Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:37:19.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Power of Transatlantic Ties: A Game-Theoretical Analysis of Viceregal Social Networks in Colonial Mexico, 1700–1755

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Christoph Rosenmüller
Christoph Rosenmüller*
Affiliation:
Middle Tennessee State University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article analyzes the power of select political actors in the social networks of New Spain (colonial Mexico), from 1700–1755. Examining the participation of these actors in successful political and economic coalitions allows for assessment of the additional (or marginal) contribution of each politician. His or her chance of altering decisions of a coalition is called the power index, delivering a quantification of the idea of power. A second step then examines how the number of communicative links with other actors changes a politician's influence and modifies the power index. A large amount of contacts significantly increases the power of an actor. Drawing on this model, I argue that the viceroy's sway increased somewhat in this period because of his improving social connections. In addition, historians who have pointed out that the Bourbon dynasty reduced the role of the Council of the Indies to that of an appellate court have underestimated the council's lasting informal influence. This interdisciplinary article introduces game theory to Latin American historical scholarship by analyzing a period that scholars have largely neglected.

Resumo

Resumo

El objetivo de este artículo es analizar el poder de actores políticos en las redes sociales de la Nueva España (México colonial), 1700–1755. La participación de estos actores en coaliciones políticas o económicas exitosas permite una determinación de la contribución marginal (o adicional) de cada actor a las alianzas. La chance de cambiar una decisión se llama el índice del poder, lo cual brinde una cuantificación del término poder. En un segundo paso, se determine como el número de contactos comunicativos en la red modifica el poder de un actor, cambiando el índice del poder. El análisis de las redes sociales muestra que los abundantes enlaces sociales aumentan decisivamente la influencia de algunos actores. Arguyo que el poder del virrey surgió algo en este período a través de mejorar sus enlaces sociales. Además, los historiadores que destacan que los Borbones tempranos redujeron el Consejo de Indias al papel de una corte judicial apelativa subestiman su influencia informal duradera. Este artículo interdisciplinario introduce la teoría de juegos a las ciencias históricas sobre América Latina, analizando una fase que la historiografía ha ignorado en su mayor parte.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , 2009 , pp. 7 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the Latin American Studies Association

Footnotes

I wish to express my gratitude to Dr. Joachim Rosenmüller, emeritus of the Institute of Mathematical Economics (IMW) at the University of Bielefeld, Germany, for fundamental suggestions and the mathematical computations of this article. I also thank the three anonymous reviewers for their significant suggestions as well as the participants of the 2007 Harvard Seminar on Atlantic History for further critique.

