Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:12:52.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Case for an In-Depth Study of the American Law Institute

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
“From the Trenches and Towers”
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Richard J., and Lewis, Philip C. 198889 Lawyers in Society. 3 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Abrahamson, Shirley S. 1995. Refreshing Institutional Memories: Wisconsin and the American Law Institute, The Fairchild Lecture. University of Wisconsin Law Review 1995(1):1.Google Scholar
Alexander, R., Brown, P., and Cox, A. 1984. The Lawyer's Professional Independence: Present Trends/Future Challenges.Google Scholar
American Law Institute. 1982. Principles of Corporate Governance and Structure: Restatement and Recommendations. Tentative draft no. 1. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.Google Scholar
American Law Institute. 1994. Products Liability Restatement. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.Google Scholar
Bainbridge, Stephen M. 1993. Independent Directors and the ALI Corporate Governance Project. George Washington Law Review 61:112–34, 1044–52.Google Scholar
Burke, Tom. 1995. What Do Lawyers Want? Attorney Interest Groups and the Case of No-Fault Insurance. Paper prepared for the 1995 Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, 3 June, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
Casner, A. James. 1981. Restatement (Second) of Property as an Instrument of Law Reform. Iowa Law Review 67:87.Google Scholar
Committee on the Establishment of a Permanent Organization for the Improvement of the Law. Report of the Committee Proposing the Establishment of an American Law Institute–To Be Submitted to a Meeting of Representative Judges, Lawyers, and Law Teachers To Re Held February 23, 1923, in Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
De Tocqueville, Alexis. [1850] 1969. Democracy in America. 13th ed. ed. Moyer, J., trans. Lawrence, G. Google Scholar
Elson, Alex, and Shakman, Michael. 1996. The ALI Principles of Corporate Governance: A Tainted Process and a Flawed Product. Business Lawyer 49:1761–92.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R. 1984. Law and Letters in American Culture.Google Scholar
Freedman, Monroe. 1992. Corporate Bar Protects Its Own. Legal Times, 15 June, 20. Friedman, Lawrence. History of American Law . 2d ed. Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1994. A Nation under Lawyers: How the Crisis of the Legal Profession Is Transforming American Society .Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 1980. The Moral Foundations of Professional Ethics.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Herbert F., and Wolkin, Paul A. 1961. The Story of the American Law Institute 19231961.Google Scholar
Gordon, 1988. The Independence of Lawyers. Boston University Law Review 68:1.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terrence C. 1970. Parameters of Professional Influence: Policies and Politics of the CBA 1945–70. Ph.D. diss. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terrence C. 1982. The Idiom of Legalism in Bar Politics: Lawyers, McCarthyism and the Civil Rights Era. American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1982:911.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terrence C., and Cappell, Charles L. 1979. Indicators of Democracy in Professional Associations: Elite Recruitment, Turnover and Decision Making in a Metropolitan Bar Association. American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1979:697.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward, Cappell, Charles L., Halliday, Terrence C., and Schaalman, Michael H. 1976. Diversity, Representation and Leadership in an Urban Bar: A First Report on a Survey of the Chicago Bar. American Bar Foundation Research Journal . 1976:713.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., and Edward Laumann. Chicago Lawyers–The Social Structure of the Bar. New York and Chicago: Russell Sage Foundation and American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Hull, Natalie E. H. 1990. Restatement and Reform: A New Perspective on the Origins of the American Law Institute. Law and History Review 855.Google Scholar
Jensen, Rita Hensley. 1993. Navigating Turbulent Waters at ALI: The American Law Institute Brings Its Corporate Governance Principles to Harbor. National Law Journal , 9 August, 4143.Google Scholar
Jost, Kenneth. 1972. ALI Turns to Tort Reform: Rarefied Atmosphere Masks High Stakes, Deep Passion. Legal Times , 17 April, 1.Google Scholar
Kelly, Michael J. 1994. Lives of Lawyers: Journeys in the Organization of Practice.Google Scholar
Kronman, Anthony T. 1993. The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Leach, W. Barton, 1937. The Restatements as They Were in the Beginning, Are Now, and Perhaps Shall Henceforth Be. Journal of the American Bar Association (July):517.Google Scholar
Lewis, William Draper. 1945. History of the American Law Institute. and the First Restatement of the Law: “How We Did It. In American Law Institute, Restatement in the Courts, 1–4. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.Google Scholar
Lewis, William Draper. Symposium: What Would Law Teachers Like to See the Institute Do American Law School Review 510.Google Scholar
Linowitz, Sol M., with Mayer, Martin 1994. The Betrayed Profession: Lawyering at the End of the Twentieth Century.Google Scholar
Livingston, Michael. 1995. Confessions of an Economist Killer: A Reply to Kronman's “Lost Lawyer. Northwestern Law Review 89:1591.Google Scholar
Luban, D. 1988. Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study.Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R. 1993. The Transformation of the American Law Institute. George Washington Law Review 61:1212–16.Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark J. 1990. Review of Lawyers in Society, by Richard J. Abel and Philip C. Lewis. Harvard Law Review 103:2009.Google Scholar
Panel Discussion Federal Securities Code. Miami Law Review 33: 1519–52.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1995. Remarks Prepared for Delivery at the Annual Dinner of the American Law Institute, 18 May. In American Law Institute, Remarks and Addresses at the 72nd Annual Meeting, May 18, 1995. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.Google Scholar
Powell, Michael J. 1979. Anatomy of a Counter-Bar Association: The Chicago Council of Lawyers. American Bur Foundation Research Journal 1979:501541.Google Scholar
Powell, Michael J. 1988. From Patrician to Professional Elite: A Study of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Rapson, Donald J. 1994. Who Is Looking out for the Public Interest? Thoughts about the UCC Revision Process in the Light (and Shadows) of Professor Rubin's Observations. Loyola–Los Angeles Law Review 28:601.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward L. 1993. Thinking Like a Lawyer, Acting Like a Lobbyist: Some Notes on the Process of Revising Articles 3 and 4. Loyola-Los Angeles Law Review 743.Google Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry. 1995. American Realism and Empirical Social Science. Durham: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Schneyer, Ted. Professionalism as Bar Politics: The Making to the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Law and Social Inquiry 677737.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Alan, and Scott, Robert E. 1995. The Political Economy of Private Legislatures. Pennsylvania Law Review 143 (Jan.): 58.Google Scholar
Shapo, Marshall S. 1995. In Search of the Law of Product Liability: The ALI Restatement Project. Vanderbilt Law Review 48(13):61.Google Scholar
Simon, 1988. Ethical Discretion in Lawyering. Harvard Law Review 101:1088.Google Scholar
Smith, Richard B. An Underview of the Principles of Corporate Governance. Business Law 48:1297.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Barry. 1996. Professions of Law. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 9(4):12351300.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Herbert. 1969. The Course of the Restatements. Journal of the American Bar Association 55 (Feb.): 147.Google Scholar