Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:21:51.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Access to Justice: Legal Aid to the Poor at Civil Law Courts in the Eighteenth-Century Low Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2014

Griet Vermeesch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Medieval and early modern rulers commonly proclaimed that protecting the legal entitlements of the personae miserabiles, who included widows, orphans, the chronically ill and “the poor,” was among their principal duties. The entitlement of the poor to legal services was not a matter of grace but was in fact their “good right.” For example, widows, orphans, and other personae miserabili had the privilege of being heard in first instance before high courts, so as to save time and costs in pursuing their legal claims. Another example of manifest commitment to legal entitlement for the poor was the refusal of Philip II of Habsburg to consent to measures that would limit the jurisdiction of his Castilian chanceries; the measures had been proposed so as to limit the chanceries’ ever-increasing workload, but, because they could also restrict indigents' access to such courts, were rejected by the monarch. At first glance, such inclusiveness appears to have been achieved, particularly in view of the large numbers of petty conflicts brought before formal law courts during the long sixteenth century, leading to a so-called “legal revolution.” Historians generally acknowledge that broad layers of early modern society made abundant use of civil adjudication in arranging their social and economic relations and interests.

Type
Articles
Information
Law and History Review , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , August 2014 , pp. 683 - 714
Copyright
Copyright © the American Society for Legal History, Inc. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Renaut, Marie-Hélène, “L'acces à la justice dans la perspective de l'histoire du droit,” Revue historique du droit français et étranger 78 (2000): 473–95Google Scholar; Borah, Woodrow, “Assistance in Conflict Resolution for the Poor and Indians in Colonial Mexico,” in Assistance in Conflict Resolution, Transactions of the Jean Bodin Society for Comparative Legal History, vol. 63 (Brussels: De Boeck Université, 1996): 217–37Google Scholar; Kagan, Richard L., Lawsuits and Litigants in Castile, 1500–1700 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1981), 66–67Google Scholar, 98–99, 103, 105; Elsener, Ferdinand, “Der ‘arme man’ (pauper) im Prozessrecht der Grafen und Herzoge von Savoyen,” The Legal History Review 44 (1976): 93–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Cerutti, Simona, Giustizia sommaria. Pratiche e ideale di giustizia in una società di Ancien Régime (Torino XVIII secolo) (Milano: Feltrinelli, 2003).Google Scholar

2. Kagan, Lawsuits and Litigants, 103; Gaillard, Arthur, Le Conseil de Brabant. Histoire, organisation, procédure, Tome 2, Organisation et procédure (Brussel: J. Lebègue, 1901), 31, 33–34Google Scholar; and Lijten, M.J.H.A., Het burgerlijk proces in stad en meierij van ‘s-Hertogenbosch 1530–1811 (Assen: Van Gorcum, 1988)Google Scholar, 46.

3. Kagan, Lawsuits and Litigants, 98–99.

4. The phrase “legal revolution” was used by Richard Kagan to describe the enormous increase of court activity during the long sixteenth century. Kagan, Lawsuits and Litigants. However, the term can be applied to other regions in Western Europe as well; Muldrew, Craig, The Economy of Obligation. The Culture of Credit and Social Relations in Early Modern England (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998)Google Scholar; Wollschläger, Christian, “Civil Litigation and Modernization: The Work of the Municipal Courts of Bremen, Germany, in Five Centuries, 1549–1984,” Law and Society Review 24 (1990): 261–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sharpe, James A., “‘Such Disagreement Betwyx Neighbours’: Litigation and Human Relations in Early Modern England,” in Disputes and Settlements. Law and Human Relation in the West, ed. Bossy, John (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), 167–87Google Scholar; Berner, Samuel, “Florentine Society in the Late Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries,” Studies in the Renaissance 18 (1971): 227–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Le Bailly, Marie-Charlotte, “Langetermijntrends in de rechtspraak bij de gewestelijke hoven van justitie in de Noordelijke Nederlanden van ca. 1450 tot ca. 1800,” Pro memorie 13 (2011): 30–67.Google Scholar

5. Hardwick, Julie, Family Business. Litigation and the Political Economies of Daily Life in Early Modern France (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mauclair, Fabrice, La Justice au Village. Justice seigneuriale et société rurale dans le duché-pairie de La Vallière (1667–1790) (Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2008)Google Scholar; Piant, Hervé, Une justice ordinaire. Justice civile et criminelle dans la prévôté royale de Vaucouleurs sous l'Ancien Régime (Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shaw, James E., The Justice of Venice: Authorities and Liberties in the Urban Economy, 1550–1700 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Van Meeteren, Aries, Op hoop van akkoord. Instrumenteel forumgebruik bij geschilbeslechting in Leiden in de zeventiende eeuw (Hilversum: Verloren, 2006)Google Scholar; Dinges, Martin, “The Uses of Justice as form of Social Control in Early Modern Europe,” in Social Control in Europe (1500–1800), I, ed. Roodenburg, Herman and Spierenburg, Pieter (Columbus: Ohia State University Press, 2004), 159–75Google Scholar; Brooks, Christopher and Lobban, Michael, eds., Communities and Courts in Britain 1150–1900 (London: The Hambledon Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Brooks, Christopher W., “Interpersonal Conflict and Social Tension: Civil Litigation in England, 1640–1830,” in The First Modern Society. Essays In English History in Honour of Lawrence Stone, ed. Beier, Augustus L., Cannadine, David, and Rosenheim, James M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 357–99Google Scholar; Bossy, John, “Postscript,” in Disputes and Settlements. Law and Human Relation in the West, ed. Bossy, John (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), 287–93Google Scholar; and Muldrew, Craig, “Credit and the Courts: Debt Litigation in a Seventeenth-Century Urban Community,” The Economic History Review 46 (1993): 29–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Hardwick, Family Business, 63; and Van Meeteren, Op hoop, 344–46.

7. Griet Vermeesch, “The Clientele of an Eighteenth-Century Law Court. An Analysis of Plaintiffs and Defendants at a Small Claims Court in the Dutch City of Leiden, 1750–1754,” article currently under review.

8. William A. Champion, “Recourse to the Law and the Meaning of the Great Litigation Decline, 1650–1750: Some Clues from the Shrewsbury Local Courts,” in Communities and Courts, 184–85; Brooks, “Interpersonal Conflict,” 375, 377–82; Dinges, “The Uses,” 168.

9. For the Low Countries: Le Bailly, “Langetermijntrends”; Willems, Bart, Leven op de pof. Krediet bij de Antwerpse middenstand in de achttiende eeuw (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2009), 220–24Google Scholar; and Deceulaer, Harald, “Guilds and Litigation: Conflict Settlement in Antwerp (1585–1796),” in Individual, Corporate and Judicial Status in European Cities (Late Middle Ages and Early Modern Period), ed. Boone, Marc and Prak, Maarten (Leuven: Garant, 1996), 171–208Google Scholar. For Dickinson, France: J., “L'activité judiciaire d'après la procédure civile. Le baillage de Falaise, 1668–1790,” Revue d'histoire économique et sociale 54 (1976): 145–68Google Scholar; and Kaiser, Colin, “The Deflation in the Volume of Litigation at Paris in the Eighteenth Century and the Waning of the Old Judicial Order,” European Studies Review 10 (1980): 309–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For England: Champion, “Recourse”; and Shoemaker, Robert, “The Decline of Public Insult in London 1660–1800,” Past and Present 169 (2000): 97–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For Germany: Wollschläger, “Civil Litigation and Modernization.” For Spain: Kagan, Lawsuits and Litigants, especially part 2.

10. Van Caenegem, Raoul C., “Reflexions on the place of the Low Countries in European Legal History,” in Europäische Rechtsdenken in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Festschrift für Helmut Coing zum. 70. Geburtstag (München: C.H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1982), 3–17.Google Scholar

11. Regionaal archief Leiden, Oud Rechterlijk Archief (hereafter RAL, ORA), inv. nr. 144A–O, Dispositiën op rekwesten, 1659–1811; Felixarchief, Privilegekamer, inv. nrs. 787–889, Rekwestboeken 1701–1792; Stadsarchief Brussel, Oud archief, Liasse 606, Procédure, 1699–1794; and Algemeen Rijksarchief Brussel, Geheime Raad (hereafter ARAB, GR), inv. nr. 552/A-B, Renvois en justice, 18th century.

12. Pot, Gerardus P.M., Arm Leiden. Levensstandaard, bedeling en bedeelden, 1750–1854 (Hilversum: Verloren, 1994)Google Scholar; and Diederiks, Herman A., “Beroepsstructuur en sociale stratificatie in Leiden in het midden van de achttiende eeuw,” in Armoede en sociale spanning. Sociaal-historische studies over Leiden in de achttiende eeuw, ed. Diederiks, Herman A., Noordam, Dirk J. and Tjalsma, Heiko D. (Hilversum: Verloren, 1985), 53–55.Google Scholar

13. Van Meeteren, Op hoop, 226, 236–37.

14. Ten Raa, Christiaan M.G., De oorsprong van de kantonrechter (Deventer: Kluwer, 1970), 158–72.Google Scholar

15. Van Meeteren, Op hoop, 19, 227.

16. Ibid., 274–81.

17. Godding, Philippe, Le droit privé dans les Pays-Bas méridionaux du 12e au 18e siècle (Brussels: Académie Royale de Belgique, 1987)Google Scholar; Van Caenegem, Raoul C., “History of European Civil Procedure,” in International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, XVI, Civil Procedure, ed. Cappeletti, Mauro (Tübingen: Mohr, 1972), 66–69Google Scholar; and Martyn, Georges, “Les avocats au Conseil de Flandre (1386–1795): à la recherché d'une déontologie,” in Les acteurs de la justice, magistrats, ministère public, avocats, huissiers et greffiers (XIIe-XIXe siècle), ed. Robaye, René (Namur: Presses Universitaires de Namur, 2002), 103–19.Google Scholar

18. RAL, ORA, inv. nr. 144A-O, Dispositiën op rekwesten, 1659–1811.

19. RAL, ORA, inv. nrs. 44 V–AA, Dingboeken van grote zaken, 1746–1794; inv. nrs. 47HHH-MMM, Vredemakersboeken, 1750–1769. A limited number of parties made use of a procureur at the court of the Leiden Peacemakers. More often than not, this was to obtain approval for having the case heard at the bench of aldermen.

20. The large collection of petitions that were not filed pro deo must have contained requests to obtain free legal aid also. However, in view of the many thousands of petitions conserved for early modern Antwerp, it was not feasible to study these petitions. Felixarchief, Privilegekamer, inv. nrs. 787–889, Rekwestboeken 1701–1792. The sample years were: 1701, 1706, 1711, 1716, 1721, 1726, 1731, 1736, 1741, 1746, 1751, 1756, 1761, 1766, 1771, 1776, 1781, 1786, and 1791.

21. Felixarchief, Vierschaar, inv. nr. 1561–63, Furnissementboecken, 1685–1793.

22. Lis, Catharina, “Sociale politiek in Antwerpen (1979). Het controleren van de relatieve overbevolking en het reguleren van de arbeidsmarkt,” Tijdschrift voor Sociale Geschiedenis 2 (1976): 146–66Google Scholar; Lis, Catharina, Social Change and the Labouring Poor: Antwerp 1770–1860 (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1986), 5–38, 110–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23. Laenens, Charles, De geschiedenis van het Antwerps gerecht (Antwerp: Van de Velde, 1953)Google Scholar, 262; De Ruysscher, Dave, ‘Naer het Romeisch Recht alsmede den stiel mercantiel’. Handel en recht in de Antwerpse rechtbank (16de–17de eeuw) (Kortrijk–Heule: University of Georgia, 2009), 100–105.Google Scholar

24. De Peuter, Roger, Brussel in de achttiende eeuw. Sociaal-economische structuren en ontwikkelingen in een regionale hoofdstad (Brussel: VUBPress, 1999)Google Scholar, 96.