References

Álvarez de Toledo, Cayetana 2004 Politics and Reform in Spain and Viceregal Mexico: The Life and Thought of Juan de Palafox, 1600–1659. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bernard, Gildas 1972 Le secrétariat d'état et le conseil espagnol des Indes (1700–1808). Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Michel 1992 “Clientélisme et pouvoir en Nouvelle-Espagne.” In Cultures et sociétes, Andes et Méso-Amérique. Mélanges en l'honneur de P. Duviols, edited by Thiercelin, Raquel, Vol. 1, pp. 147–159. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l'Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Michel 1999 Grandeur et misères de Voffice. Les officiers de finances de Nouvelle-Espagne XVIIe–XVIIIe siècles. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Blank, Stephanie 1974 “Patrons, Clients, and Kin in Seventeenth-Century Caracas: A Methodological Essay in Colonial Spanish American Social History.” Hispanic American Historical Review 54 (2): 260–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkholder, Mark A. 1976 “The Council of the Indies in the Late Eighteenth Century: A New Perspective.” Hispanic American Historical Review 56 (3): 405–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkholder, Mark A., and Chandler, Dewitt Samuel 1982 Biographical Dictionary of Audiencia Ministers in the Americas, 1687–1821. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Castro Santa-Anna, José Manuel de 1854 Diario de sucesos notables. Documentos para la historia de Méjico. Vols. 4–5. Mexico City: Imprenta de Juan R. Navarro.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1994 “Truth and Power.” In Essential Works of Michel Foucault, edited by Faubion, James D., pp. 111–133. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Gómez Urdáñiz, José Luis 1996 El proyecto reformista de Ensenada. Lleida, Spain: Milenio.Google Scholar
Gómez Urdáñiz, José Luis 2002 “Carvajal y Ensenada, un binomio político.” In Ministros de Fernando VI, edited by Barrado, José Miguel Delgado and Urdáñez, José Luis Gómez, pp. 65–92. Córdoba, Spain: Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Córdoba.Google Scholar
Kamen, Henry 2001 Philip V of Spain: The King Who Reigned Twice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Klaveren, Jacob van 1960 Europäische Wirtschaftsgeschichte Spaniens im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Kuethe, Alan J. 1999 “El fin del monopolio: Los Borbones y el consulado andaluz.” In Relaciones de poder y comercio colonial: Nuevas perspectivas, edited by Vilar, Enriqueta Vila and Kuethe, Alan J., pp. 35–66. Seville: Escuela de Estudios Hispano-Americanos.Google Scholar
Ladd, Doris M. 1976 The Mexican Nobility at Independence, 1780–1826. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, John 1989 Bourbon Spain, 1700–1808. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
MacLachlan, Colin M. 1988 Spain's Empire in the New World: The Role of Ideas in Institutional and Social Change. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Myerson, Roger B. 1977 “Graphs and Cooperation in Games.” Mathematics of Operation Research 2 (3): 225–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro García, Luis 1975 “Los oficios vendibles en Nueva España durante la Guerra de Sucesión.” Anuario de Estudios Americanos (Seville) 32:133–154.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F., and Ansell, Christopher K. 1993 “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici.” American Journal of Sociology 98:1259–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Mallaina Bueno, Pablo Emilio 1982 Política naval española en el Atlántico, 1700–1715. Seville: Escuela de Estudios Hispano-Americanos.Google Scholar
Phelan, John Leddy 1967 The Kingdom of Quito in the Seventeenth Century: Bureaucratic Politics in the Spanish Empire. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Pieper, Renate 2000 Die Vermittlung einer neuen Welt: Amerika im Nachrichtennetz des Habsburgischen Imperiums 1493–1598. Mainz: von Zabern.Google Scholar
Pietschmann, Horst 1991 “Consideraciones en torno al protoliberalismo, reformas borbónicas y revolución: La Nueva España en el último tercio del siglo XVIII.” Historia Mexicana 41 (2): 167–205.Google Scholar
Razo, Armando 2003 “Social Networks and Credible Commitments in Dictatorships: Political Organization and Economic Growth in Porfirian Mexico (1876–1911).” Ph.D. diss., Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Reinhard, Wolfgang 1979 Freunde und Kreaturen. “Verflechtung” als Konzept zur Erforschung historischer Führungsgruppen. Römische Oligarchic um 1600. Munich: Ernst Vögel.Google Scholar
Rosenmüller, Christoph 2008 Patrons, Partisans, and Palace Intrigues: The Court Society of Colonial Mexico, 1702–1710. Latin American and Caribbean Series No. 6. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapley, L. S. 1958 “A Value For n-Person Games.” Annals of Mathematical Studies 28:307–318.Google Scholar
Shubik, Martin 1983 Game Theory in the Social Sciences: Concepts and Solutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Téllez Alarcia, Diego 2001 “El caballero Don Ricardo Wall y la conspiración antiensenadista.” In Los ministros de Fernando VI, pp. 93–138. Córdoba, Spain: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Córdoba.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George 2002 Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutino, John Mark 1976 “Creole Mexico: Spanish Elites, Haciendas, and Indian Towns, 1750–1810.” Ph.D. diss., University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Valle Menéndez, Antonio del 1998 Juan Francisco de Güemes y Horcasitas. Primer Conde de Revillagigedo. Virrey de México. La historia de un soldado (1681–1766). In collaboration with Pilar Latasa Vasallo. Santander, Spain: Librería Estudios.Google Scholar
Weber, Max 1980 Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie, 5th rev. ed., edited by Winkelmann, Johannes. Tübingen, Germany: J. C. B. Mohr, Paul Siebek.Google Scholar
Weingrod, Alex 1968 “Patrons, Patronage and Political Parties.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 10 (4): 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar