Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T18:15:02.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Successes and Failures of Neoliberalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2022

Evelyne Huber  and
Fred Solt
Evelyne Huber
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Fred Solt
Affiliation:
Rice University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As Kurt Weyland points out in his introduction, we have a rich scholarly literature on the causes and processes of neoliberal reforms in Latin America and elsewhere. In contrast, much of the debate about the effects of neoliberal reforms in Latin America has been carried out at a political and ideological level. The image of an overblown and inefficient state that stifles market forces and private initiative has been contrasted with the model of a lean and efficient state that relies on the market to set free productive energies and thus stimulates growth and solves social problems (e.g., Larroulet 1993). With this research note, we aim to make a contribution to the emerging empirically based scholarly literature that investigates the effects of neoliberal policy reforms (e.g., Stallings and Peres 2000).

Type
Research Reports and Notes
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , 2004 , pp. 150 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

∗

The authors would like to thank Bill Smith, John Stephens, and Kurt Weyland for comments on earlier drafts and Tom Mustillo and Jenny Pribble for research assistance.

References

Bresser Pereira, Luiz Carlos, Maravall, José María, and Przeworski, Adam 1993 Economic Reforms in New Democracies: A Social-Democratic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, Hartlyn, Jonathan, Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour Martin, eds. 1999 Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David, eds. 2001 Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D. 2000 “The Political Economy of Pension Reform.” Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development: Occasional Paper 7.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D. 2001 Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D. 2002 “Globalization, Competitiveness, and the Social Democratic Model.” Social Policy and Society 1 (1): 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) 1995 Economic and Social Progress in Latin America, 1995 Report: Overcoming Volatility. Washington, DC: IDB/Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) 1996 Economic and Social Progress in Latin America, 1996 Report. Washington, DC: IDB/Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and Stephens, John D., eds. 1999 Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larroulet V., Cristián 1993 “Introduction.” In Private Solutions to Public Problems: The Chilean Experience, edited by Cristián Larroulet V., 7–12. Santiago, Chile: Instituto Libertad y DesarrolloGoogle Scholar
Londoño, Juan Luis, and Székely, Miguel 1997 “Persistent Poverty and Excess Inequality: Latin America, 1970–1995.” Working Paper 357, Office of the Chief Economist, Inter-American Development Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, Brinks, Daniel, and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal 2001 “Classifying Political Regimes in Latin America, 1945–1999,” Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (1): 37–65. (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith 2002 Polity IV: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2001. Dataset available for download at http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/index.htm.Google Scholar
Morley, Samuel A., Machado, Roberto, and Pettinato, Stefano 1999 “Indexes of Structural Reform in Latin America.” Serie Reformas Económicas 12. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.Google Scholar
Müller, Katharina 2003 Privatising Old Age Security: Latin America and Eastern Europe Compared. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L., and Verkuilen, Jay 2002 “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (1): 5–34. (February).Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/Statistics Canada 2000 Literacy in the Information Age: Final Report of the International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro, and Hoffman, Kelly 2003 “Latin American Class Structures: Their Composition and Change during the Neoliberal Era.” Latin American Research Review 38 (1): 41–82. (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W., and Schmidt, Vivien A. 2000 Welfare and Work in the Open Economy: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stallings, Barbara, and Peres, Wilson 2000 Growth, Employment, and Equity: The Impact of the Economic Reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) 2002 Human Development Report 2002: Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) 1998 The Fiscal Covenant. Santiago, Chile: ECLAC.Google Scholar
United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) 2002 Social Panorama of Latin America. Santiago, Chile: Freedom HouseGoogle Scholar
United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) 2002 Freedom in the World: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties, 2001–2002. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
World Bank 2000 World Development Indicators 2000. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar