Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:49:08.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Opinion of the Economy and the President among Mexico City Residents: The Salinas Sexenio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2022

Andrés Villarreal
Andrés Villarreal*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Because of the prominence of the president in the Mexican political system, public opinion of the executive is a particularly important political indicator. Two models of public opinion are used here to explain changes in President Carlos Salinas de Gortari's approval rate from 1990 to 1994. The economic-performance model assumes that approval was based on public perception of trends in the economy. The statistical analysis shows that individuals' perceptions of economic performance had a strong positive effect on their opinions of the president. But basic economic indicators such as inflation, the real value of wages, and the level of unemployment are found to explain only partially Mexico City residents' opinions of the economy. The policy-initiatives model assumes that approval of President Salinas was based on public opinion of his economic policy initiatives. Citizens' approval of Salinas's economic initiatives was found to affect their opinions of the president substantially. Because many of these policy initiatives, such as NAFTA, had no immediate direct impact on the economic condition of the country, I conclude that Salinas's extraordinary popularity was largely due to the expectations that these initiatives created.

Type
Research Reports and Notes
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , 1999 , pp. 132 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

*

The initial phase of this research was funded by a grant from the University of California Institute for Mexico and the United States (UC-MEXUS). I would like to thank Peter Smith, Daniel Hallin, and William Parish as well as the anonymous LARR referees for helpful comments on previous drafts. I would also like to thank Ricardo de la Peña and Rosario Toledo of the Gabinete de Estudios de Opinión (GEO) for sharing their data with me.

References

BANCO NACIONAL DE MEXICO 1993 Review of the Economic Situation of Mexico 69, nos. 807–8 (Feb.–Mar.):69–80.Google Scholar
Brody, Richard A. 1991 Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buendia, Jorge 1996 “Economic Reform, Public Opinion, and Presidential Approval in Mexico, 1988–1993.” Comparative Political Studies 29, no. 5: 566–91.Google Scholar
Carpizo, Jorge 1978 El presidencialismo mexicano. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
CastaÑEda, Jorge G. 1993 “The Clouding Political Horizon.” Current History 92, no. 571 (Feb.):59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Charles L., AND Coleman, Kenneth M. 1994 “Neoliberal Economic Policies and the Potential for Electoral Change in Mexico.” Mexican Studies 10, no. 2 (Summer):341–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominguez, Jorge, AND Mccann, James 1996 Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dornbusch, Rudiger, AND Werner, Alejandro 1994 “Mexico: Stabilization, Reform, and No Growth.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1:253–97Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. III 1991 Presidential Approval. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Garrido, Luis Javier 1989 “The Crisis of Presidencialismo.” In Mexico's Alternative Political Futures, edited by Wayne Cornelius, Judith Gentleman, and Smith, Peter H., 417–34. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A., WITH Rivers, R. Douglas AND Vasilatos, Nicholas 1982 “The Dynamics of Political Support for American Presidents among Occupational and Partisan Groups.” American Journal of Political Science 26, no. 2 (May):312–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, Samuel H. 1978 “Explaining Presidential Popularity.” American Political Science Review 72 (June): 506–22.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick 1983 Macroeconomics and Micropolitics. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald, AND Kiewiet, D. Roderick 1979 “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 23, no. 3 (Aug.):495–527.Google Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1971 “Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.” American Political Science Review 65, no. 1:131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustig, Nora 1992 Mexico: The Remaking of an Economy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Mackuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., AND Stimson, James 1992 “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.” American Political Science Review 86, no. 3 (Sept.):597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, Paul E. 1977 “The Selfish Voter Paradox and the Thrown-Away Vote Argument.” American Political Science Review 71 (Mar.):11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Lorenzo 1993 “El presidencialismo: Del populismo al neoliberalismo.” Revista Mexicana de Sociología 55, no. 2 (Apr.–June):57–81.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam 1996 “Public Support for Economic Reforms in Poland.” Comparative Political Studies 29, no. 5:520–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., AND Brody, Richard A. 1977 “Coping: The Ethic of Self-Reliance.” American Journal of Political Science 21, no. 3 (Aug.):501–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar