Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:41:40.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hidden in Plain View: Murray Edelman in the Law and Society Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Patricia Ewick  and
Austin Sarat
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This year marks the fortieth anniversary of the publication of Murray Edelman's The Symbolic Uses of Politics (1964) and provides the occasion for us to reflect on his contributions and the influence of his work in law and society scholarship. Measuring its impact is no easy or straightforward task, in part because reading a book that was written that long ago is an exercise in translation. Over the course of four decades, terms of art are invented, intellectual styles change, and paradigms shift.

Type
Review Article
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , Spring 2004 , pp. 439 - 463
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodore W., with Else Frankel-Brunswick, Daniel J. Levinson, R. Nevitt Sanford. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Amherst Seminar Editorial Collective. 1988. Law and Ideology. Law and Society Review 22.Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan, ed. 1999. The Passions of Law. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Brigham, John. 1996. The Constitution of Interests: Beyond the Politics of Rights. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. 1988. The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Chambliss, William. 1964. A Sociological Analysis of Vagrancy. Social Problems 26:67–77.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger. [1984] 1992. The Sociology of Law: An Introduction. 2d ed. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
De Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Rendall. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John, and Bentley, Arthur F. 1949. Knower and the Known Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, Jack, ed. 1970. Understanding Everyday Life. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Dumm, Thomas. 1990. Fear of Law. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 10:29–60.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1972. Politics as Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiescence. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1977. Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1988. Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 2001. The Politics of Misinformation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. Elias, Norbert. 1978. What Is Sociology Trans. Stephen Mennell and Graces Morrissey. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Engel, David M. 1993. Origin Myths: Narratives of Authority, Resistance, Disability and Law. Law and Society Review 27:785–826.Google Scholar
Engel, David M., and Munger, Frank W. 2003. Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan. 1992. Conformity, Contestation, and Resistance: An Account of Legal Consciousness. New England Law Review 26:731–49.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan. 1998. The Commonplace of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Books. Fromm, Erich. 1956. The Art of Loving. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Gabel, Peter. 1980. Reification in Legal Reasoning. Research in Law and Sociology 3.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974- Why the Haves Come Out Ahead: Speculation on the Limits of Legal Change. Law and Society Review 9:95–160.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert. 1984. Critical Legal Histories. Stanford Law Review 36.Google Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol. 1988. Courting Difference: Issues of Interpretation and Comparison in the Study of Legal Ideologies. Law and Society Review 22:687–707.Google Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph. 1963. Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1984. Reason and Rationalization in Society. Trans. Thomas McCarthy. Vol. 1 of The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel. 1992. Postmodernism, Protest, and the New Social Movements. Law and Society Review 26:697–731.Google Scholar
Harrington, Christine B., and Yngvesson, Barbara. 1990. Interpretive Sociolegal Research. Law & Social Inquiry 15:135–48.Google Scholar
Hart, Michael, and Negre, Antonio. 2000. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik. 1993. Abigail Bailey's Coverture: Law in a Married Woman's Consciousness. Law in Everyday Life, ed. Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R., 63–108. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought Since the Revolution. New York: Harcourt, Brace. Harvey, David. 1990. The Condition of Post-Modernity. Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heller, Agnes. 1984- Everyday Life. Trans. G. L. Campbell. London: Routledge, Chapman, and Hall.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. Critique of Everyday Life. Trans. John Moore. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mayhew, Leon, and Reiss, Albert J. Jr. 1969. The Social Organization of Legal Contacts. American Sociological Review 34:309–18.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. 1988. The Uses of History: Language, Ideology, and Law in the United States and South Africa. Law and Society Review 22:661–85.Google Scholar
Messick, Brinkley. 1988. Kissing Hands and Knees: Hegemony and Hierarchy in Sharia Discourse. Law and Society Review 22:637–59.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 1990. Everyday Metaphors of Power. Theory and Society 19:545–78.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2000. Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment. Law and Society Review 34:1055–90.Google Scholar
Riesman, David. 1950. The Lonely Crowd. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 1989. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 1990. ”The Law Is All Over”: Power, Resistance, and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor. Yale Journal of Law and Humanities 2:343–79.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, Douglas, Lawrence, and Umphrey, Martha, eds. 2003. Law's Madness. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas R. 1993. Beyond the Great Divide: Forms of Legal Scholarship and Everyday Life. In Law in Everyday Life, ed. Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Silbey, Susan. 1988. The Pull of the Policy Audience. Law and Policy 10:97–168.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Simon, Jonathan, eds. 2003. Cultural Analysis, Cultural Studies, and the Law: Moving Beyond Legal Realism. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Trans. George Walsh and Frederick Lehnert. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen. 1996. Suspended in Space: Bedouins under the Law of Israel. Law and Society Review 30:231–57.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan. 1997. Let Them Eat Cake: Globalization, Postmodern Colonialism, and the Possibilities of Justice. Law and Society Review 30:207–35.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan. 1998. Ideology, Power, and Justice. In Power and justice in Law and Society Research, ed. Garth, Bryant and Sarat, Austin, 272–308. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, George. 1978. The Philosophy of Money. Trans. Tom Bottomore and Donald Frisby. London: Routledge, Kegan, Paul.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. 1988. Ideological Effects of Actuarial Practices. Law and Society Review 22:771–800.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Marc. 1999. The Talk and Back Talk of Collective Action: A Dialogic Analysis of Repertoires of Discourse among Nineteenth-Century English Cotton Spinners. American Journal of Sociology 105:736–80.Google Scholar
Thompson, John. B. 1990. Ideology and Modern Culture. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Umphrey, Martha. M. 1999. The Dialogics of Legal Meaning: Spectacular Trials, the Unwritten Law, and Narratives of Criminal Responsibility. Law and Society Review 33:393–423.Google Scholar
White, Lucie. 1990. Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G. Buffalo Law Review 38:1–58.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara. 1989. Inventing Law in Local Settings: Rethinking Popular Legal Culture. Yak Law Journal 98:1689–709.Google Scholar