25. Vanrie, André, “Le XVIIIe siècle,” in Histoire de Bruxelles, ed. Martens, Mina (Toulouse: Privat, 1976), 233–70.Google Scholar

26. Verbeemen, Joseph, “Bruxelles en 1755. Sa situation démographique, sociale et économique,” Bijdragen tot de Geschiedenis 45 (1962): 205.Google Scholar

27. Van de Voorde, Eddy and Verbesselt, Jan, “De volkstelling van 1783 te Brussel,” Eigen Schoon de Brabander 72 (1989)Google Scholar: 8.

28. Verbeemen, “Bruxelles en 1755,” 220.

29. Van de Voorde and Verbesselt, “De volkstelling van 1783 te Brussel,” 8, 11.

30. Bonenfant, Paul, Le problème du paupérisme en Belgique à la fin de l'ancien régime (Brussels: Palais des Académies, 1934), 19–20.Google Scholar

31. Philippe Godding, “Comment la justice échevinale a pu faire face aux besoins de villes en expansion: le cas du Brabant (XIIe–XVIIIe siècles),” in Les acteurs de la justice, 7–13; Pierard-Gilbert, Renée, “Les procès devant le magistrat de Bruxelles au XVIIIe siècle. Leur rapport à l'histoire de la ville,” Annales de la société royale d'archéologie de Bruxelles fondée à Bruxelles en 1887, 51 (1962–1966): 201–17.Google Scholar

32. Stadsarchief Brussel, Oud archief, Liasse 606-A, Procédure, 1699–1794.

33. ARAB, GR, inv. nr. 552/A, Renvois en justice, Pro deo, 1734–1786, 1791–1794.

34. Brundage, James A., “Legal Aid for the Poor and the Professionalization of Law in the Middle Ages,” The Journal of Legal History 9 (1988): 170–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 176, footnote 12; Brundage, James A., “Widows as Disadvantaged Persons in Medieval Canon Law,” in Upon My Husband's Death. Widows in the Literature and Histories of Medieval Europe ed. Mirrer, Louise (Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1992), 193–206.Google Scholar

35. See, for an overview of the legal origins of the term persona miserabiles: Duve, Thomas, Sonderrecht in der Frühen Neuzeit. Studien zum ius singulare und den privilegia miserabilium personarum, senum und indorum in Alter und Neuer Welt (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH, 2008).Google Scholar

36. Elsener, “Der ‘arme man’,” 93–113; and Cerutti, Giustizia sommaria.

37. Elsener, “Der ‘arme man’,” 101; and Helmholz, Richard H., The Spirit of Classical Canon Law (Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press, 1996), 128–32.Google Scholar

38. Kagan, Lawsuits and Litigants, 13, 66–7.

39. Brundage, “Legal Aid for the Poor,” 174; Elsener, “Der ‘arme man’”; and Briod, Alice, L'assistance des pauvres au moyen âge dans le Pays de Vaud du commencement du moyen âge à la fin du XVIe siècle (Lausanne: Editions Spes, 1926)Google Scholar, 26.

40. Nauwelaers, Jules, Histoire des avocats au souverain Conseil de Brabant, vol. 1 (Brussels: E. Bruylant, 1947): 334–35Google Scholar; Gaillard, Le Conseil de Brabant, vol 2, 122.

41. Antwerp: Felixarchief, Vierschaar, inv. nr. 24, Rechten en Costumen der Stad Antwerpen, Maniere van procederen, enz. Commentaria, early 17th century; ’s-Hertogenbosch: Lijten, Het burgerlijk proces, 309; Amsterdam: Helmers, Dini, ‘Gescheurde bedden’. Oplossingen voor gestrande huwelijken, Amsterdam 1753–1810 (Hilversum: Verloren, 2002)Google Scholar, 172; and Diest: Nauwelaers, Histoire des avocats, 336.

