Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:17:18.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to Symposium on Keith J. Bybee's All Judges Are Political—Except When They Are Not

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Helena Silverstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This introduction to the symposium on Keith J. Bybee's All Judges Are Political—Except When They Are Not provides a brief synopsis of the book's main argument and identifies some of the unsettled questions generated by the author's innovative treatment of courtesy, hypocrisy, and law.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , Winter 2013 , pp. 190 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burgess, Susan. 2013. Outing Courtesy: The Role of Rude Dissent in Rule of Law Systems. Law & Social Inquiry 38 (1): 206–214.Google Scholar
Bybee, Keith J. 2010. All Judges Are Political—Except When They Are Not: Acceptable Hypocrisies and the Rule of Law. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Matthew. 2012. The “Hypocritic” Oath: What the Roberts Ruling Says About How Courts Function. Presidential Power: A NonPartisan Analysis of Presidential Politics (blog), July 3. http://blogs.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/07/03/the‐hypocritic‐oath‐what‐the‐roberts‐ruling‐says‐about‐how‐courts‐function/ (accessed July 14, 2012).Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia. 2013. Principles, Passions and the Paradox of Modern Law: A Comment on Bybee. Law & Social Inquiry 38 (1): 196–205.Google Scholar