Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:01:15.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

With All Due Respect: Popular Resistance to the Privatization of Communal Lands in Nineteenth-Century Michoacán

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2022

Jennie Purnell
Jennie Purnell*
Affiliation:
Boston College
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Thearticle explores popular opposition to the nineteenth-century liberallaws thatmandated privatization ofthecommunal lands held byIndian communities in Mexico. It argues that peasants in Michoactin responded to the reparto withacomplex mixtureof resistance, negotiation, andaccommodation in attempts to retain local control over the definition and distribution of property rights and to defend local religious and political institutions. The first section provides a briefoverview of liberal thinkingand legislation on the privatization of communal lands, highlighting the legal and ideological ambiguities and contradictions that provided opportunities for resistance and negotiation. The second section explores howand why peasants sooften opposed the reparto in Michoacdn, stressing the complex natureof popular resistance and state responses to it. Thethirdsection offers a briefoverview of nineteenth-century agrarian development in Michoactin as background for thetwo case studies of the politics of privatization at thelocal level. Zacapu peasants managed to delay thereparto for thirty-five years but ended up losing muchof theirlandto statetax officials and neighboring landowners. SanJuan Parangaricutiro successfully retained its substantial woodlands as communal property, evenas local mestizo elites appropriatedthe best of cultivated landas private property. Thearticle concludes with a comparative analysis of the liberal reparto in the two communities, linking the different outcomes to peasant partisanship in theagrarian andpolitical struggles of theMexican Revolution.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , 1999 , pp. 85 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Christopher Boyer, Gilbert Joseph, Jeffrey Rubin, Lynn Stephen, and the anonymous LARR reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. I would also like to acknowledge support provided through two Boston College Research Expense Grants. Portions of this article will appear in my forthcoming book, to be published by Duke University Press.

References

Aguirre Beltran, Gonzalo 1952 Problemas de la población indígena de la Cuenca de Tepalcatepec. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional Indigenista.Google Scholar
Bazant, Jan 1971 Alienation of Church Wealth in Mexico: Social and Economic Aspects of the Liberal Revolution, 1856–1875. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Marjorie 1994 “Torching La Purísima, Dancing at the Altar: The Construction of Revolutionary Hegemony in Michoacán, 1934–40.” In JOSEPH AND NUGENT, EDS., 1994, 247–64.Google Scholar
Becker, Marjorie 1995 Setting the Virgin on Fire: Lázaro Cárdenas, Michoacán Peasants, and the Redemption of the Mexican Revolution. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Thomas 1984 “Introduction: Approaching the Porfiriato.” In Other Mexicos: Essays on Regional Mexican History, 1876–1911, edited by Benjamin, Thomas and Mcnellie, William, 3–25. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Charles R. 1970 “The Fiction and Fact of the Reform: The Case of the Central District of Oaxaca, 1856–1867.” The Americas 26: 277–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Joyce M. 1977 “El Corazón del Pueblo: The Religious Cargo System of San Juan Nuevo Parangaricutiro, Michoacán, México.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Brand, Donald 1960 Coalcomán and Motines del Oro: An Ex-Distrito of Michoacán, Mexico. The Hague: Martious Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Bravo Ugarte, Jose 1960 Inspección ocular en Michoacán. Mexico City: Editorial Jus.Google Scholar
Carrasco, Pedro 1976 El catolicismo popular de los Tarascos. Mexico City: Secretaría de Educación Pública.Google Scholar
Carrasco, Pedro, ed. 1986 La sociedad indígena en el centro y occidente de México. Zamora: Colegio de Michoacán.Google Scholar
Chevalier, FranÇOis 1963 Land and Society in Colonial Mexico. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chowning, Margaret 1984 “A Mexican Provincial Elite: Michoacán, 1810–1910.” Ph.D. diss., Stanford University.Google Scholar
Chowning, Margaret 1990 “The Management of Church Wealth in Michoacán, 1810–1856: Economic Motivations and Political Implications.” Journal of Latin American Studies 22, pt. 3: 459–96.Google Scholar
Chowning, Margaret 1992 “The Contours of the Post-1810 Depression in Mexico: A Reappraisal from a Regional Perspective.” LARR 27, no. 2: 119–50.Google Scholar
Cochet, Hubert, Leonard, Eric, and Surgy, Jean Damien De 1988 Paisajes agrarios de Michoacán. Zamora: Colegio de Michoacán.Google Scholar
Embriz Osorio, Arnulfo 1984 La Liga de Comunidades y Sindicatos Agraristas en Michoacán: Práctica político-sindical, 1919–1929. Mexico City: Centro de Estudios Históricos del Agrarismo en México and Colección Investigadores.Google Scholar
Espin Diaz, Jaime 1986 “Ecología y política: El impacto del reparto agrario en la meseta y la secularización del poder.” In CARRASCO, ED., 1986, 237–61.Google Scholar
Falcon, Romana 1994 “Force and the Search for Consent: The Role of the Jefaturas Políticas of Coahuila in National State Formation.” In JOSEPH AND NUGENT, EDS., 1994, 107–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Donald J. 1972 “La política de desamortización en las comunidades indígenas, 1856–1872.” Historia mexicana 21, no. 4: 615–52.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul 1977 Agrarian Revolt in a Mexico Village. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Paul 1986 The Princes of Naranja: An Essay in Anthrohistorical Method. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, Luis 1968 Pueblo en vilo. Mexico City: Fundo de Cultura Económica, Secretaría de Educación Pública.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, Luis 1971 “Tierra Caliente.” In Extremos de México: Homenaje a Don Daniel Cosío Villegas, 115–49. Mexico City: Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, Luis 1979 Sahuayo. Monografías Municipales del Estado. Morelia: Gobierno del Estado de Michoacán.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, Angel 1984 “Investigación histórica y lucha ideológica: El caso de las comunidades michoacanas.” In GUTIERREZ, GUZMAN AVILA, AND SANCHEZ DIAZ 1984, 11–26.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, Angel, Avila, Jose Napoleon Guzman, and Diaz, Gerardo Sanchez 1984 La cuestión agraria: Revolución y contrarrevolución en Michoacán. Morelia: Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo.Google Scholar
Guzman Avila, Jose Napoleon 1984 “Movimiento campesino y empresas extranjeras: La ciénega de Zacapu, 1870–1910.” In GUTIERREZ, GUZMAN AVILA, AND SANCHEZ DIAZ 1984, 27–39.Google Scholar
