Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:14:43.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is the Solicitor General an Executive or a Judicial Agent? Caplan's Tenth Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Louis Fisher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , Spring 1990 , pp. 305 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Werdeger, Kathryn Mickle, “The Solicitor General and Administrative Due Process: A Quarter-Century of Advocacy,” 36 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 481, 482 (1968).Google Scholar

2 Joseph Borkin, The Corrupt Judge 25 (New York: Clarkson N. Potter, 1962).Google Scholar

3 Francis Biddle, In Brief Authority 97 (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1962).Google Scholar

4 28 U.S.C. § 505 (1982).Google Scholar

5 28 C.F.R. § 0.20(d) (July 1, 1982).Google Scholar

6 Griswold, Erwin N., “The Office of the Solicitor General—Representing the Interests of the United States Before the Supreme Court,” 34 Mo. L. Rev. 527 (1969). The same language appears in Wade H. McCree, Jr., “The Solicitor General and His Client,” 59 Wash. U.L.Q. 337, 346 (1981).Google Scholar

7 Humphrey's Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602, 629 (1935).Google Scholar

8 1 Op. Off. Legal Counsel 228, 230 (1977).Google Scholar

9 Nominations of Joseph T. Sneed to Be Deputy Attorney General and Robert H. Bork to Be Solicitor General: Headings Before the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary, 93d Cong., 1st Sess. 16 (1973).Google Scholar

10 Confirmation Hearings on Federal Appointment, Part 2: Hearing Before the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary, 99th Cong., 1st Sess. 494 (1986) (“Confirmation Hearings”).Google Scholar

11 Solicitor General's office: Hearing Before the House Comm. on the Judiciary, 100th Cong., 1st Sess. 45 (1987) (“Solicitor General's office”).Google Scholar

12 Burger, Warren E., “Wade McCree,” 21 Loyola L.A.L. Rev. 1051, 1052 (1988).Google Scholar

13 Sobeloff, Simon E., “The Law Business of the United States,” 34 Or. L. Rev. 145, 147 (1955). The same language appears in Simon E. Sobeloff, “Attorney for the Government: The Work of the Solicitor General's Office,” 41 A.B.A. J. 229 (1955).Google Scholar

14 Griswold, , 34 Mo. L. Rev. at 529.Google Scholar

15 Meadows, David W., “Foreword,” 21 Loyola L.A.L. Rev. 1047 (1988).Google Scholar

16 Miller, Geoffrey P., “Government Lawyers' Ethics in a System of Checks and Balances,” 54 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1293, 1296 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 “Brief for Petitioner” in Sawyer v. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co., 48 Landmark Briefs and Arguments of the Supreme Court of the United Stares: Constitutional Law 755–57 (Kurland & Casper ed. 1975) (“Landmark Briefs”).Google Scholar

18 Id. at 920.Google Scholar

19 Youngstown Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579, 647 (1952).Google Scholar

20 Werdeger, , 36 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. at 481 (cited in note 1).Google Scholar

21 Brief for the United States in New York Times Co. v. United States, 71 Landmark Briefs 123 (1975).Google Scholar

22 Id. at 228.Google Scholar

23 New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971).Google Scholar

24 Erwin N. Griswold, “Secrets Not Worth Keeping,”Wash. Post, Feb. 15, 1989, at A24.Google Scholar

25 Note, “The Solicitor General and Intergovernmental Conflict,” 76 Mich. L. Rev. 324, 329–30 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 Id. at 352.Google Scholar

27 Confirmation Hearings 486 (cited in note 10).Google Scholar

28 Clegg, Roger, Book Review, 1987 Duke L.J. 964.Google Scholar

29 Confirmation Hearings, 486 (cited in note 10).Google Scholar

30 United States v. Mendoza, 464 U.S. 154, 161 (1984).Google Scholar

31 Lee, Rex E., “Lawyering for the Government: Politics, Polemics & Principle,” 47 Ohio St. L.J. 595, 599 (1986). See also Bork, Robert H., “The Problems and Pleasures of Being Solicitor General,” 42 Antitrust L.J. 701, 704 (1973).Google Scholar

32 Geller, Kenneth, quoted in Jenkins, John A., “The Solicitor General's Winning Ways,” 69 A.B.A. J. 734, 737 (1983).Google Scholar

33 Young v. United States, 315 U.S. 257, 258 (1942).Google Scholar

34 McCree, , 59 Wash. U.L.Q. at 342 (cited in note 6); Note, “Confession of Error by the Solicitor General,” 74 Mich. L Rev. 1067 (1976).Google Scholar

35 Karen O'Connor, , “The Amicus Curiae Role of the U.S. Solicitor General in Supreme Court Litigation,” 66 Judicature 256, 260 (1983).Google Scholar

36 Neuborne, Burt, “In Lukewarm Defense of Charles Fried,” 21 Loyola L.A.L Rev. 1069, 1070 (1988).Google Scholar

37 247 US. 251 (1981).Google Scholar

38 Brief for the United States in United States v. Darby, 37 Landmark Briefs 68–69 (1975).Google Scholar

39 United States v. Darby, 312 US. 100 (1941).Google Scholar

40 Newberry v. United States, 256 U.S. 232 (1921).Google Scholar

41 38 Landmark Briefs 32 (1975).Google Scholar

42 United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 (1941).Google Scholar

43 Nomination of Robert H. Jackson: Hearings Before the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. 107 (1938).Google Scholar

44 Id. at 121–22.Google Scholar

45 McConnell, Michael W., “The Rule of Law and the Role of the Solicitor General,” 21 Loyola L.A.L. Rev. 1105–1111 (1988).Google Scholar

46 Chamberlain, Ronald S., “Mixing Politics and Justice: The Office of Solicitor General,” 4 J.L. & Pol. 379, 424 (1987).Google Scholar

47 “Solicitor General's Office,” at 34 (cited in note 11).Google Scholar

48 Swain v. Alabama, 380 US. 202 (1965).Google Scholar

49 Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986).Google Scholar

50 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar

51 109 S. Ct. 3040 (1989).Google Scholar

52 163 US. 537 (1896).Google Scholar

53 Edwin Meese, III, “The Law of the Constitution,” 61 Tul. L. Rev. 979 (1987).Google Scholar

54 Louis Fisher, Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretation as Political Process 238–242 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1988) (“Fisher, Constitutional Dialogues”).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

55 358 U.S. 1 (1958).Google Scholar

56 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857).Google Scholar

57 57 Fisher, Constitutional Dialogues at 241–42 (cited in note 54).Google Scholar

58 Victor S. Navasky, Kennedy Justice (New York: Atheneum, 1977) (“Navasky, Kennedy Justice”).Google Scholar

59 Id. at 306.Google Scholar

60 Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946); MacDougall v. Green, 335 U.S. 261 (1948).Google Scholar

61 Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 202 (1962).Google Scholar

62 Navasky, Kennedy Justice at 311 (cited in note 58).Google Scholar

63 Id. at 313.Google Scholar

64 Id. at 309.Google Scholar

65 Lee, 47 Ohio St. L.J. at 600 (cited in note 31).Google Scholar

66 462 U.S. 416 (1983).Google Scholar

67 N.Y. Times, Aug. 4, 1982, at A22.Google Scholar

68 Linda Greenhouse, “Abortion Brief Serves as a Roadmap,”N.Y. Times, Aug. 10, 1982, at B6.Google Scholar

69 461 U.S. 574 (1983).Google Scholar

70 136 Landmark Briefs 95 (asterisked material) (1984).Google Scholar

71 461 US. 574 (1983).Google Scholar

72 Jenkins, , 69 A.B.A.J. at 736 (cited in note 32).Google Scholar

73 Fred Barbash, “Solicitor General Lee Reflects on His Role,”Wash. Post, Aug. 11, 1983, at A21.Google Scholar

74 Mary Thornton, “Burger Comes to Defense of Solicitor General Fried,”Wash. Post, Aug. 20, 1987, at A21; Jonathan Groner, “Marshall, Powell Deny Criticizing SG,”!Legal Times, Nov. 2, 1987, at 2, 3.Google Scholar