No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Business Myths, Lawyerly Strategies, and Social Context: Ernst on Labor Law History
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Review Essay
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1998
References
References
Atleson, James. 1983. Values and Assumptions in American Labor Law. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Irving. 1960. The Lean Years: A History of the American Worker, 1920–1933. Cambridge, Mass.: Riverside Press.Google Scholar
Christenson, Carroll Lawrence. 1933. Collective Bargaining in Chicago: 1929–30: A Study of the Economic Significance of the Industrial Location of Trade-Unionism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Commons, John, et al.
191835. History of Labor in the United States. 4 vols. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dickman, Howard. 1987. Industrial Relations in America: Ideological Origins of a National Labor Relations Policy. LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard. 1983. A Common Law for Labor Relations: A Critique of the New Deal. Yale Law Journal
92 (July): 1357–1408.Google Scholar
Fink, Leon. 1987. Labor, Liberty, and the Law: Trade Unionism and the Problem of the American Constitutional Order. Journal of American History
74 (December): 905–25.Google Scholar
Fisher, William W. III. 1996. Texts and Contexts: The Application to Legal History of the Methodologies of Intellectual History. Paper presented at the University of Chicago Comparative Legal History Workshop, Chicago, Ill., October.Google Scholar
Forbath, William E.
1991. Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Galambos, Louis, and Chandler, Alfred D. Jr.
1970. The Development of Large Scale Organizations in Modem America. Journal of Economic History
30 (March): 201–17.Google Scholar
Grossberg, Michael. 1996. A Judgment for Solomon: The D'Hauteville Case and Legal Experience in Antebellum America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Handsaker, Morrison. 1939. The Chicago Cleaning and Dyeing Industry: A Case Study in Controlled Competition. Ph.D. diss., Department of Economics, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik. 1988. Mrs. Packard on Dependency. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities
1 (December): 79–103.Google Scholar
Hattam, Victoria C.
1993. Labor Visions and State Power: The Origins of Business Unionism in the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hawley, Ellis W.
1978. The Discovery and Study of a Corporate Liberalism. Business History Review
52, no. 3 (August):309–20.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1991. Enterprise and American Law, 1836–1937. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Industrial Commission. 1901.
Report of the Industrial Commission on the Chicago Labor
Disputes of 1900 with Special Reference to the Disputes in the Building and Machinery Trades. Vol. 8. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Keller, Morton. 1990. Regulating a New Economy: Public Policy and Economic Change in America, 19001933. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Alfred H.
1938. A History of the Illinois Manufacturers' Association. Ph.D. diss., Department of History, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda K.
1992. The Paradox of Women's Citizenship in the Early Republic: The Case of Martin vs. Massachusetts
, 1805. American Historical Review
97:349–78.Google Scholar
Klare, Karl E.
1978. Judicial Deradicalization of the Wagner Act and the Origins of Modem Legal Consciousness. Minnesota Law Review
62:265–339.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R.
1985. The Great Merger Movement in American Business, 895–1904. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Daniel. 1964. Varieties of Social Reform. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lorwin, Lewis, with Flexner, Jean A.. 1933. The American Federation of Labor: History, Policies, and Prospects Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. 1951. White Collar: The American Middle Classes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Royal E.
1927. Industrial Relations in the Chicago Building Trades. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Myers, Harold Barton. 1929. Policing of Labor Disputes in Chicago: A Case Study. Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen. 1991. Belated Feudalism: Labor, the Law, and Liberal Development in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petro, Sylvester. 1978. Injunctions and Labor Disputes: 1880–1932. Part 1: What the Courts Actually Did–and Why. Wake Forest Law Review
14 (June): 341–576.Google Scholar
Poulson, B. W.
1986. Criminal Conspiracy, Injunctions, and Damage Suits in Labor Law. Journal of Legal History
7 (September): 212–27.Google Scholar
Scranton, Philip. 1983. Proprietary Capitalism: The Textile Manufacture at Philadelphia, 18001885. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Sklar, Martin J.
1960. Woodrow Wilson and the Political Economy of Modem United States Liberalism. Studies on the Left
1:17–47.Google Scholar
Stone, Katherine Van Wezel. 198081. The Post-War Paradigm in American Labor Law. Yale Law Review
90:1509–80.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L.
1985. The State and the Unions: Labor Relations, Law, and the Organized Labor Movement in America, 18801960. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L.
1993. Law Labor and Ideology in the Early American Republic. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L.
1996.
Review of Lawyers against Labor: From Individual Rights to Corporate Liberalism
, by Daniel R. Ernst. Industrial and Labor Relations Review
50, no. 1: 160.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark V.
1987. The N. A. A. C. P.'s Legal Strategy against Segregated Education, 1925–1950. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Cases
Buck's Stove and Range Co. v. American Federation of Labor, 35 Wash. Law Rep. (1907).Google Scholar
Builders' Painting and Decorating Company v. Advisory Board Building Trades of Chicago et al.
, 116 111. App. 265 (1904).Google Scholar
Loewe v. Lawlor 148 Fed. 924 (1907); 208 US. 274 (1908); 187 Fed. 552 (191); 223 US. 729 (1912); 209 Fed. 712 (1913). 235 US. 522 (1915).Google Scholar
Moores and Co. v. Bricklayers Union No. 1
, 23
Weekly Law Bulletin and Ohio Law Journal
48 (Ohio Superior Court (1890).Google Scholar