Hale, Charles A. 1968 Mexican Liberalism in the Age of Mora, 1821–1853. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Charles A. 1989 Transformation of Liberalism in Late-Nineteenth-Century Mexico. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Holden, Robert 1994 Mexico and the Survey of Public Lands: The Management of Modernization, 1876–1911. De Kalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, Gilbert M., and Nugent, Daniel 1994 “Popular Culture and State Formation in Revolutionary Mexico.” In JOSEPH AND NUGENT, EDS., 1994, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Gilbert M., and Nugent, Daniel, EDS. 1994 Everyday Forms of State Formation: Revolution and the Negotiation of Rule in Modern Mexico. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Friedrich 1991 “The Liberal Republic and the Porfiriato, 1867–1910.” In Mexico since Independence, edited by Bethell, Leslie, 49–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Alan 1986 The Mexican Revolution. Vol. 1. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Alan 1994 “Weapons and Arches in the Revolutionary Landscape.” In JOSEPH AND NUGENT, EDS., 1994, 24–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallon, Florencia 1994 “Reflections on the Ruins: Everyday Forms of State Formation in Nineteenth-Century Mexico.” In JOSEPH AND NUGENT, EDS., 1994, 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallon, Florencia 1995 Peasant and Nation: The Making of Postcolonial Mexico and Peru. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mendoza, Moises Franco 1986 “La desamortización de bienes de comunidades indígenas en Michoacán.” In CARRASCO, ED., 1986, 169–87.Google Scholar
Meyer, Jean 1972 Problemas campesinas y revueltas agrarias, 1821–1910. Mexico City: Secretaría de Educación Pública.Google Scholar
Meyer, Jean 1973 La cristiada. 3 vols. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
Meyer, Jean 1984 Esperando a Lozada. Zamora: Colegio de Michoacán.Google Scholar
Michoacan, Estado De 1958 Projecto del Programa de Gobierno del Estado de Michoacán. Morelia: Estado de Michoacán.Google Scholar
Moheno, Cesar 1985 Las historias y los hombres de San Juan. Zamora: Colegio de Michoacán.Google Scholar
Moreno Garcia, Heriberto 1986 “Un documento sobre las comunidades indígenas del Distrito de Zamora durante el Segundo Imperio.” In CARRASCO, ED., 1986, 213–35.Google Scholar
Moreno Garcia, Heriberto 1994 Guaracha: Tiempos viejos, tiempos nuevos. Zamora: Colegio de Michoacán.Google Scholar
Nugent, Daniel 1993 Spent Cartridges of the Revolution: An Anthropological History of Namiquipa, Chihuahua. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nugent, Daniel, and Alonso, Ana Maria 1994 “Multiple Selective Traditions in Agrarian Reform and Agrarian Struggle: Popular Culture and State Formation in the Ejido of Namiquipa, Chihuahua.” In JOSEPH AND NUGENT, EDS., 1994, 209–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, T. G. 1972 “Los Liberales, el campesinado indígena y los problemas agrario durante la Reforma.” Historia Mexicana 21, no. 4: 653–75.Google Scholar
Purnell, Jennie n.d. Popular Movements and State Formation in Revolutionary Mexico: The Agraristas and Cristeros of Michoacán. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Ricard, Robert 1966 The Spiritual Conquest of Mexico. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Romero, Jose Guadalupe 1860 Noticias para formar la historia y la estadística del Obispado de Michoacán. Mexico City: Imprenta de Vicente García Torres.Google Scholar
Romero Flores, Jesus 1946 Historia de Michoacán. Mexico City: Imprenta “Claridad.”Google Scholar
Sanchez Diaz, Gerardo 1982 “La transformación del régimen de propiedad en un pueblo: Conflictos agrarios en Churumuco, 1879–1900.” In Después de los latifundios, edited by GarcÍA, Heriberto Moreno, 63–78. Zamora: Colegio de Michoacán.Google Scholar
Sanchez Diaz, Gerardo 1988 El suroeste de Michoacán: Economía y sociedad, 1852–1910. Morelia: Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985 Weapons of the Weak. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1990 Domination and the Arts of Resistance. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Eyler N. 1937 The Ejido: Mexico's Way Out. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Sinkin, Richard N. 1979 The Mexican Reform, 1855–1876: A Study in Liberal Nation-Building. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Donald Fithian 1982 “Agrarian Policy and Instability in Porfirian Mexico.” Americas 39, no. 2: 153–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Guy P. C. 1991a “Agrarian Conflict in the Municipality of Cuetzalán (Sierra de Puebla): The Rise and Fall of Tala' Agustín Dieguillo, 1861–1894.” Hispanic American Historical Review 71, no. 2: 205–58.Google Scholar
Thomson, Guy P. C. 1991b “Popular Aspects of Liberalism in Mexico, 1848–1888.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 10, no. 3: 265–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutino, John 1986 From Insurrection to Revolution in Mexico: Social Bases of Agrarian Violence, 1750–1940. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tutino, John 1988 “Agrarian Social Change and Peasant Rebellion in Nineteenth-Century Mexico: The Example of Chalco.” In Riot, Rebellion, and Revolution: Rural Social Conflict in Mexico, 95–140. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vanderwood, Paul 1990 “Explaining the Mexican Revolution.” In The Revolutionary Process in Mexico: Essays on Political and Social Change, 1880–1940, edited by Jaime E. Rodríguez, 97–114. Los Angeles: UCLA Latin America Center Publications.Google Scholar