Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:25:43.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

25 Divorce Attorneys and 40 Clients in Two Not So Big but Not So Small Cities in Massachusetts and California: An Appreciation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

David L. Chambers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , Winter 1997 , pp. 209 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Danet, Brenda, Hoffman, Kenneth, and Kermish, Nicole. 1980. Obstacles to the Study of Lawyer-Client Interaction: The Biography of a Failure. Law & Society Review 14:905–22.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., and Sarat, Austin. 198081. The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, and Claiming …. Law & Society Review 15:631–54.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., and Sarat, Austin. 1992. Enactments of Power: Negotiating Reality and Responsibility in Lawyer-Client Interactions. Cornell Law Review 77:1447–98.Google Scholar
Garrison, Marsha. 1991. Good Intentions Gone Awry: The Impact of New York's Equitable Distribution Law on Divorce Outcomes. Brooklyn Law Review 57:621–754.Google Scholar
Heinz, John, and Laumann, Edward. 1982. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Hosticka, Carl. 1979. We Don't Care about What Happened, We Only Care about What Is Going to Happen: Lawyer-Client Negotiations of Reality. Social Problems 25:599–610.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert, Felstiner, William L. F., Sarat, Austin, and Trubek, David. 1985. The Impact of Fee Arrangement on Lawyer Effort. Law & Society Review 19:251–78.Google Scholar
Lind, E. Allan, MacCoun, Robert J., Ebener, Patricia A., Felstiner, William L. F., Hensler, Deborah, Resnick, Judith, and Tyler, Tom. 1990. In the Eye of the Beholder: Tort Litigants' Evaluations of Their Experiences in the Civil Justice System. Law & Society Review 24:953–89.Google Scholar
McEwen, Craig, Mather, Lynn, and Maiman, Richard. 1994. Lawyers, Mediation and the Management of Divorce Practice. Law and Society Review 28:149–86.Google Scholar
Mather, Lynn, and Yngvesson, Barbara. 198081. Language, Audience and the Transformation of Disputes. Law & Society Review 15:775–821.Google Scholar
Melli, Marygold, Erlanger, Howard, and Chambliss, Elizabeth. 1988. The Process of Negotiation: An Exploratory Investigation in the Context of No-Fault Divorce. Rutgers Law Review 40:1133–72.Google Scholar
Mishler, Elliot. 1984. The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Douglas B. 1984. Lawyer and Client: Who's in Charge? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Felstiner, William L. F. 1986. Law and Strategy in the Divorce Lawyer's Office. Law & Society Review 20:93–134.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Felstiner, William L. F. 1988. Law and Social Relations: Vocabularies of Motive in Lawyer/Client Interaction. Law & Society Review 22:737–70.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Felstiner, William L. F. 1989. Lawyers and Legal Consciousness: Law Talk in the Divorce Lawyer's Office. Yak Law Journal 98:1663–72.Google Scholar