Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:40:36.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Disability Lens on Sociolegal Research: Reading Rights of Inclusion from a Disability Studies Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Katharina Heyer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Rights of Inclusion
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , Winter 2007 , pp. 261 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balcazar, Fabricio. 1998. Participatory Action Research and People with Disabilities: Principles and Challenges. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 12:105–112.Google Scholar
Balcazar, Fabricio, Keys, Christopher, and Suarez-Balcazar, Yolanda. 2001. Empowering Latinos with Disabilities to Address Issues of Independent Living and Disability Rights. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community 21:53–70.Google Scholar
Barnes, Colin, and Mercer, Geoff. 1997. Doing Disability Research. Leeds, UK: The Disability Press. Google Scholar
Berg, Paula. 1999. Ill/Legal: Interrogating the Meaning and Function of the Category of Disability in Antidiscrimination Law. Yale Law Review 18:1–51.Google Scholar
Burgdorf, Robert. 1997. “Substantially Limited” Protection from Disability Discrimination: The Special Treatment Model and Misconstructions of the Definition of Disability. Villanova Law Review 42:409–586.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty. 2002. “Goose Bumps” and the Role of the Public Intellectual. Law & Society Review 36:5–20.Google Scholar
Colker, Ruth. 1999. The Americans with Disabilities Act: A Windfall for Defendants. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 34:99–162.Google Scholar
Colker, Ruth. 2005. The Disability Pendulum: The First Decade of the Americans with Disabilities Act. New York: New York University Press. Google Scholar
Corker, Mairian, and Shakespeare, Tom. 2002. Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. London: Continuum. Google Scholar
Couser, Thomas. 2002. Signifying Bodies: Life Writing and Disability Studies. In Enabling the Humanities: A Sourcebook in Disability Studies, ed. Sharon Snyder, B. J. B. and Garland-Thomson, Rosemary, 109–17. New York: MLA. Google Scholar
Danieli, Ardha, and Woodhams, Carol. 2005. Emancipatory Research Methodology and Disability: A Critique. International Journal on Social Research Methodology 8:281–96.Google Scholar
Davis, Lennard. 1995. Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. London: Verso. Google Scholar
Davis, Lennard. 1997. The Disability Studies Reader. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
Diller, Matthew. 2003. Judicial Backlash, the ADA, and the Civil Rights Model. In Backlash Against the ADA: Reinterpreting Disability Rights, ed. Krieger, L., 62–97. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
Duckett, Paul, and Pratt, Rebekah. 2001. The Researched Opinions on Research: Visually Impaired People and Visual Impairment Research. Disability & Society 16:815–35.Google Scholar
Engel, David. 1999. Making Connections: Law and Society Researchers and Their Subjects. Law & Society Review 33:3–16.Google Scholar
Engel, David M., and Munger, Frank W. 2003. Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Story of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Farrington, Alice, and Robinson, Peter. 1999. Homelessness and Strategies of Identity Maintenance: A Participant Observation Study. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 9:175–94.Google Scholar
Fine, Michelle, and Ash, Adrienne. 1988. Women with Disabilities: Essays in Psychology, Culture, and Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Google Scholar
Finger, Anne. 1990. Past Due: A Story of Disability, Pregnancy and Birth. Seattle, WA: Seal Press. Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Vick. 1996. The Disability Movement Has Run Out of Steam. Disability Now, February, 11.Google Scholar
Francis, Leslie Pickering, and Silvers, Anita. 2000. Americans with Disabilities: Exploring Implications for the Law for Individuals and Institutions. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
Fries, Kenny. 1997. Staring Back: The Disability Experience from the Inside Out. New York: Plume. Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
Hans, Asha, and Patri, Annie. 2003. Women, Disability and Identity. London: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
Hatch, J. Amos, and Wisniewski, Richard. 1995. Life History and Narrative. Philadelphia: Falmer. Google Scholar
Heyer, Katharina. 2002. The ADA on the Road: Disability Rights in Germany. Law & Social Inquiry 27:723–62.Google Scholar
Hillyer, Barbara. 1993. Feminism & Disability. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press. Google Scholar
Hinton, Cathy. 2003. The Perceptions of People with Disabilities as to the Effectiveness of the ADA. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 13:310–320.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Karen. 2000. From Colonization to Civil Rights. In Employment, Disability and The Americans with Disabilities Act: Issues in Law, Public Policy and Research, ed. Blanck, P., 412–31. Chicago: Northwestern University Press. Google Scholar
Hughes, Bill, and Paterson, Kevin. 1997. The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment. Disability & Society 12:325–40.Google Scholar
Jordan, I. King. 2003. Ethical Issues in the Genetic Study of Deafness. Sign Language Studies 4:4–9.Google Scholar
Keith, Lois. 1994. What Happened to You? Writings by Disabled Women. New York: The New Press. Google Scholar
Linton, Simi. 1998. Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity. New York: New York University Press. Google Scholar
Locke, Steven. 1997. The Incredible Shrinking Protected Class: Redefining the Scope of Disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Villanova Law Review 42:5107–46.Google Scholar
Mairs, Nancy. 1996. Waist-High in the World: A Life Among the Nondisabled. Boston: Beacon Press. Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, and Morris, Aldon. 2001. Oppositional Consciousness: the Subjective Roots of Social Protest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Merry, Sally. 1995. Resistance and the Cultural Power of Law. Law & Society Review 29:11–26.Google Scholar
Michalko, Rod. 2002. The Difference that Disability Makes. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1990. Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
Morris, Jenny. 1991. Pride Against Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers. Google Scholar
NCD, National Council on Disability. 1995. Voices of Freedom: America Speaks Out on the ADA. Washington, DC: National Council on Disability. Google Scholar
NIDRR, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. 2000. Disability Studies, a Global Perspective. http://www.conwal.com/conference/conference.html (accessed November 18, 2006).Google Scholar
NOD, National Organization on Disability. 1999. Public Support for the ADA Is Strong. http://www.nod.org (accessed November 18, 2006).Google Scholar
Northway, Ruth. 2000. Ending Participatory Research? Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 4:27–36.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Ruth. 2004. Voices from the Edge: Narratives about the Americans with Disabilities Act. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael. 1996. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael. 1997a. Emancipatory Research: Realistic Goal or Impossible Dream? In Doing Disability Research, ed. Barnes, C. a. G. M. Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael. 1997b. The Politics of Disablemen. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Opie, Anne. 1992. Qualitative Research, Appropriation of the “Other” and Empowerment. Feminist Review 40:52–69.Google Scholar
Paterson, Kevin, and Hughes, Bill. 1999. Phenomenology: The Carnal Politics of Everyday Life. Disability & Society 14:597–610.Google Scholar
Potok, Andrew. 2002. A Matter of Dignity: Changing the World of the Disabled. New York: Bantam Books. Google Scholar
Priestley, Mark. 1997. Who's Research? A Personal Audit. In Doing Disability Research, ed. Barnes, C. a. G. M. Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Jackie. 1999. Trying to Get It Right: Undertaking Research Involving People with Learning Difficulties. Disability & Society 14:412–33.Google Scholar
Sample, Pat. 1996. Beginnings: Participatory Action Research and Adults with Developmental Disabilities. Disability & Society 11:317–32.Google Scholar
Santeria, B., Singer, G. H., Di Verne, N., Ginsberg, C., and Powers, L. E. 1998. Participatory Action Research: Reflections on Critical Incidents in a PAR Project. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 23:211–22.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas. 1995. Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press. Google Scholar
Schneider, William. 2002.… So They Understand: Cultural Issues in Oral History. Logan: Utah State University Press. Google Scholar
Schriner, Kay, and Scotch, Richard. 2003. The ADA and the Meaning of Disability. In Backlash Against the ADA: Reinterpreting Disability Rights, ed. Krieger, L. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Scotch, Richard. 2001. From Good Will to Civil Rights: Transforming Federal Disability Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Google Scholar
Shapiro, Joseph. 1994. No Pity: People with Disabilities Forging a New Civil Rights Movement. New York: Times Books. Google Scholar
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous People. London: Zed Books. Google Scholar
Snow, David, and Anderson, Leon. 1993. Down on their Luck: A Study of Homeless Street People. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
Stone, Emma, and Priestley, Mark. 1996. Parasites, Pawns, and Partners: Disability Research and the Role of Non-disabled Researchers. British Journal of Sociology 47:699–716.Google Scholar
Stoeker, Randy. 1999. Are Academics Irrelevant? American Behavioral Scientist 42:840–54.Google Scholar
Taylor, Verta. 1998. Feminist Methodology in Social Movement Research. Qualitative Sociology 21:357–79.Google Scholar
Tobin, Joseph, and Davidson, Dana. 1990. The Ethics of Polyvocal Ethnography: Empowering vs. Textualizing Children and Teachers. Qualitative Studies in Education 3:271–83.Google Scholar
Tremain, Shelly. 2002. On the Subject of Impairment. In Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory, ed. Corker, Mairian and Shakespeare, Tom, 32–47. London: Continuum. Google Scholar
Vernon, Ayesha. 1997. Reflexivity: the Dilemmas of Researching from the Inside. In Doing Disability Research, ed. Barnes, C. a. G. M. Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
Waddington, Lisa. 1994. Legislating to Employ People with Disabilities: The European and the American Way. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 1:367–95.Google Scholar
Ward, Karen, and Trigler, Jordan. 2001. Reflections on Participatory Action Research With People Who Have Developmental Disabilities. Mental Retardation 39:57–59.Google Scholar
Wendell, Susan. 1996. The Rejected Body. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
Whyte, W. F. 1991. Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wolf, Diane. 1996. Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork. Boulder, CO: Westview. Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara. 1997. Negotiating Motherhood: Identity and Difference in “Open” Adoptions. Law & Society Review 31:31–80.Google Scholar
Young, Damon, and Quibell, Ruth. 2000. Why Rights Are Never Enough: Rights, Intellectual Disability and Understanding. Disability & Society 15:747–67.Google Scholar
Zarb, Gerry. 1992. On the Road to Damascus: First Steps Towards Changing Relations of Disability Research Production. Disability & Society 7:125–38.Google Scholar
Zola, Irving Kenneth. 1989. Toward the Necessary Universalizing of a Disability Policy. Milbank Quarterly 67:401–28.Google Scholar
Zola, Irving Kenneth. 1993. Self, Identity and the Naming Question: Reflections on the Language of Disability. Social Science and Medicine 36 (2):167–73.Google Scholar