42. Nauwelaers, Histoire des avocats, 334.

43. Martyn, Georges, “Tussenkomsten van de Geheime Raad in rechtbedelingsperikelen (17de–18de eeuw): op zoek naar leidende beginselen (enkele bedenkingen),” in: Voortschrijdend procesrecht. Een historische verkenning, ed. Van Rhee, Remco, Stevens, Fred and Persoons, Ernest (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2001), 177–78.Google Scholar

44. Felixarchief, Privilegekamer, inv. nr. 815, Rekwestboek 1726–1727, folio 204v–205r.

45. For Leiden: RAL, ORA, inv. nrs. inv. nr. 144A–144O, Registers van dispositiën of requesten, 1659–1810. For Antwerp: Felixarchief, Privilegekamer, inv. nrs. 787–889, Rekwestboeken, passim. For Brussels: Stadsarchief Brussel, Oud archief, Liasse 606, Procédure, 1699–1794.

46. Nationaal Archief, Hof van Holland, inv. nr. 5943, Register van de namen van bij het Hof geadmitteerde advocaten, 1593–1796 en procureurs, 1569–1794; inv. nr. 5946, Advocaten en procureurs; and Nauwelaers, Histoire des avocats, 336.

47. See, for an example from eighteenth-century Amsterdam: Stadsarchief Amsterdam, Collectie handschriften (5059), inv. nr. 55, Aantekeningen van M. Weveringh Anton betreffende het verhandelde in de schepenbank (…), 1765–1777, folio's 59 and 127.

48. Martyn, Georges, “Een Oudenaards stadsreglement op de ‘nering’ van advocaten en procureurs (1662),” Handelingen van de Koninklijke Commissie voor de uitgave der oude wetten en verordeningen van België 50 (2012): 133–45Google Scholar; de Ridder–Symoens, Hilde, “The Growth of Civil Society: The Emergence of Guilds of Lawyers in the Southern Low Countries in its European Context (The Sixteenth And Seventeenth Century),” in The Reach of the Republic of Letters. Literary and Learned Societies in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, ed. Van Dixhoorn, Arjan and Sutch, Susie Speakman (Leiden: Brill, 2008)Google Scholar, 340; Sien Van Seeveren, ‘Voor tghemeene welvaert’. De Sint-Ivogilde van het Brugse Vrije (1591–1791). (Masters diss., University of Ghent, 2005); and Gaillard, M., “La confrérie de St-Ivon et le bureau de consultation gratuite à Gand,” Bulletin de l'Académie royale de Belgique 20 (1853): 1–27.Google Scholar

49. Rieck, Anette, Der Heilige Ivo von Hélory (1247–1303). Advocatus pauperum und Patron der Juristen (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1998).Google Scholar

50. De Ridder-Symoens, “The Growth of Civil Society,” 345–48; and Van Dievoet, Guido, “De H. Ivo, advocaat van de armen, en het collegium utriusque iuris van de oude universiteit Leuven,” Jaarboek van de Geschied- en Oudheidkundige Kring voor Leuven en Omgeving 34 (1994)Google Scholar: 187.

51. Van Peteghem, Peter, “De broederschap van de heilige Ivo en de Gentse advocaten tijdens het Ancien regime. Op zoek naar sporen van de cultus van de heilige Ivo in het graafschap Vlaanderen, maar vooral te Gent,” Tijdschrift voor privaatrecht 45 (2008): 1398–99.Google Scholar

52. Pot, Arm Leiden, 308.

53. Rijksarchief Gent, Raad van Vlaanderen, inv. nrs. 8076–8289, Rapportboeken, 1558–1789. These documents were consulted at random.

54. Gemeentearchief Rotterdam, Oud Rechterlijk Archief, inv. nrs. 341–405, Civiele rol, 1702–1810.

55. Felixarchief, Vierschaar, inv. nr. 1561–63, Furnissementboecken, 1685–1793.

56. Vermeesch, “The Clientele.”

57. Vermeesch, Griet, ‘Een achttiende-eeuws pro deo proces voor de Raad van Vlaanderen. Een sociaal-historische analyse van rechtspraak in de vroegmoderne Lage Landen’, in Het gelijk in de Gouden Eeuw. Recht, onrecht en reputatie in de Republiek (1550–1750), ed. Cools, Hans, van Groesen, Michiel, and Pollman, Judith (Hilversum: Verloren, 2014), 127–39.Google Scholar

58. ARAB, GR, inv. nr. 552/A, Renvois en justice, 18th century.

59. Ibid.

60. Felixarchief, Privilegekamer, inv. nrs. 787–889, Rekwestboeken, passim. For Brussels: Stadsarchief Brussel, Oud archief, Liasse 606, Procédure, 1699–1794.

61. Stadsarchief Brussel, Oud archief, Liasse 606, Procédure, 1699–1794.

62. RAL, ORA, inv.nr. 146, Rekesten tot het procederen pro deo. Register van dispositiën op requesten om brieven van voorschrijving tot het verkrijgen van akten van admissie, 1764–1811. The same procedure was followed in Amsterdam: Stadsarchief Amsterdam, Schout en schepenen, inv. nr. 943, Schepenen minuut register, 1756; and Helmers, ‘Gescheurde bedden,’ 176.

63. Felixarchief, Privilegekamer, inv. nrs. 787–889, Rekwestboeken, passim; and Stadsarchief Brussel, Oud archief, Liasse 606, Procédure, 1699–1794.

64. Nauwelaers, Histoire des avocats, 336; and Gaillard, Conseil de Brabant, Vol 2, 123.

65. For example, the petition of Guillaume Vanden Houte to the Antwerp aldermen in 1731: Felixarchief, Privilegekamer, inv. nr. 820, Rekwestboek 1731, folio 80v–81r.

66. RAL, ORA, inv. nr. 144E, Registers van dispositiën op requesten, 1659–1810, 1758–1768; inv.nr. 146, Rekesten tot het procederen pro deo. Register van dispositiën op requesten om brieven van voorschrijving tot het verkrijgen van akten van admissie, 1764–1811. Such procedure has also been described for the city of Amsterdam: Stadsarchief Amsterdam, Archief van de familie van Lennep, inv. nr. 125, Ordonnantie op de maniere van procederen voor den Gerecht der stad Amsterdam, 1779; and Helmers, Gescheurde bedden, 176.

67. ARAB, GR, inv. nr. 552/A, Renvois en justice, 18th century; Utrechts archief, Hof van Utrecht (239-1), inv. nr. 342-a-4, Stukken betreffende de kleine rol, 1743–1792.

68. For example: ORA, RAL, inv.nr. 146, Rekesten tot het procederen pro deo. Register van dispositiën op requesten om brieven van voorschrijving tot het verkrijgen van akten van admissie, 1764–1811.

69. De Ridder-Symoens, “The Growth of Civil Society”.

70. Jütte, Robert, Poverty and Deviance in Early Modern Europe. New Approaches to European History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 158–65.Google Scholar

71. Lynch, Katherine, Individuals, Families, and Communities in Europe, 1200–1800: The Urban Foundations of Western Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 103–35.Google Scholar

72. Lis, Social Change, 116–127, 132–133; van der Vlis, Ingrid, Leven in armoede. Delftse bedeelden in de zeventiende eeuw (Amsterdam: Prometheus/Bert Bakker, 2001): 277–9.Google Scholar

73. Cavallo, Sandra, “Conceptions of poverty and poor relief in Turin in the second half of the eighteenth century,” Domestic strategies. Work and family in Italy and France (17th–18th centuries), ed. Woolf, Stuart J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 148–99Google Scholar; Cavallo, Sandra, Charity and power in early modern Italy. Benefactors and their motives in Turin, 1541–1789 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 69–80.Google Scholar

74. Van der Vlis, Leven in armoede, 277–79; Cavallo, Charity and power, 15, 57, 69, 111–2, 220; Hufton, Olwen, The poor in eighteenth-century France (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974), 214–5Google Scholar; Lis, Social Change, 156–7.

