Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:27:00.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Race and Natural Resource Conflicts in Honduras: The Miskito and Garifuna Struggle for Lasa Pulan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2022

Sharlene Mollett*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Honduran Rio Platano Biosphere Reserve has become a place of struggle over natural resources. This paper examines a land contest between the Miskito Indians and the Garifuna, an indigenous group and Afro-indigenous group respectively. The area in question is Lasa Pulan, a one square kilometer of forest and farmland, historically shared by both Miskito and Garifuna collectives. Through discursive analysis, this paper traces contemporary discourse and practice that these actors employ to justify exclusive claims to Lasa Pulan. Such contemporary claims are structured by longstanding colonial and postcolonial racial ideologies that stereotypically label blacks as “immoral” and “violent” and Indians as “ignorant” and “backward. ” This paper argues, through analysis of Miskito and Garifuna claims to Lasa Pulan, that natural resource struggles are simultaneously racial struggles, and it acquaints policy makers with the multiple tenure arrangements in pluricultural Honduras.

Resumen:

RESUMEN:

La Reserva de la Biosfera de Río Plátano se ha convertido en un terrenode lucha por sus recursos naturales. Este trabajo examina la disputa por su tierra que existe entre los Miskito y los Garifuna, grupos indigenas y afroindigenas respectivamente. El area en cuestion es Lasa Pulan, un kilometre cuadradode bosqueytierra de cultivo,compartidaa 10 largode la historia por ambospueblos. Atravesde un analisisdiscursivo,estetrabajo trazael discurso y la practica contemporaneos utilizados por estos actores para justificar los derechos exclusivos que ellos poseen sobre Lasa Pulan. Dichas pretensiones fueron estructuradas por muchosafios de ideologiasracialesexistentesdurante y despues de la colonia, que etiquetaban a los negros como “inmorales” y “violentos,” y a las indigenas como “ignorantes” y “retrasados.” Este articulo argumenta, a traves de las reclamaciones hechas por Lasa Pulan, que luchas sobre sus recursos naturales son simultaneamente las luchas raciales, e informa a aquellos responsables de las politicas sobre las multiples normas de tenencia de la tierra existentes en Honduras pluricultural.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by the University of Texas Press

References

AFE-COHDEFOR, State Forestry Administration—Honduran Corporation for Forest Development 2000Plan de Manejo, Reserva del Hombre y la Biosfera del Río Plátano.” Tegucigalpa: Proyecto Manejo y Protección de la Biosfera Río Plátano.Google Scholar
Alvarado Garcia, E. 1958 “Legislación Indigenista de Honduras.” Recopilación e introducción de Ernesto Alvarado García. Ediciones Especiales, Numero 35. Mexico: Instituto Indigenista Interamericano.Google Scholar
Anderson, Mark 1997The Significance of Blackness: Representations of Garifuna in St. Vincent and Central America, 1700–1900.” Transforming Anthropology 6 (1-2): 2235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Mark 2000 “Garifuna Kids: Blackness, Tradition and Modernity in Honduras.” Anthropology Department. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Anthias, F., and Yuval-Davis, N. 1992 Racialized Boundaries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bancroft, Hubert H. 1886 The Works of Hubert Howe Bancroft: History of Central America. Vol. 2, 15301800. San Francisco: The History Company.Google Scholar
Bannerji, H. 2001 Inventing Subjects: Studies in Hegemony, Patriarchy and Colonialism. Delhi: Tulika Books. Barahona, M.Google Scholar
Barahona, M. 1998Introducción.” In Imagen y percepción de los pueblos indígenas en Honduras, edited by Barahona and Rivas, 1741. Tegucigalpa: Servicio Holandés de Cooperación al Desarrollo and Editorial Guaymuras.Google Scholar
Barot, R., and Bird, J. 2001Racialization: The Genealogy and Critique of a Concept.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 24 (4): 601618. (July).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, C. N. 1862Remarks on the Mosquito Territory, Its Climate, People, Productions, etc., etc., with a Map.” Journal of the Royal Geographical Society 32: 242268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaikie, P., and Brookfield, Harold 1987 Land, Degradation and Society. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bonnett, A. 2000 White Identities: Historical and International Perspectives. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bryant, R. 1998Power, Knowledge and Political Ecology in the Third World: A review.” Progress in Physical Geography 22 (1): 2994.Google Scholar
Central American and Caribbean Research Council (CACRC) 2002aEstudio de caso Comunidad Plaplaya.” Diagnóstico del Uso y Tenencia de la Tierra en Comunidades Garifunas y Miskitas de Honduras. Austin: CACRC.Google Scholar
Central American and Caribbean Research Council (CACRC) 2002bLa Comunidad de Ibans.” Diagnóstico del Uso y Tenencia de la Tierra en Comunidades Garifunas y Miskitas de Honduras. Austin: CACRC.Google Scholar
Dei, G. 1996 Theory and Practice: Anti-Racism Education. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
De la Cadena, M. 2001Reconstructing Race: Racism, Culture and Mestizaje in Latin America.” NACLA Report on the Americas 34 (6): 1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaney, David 2002The Space that Race Makes.” The Professional Geographer 54 (1): 614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, D. 1998Lobster in the Rain Forest: The Political Ecology of Miskito Wage Labor and Agricultural Deforestation.” Journal of Political Ecology 5: 83108.Google Scholar
Durkheim, K., and Dixon, J. 2001The Role of Place and Metaphor in Racial Exclusion: South Africa's Beaches as Sites of Shifting Racialization.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 24 (3): 443450.Google Scholar
Edwards, Bryan 1819Some Account of the British Settlments on the Musquito Shore.” In The History, Civil and Commercial, of the British Colonies in the West Indies. Vol. 5. 5th ed., 202–14. London: G. and W. E. Whittaker. Quoted in Helms 1977.Google Scholar
Cronista, El 1930La importancia siempre creciente y siempre de actualidad de extenso y fértil territorio de la Mosquitia Hondureña.” (15, 19, 21, 22 de abril): 7.Google Scholar
Eriksson, P. 2000Territorial Conflicts in the Northern Atlantic Coast of Nicaragua: Indigenous Peoples' Struggles over Resources and Representations.” Fennia 178 (2): 215225.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. 1999After Nature: Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology.” Current Anthropology 40 (1): 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euraque, D. A. 1996 Estado, poder, nacionalidad y raza en la historia de Honduras: Ensayos. Obispado de Choluteca. Choluteca: Ediciones Subirana.Google Scholar
Euraque, D. A. 2003 “The Threat of Blackness to the Mestizo Nation: Race and Ethnicity in the Honduran Banana Economy, 1920s and 1930s.” In S. Striffler and M. Moberg, eds., Banana Wars: Power Production and History in the Americas. Durham and London: Duke University Press. 229249.Google Scholar
Floyd, Troy 1967 The Anglo-Spanish Struggle for the Mosquitia. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
González, N. L. 1988 Sojourners of the Caribbean, Ethnogenesis and Ethnohistory of the Garifuna. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, E. T. 1998 Disparate Diasporas: Identity and Politics in an African Nicaraguan Community. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gould, J. 1998 “‘Vana Ilusión!‘: The Highlands Indians and the Myth of Nicaragua Mestiza, 1880–1925.” In A. Chomsky and A. Lauria-Santiago (eds.), Identity and Struggle at the Margins of the Nation-State. The Laboring Peoples of Central America and the Hispanic Caribbean. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Claro, Hablemos 1997 “IN A entrega a la AFE-COHDEFOR: Presidente Reina Participa en Traspaso de Tierras Nacionales.” Revista Hablemos Claro (agosto): 64.Google Scholar
