Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:03:07.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Michigan's Minority Graduates in Practice: The River Runs Through Law School

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Richard O. Lempert ,
David L. Chambers  and
Terry K. Adams
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a 1997–98 survey designed to explore the careers of the University of Michigan Law School's minority graduates from the classes of 1970 through 1996, and of a random sample of Michigan Law School's white alumni who graduated during the same years. It is to date the most detailed quantitative exploration of how minority students fare after they graduate from law school and enter law practice or related careers. The results reveal that almost all of Michigan Law School's minority graduates pass a bar exam and go on to have careers that appear successful by conventional measures. In particular, the survey indicates that minority graduates (defined so as to include graduates with African American, Latino, and Native American backgrounds) are no less successful than white graduates, whether success is measured by the log of current income, self-reported satisfaction, or an index of service contributions. Also, although an admissions index that combines LSAT scores and undergraduate grade-point average is a significant predictor of law school grades, it does not predict career success on any of our three outcome measures. Michigan is a highly selective law school; our results may not generalize to people who have graduated from other law schools.

Type
“From The Trenches and Towers”
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , Spring 2000 , pp. 395 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowen, William, and Derek, Box. 1998. The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, A. B., and Werts, C. E. 1976. Relationships among Law School Predictors, Law School Performance, and Bar Examination Results. In Reports of LSAC-sponsored Research: Volume 1, 19491969, Report no. LSAC 76–1, pp. 264–69. Princeton, N.J. Law School Admissions Council.Google Scholar
Darley, J. M., and Latane, B. 1968a. Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8:377–83.Google Scholar
Darley, J. M., and Latane, B. 1968b. The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.Google Scholar
Davidson, Robert, and Ernest, Lewis. 1997. Affirmative Action and Other Special Consideration Admissions at the University of California, Davis, School of Medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 278:1153–1158.Google Scholar
Heinz, J. P., and Laumann, E. O. 1982. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Keith, Stephen, et al. 1986. Acts of Affirmative Action in Medical School: A Study of the Class of 1976. New England Journal of Medicine 313:1519–1525.Google Scholar
Komaromy, Miriam, et al. 1996. The Role of Black and Hispanic Physicians in Providing Health Care for Underserved Populations. New England Journal of Medicine 334:1305–1310.Google Scholar
Lin, P., and Humphreys, L. G. 1977. Predictions of Academic Performance in Graduate and Professional School. Applied Psychological Measurement 1(2):249–57.Google Scholar
Moy, Ernest, and Bartman, Barbara A. 1995. Physician Race and Care of Minority and Medically Indigent Patients. Journal of the American Medical Association 273:1515–1520.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. L. 1988. Partners with Power. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Orfield, Gary, and Dean, Whitla. 1999. Diversity and Legal Education: Student Experiences in Leading Law Schools. Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, Stephen W. 1999. Supplemental Expert Witness Report, Grutter v. Bollinger et al. No. 97–75928 (E.D. Mich.), 3 March.Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah. 1999. Cultures of Commitment: Pro Bono for Lawyers and Law Students. Fordham L. Rev. 67:2415.Google Scholar
Ross, A. S. 1971. Effect of Increased Responsibility on Bystander Intervention: The Presence of Children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 19:306–310.Google Scholar
Smigel, E. O. 1969. The Wall Street Lawyer: Professional Organization Man? Revised edition. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1997. Annual Demographic File of Current Population Survey. Public Use Microdata Sample; Bureau of the Census. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
U.S. News & World Report. America's Best Graduate Schools, 29 March 1999, 74–115.Google Scholar
Wightman, L. 1999. Beyond FYA: Analysis of the Utility of LSAT Scores and UGPA for Predicting Academic Success in Law School. Report prepared for the Law School Admission Council, Princeton, N.J. Google Scholar
Wilkins, David, and Gulati, G. Mitu. 1996. Why Are There So Few Black Lawyers in Corporate Law Firms? An Institutional Analysis. California Law Review 84:493–625.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, J. A., Pitcher, B., and , P. Van Miller, R. 1976. Report of the Readministration of the LSAT to Third-Year Students. In Reports of LSAC-sponsored Research: Volume 1, 1949–1969, pp. 255–66. Report No. LSAC 63–3. Princeton, N.J.: Law School Admission Council.Google Scholar