75. Helmholz, The Spirit.

76. Thus far, the personae miserabiles have not been described for the Low Countries. The author is currently preparing an article in which she assesses the social profile of litigants who sought free legal aid in Leiden in the period 1745–1811 via cross-linking the names of such parties with databases containing demographic, fiscal, and other data. This research will help to assess what sorts of people belonged to the category of personae miserabiles in eighteenth century Leiden.

77. Cerutti, Simona, “Les ‘misérables’ en droit Italien au XVIIIe siècle,” in Gens de passage en Méditerrannée de l'Antiquité à l'époque moderne. Procédures de contrôle et d'identification, ed. Moatti, Claudia and Kaiser, Wolfgang (Paris: Maisonneuve & Laroise, 2007)Google Scholar, 228.

78. RAL, ORA, inv. nrs. inv. nr. 144A–144O, Registers van dispositiën of requesten, 1659–1810; Felixarchief, Privilegekamer, inv. nrs. 787–889, Rekwestboeken 1701–1792.

79. RAL, ORA, inv. nrs. inv. nr. 144H, Registers van dispositiën of requesten, 1778–1786, fol. 59–60.

80. Stadsarchief Brussel, Oud archief, Liasse 606, Procédure, 1699–1794.

81. Felixarchief, Privilegekamer, inv. nrs. 787–889, Rekwestboeken; RAL, ORA, inv. nr. 144A-O, Dispositiën op rekwesten, 1659–1811.

82. Vermeesch, Griet, “Professional Lobbying in Eighteenth-Century Brussels: The Role of Agents in Petitioning the Central Government Institutions in the Habsburg Netherlands,” Journal of Early Modern History 16 (2012): 95–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Johanna Roelevink, “‘t Welck doende etcetera.' Lobby bij de Staten-Generaal in de vroege zeventiende eeuw,” Jaarboek Geschiedkundige Vereniging ‘De Haghe’ (1990): 153–67.

83. In-depth analysis of a limited number of case studies of the social position of pro deo litigants in the local community will help to test this scenario.

84. Utrechts archief, Hof van Utrecht, inv. nr. 342-a-4, Stukken betreffende de kleine rol.

85. Rijksarchief Gent, Raad van Vlaanderen, inv. nr. 7995, Staten van gerechtskosten “Pro deo et Sancto Ivone,” 1744–1761; and Gaillard, Conseil de Brabant, Vol 2, 123. The costs for the urban courts in Antwerp are mentioned in the local customs: Ordonnantie ende Verhael vanden Stijl ende Maniere van Procederen voorAmptman, Borghemeester ende Schepenen der Stadt van Antwerpen, https://www.kuleuven-kulak.be/facult/rechten/Monballyu/Rechtlagelanden/Brabantsrecht/antwerpen/style.html . (accessed 8 June 2014). On the cost of litigation at the Leiden bench of aldermen, see, Van Meeteren, Op hoop, 280.

86. Rijksarchief Gent, Raad van Vlaanderen, inv. nr. 21.077, Jan Vermeulen (Etikhove), hr. bev., c. François Devos (Munkzwalm): terugbetaling van geleend geld, 1737–1738.

87. As summarized in an Extrait du Protocole of the Privy Council in Brussels dated August 22, 1778. For Leiden, the acquittal of the costs of seals and the payment of legal spokesmen could be derived from the apostilles on consulted petitions.

88. Stadsarchief Brussel, Oud archief, Liasse 606, Procédure, 1699–1794.

89. Utrechts archief, Hof van Utrecht, inv. nr. 342-a-4, Stukken betreffende de kleine rol, 1743–1792.

90. “Décret de Charles VI ordonnant à tous magistrats, collèges de justice, secrétaires, greffiers, huissiers, d'expédier gratis les actes requis pour les procès des personnes misérables faisant partie de la clientèle de la confrérie de Saint-Ivon, à Gand, 28 novembre 1733,” in Recueil des ordonnances des Pays-Bas Autrichiens, troisième série – 1700–1794, ed. Gachard, Louis-Prosper (Brussels: Fr. Gobbaerts, 1877), 528–29.Google Scholar

91. “Costen omme Jan Vermeulen”; inv. nr. 21.077, Jan Vermeulen (Etikhove), hr. bev., c. François Devos (Munkzwalm): terugbetaling van geleend geld, 1737–1738.

92. ARAB, GR, inv. nr. 552/A, Renvois en justice, 18th century.

93. ARAB, GR, inv. nr. 552/B, Renvois en justice, 18th century.

94. Stadsarchief Amsterdam, Schout en schepenen, inv. nr. 943, Schepenen minuut register, januari 1756–juli 1756, folio 194–195.

95. ARAB, GR, inv. nr. 552/B, Renvois en justice, 18th century.

96. Stadsarchief Brussel, Oud archief, Liasse 606, Procédure, 1699–1794.

97. Ibid.

98. Felixarchief, Privilegekamer, inv. nrs. 787–889, Rekwestboeken, 18th century.

99. Stadsarchief Brussel, Oud archief, Liasse 606, Procédure, 1699–1794.

100. Nauwelaers, Histoire des avocats, 339.

101. This has been described for England in Brooks, Christopher W., Pettyfoggers and Vipers of the Commonwealth. The “Lower Branch” of the Legal Profession in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986) 108–11.Google Scholar

102. Cited in Gaillard, Le Conseil de Brabant, Vol 2, 122.

103. Cited in Gaillard, Le Conseil de Brabant, Vol 2, 123.

104. Stadsarchief Brussel, Oud archief, Liasse 606, Procédure, 1699–1794.

105. Schmidt, Ariadne, Overleven na de dood. Weduwen in Leiden in de Gouden Eeuw (Amsterdam: Prometheus/Bert Bakker, 2001)Google Scholar, 179; Kagan, Lawsuits and Litigants, 103; Gaillard, Conseil de Brabant, Vol. 2, 31, 33–34; and Lijten, Het burgerlijk proces, 46.

106. Gaillard, Conseil de Brabant, Vol 2, 123–24.

107. Stadsarchief Brussel, Oud archief, Liasse 606, Procédure, 1699–1794.

108. Nationaal archief, Hof van Holland, inv. nr. 3140, Rekwesten om mandement.

109. Ibid.

110. Gaillard, Conseil de Brabant, Vol 2, 124.

111. Felixarchief, Privilegekamer, inv. nr. 820, Rekwestboeken, folios 92–93.

112. Felixarchief, Vierschaar, inv. nr. 1561, Furnissementboecken, 1685–1728; and Regionaal archief Leiden, Oud Rechterlijk Archief, inv. nr. 44 W, Dingboeken van grote zaken, sept. 1755-oktober 1766.

113. A search of the terms poor, widows, orphans, miserabiles, and gratis in the available online customary law of Aarschot, Asse (1569), Diest (1696–1701), Baronie Grimbergen (1606), Leuven (1622), Brussels (1570 and 1606), and Eeklo, yielded few stipulations. https://www.kuleuven-kulak.be/facult/rechten/Monballyu/Rechtlagelanden/Bronnenindex.htm (February 26, 2012).

114. “Décret de Charles VI”.

115. Rijksarchief in Anderlecht, Raad van Brabant, Archief van de Griffies, inv. nr. 5222, Consulten, 1702–1705, folio 90–91; and Gaillard, Conseil de Brabant, Vol 2, 123.

116. Stadsarchief Amsterdam, Archief van de familie van Lennep, inv. nr. 125, Ordonnantie op de maniere van procederen voor den Gerecht der stad Amsterdam, 1779; and Helmers, Gescheurde bedden, 176.

117. Roelevink, “‘t Welck doende,” 163.