No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Enduring Principles and Current Crises in Constitutional Criminal Procedure
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Review Essay
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1999
References
References
American Bar Association Special Committee on Criminal Justice in a Free Society (American Bar Association). 1988. Criminal Justice in Crisis. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Alschuler, Albert W.
1984. Bright Line Fever and the Fourth Amendment. University of Pittsburgh Law Review
45:227–288.Google Scholar
1996. A Peculiar Privilege in Historical Perspective: The Right to Remain Silent. Michigan Law Review
94: 2625–2672.Google Scholar
Amsterdam, Anthony G.
1974. Perspectives on the Fourth Amendment. Minnesota Law Review
58:349–477.Google Scholar
Austin American Statesman.
1998. Parole, Probation Rolls Hit Record, 17 August, p. A2. From U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Baldus, David, and Woodworth, George. 1998. The Death Penalty in Black and White: Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Decides. Washington, D.C.: Death Penalty Information Center.Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan. 1998. “We the People” and Our Enduring Values. Michigan Law Review
96:1376–1420.Google Scholar
Bast, Carol M.
1997. Driving While Black: Stopping Motorists on a Subterfuge. Criminal Law Bulletin
33:457–486.Google Scholar
Beale, Sarah Sun. 1995. Too Many and Yet Too Few: New Principles to Define the Proper Limits for Federal Criminal Jurisdiction. Hastings Law Journal
46:979–1018.Google Scholar
Beatty, Michael L.
1981. The Ability to Suppress Exculpatory Evidence: Let's Cut Off the Prosecutor's Hands. Idaho Law Review
17:237–28.Google Scholar
Bedau, Hugh Adam, and Michael, L. Radelet. 1987. Miscarriages of Justice in Potentially Capital Cases. Stanford Law Review
40:21–179.Google Scholar
Bochard, Edward. 1932. Convicting the Innocent. Garden City, N.Y.: Garden City Publishing.Google Scholar
Bradley, Craig M.
1993. The Court's “Two Model” Approach to the Fourth Amendment: Carpe Diem!
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
84:429–461.Google Scholar
Brand-Williams, Oralandar. 1998. Eastpointe Cops Accused of Bias: Black Bike Riders are Stopped Because of Their Race, Suit Says. Detroit News
, 1 July, p. A1.Google Scholar
Braun, Gerry. 1998. Election'98 Governor Debate Analysis: Davis, Lungren in Sharp Contrast. San Diego Union-Tribune
, 1 August, p. A1.Google Scholar
Brazil, Jeff, and Berry, Steve. 1992. Color of Driver Is Key to Stops in 1–95 Videos. Orlando Sentinel
, 23 August, p. A1.Google Scholar
Brigham, John C., and Robert, K. Brothwell. 1983. The Ability of Prospective Jurors to Estimate the Accuracy of Eyewitness Identification. Law and Human Behavior
7:19–30.Google Scholar
Capra, Daniel J.
1984. Access to Exculpatory Evidence: Avoiding the Agurs Problems of Prosecutorial Discretion and Retrospective Review. Fordham Law Review
53:391–448.Google Scholar
Clifford, Brian R. and Clive, R. Hollin. 1981. Effects of the Type of Incident and the Number of Perpetrators on Eyewitness Memory. Journal of Applied Psychology
66:364–70.Google Scholar
Cloud, Morgan. 1996. Searching through History; Searching for History. University of Chicago Law Review
63:1707–47.Google Scholar
Cohen, Sharon. 1996. “Ringmasters” Unlock Truth, Free Man Who Confessed to Murder. L. A. Times
, 31 March, p. A2.Google Scholar
Connors, E., Lundregan, T., Miller, N., and McEwen, T.
1996. Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence after Trial. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Cutler, Brian L., Steven Penrod, D., and Red Dexter, Hedy. 1990. Jury Sensitivity to Eyewitness Identification Evidence. Law and Human Behavior
14:185–91.Google Scholar
Davies, Thomas Y.
1974. On the Limitations of Empirical Evaluations of the Exclusionary Rule: A Critique of the Spiotto Research and
United States v. Calandra. Northwestern University Law Review
69:740–98.Google Scholar
1983. A Hard Look at What We Know (and Still Need to Learn) About the “Costs” of the Exclusionary Rule: The NIJ Study and Other Studies of “Lost” Arrests. American Bar Foundation Research Journal
611–90.Google Scholar
1999. The Original Meaning of “Unreasonable” in “Unreasonable Search and Seizures”: Recovering the Authentic Historical Fourth Amendment by Avoiding Prochronistic Assumptions. University of Michigan Law Review. In press.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela J.
1997. Race, Cops, and Traffic Stops. University of Miami Law Review
51:425–43.Google Scholar
Dripps, Donald. 1996. Akhil Amar on Criminal Procedure and Constitutional Law: “Here I Go Down that Wrong Road Again. North Carolina Law Review
74:1559–639.Google Scholar
Estrich, Susan. 1998. Getting Away with Murder: How Politics Is Destroying the Criminal Justice System. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Federal Bureau of Investigations. 1996. Crime in the United States: Uniform Crime Report. Washington, D.C.: Federal Bureau of Investigations.Google Scholar
Fisher, Stanley Z.
1993. Just the Facts, Ma'am: Lying and the Omission of Exculpatory Evidence in Police Reports. New England Law Review
28:1–62.Google Scholar
Friendly, Henry J.
1968. The Fifth Amendment Tomorrow: The Case for Constitutional Change. University of Cincinnati Law Review
37:671–726.Google Scholar
Gershman, Bennett L.
1992. The New Prosecutors. University of Pittsburgh Law Review
54:393–458.Google Scholar
Givelber, Daniel. 1997. Meaningless Acquittals, Meaningful Convictions: Do We Reliably Acquit the Innocent
Rutgers Law Review
49:1317–96.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, Gisli H.
1992. The Psychology of Interrogations, Confessions, and Testimony. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Handberg, Roger B.
1995. Expert Testimony on Eyewitness Identification: A New Pair of Glasses for the Jury. American Criminal Law Review
32:1013–64.Google Scholar
Harris, David A.
1994. Factors for Reasonable Suspicion: When Black and Poor Means Stopped and Frisked. Indiana Law Journal
69:659–88.Google Scholar
Higgins, Michael. 1999. Tough Luck for the Innocent Man. ABA Journal, March, pp. 46–52.Google Scholar
Hoffheimer, Michael H.
1989. Requiring Jury Instructions on Eyewitness Identification Evidence at Federal Criminal Trials. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
80:585–672.Google Scholar
Huff, Ronald A. C., Rattner, Arye, and Sagarin, Edward. 1996. Convicted But Innocent: Wrongful Conviction and Public Policy. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Johnson, Sheri L.
1983. Race and the Decision to Detain a Suspect. Yale Law Journal
93:214–258.Google Scholar
1984. Cross-Racial Identification Errors in Criminal Cases. Cornell Law Review
69:934–87.Google Scholar
Kamisar, Yale. 1995. On the “Fruits” of Miranda Violations, Coerced Confessions, and Compelled Testimony. Michigan Law Review
93:929–1010.Google Scholar
King, Nancy J.
1995. Portioning Punishment: Constitutional Limits on Successive and Excessive Penalties. University of Pennsylvania Law Review
144:101–96.Google Scholar
Klein, Richard, and Spangenberg, Robert. 1993. The Indigent Defense Crisis. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Klein, Susan R.
1994. Miranda Deconstitutionalized: When the Self-Incrimination Clause and the Civil Rights Act Collide. University of Pennsylvania Law Review
143:417–489.Google Scholar
1999. Redrawing the Criminal-Civil Boundary. Buffalo Criminal Law Review
2:26 (in press).Google Scholar
Klein, Susan R., and Chiarello, Katherine. 1998. Successive Prosecutions and Compound Criminal Statutes: A Functional Test. Texas Law Review
77:333–401.Google Scholar
Kubie, Lawrence S.
1959. Implications for Legal Procedure of the Fallibility of Human Memory. University of Pennsylvania Law Review
108:59–75.Google Scholar
LaFave, Wayne R.
1982. The Fourth Amendment in an Imperfect World: On Drawing “Bright Lines” and “Good Faith. University of Pittsburgh Law Review
43:307–61.Google Scholar
Levine, Felice J., and Lovin Tapp, June. 1973. The Psychology of Criminal Identification: The Gap from Wade to Kirby
. University of Pennsylvania Law Review
121:1079–131.Google Scholar
Levy, Leonard W.
1968. The Origins of the Fifth Amendment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luban, David. 1988. Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maclin, Tracey. 1994. When the Cure for the Fourth Amendment Is Worse than the Disease. Southern California Law Review
68:1–72.Google Scholar
1997. The Complexity of the Fourth Amendment: A Historical Review. Boston University Law Review
77:925–74.Google Scholar
Mann, Kenneth. 1992. Punitive Civil Sanctions: The Middleground Between Criminal and Civil Law. Yale Law Journal
101:1795–873.Google Scholar
Mauer, Marc, and Huling, Tracy. 1995. Young Black Americans and the Criminal Justice System: Five Years Later. Washington, D.C.: The Sentencing Profect.Google Scholar
Mclntyre, Lisa J.
1987. The Public Defender: The Practice of Law in the Shadows of Repute. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McMunigal, Kevin C.
1989. Disclosure and Accuracy in the Guilty Plea Process. Hastings Law Journal
40:957–1029.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Daniel J.
1988. Deterring Constitutional Violations by Law Enforcement Officials: Plaintiffs and Defendants as Private Attorneys General. Columbia Law Review
88:247–328.Google Scholar
Middlekauff, W. M. Bradford. 1994. What Practitioners Say About Broad Criminal Discovery Practice, More Just–or Just More Dangerous
Criminal Justice
9:14.Google Scholar
Nardulli, Peter F.
1983. The Societal Cost of the Exclusionary Rule: An Empirical Assessment, American Bar Foundation Research Journal
585–609.Google Scholar
National Center on Institutions and Alternatives. 1992. Hobbling a Generation: Young African American Males in the Criminal Justice System of America's Cities. Baltimore, Maryland: National Center on Institutions and Alternatives.Google Scholar
Office of Legal Policy. 1989.
Report to the Attorney General on the Search and Seizure Exclusionary Rule. U.S. Department of Justice, Truth in Criminal Justice Series, Report No. 2, 1986. Reprint, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
22:573–82.Google Scholar
Ogletree, Charles J.
1987. Are Confessions Really Good for the Soul? A Proposal to Mirandize Miranda. Harvard Law Review
100:1826–45.Google Scholar
Orfield, Myron W. Jr.
1987. The Exclusionary Rule and Deterrence: An Empirical Study of Chicago Narcotics Officers. University of Chicago Law Review
54:1016–55.Google Scholar
Paulsen, Michael Stokes. 1997. Dirty Harry and the Real Constitution. University of Chicago Law Review
64:1457–91.Google Scholar
Precious, Tom. 1998. Assemblymen Meet to Approve “Jenna's Law” Measure Aimed at Making More Certain Length of Sentences for Violent Offenses. Buffalo News
, 30 July, p. A5.Google Scholar
Rosen, Richard A.
1987. Disciplinary Sanctions Against Prosecutors for Brady Violations: A Paper Tiger. North Carolina Law Review
65:693–744.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Benjamin E.
199091. Rethinking the Right to Due Process in Connection with Pretrial Identification Procedures: An Analysis and a Proposal. Kentucky Law Journal
79:259–316.Google Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J.
1984. Is Plea Bargaining Inevitable
Harvard Law Review
97:1037–107.Google Scholar
Seidman, Louis Michael. 1995. The Problems with Privacy's Problem. Michigan Law Review
93:1079–101.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Lee. 1981. Disclosure to the Guilty Pleading Defendant; Brady v. Maryland and the Brady Trilogy. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
72:165–203.Google Scholar
Sklansky, David. 1995. Cocaine, Race, and Equal Protection. Stanford Law Review
47:1283–322.Google Scholar
1997. Traffic Stops, Minority Motorists, and the Future of the Fourth Amendment. 1997 Supreme Court Review
271–329.Google Scholar
Skolnick, Jerome H.
1982. Deception by Police. Criminal Justice Ethics
1(summer/fall):40–54.Google Scholar
Slobogin, Christopher, and Schumacher, Joseph E.
1993. Reasonable Expectations of Privacy and Autonomy in Fourth Amendment Cases: An Empirical Look at “Understandings Recognized and Permitted by Society. Duke Law Journal
42:727–75.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark M.
1979. Damages or Nothing–The Efficacy of the Bivens-Type Remedy. Cornell Law Review
64:667–703.Google Scholar
Steiker, Carol. 1994. Second Thoughts About First Principles. Harvard Law Review
107:820–57.Google Scholar
Stuntz, William J.
1995. Privacy's Problem and the Law of Criminal Procedure. Michigan Law Review
93:1016–78.Google Scholar
1997. The Uneasy Relationship Between Criminal Procedure and Criminal Justice. Yale Law Journal
107:1–76.Google Scholar
Sundby, Scott. 1994. Everyman's Fourth Amendment: Privacy or Mutual Trust Between Government and Citizen
Columbia Law Review
94:1751–1812.Google Scholar
Taylor, Telford. 1969. Two Studies in Constitutional Interpretation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Tillman, Robert. 1987. The Size of the “Criminal Population,” The Prevalence and Incidents of Adult Arrests. Criminology
25:561–79.Google Scholar
Natta, Van, Don, Jr.
1996. Judge Baer Takes Himself Off Drug Case. New York Times
, 17 May, p. B1.Google Scholar
Wells, Gary L., Ferguson, Tamara, Lindsay, R. C.
1981. The Tractability of Eyewitness Confidence and Its Implications for Triers of Fact. Journal of Applied Psychology
66:688–96.Google Scholar
Westley, William A.
1970. Violence and the Police: A Sociological Study of Law, Custom, and Morality. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Westling, Wayne. 1992. The Case for Expert Witness Assistance to the Jury in Eyewitness Identification Cases. Oregon Law Review
71:93–126.Google Scholar
White, Welsh W.
1997. False Confessions and the Constitution: Safeguards Against Untrustworthy Confessions. Harvard civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
32:105–57.Google Scholar