Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:22:39.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Langdell's Auto-da-fé

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2011

John Henry Schlegel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As one who has suggested in print that Christopher Columbus Langdell was a loony, I am singularly pleased that Bruce Kimball has so carefully demonstrated that Kit was a regular guy just trying to teach his classes and learn some law. But this observation seems to me to be not particularly relevant to the debate about Langdell that I have mostly watched, but occasionally commented on. I shall try to recreate that debate as best I can, to show where it stands, and so, to identify where an understanding of Langdell's teaching places us.

Type
Forum: Comment
Information
Law and History Review , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , Spring 1999 , pp. 149 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © the American Society for Legal History, Inc. 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1994), 25Google Scholar.

2. A Selection of Cases on the Law of Contracts, 2d. ed. (Boston: Little, Brown, 1879), viiGoogle Scholar.

3. “Harvard Celebration Speeches,” Law Quarterly Review 5 (1887): 124.Google Scholar

4. The Ages of American Law (New Haven: Yale University Press 1977), 47Google Scholar.

5. Ibid., 43.

6. “The Birth of the Modern Law School,” American Journal of Legal History 23 (1979): 329CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. “Langdell's Concept of Law as Science: The Beginning of Anti-Formalism in American Legal Thought,” Vermont Law Review 5 (1980): 1Google Scholar.

8. Ibid., 15.

9. Law School: Legal Education in America from the 1850s to the 1980s (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1983), 53, 54.Google Scholar

10. “Legal Thought and Legal Practice in the Age of American Enterprise, 1870-1920,” in Professions and Professional Ideologies in America, ed. Geisen, Gerald L. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1983), 71, 82Google Scholar.

11. Ibid., 87.

12. Ibid., 90.

13. Ibid., 94.

14. Ibid., 82.

15. “Langdell's Orthodoxy,” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 45 (1983): 1Google Scholar.

16. “The ‘Science’ of Legal Science: The Model of the Natural Sciences in Nineteenth-Century American Legal Education,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Legal History, October 1997.

17. Logic and Experience: The Origin of Modern American Legal Education (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar.

18. Ibid., 26.

19. “The ‘Science’ of Legal Science: The Model of the Natural Sciences in Nineteenth-Century American Legal Education.”

20. “Christopher C. Langdell, Annual Report on the Law School,” in Annual Report of the President and Treasurer of Harvard College, 1890-91 (Cambridge: Harvard College, 1891): 104, 166.Google Scholar

21. The Centennial History of the Harvard Law School, 1817-1917 (Cambridge: Harvard Law School, 1918), 36.Google Scholar

22. Ibid.