Hale, C. 1994 Resistance and Contradictions: Miskitu Indians and the Nicaraguan State, 1894–1987. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Helms, M. W. 1971 Asang: Adaptations to Cultural Contact in a Miskito Community. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Helms, M. W. 1977 “Negro or Indian? The Changing Identity of a Frontier Population” In Pescatello, ed., Old Roots in New Lands: Historical and Anthropological Perspectives on Black Experiences in the Americas. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Herlihy, P. 1997 “Indigenous Peoples and Biosphere Reserve Conservation in the Mosquitia Rain Forest Corridor, Honduras.” In S. Stevens, Consewation through Cultural Survival: Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional Agrario (INA) 1997 Resolución no. 140. Tegucigalpa, M. D.C. Agosto 19 de 1997.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional Agrario (INA) 2002 Título de Propiedad en Dominio Pleno, Comunidad Garifuna Plaplaya. Tegucigalpa, Municipio del Distrito Central, Abril 19 de 2002.Google Scholar
International Labour Organisation 1989 “Convention Concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries” (ILO, no. 169) http://wwwl.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/rlcitp.htmlGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Kees 1998 Political Ecology, Mountain Agriculture, and Knowledge in Honduras. Amsterdam: Thela Publishers.Google Scholar
Joseph, G. 2000Taking Race Seriously: Whiteness in Argentina's National and Transnational Imaginary.” Identities 7 (3): 333371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, F. 2003Land Tenure and Biodiversity: An Exploration in the Political Ecology of Muran'a District, Kenya.” Human Organization 62 (3): 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, M. 2003 “Banco Mundial, Reporte Preliminar, Análisis de las oportunidades y limitaciones de las comunidades indígenas y organizaciones comunitarias en la gestión de comanejo de las áreas protegidas en Honduras.” Proyecto Regional de Manejo Integrado de Ecosistemas por Pueblos Indígenas en el Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano. Tegucigalpa.Google Scholar
Medina, L. K. 1997Defining Difference, Forging Unity: The Co-construction of Race, Ethnicity and Nation in Belize.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 20 (4): 757780.Google Scholar
Medina, L. K. 1999History, Culture, and Place-making: ‘Native’ Status and Maya Identity in Belize.” Journal of Latin American Anthropology 4 (1): 133165.Google Scholar
Naylor, R. 1989 Penny Ante Imperialism: The Mosquito Shore and the Bay of Honduras, 1600–1914. London and Toronto: Associated University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. M. 1999Perpetual Creation and Decomposition: Bodies, Gender and Desire in the Assumptions of a Guatemalan Discourse of Mestizaje.” Journal of Latin American Anthropology 4 (1): 74111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newson, L. 1992 El costo de la conquista. Traducción de Jorge Travieso. Tegucigalpa: Editorial Guaymuras.Google Scholar
Occhipinti, L. 2003Claiming a Place: Land and Identity in Two Communities in Northwestern Argentina.” The Journal of Latin American Anthropology 8 (3): 155174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offen, K. 2002The Sambo and Tawira Miskitu: The Colonial Origins and Geography of Intra-Miskitu Differentiation in Eastern Nicaragua and Honduras.” Ethnohistory 49 (2): 319372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olien, M. 1988Were the Miskito Indians Black? Ethnicity, Politics and Plagiarism in the Mid-Nineteenth Century.” New West Indian Guide 62 (1&2): 2749.Google Scholar
Organización de Desarrollo Etnico Comunitario, ODECO 2001 “La comunidad garifuna y sus desafíos en el siglo XX.” Diagnóstico de potencialidades agras económicas de las comunidades garifunas de la costa norte de Honduras. La Ceiba, Honduras.Google Scholar
Peet, R., and Watts, M., eds. 1996 “Liberation Ecology: Development, Sustainability, and Environment in an Age of Market Triumphalism.” Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements. London: Routledge. 145.Google Scholar
Peluso, N. 1992 Rich Forests, Poor People, Resource Control and Resistance in Java. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pim, Bedford 1863 The Gate of the Pacific. London: Lovell Reeve. Quoted in Anderson 1997.Google Scholar
Pineda, Baron L. 1998The Port People of Bilwi: Ideologies of Race, Lexicons of Identity and the Politics of Peoplehood in the Mosquito Coast.” PhD diss., The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, S., and Westwood, S. 1996 Remaking the Nation: Identity and Politics in Latin America. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Honduras, República 1982 “Constitución de la República.” Discreto no. 131 del 11 de enero. Tegucigalpa M. D. C.Google Scholar
de Honduras, República 1992Lev para la modernización y el desarrollo del sector agrícola.” Tegucigalpa M.D.C.Google Scholar
Rocheleau, D., Thomas-Slayter, B., and Wangari, E., eds. 1996 “Gender and Environment: A Feminist Political Ecology Perspective.” In Feminist Political Ecology, Global Issues and Local Experiences. London: Routledge. 323.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1997The Symbolics of Blood: Mestizaje in the Americas.” Identities 3 (4): 495521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoler, A. L., and Cooper, F. 1997Between Metropole and Colony: Rethinking a Research Agenda.” In Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World, ed. Cooper, F. and Stoler, A. L. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stonich, S. 1993 “I Am Destroying the Land!”: The Political Ecology of Poverty and Environmental Destruction in Honduras. Boulder: Westview Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Sundberg, J. 2004Identities in the Making: Conservation, Gender and Race in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala.” Gender Place and Culture 11 (1): 4366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. 2004‘Useful Laborers’ and ‘Savage Hordes’: Hispanic Central American Views of Afro-Indigenous Peoples in the Nineteenth Century.” Transforming Anthropology 12 (1&2): 2129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, E. 2004Land Rights and Garifuna Identity.” NACLA Report on the Americas 38 (2): 2125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, V. 2005 “Mestizaje and the Ethnicization of Race in Latin America.” In P. Spickard, ed., Race and Nation: Ethnic Systems in the Modern World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Urteaga Crovetto, P. 1998 “Indigenous Peoples and Reform of the State in Latin America.” In W. Assies, G. Van der Haar, and A. Hoekema, eds., The Challenge of Diversity: Indigenous Peoples and Reform of the State in Latin America. Amsterdam: Thela-Thesis.Google Scholar
Vallejo Larios, M. 1997 “Análisis legal, tenencia de tierras indígenas y colonizadoras en la Biosfera del Río Plátano.” Análisis a los Instrumentos e Institucionales que Reglan la Tenencia de la Tierra en la Biosfera del Río Plátano. Tegucigalpa (diciembre).Google Scholar
Vandergeest, P. 2003Racialization and Citizenship in Thai Forest Politics.” Society and Natural Resources 16: 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, P. 2001Racial Identity and Nationalism: A Theoretical View from Latin America.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 24 (5): 845865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitten, N. Jr., and Torres, A., eds. 1998To Forge the Future in the Fires of the Past.” In Blackness in Latin America and the Caribbean: Social Dynamics and Cultural Transformations. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 333.Google Scholar
Winant, H. 1994 Racial Conditions: Politics, Theory, Comparisons. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitten, N. Jr., and Torres, A., eds. 1998To Forge the Future in the Fires of the Past.” In Blackness in Latin America and the Caribbean: Social Dynamics and Cultural Transformations. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 333.Google Scholar
Wood, E. n.d. “Regulating Our Own Lands: Participatory Zoning and Management of the Rio Platano Biosphere Reserve of Honduras.” Department of Geography, University Kansas, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Zelaya, Alfonso Guillen 1931 “Protección a los Nacionales,” El Pueblo, Tegucigalpa, 10 de marzo de 1931. National Archives of Honduras.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, K., and Bassett, T. 2003 Political Ecology, An Integrative Approach to Geography and Environment-Development Studies. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Zúñiga Echenique, Melquisedec 1938 [1875] “Descripción geográfica del Departamento de La Mosquitia, practicada el año de 1875.” In Límites entre Honduras y Nicaragua: Alegato presentado a Su Majestad Católica el Rey de España en calidad de Arbitro por los Representantes de la República de Honduras. Madrid, marzo de 1905. New York.Google Scholar