Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:23:32.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Sugar Industry in Postrevolutionary Mexico: State Intervention and Private Capital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2022

Peter Singelmann
Peter Singelmann*
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Kansas City
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The development of the Mexican sugar industry during the twentieth century has reflected both the general problems of industrialization in the hemisphere and the distinct historical conditions that were shaped by the Revolution of 1910. The broader problems can be assessed in terms of the implications of peripheral capitalist development for the internal dynamics of social class relations and for the corresponding political factors that set the boundaries for government policy options.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , 1993 , pp. 61 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Latin American Research Review

References

Aguilar, Alonso, and Carmona, Fernando 1974 México: riqueza y miseria. Mexico City: Nuestro Tiempo.Google Scholar
Amin, Samir 1974a El desarrollo desigual. Mexico City: Nuestro Tiempo.Google Scholar
Amin, Samir 1974b El capitalismo periférico. Mexico City: Nuestro Tiempo.Google Scholar
Anguiano, Arturo 1975 El estado y la política obrera del cardenismo. Mexico City: Era.Google Scholar
Azucar, S.A. 1984–1989 Estadísticas Azucareras. Various annual issues. Mexico City: Azúcar, S.A.Google Scholar
Buzzanell, Peter 1991 “Mexico's Sugar Industry in Transition: Implications for Sweetener Trade with the United States.” In-house document, U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Canak, William L. 1984 “The Peripheral State Debate: State Capitalist and Bureaucratic-Authoritarian Regimes.” LARR 19, no. 1:3–36.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique 1975 Autoritarismo e Democratização. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, and Faletto, Enzo 1969 Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
Carmona, Fernando, Montaño, Guillermo, Carrion, Jorge, and M., ALONSO AGUILAR 1970 “La situación económica.” In El milagro mexicano, 13–103. Mexico City: Nuestro Tiempo.Google Scholar
Chilcote, Ronald H., and Johnson, D., EDS. 1983 Theories of Development: Modes of Production or Dependency? Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
CNIA (COMISION NACIONAL DE LA INDUSTRIA AZUCARERA) 1973–1981 Estadísticas Azucareras. Mexico City: CNIA.Google Scholar
CNIAA (CAMARA NACIONAL DE LAS INDUSTRIAS AZUCARERA Y ALCOHOLERA) 1978 Problema básico de la industria azucarera: necesidad de elevar sus ingresos para lograr su viabilidad económica. Mexico City: McKinsey.Google Scholar
Cockcroft, James 1983 Mexico: Class Formation, Capital Accumulation, and the State. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Collier, David, ED. 1979 The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cordova, Arnaldo 1972 La formación del poder político en México. Mexico City: Era.Google Scholar
Cordova, Arnaldo 1974 La política de masas del cardenismo. Mexico City: Era.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A. 1985 “The Political Economy of Mexico under de la Madrid: Austerity, Routinized Crisis, and Nascent Recovery.” Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 1, no. 1:83–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Janvry, Alain 1981 The Agrarian Question and Reformism in Latin America. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Emmanuel, Arghiri 1972 Unequal Exchange. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Espinosa, Gisela 1985 “El desarrollo de la industria azucarera en México durante el porfiriato.” Paper presented at the Coloquio de Antropología e Historia, Colegio de Michoacán, Oct., Zamora.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter 1979 Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and National Capital in Brazil. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers, Tilman 1981 El estado en la periferia capitalista. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
Foley, Michael W. 1991 “Agenda for Mobilization: The Agrarian Question and Popular Mobilization in Contemporary Mexico.” LARR 26, no. 2:39–74.Google Scholar
Frank, Andre Gunder 1969 “The Development of Underdevelopment.” In Frank, Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution, 3–17. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Fröbel, F., Heinrichs, J., and Kreye, O. 1977 Die Neue Internationale Arbeitsteilung: Strukturelle Arbeitslosigkeit in den Industrieländern und die Industrialisierung der Entwicklungsländer. Hamburg: Reinbek.Google Scholar
Furtado, Celso 1970 Obstacles to Development in Latin America. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gonzalez Casanova, Pablo, and Camin, Hector Aguilar, EDS. 1985 México ante la crisis. Vols. 1–2. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
Grindle, Merilee S. 1977 “Patrons and Clients in the Bureaucracy: Career Networks in Mexico.” LARR 12, no. 1:37–66.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Nora 1982 The Limits of State Autonomy: Post-Revolutionary Mexico. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Nora, and Harding, Timothy F., EDS. 1986 Modern Mexico: State, Economy, and Social Conflict. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Hefley, James C. 1970 Aarón Sáenz: Mexico's Revolutionary Capitalist. Waco, Tex.: World Books.Google Scholar
Hellman, Judith Adler 1983 Mexico in Crisis. 2d ed. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
Ianni, Octavio 1977 El estado en la época de Cárdenas. Mexico City: Era.Google Scholar
Iguartua, Gabriela, and Mestries, Francisco 1987 “El movimiento cañero en Veracruz a principios de los setentas.” El estado, los cañeros y la industria azucarera, 1940–1980, edited by L. Paré, 87–165. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Machado Castillo, Maria Teresa 1983 “Producción y comercialización del azúcar en México.” Thesis in Licenciatura de Administración Pública, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Malloy, James 1977 Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Maturana Medina, Sergio, and F., IVAN RESTREPO 1970 El azúcar: problema de México. Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Agrarias.Google Scholar
Mintz, Sidney 1986 Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
MÜLLER, RONALD 1975 “Multinational Corporations and the Underdevelopment of the Third World.” The Political Economy of Development and Underdevelopment, edited by Wilder, Charles K., 124–51. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Murrieta C., Marcelino 1960 El latifundio cañero. Jalapa, Veracruz: n.p.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Barbara 1986 “Structural Change and State Policy: The Politics of Sugar in Brazil since 1964.” LARR 21, no. 2:53–92.Google Scholar
O'DONNELL, GUILLERMO 1973 Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in Latin American Politics. Berkeley: International and Area Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
O'DONNELL, GUILLERMO 1979 “Tensions in the Bureaucratic-Authoritarian State and the Question of Democracy.” In COLLIER 1979, 283–318.Google Scholar
O'DONNELL, GUILLERMO, and Schmitter, Philippe C. 1986 “Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies.” Part 4 of O'Donnell et al., Transition from Authoritarian Rule. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pare, Luisa 1987a “Insubordinación de los líderes tradicionales: las huelgas de la zafra 1974–75.” In PARE, ED., 1987, 16–84.Google Scholar
Pare, Luisa 1987b “Los decretos cañeros de 1975.” In PARE, ED., 1987, 187–201.Google Scholar
Pare, Luisa, ED. 1987 El estado, los cañeros y la industria azucarera, 1940–1980. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Pare, Luisa, and Morett, Jorge 1987 “La unificación de la organizaciones cañeras.” In PARE, ED., 1987, 202–29.Google Scholar
Perez Arce, Francisco 1979 “El marco ecónomico y jurídico del problema cañero.” In Ensayos sobre el problema cañero, edited by Luisa Paré, 13–36. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Perez Sainz, Juan Pablo 1980 “Toward a Conceptualization of State Capitalism in the Periphery.” The Insurgent Sociologist 9. no. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petras, James 1978 Critical Perspectives on Imperialism and Social Class Relations in the Third World. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Portes, Alexandro, and Walton, John 1981 Labor, Class, and the International System. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Quijano, Anibal 1968 “Dependencia, cambio social y urbanización en América Latina.” Revista Mexicana de Sociología 30:525–70.Google Scholar
Quijano, Anibal 1979 “Imperialismo y campesinado: sus actuales condiciones en Perú.” In Problemas agrarias y movimientos campesinos, edited by Quijano, Aníbal, 1–25. Lima: Mosca Azul.Google Scholar
Reyna, Jose Luis, and Weinert, Richard S., EDS. 1977 The Authoritarian State in Mexico. Philadelphia, Pa.: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
Roberts, Bryan 1978 Cities of Peasants: The Political Economy of Urbanization in the Third World. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Ronfeldt, David 1973 Atencingo: The Politics of Agrarian Struggle in a Mexican Ejido. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Santos, Theotonio Dos 1969 “La crisis de la teoría del desarrollo y las relaciones de dependencia en América Latina.” In La dependencia política-económica en América Latina, edited by Jaguaribe, Hélio et al., 147–88. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
Santos, Theotonio Dos 1982 Imperialismo y dependencia. Mexico City: Era.Google Scholar
Semo, Enrique 1973 Historia del desarrollo del capitalismo en México. Mexico City: Era.Google Scholar
Singelmann, Peter 1979 “Intraorganizational Coercion and Interorganizational Structure: Theoretical Considerations and a Case Study.” In The International Yearbook of Organization Studies 1979, edited by Dunkerley, David and Salamon, Graeme, 186–217. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Singelmann, Peter, and Tapia, Jesus 1979 “La empresa cooperativa como medio de dominación: el caso de un ingenio azucarero.” In Dinámica de la empresa mexicana: perspectivas políticas, económicas y sociales, edited by Viviane Brachet-Márquez, 121–50. Mexico City: Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Soares, Glaucio Ary Dillon 1977 “The Web of Exploitation: State and Peasants in Latin America.” Studies in Comparative International Development 12 (Fall):3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John G. 1979 From Modernization to Modes of Production. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNPASA (UNION NACIONAL DE PRODUCTORES DE AZUCAR, S.A.) 1971 Estadísticas Azucareras. Mexico City: UNPASA.Google Scholar
UNPASA (UNION NACIONAL DE PRODUCTORES DE AZUCAR, S.A.) 1973 Estadísticas Azucareras. Mexico City: UNPASA.Google Scholar
Villar, Samuel Del 1975 “Depresión de la industria azucarera.” Foro Internacional, no. 64:526–85.Google Scholar