Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:18:08.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Last Words, Last Meals, and Last Stands: Agency and Individuality in the Modern Execution Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Daniel LaChance
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the historical transformation of executions in the United States into cloistered, bureaucratic affairs, two past practices have persisted in modern executions: the opportunities for the condemned to request a special last meal and to make a speech to those assembled to witness the execution. The retention of these practices and the communication of their contents by the state and the media to the public reinforce a conception of those executed as autonomous actors, endowed with agency and individuality. Through these practices, the state and the media reflect and strengthen the oxymoronic construction of offenders in contemporary discourses as self-made monsters who are intrinsically different by choice. Presenting offenders in this way may ultimately maintain the emotional satisfaction needed to sustain the death penalty. Arguments are supported by published last meal requests and final statements in the state of Texas.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , Summer 2007 , pp. 701 - 724
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Ayres, Chris. 2005. It took them 11 minutes to find a vein. “You doing that right?” Tookie asked. The Times (London), December 14, 33.Google Scholar
Banner, Stuart. 2002. The Death Penalty: An American History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Berns, Walter. 1979. For Capital Punishment: Crime and the Morality of the Death Penalty. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Beschle, Donald L. 1997. What's Guilt (Or Deterrence) Got to Do with It?: The Death Penalty, Ritual, and Mimetic Violence. William and Mary Law Review 38:487–538.Google Scholar
Beschle, Donald L. 2001. Why Do People Support Capital Punishment? The Death Penalty as Community Ritual. Connecticut Law Review 33:765–90.Google Scholar
Connolly, William. 1999. The Will, Capital Punishment, and Cultural War. In The Killing State: Capital Punishment in Law, Politics, and Culture, ed. Sarat, Austin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dead Man Eating Homepage. 2006. http://www.deadmaneating.com (accessed July 28, 2006).Google Scholar
Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) Homepage. 2006. http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org (accessed July 28, 2006).Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Mische, Ann. “What Is Agency?” The American Journal of Sociology 103:962–1023.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1975. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2005. Capital Punishment and American Culture. Punishment and Society 7:347–76.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M., and Simon, Jonathan. 1992. The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications. Criminology 30:449–74.Google Scholar
Johnson, Robert. 1998. Death Work: A Study of the Modern Execution Process, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Kaufman-Osborn, Timothy V. 2000. The Metaphysics of the Hangman. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 20:35–70.Google Scholar
Lesser, Wendy. 1993. Pictures at an Execution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Mona. 2000. The Disposal of Inmate #85271. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 20:3–34.Google Scholar
Mansnerus, Laura. 2001. Damaged Brains and the Death Penalty. New York Times, July 21, B9.Google Scholar
The Memory Hole Homepage. 2006. http://www.thememoryhole.org (accessed July 28, 2006).Google Scholar
Morris, Norval. 1976. Punishment, Desert, and Rehabilitation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
North Carolina Department of Correction Homepage. 1998. http://www.doc.state.nc.us (accessed July 28, 2006).Google Scholar
O'Neill, Kevin Francis. 2001. Muzzling Death Row Inmates: Applying the First Amendment to Regulations That Restrict a Condemned Prisoner's Last Words. Arizona State Law Journal 33:1159–1218.Google Scholar
Price, Brian. 2004. The Last Supper. Legal Affairs, March/April: 31.Google Scholar
Price, Brian. 2005. Meals to Die For. London: Artnik.Google Scholar
Rimer, Sara. 2000. In the Busiest Death Chamber, Duty Carries Its Own Burdens. The New York Times, December 10, 1.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 2001. When the State Kills: Capital Punishment and the American Condition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas, eds. 1995. Making Peace with Violence: Robert Cover on Law and Legal Theory. In Law's Violence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J., Cleveland, Lara L., and King, Ryan D. Institutional Environments and Scholarly Work: American Criminology, 1951–1993. Social Forces 82:1275–302.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip. 1996. Executing Executions: Aesthetics, Identity, and the Problematic Narratives of Capital Punishment Ritual. Theory and Society 25:235–61.Google Scholar
Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) Death Row Homepage. 2006. http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us (accessed on July 28, 2006).Google Scholar
Treadwell, Ty, and Vernon, Michelle. 2001. Last Suppers: Famous Final Meals from Death Row. Port Townsend, WA: Loompanics Unlimited.Google Scholar
Trombley, Stephen. 1993. The Execution Protocol: Inside America's Capital Punishment Industry. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E. 2003. The Contradictions of American Capital Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Case Cited

Callins v. Collins. 510 U.S. 1141 (1994).Google Scholar