brother's Growth Spurt: Federal Files Grow in Child Support Enforcement Effort. Washington Post, 27 June.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. Thomas. 1996. Lessons from the New English and Australian Child Support Systems. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 29:691–733.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. Thomas 1998. The American Law Institute's Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution: Its Impact on Family Law. Texas Journal of Women and the Law 7:161–68.Google Scholar
Pearson, Jessica, and Thoennes, Nancy. 1999. Programs to Increase Fathers' Access to Their Children. In Garfinkel et al. 1999.Google Scholar
Pertman, Adam. 2000. DNA Tests Give New Twist to Paternity Fights. Clevel and Plain Dealer, 25 July, 12A.Google Scholar
Prisons Offer No Escape from Paying Child Support. 2000. New York Times, 17 Sept.Google Scholar
Riccardi, Nicholas. 1998. Failure to Provide: Los Angeles County's Child Support Crisis: Adding Errors: Computer System That Was Supposed to Dramatically Boost Collections Has Instead Pulled Some Parents into a Nightmare. Los Angeles Times, 11 Oct., A26.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. Mark. 1999. Wisconsin-Style and Income Shares Child Support Guidelines: Excessive Burdens and Flawed Foundations. Family Law Quarterly 33:135–56.Google Scholar
Shatzkin, Kate. 2000. Policies on Child Support Assessed. Baltimore Sun, 29 Aug., 1B.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Elaine. 1997. A National Profile of Nonresident Fathers and Their Ability to Pay Child Support. Journal of Marriage and the Family 59:785–97.Google Scholar
Sugarman, Stephen D. 1995. Financial Support of Children and the End of Welfare as We Know It. Virginia Law Review 81:2523–73.Google Scholar
Teachman, Jay D. 1991. Who Pays? Receipt of Child Support in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:759–72.Google Scholar
Broek, ten, Jacobus, . 1964a. California's Dual System of Family Law: Its Origin, Development and Present Status, Part 1. Stanford Law Review 16:257–317.Google Scholar
Broek, ten, Jacobus, 1964b. California's Dual System of Family Law: Its Origin, Development and Present Status, Part 2. Stanford Law Review 16:900–81.Google Scholar
Broek, ten, Jacobus, 1965. California's Dual System of Family Law: Its Origin, Development and Present Status, Part 3. Stanford Law Review 17:614–82.Google Scholar
United States, Commission on Child and Family Welfare. 1996. Parenting Our Children: In the Best Interest of Our Nation. Washington D.C.: Commission on Child and Family Welfare.Google Scholar
United States, Department of Health and Human Services. 1999. HHS Fact Sheet: HHS Fatherhood Initiative. 21 June. http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/cse/fct/fthr990621,htm.Google Scholar
United States, Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. HHS Fact Sheet: Child Support Enforcement: A Clinton/Gore Administration Priority. 17 June. http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/news/fschsupt.htm.Google Scholar
United States, Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Child Support Enforcement. Division of Planning, Research and Evaluation. 1999. Child Support Enforcement FY 1999 Preliminary Data Report. http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/cse/rpt/99report/index.html.Google Scholar
Venohr, Jane C., and Robert Williams, G. 1999. The Implementation and Periodic Review of State Child Support Guidelines. Family Law Quarterly 33:7–37.Google Scholar
Werland, Ross. 2000. Searching out the Deadbeats for a Price. Chicago Tribune, 24 Sept., 1.Google Scholar
Wheaton, Laura, and Sorensen, Elaine. 1998. Reducing Welfare Costs and Dependency: How Much Bang for the Child Support Buck Georgetown Public Policy Review 4:23–36.Google Scholar
Women's Legal Defense Fund. 1987. Essentials of Child Support Guideline Development: Economic Issues and Policy Considerations. Washington D.C.: Women's Legal Defense Fund.Google Scholar

Cases

Alaska Department of Revenue v. Beans , 965 P.2d 725 (Alaska 1998).Google Scholar
Boddie v. Connecticut , 401 US. 371 (1971).Google Scholar
Chustain v. Chustain , 932 S.W.2d 396 (Mo. 1996).Google Scholar
Dubabnah v. West Virginia Board of Medicine , 535 S.E.2d 220 (W. Va. 2000).Google Scholar
Florida Department of Revenue ex re. R.A.E. v. M.L.S. , 756 So. 2d 125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000).Google Scholar
Holmberg v. Holmberg , 578 N.W.2d 817 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998).Google Scholar
Holmberg w. Holmberg , 588 N.W.2d 720 (Minn. 1999).Google Scholar
In re Marriage of Thurmond , 962 P.2d 1064 (Kan. 1998).Google Scholar
Iowa ex rel. Sara Allee v. Gocha , 555 N.W.2d 683 (Iowa 1996).Google Scholar
Kansas v. United States , 24 F. Supp. 2d 1192 (D. Kan. 1998), affd 214 F.3d 1196 (10th Cir. 2000).Google Scholar
Langston v. Riffe , 754 A.2d 389 (Md. 2000).Google Scholar
Loving w. Virginia , 388 US. 1 (1967).Google Scholar
Moss w. Superior Court , 950 P.2d 59 (Cal. 1998).Google Scholar
Seubert w. Seubert , 2000 WL 1231507 (Mont. 2000).Google Scholar
Turner v. Safley , 487 US. 78 (1987).Google Scholar
United States v. Balkk , 170 F.3d 871 (9th Cir. 1999).Google Scholar
Wills v. Jones , 667 A.2d 331 (Md. 1995).Google Scholar
Zablocki w. Redhail , 434 US. 374 (1978).Google Scholar