Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:51:27.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plus ÇA Change …: The English Edition of Cardoso and Faletto'S Dependencia y Desarrollo en América Latina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2022

Robert A. Packenham
Robert A. Packenham*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The publication of the English edition of Cardoso and Faletto (1979) is a “happening,” an “event.” Consider the following:

Of all the approaches to development, particularly Latin American development, of the last fifteen years, none has had deeper or more pervasive influence, especially in the United States, than the dependency perspective.

Type
Symposium
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , 1982 , pp. 131 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this article was presented at the Stanford-Berkeley Colloquium on Latin American Studies, Stanford, California, 29 May 1980. It is a byproduct of a larger study of the nature, context, and consequences of the dependency perspective in general and Cardoso's work in particular. The larger study has been supported at various times by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, the National Fellows Program of the Hoover Institution, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and the Institute for the Study of World Politics. Responsibility for the views expressed here is entirely my own.

References

Caporaso, James A. “Dependence, Dependency, and Power in the Global System: A Structural and Behavioral Analysis.” International Organization 32, no. 1 (Winter 1978):13–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. Capitalismo e Escravidão no Brasil Meridional. São Paulo: Difusão Europeia do Livro, 1962.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. “‘Teoría de dependencia’ o análises concretas de situaciones de dependencia?” Revista Latino-Americana de Ciencia Politica 1, no. 3 (Dec. 1970):402–14.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. “‘Teoria da Dependência’ ou Análises Concretas de Situações de Dependência?” Estudos CEBRAP (São Paulo) 1 (1971a).Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. Política e Desenvolvimento em Sociedades Dependentes: Ideologias do Empresariado Industrial Argentino e Brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores, 1971b.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. “Notas sobre el estado actual de los estudios sobre dependencia.” Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, No. 4 (Dec. 1972):3–31.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. “Associated-Dependent Development.” In Authoritarian Brazil, edited by Alfred Stepan, pp. 142–76. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. “O Inimigo de Papel (The Paper Enemy).” Latin American Perspectives 1, no. 1 (Spring 1974):66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. “The Consumption of Dependency Theory in the United States.” LARR 12, no. 3 (1977):7–24.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. “The Originality of the Copy: The Economic Commission for Latin America and the Idea of Development.” in Toward a New Strategy for Development, A Rothko Chapel Colloquium, pp. 53–72, 312–16. New York: Pergamon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique and Faletto, Enzo. “Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina.” Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Serie Documentos Teóricos No. 1, March 1967. Mimeographed. 37 pp.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique and Faletto, Enzo. “Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina.” In Helio Jaguaribe et al., La dominación de América Latina, pp. 177–221. Lima: Francisco Moncloa, 1968.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique and Faletto, Enzo. Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina. México: Siglo XXI., 1969.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique and Faletto, Enzo. Dependência e Desenvolvimento na America Latina: Ensaio de Interpretação Sociológica. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores, 1970.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique and Faletto, Enzo. Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina, 14th printing, with new “Post Scriptum.” Mexico: Siglo XXI, 1978.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique and Faletto, Enzo. Dependency and Development in Latin America, English edition of Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina, with a new “Preface” and “Post Scriptum.” Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique and Ianni, Octavio. Cor e Mobilidade Social em Florianopolis. São Paulo: Editora Nacional, 1960.Google Scholar
Castaneda, Jorge G., and Hett, Enrique. El economismo dependentista. México: Siglo XXI, 1979.Google Scholar
Collier, David. “Industrialization and Authoritarianism in Latin America. Items (Social Science Research Council) 31/32, no. 4/1 (Mar. 1978):5–13.Google Scholar
Cueva, Augustin. “A Summary of ‘Problems and Perspectives of Dependency Theory.‘” Latin American Perspectives 3, no. 4 (Fall 1976):12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DomÍNguez, Jorge I. “Consensus and Divergence: The State of the Literature on Inter-American Relations in the 1970s.” LARR 13, no. 1 (1978a):87–126.Google Scholar
DomÍNguez, Jorge I. Cuba: Order and Revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978b.Google Scholar
Duvall, Raymond B. “Dependence and Dependencia Theory: Notes toward Precision of Concept and Argument.” International Organization 32, no. 1 (Winter 1978): 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishlow, Albert. “Flying Down to Rio: Perspectives on U.S.-Brazil Relations.” Foreign Affairs 57, no. 2 (Winter 1978/79):387–405.Google Scholar
Frank, AndrÉ Gunder. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil. New York and London: Monthly Review Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Frank, AndrÉ Gunder. “Dependence Is Dead, Long Live Dependence and the Class Struggle: A Reply to Critics.” Latin American Perspectives 1, no. 1 (Spring 1974):87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. “Beyond Asymmetry: Critical Notes on Myself as a Young Man and on Some Other Old Friends.” International Organization 32, no. 1 (Winter 1978):45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahl, Joseph A. Modernization, Exploitation, and Dependency in Latin America: Germani, Gonzalez Casanova, and Cardoso. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1976.Google Scholar
Leonard, H. Jeffrey. “Multinational Corporations and Politics in Developing Countries.” World Politics 32, no. 3 (Apr. 1980):454–83.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, Abraham. “The United States and Latin America: Ending the Hegemonic Presumption.” Foreign Affairs 55, no. 1 (Autumn 1976):199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenthal, Abraham, and Fishlow, Albert. Latin America's Emergence: Toward a U.S. Response. New York: Foreign Policy Association, Headline Series No. 243, 1979.Google Scholar
Martins, Carlos Estevam, ED. Estado e Capitalismo no Brasil. São Paulo: Hucitec-CEBRAP, 1977.Google Scholar
Packenham, Robert A. “Trends in Brazilian National Dependency since 1964.” In Brazil in the Seventies, edited by Riordan Roett, pp. 89–115. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1976.Google Scholar
Packenham, Robert A. “The New Utopianism: Political Development Ideas in the Dependency Literature.” Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Latin American Program Working Paper No. 19. Washington, D.C., 1978.Google Scholar
Palma, Gabriel. “Dependency: A Formal Theory of Underdevelopment or a Methodology for the Analysis of Concrete Situations of Underdevelopment.” World Development 6 (1978):881–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prowess, M. Cavalcade Frank, Tony; and O'FIELDS, HARRY [PSEUDONYMS FOR RICHARD MORSE]. “McLuhanaíma The Solid Gold Hero; or, O Heroi Com Bastante Caracter (Uma Fuga).” Almanaque, Cadernos de Literature e Ensaio, no. 3 (1977):63–74.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. “Paths to Political Development in Latin America.” In Changing Latin America: New Interpretations of its Politics and Society, edited by Douglas A. Chalmers, pp. 83–108. New York: Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science 30, no. 4 (1972).Google Scholar
Schwartzman, Simon. “As Eleições e o Problema Institucional (1): Estado e Sociedade no Brasil.” Dados 14 (1977):164–84.Google Scholar
Sigmund, Paul E. Multinationals in Latin America: The Politics of Nationalization. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J. Samuel, and Valenzuela, Arturo. “Modernization and Dependency: Alternative Perspectives on the Study of Latin American Underdevelopment.” Comparative Politics 10, no. 4 (July 1978):535–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar