Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T01:44:48.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Social Bases of Political Parties in Argentina, 1912–2003

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Noam Lupu
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Susan C. Stokes
Affiliation:
Yale University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To what extent has the Argentine party system been polarized along class lines? The political historiography gives mixed and contradictory answers to this question. We explore the social bases of Argentina's political parties using an original database, the most comprehensive database of Argentine elections yet assembled, and new methods of ecological inference that yield more reliable results than previous analyses. We identify two distinct party systems, one in place between 1912 and 1940, the other emerging after 1946. The first party system was not consistently class based, but the second was, with the Radical Party representing the middle classes and the Peronists, workers and the poor. Still, there were important exceptions. Lower-class support for the Peronists, as proxied by literacy rates, declined during Perón's exile, which implies that the party had trouble mobilizing lower-class illiterate voters. Since the return to democracy in 1983, class polarization has again found some expression in the party system.

Resumo

Resumo

¿Cuán polarizado por clase socioeconómica ha sido el sistema partidario en la Argentina? La historiografía política nos ofrece respuestas variadas y contradictorias a esta pregunta. En este trabajo exploramos las bases sociales de los partidos políticos argentinos usando una base de datos original, la más completa de elecciones argentinas que se haya construido. Además aplicamos métodos novedosos de inferencia ecológica que producen resultados más confiables que estudios anteriores. Identificamos dos sistemas partidarios distintos, uno existente entre 1912 y 1940, y el otro surgiendo después del 1946. El primer sistema partidario no fue consistentemente basado en las clases sociales, pero el segundo sí lo fue, con el partido radical representando las clases medias y el peronista las clases trabajadoras y pobres. Sin embargo, hubo excepciones. El apoyo que la clase baja dio al peronismo, medido con tazas de alfabetismo como proxy, declinó durante el exilio de Juan Perón, sugiriendo que el partido no pudo movilizar votantes analfabetos pobres. Desde la transición democrática en el 1983, la polarización económica ha vuelto a ser expresada en el sistema partidario.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the Latin American Studies Association

Footnotes

*

For their comments, advice, and data, we thank Ernesto Calvo, Darío Canton, Gary King, Marcelo Nazareno, Luis Schiumerini, and Jason Wittenberg. Christie Kim, Mayanka Mudgal, Amy Swanson, and Chen Zhao provided excellent research assistance. We especially wish to thank Valeria Brusco.

References

Adelman, Jeremy 1992Reflections on Argentine Labour and the Rise of Perón.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 11 (3): 243259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, Paula 2006 Between Revolution and the Ballot Box: The Origins of the Argentine Radical Party in the 1890s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Botana, Natalio R. 1977 El orden conservador: La política argentina entre 1880 y 1916. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Brusco, Valeria, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Stokes, Susan C. 2004Vote Buying in Argentina.” Latin American Research Review 39 (2): 6688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, David 1969Charisma, Migration, and Elite Coalescence: An Interpretation of Peronism.” Comparative Politics 1 (3): 423439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canton, Darío 1968 Materiales para el estudio de la sociología política en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Instituto Di Tella.Google Scholar
Canton, Darío 1973 Elecciones y partidos políticos en la Argentina: Historia, interpretación y balance, 1910–1966. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.Google Scholar
Canton, Darío 1986 El pueblo legislador: Las elecciones de 1983. Buenos Aires: Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Sociales.Google Scholar
Canton, Darío, and Jorrat, Jorge Raúl 1978Occupation and Vote in Urban Argentina: The March 1973 Presidential Election.” Latin American Research Review 13 (1): 146157.Google Scholar
Canton, Darío, and Jorrat, Jorge Raúl 1980El voto peronista en 1973: Distribución, crecimiento marzo-setiembre y bases ocupacionales.” Desarrollo Económico 20 (77): 7192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canton, Darío, and Jorrat, Jorge Raúl 1996Radicalismo, socialismo y terceras fuerzas en la Capital Federal: Sus bases socioespaciales en 1912–1930.” Sociedad 10:3355.Google Scholar
Canton, Darío, and Jorrat, Jorge Raúl 1997El peronismo proscripto y su vuelta al gobierno: Elecciones en la Capital Federal entre 1957 y 1973.” In La investigación social hoy, edited by Canton, D. and Jorrat, J. R., 117151. Buenos Aires: Editora del CBC-UBA.Google Scholar
Canton, Darío, and Jorrat, Jorge Raúl 1998Continuity and Change in Elections in the City of Buenos Aires, 1931–1954.” Latin American Research Review 33 (3): 137160.Google Scholar
Canton, Darío, and Jorrat, Jorge Raúl 2002Economic Evaluations, Partisanship, and Social Bases of Presidential Voting in Argentina, 1995 and 1999.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 14 (4): 413427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canton, Darío, Jorrat, Jorge Raúl, and Juarez, Eduardo 1976Un intento de estimación de las celdas interiores de una tabla de contingencia basado en el análisis de regresión: El caso de las elecciones presidenciales de 1946 y marzo de 1973.” Desarrollo Económico 16 (63): 395417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canton, Darío, and Moreno, José Luis 1971 Pequeño censo de 1927. Buenos Aires: Instituto Torcuato Di Tella.Google Scholar
Catterberg, Edgardo 1990 Argentina Confronts Politics: Political Culture and Public Opinion in the Argentine Transition to Democracy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Escolar, Marcelo 2003 Bases Departamentales de la Argentina, 1983–1999. Buenos Aires: Programa de Estudios Electorales y Legislativos (PEEL), Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.Google Scholar
Forni, Floreai H., and Weinberg, Pedro D. 1972Reflexiones sobre la relación entre clases sociales y partidos políticos en la Argentina.” Desarrollo Económico 12 (46): 421436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germani, Gino 1955 Estructura social de la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Raigal.Google Scholar
Germani, Gino 1973El surgimiento del peronismo: El rol de los obreros y de los migrantes internos.” Desarrollo Económico 13 (51): 435488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward, and Calvo, Ernesto 2000Federalism and Low-Maintenance Constituencies: Territorial Dimensions of Economic Reform in Argentina.” Studies in Comparative International Development 35 (3): 3255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huerta Palau, Pedro 1963 Análisis electoral de una ciudad en desarrollo. Córdoba, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.Google Scholar
Johnson, John J. 1958 Political Change in Latin America: The Emergence of the Middle Sectors. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jorrat, Jorge Raúl 1975Algunas notas sobre la correlación negativa entre voto al Frejuli y la clase obrera.” Desarrollo Económico 15 (59): 445455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorrat, Jorge Raúl 1986Las elecciones de 1983: ¿‘Desviación’ o ‘realineamiento‘?Desarrollo Económico 26 (101): 89120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, Eldon 1973The Function of the Little-Known Case in Theory Formation or What Peronism Wasn't.” Comparative Politics 6 (1): 1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, Eldon 1975Interpretaciones ortodoxas y revisionistas del apoyo inicial del peronismo.” Desarrollo Económico 14 (56): 749764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary 1997 A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Rosen, Ori, and Tanner, Martin A. 1999Binomial-Beta Hierarchical Models for Ecological Inference.” Sociological Methods & Research 28 (1): 6190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Jeane 1971 Leader and Vanguard in Mass Society: A Study of Peronist Argentina. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven 2003 Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin 1981 Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Little, Walter 1973aElectoral Aspects of Peronism, 1946–1954.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 15 (3): 267284.Google Scholar
Little, Walter 1973bParty and State in Peronist Argentina, 1945–1955.” Hispanic American Historical Review 53 (4): 644662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy R., eds. 1995 Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi 1993 Institutions, Parties, and Coalitions in Argentine Politics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, James W. 1997 Peronism without Perón: Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ministerio del Interior 1950 Resultados electorales. Buenos Aires: Ministerio del Interior.Google Scholar
Ministerio del Interior various Escrutinio definitivo de resultados electorales por departamento. Buenos Aires: Ministerio del Interior.Google Scholar
Mora, y Araujo, Manuel 1975La estructura social del peronismo: Un análisis electoral interprovincial.” Desarrollo Económico 14 (56): 699718.Google Scholar
Mora, y Araujo, Manuel, and Smith, Peter H. 1983Peronism and Economic Development: The 1973 Elections.” In Juan Perón and the Reshaping of Argentina, edited by Turner, F. C. and Miguens, J. E., 171187. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Persello, Ana Virginia 2004 El Partido Radical: Gobierno y oposición, 1916–1943. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.Google Scholar
Ranis, Peter 1979Early Peronism and the Post-Liberal Argentine State.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 21 (3): 313338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranis, Peter 1991View from Below: Working-Class Consciousness in Argentina.” Latin American Research Review 26 (2): 133156.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen L., and Wibbels, Erik 2000The Subnational Politics of Economic Adjustment: Provincial Politics and Fiscal Performance in Argentina.” Comparative Political Studies 33 (4): 419451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2002Social Inequalities without Class Cleavages in Latin America's Neoliberal Era.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (4): 333.Google Scholar
Rock, David 1975 Politics in Argentina: 1890–1930: The Rise and Fall of Radicalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, Luis Alberto 2002 A History of Argentina in the Twentieth Century, translated by Brennan, J. P. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Ori, Wenxin, Jiang, King, Gary, and Tanner, Martin A. 2001Bayesian and Frequentist Inference for Ecological Inference: The R × C case.” Statistica Neerlandica 55 (2): 134156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoultz, Lars 1977The Socio-Economic Determinants of Popular-Authoritarian Electoral Behavior: The Case of Peronism.” American Political Science Review 71 (4): 14231446. Seligson, Amber L.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoultz, Lars 2003Disentangling the Roles of Ideology and Issue Positions in the Rise of Third Parties: The Case of Argentina.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (4): 465475.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter H. 1969Social Mobilization, Political Participation, and the Rise of Juan Perón.” Political Science Quarterly 84 (1): 3049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Peter H. 1972The Social Base of Peronism.” Hispanic American Historical Review 52 (1): 5573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Peter H. 1974Las elecciones argentinas de 1946 y las inferencias ecológicas.” Desarrollo Económico 14 (54): 385398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, Peter G. 1965Parties and Politics in Argentina: The Elections of 1962 and 1963.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 9 (1): 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, Peter G. 1969The Class Basis of Argentine Political Parties.” American Political Science Review 63 (1): 163167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Richard J. 1978Elections in the City of Buenos Aires during the First Yrigoyen Administration: Social Class and Political Preferences.” Hispanic American Historical Review 58 (4): 595624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Richard J. 1984Politics, Parties, and Elections in Argentina's Province of Buenos Aires, 1912–42.” Hispanic American Historical Review 64 (4): 707735.Google Scholar
Wellhofer, E. Spencer 1977Peronism in Argentina: The Social Base of the First Regime, 1946–1955.” Journal of Developing Areas 11 (3): 335356.Google Scholar
Wittenberg, Jason, and Bhaskar, Badri Narayan 2005 R Code for R×C Ecological Inference, University of California, Berkeley, unpublished.Google Scholar
Zalduendo, Eduardo 1958 Geografía electoral de la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Ancora.Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article: