Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:37:13.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partisan Cleavages, State Retrenchment, and Free Trade: Latin America in the 1990s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Beatriz Magaloni  and
Vidal Romero
Beatriz Magaloni
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Vidal Romero
Affiliation:
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article accounts for the role that partisan divisions played in shaping variation in mass preferences for market-oriented policies in Latin America during the 1990s. Most of the existing studies on attitudes toward market reforms have focused on issues such as the timing of reforms, the presence of economic crises, and how economic performance shaped citizens' preferences. Fewer studies have investigated whether partisan cleavages translated into divergent preferences toward market reforms. Were there systematic differences between left- and right-wing voters in their preferences toward market reforms? Did left-wing voters oppose these policies and right-wing voters favor them? Which of these structural transformations—state retrenchment or trade liberalization—witnessed greater mass polarization along partisan lines? This article answers these questions with the use of a mass survey on public opinion about market reforms conducted by Mori International in eleven Latin American countries in 1998.

Resumo

Resumo

Este trabajo estudia las divisiones partidistas entre el electorado con respecto a sus preferencias sobre las reformas de mercado que fueron implementadas en la década de los noventa. La mayoría de los estudios sobre opinión pública se han enfocado en cómo factores como crisis económicas, el momento de inicio de las reformas y el desempeño económico afectaron las preferencias de los ciudadanos. Pocos estudios han investigado la manera como los clivajes partidistas se tradujeron en diversas preferencias. ¿Existieron diferencias sistemáticas entre votantes de izquierda y derecha en sus preferencias sobre políticas de mercado? ¿Los votantes de izquierda rechazaron estas políticas y los de derecha las apoyaron? ¿Cuál de las transformaciones estructurales—liberalización del comercio o reducción del estado—crearon más división partidista entre el electorado? Este trabajo contesta estas preguntas mediante el análisis sistemático de una encuesta de opinión levantada por Mori Internacional en 1998.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , 2008 , pp. 107 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

*

Previous versions of this paper were presented at the Workshop on the Analysis of Political Cleavages and Party Competition, at Duke University in April 2004. We thank Frances Haggopian, Herbert Kitschelt, Kenneth Scheve, and other participants in the workshop for their useful comments; the Center for Latin American Studies, University of California, Berkeley (April 11, 2005); and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia (September 2, 2006). We thank Evelyne Huber for her insightful comments. We also thank Alberto Díaz-Cayeros and Federico Estévez for their comments, three anonymous reviewers for their suggestions, and César Olea for research assistance.

References

Achen, Christopher H. 1992 “Social Psychology, Demographic Variables, and Linear Regression: Breaking the Iron Triangle in Voting Research.” Political Behavior 14 (3): 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcántara, Manuel, and Freidenberg, Flavia, eds. 2003a Partidos políticos de América Latina: Centroamérica, México y República Dominicana. Mexico City: Instituto Federal Electoral and Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Alcántara, Manuel, and Freidenberg, Flavia, eds. 2003b Partidos políticos de América latina: Cono Sur. Mexico City: Instituto Federal Electoral and Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Alcántara, Manuel, and Freidenberg, Flavia, eds. 2003c Partidos políticos de América latina: Países andinos. Mexico City: Instituto Federal Electoral and Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., and Tverdova, Yuliya V. 2000 “Merging East and West: How East Europeans Form Opinions About Economic Integration into the European Union.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Baker, Andy 2003 “Why Is Trade Reform So Popular in Latin America? A Consumption-Based Theory of Trade Policy Preferences.” World Politics 55 (April): 423–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles 2000 “Partisan Governments, the International Economy, and Macroeconomic Policies in Advanced Nations, 1960–93.” World Politics 53 (October): 38–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, David 1978 “The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 72 (4): 1243–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins 1992 The Contradictory Alliance: State-Labor Relations and Regime Change in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981 Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J. 1998a “International Economics and Mass Politics: Market Liberalization and Public Support for European Integration.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 936–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J. 1998b “Public Opinion and European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories.” Journal of Politics 60 (2): 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J., Davis, Charles, and Coleman, Kenneth 1998 “Citizen Response to Regional Integration in the Americas: The Cases of Costa Rica and El Salvador.” Studies in Comparative International Development 33 (2): 88–109.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey 1995 “Capital Mobility, Trade, and the Domestic Politics of Economic Policy.” International Organization 49 (4): 657–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Carol, and Pettinato, Stefano 2003 “Hardship and Happiness: Social Mobility and Public Perceptions during Market Reforms.” In Post-Stabilization Politics in Latin America: Competition, Transition, Collapse, edited by Wise, Carol and Roett, Riordan, 56–87. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hiscox, Michael 2006 “Through a Glass and Darkly: Attitudes toward International Trade and the Curious Effects of Issue Framing.” International Organization 60 (3): 755–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D. 2001 Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Cusack, Thomas R. 2000 “The Causes of Welfare State Expansion.” World Politics 52 (April): 313–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Robert, and Zuckermann, Leo 1998 “Attitudes toward Economic Reform in Mexico: The Role of Political Orientations.” American Political Science Review 92 (2): 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, and Scheve, Kenneth 2001 “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review 95 (1): 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven 2003 Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loayza, Norman, Fajnzylber, Pablo, and Calderón, César 2005 Economic Growth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Stylized Facts, Explanations, and Forecasts. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lora, Eduardo, Panizza, Hugo, and Quispe-Agnoli, Myriam 2004 “Reform Fatigue: Symptoms, Reasons, Implications.” Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review 89 (2nd quarter): 1–28.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz 2006 Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamoon, Dawood 2007 “How May International Trade Affect Poverty in a Developing Country Setup? The Inequality Channel.” Working paper, Institute of Social Studies.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela 2003 The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayda, Anna, and Rodrik, Dani 2005 “Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist Than Others?” European Economic Review 49:1393–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, Victoria 2001 Labor Unions, Partisan Coalitions, and Market Reforms in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oatley, Thomas 1999 “How Constraining Is Capital Mobility? The Partisan Hypothesis in an Open Economy.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 1003–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panizza, Hugo, and Yáñez, Monica 2005 “Why Are Latin Americans So Unhappy about Reforms?” Journal of Applied Economics 7 (1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul 1996 “The New Politics of the Welfare State.” World Politics 48 (2): 143–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam 1991 Democracy and the Market. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam 1996 “Public Support for Economic Reforms in Poland.” Comparative Political Studies 29 (5): 520–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remmer, Karen 2003 “Elections and Economics in Contemporary Latin America.” In Post-Stabilization Politics in Latin America: Competition, Transition, Collapse, edited by Wise, Carol and Roett, Riordan, 31–55. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani 1998 “Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?” The Journal of Political Economy 106 (5): 997–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth Forthcoming Changing Course: Parties, Populism, and Political Representation in Latin America's Neoliberal Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald 1989 Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Romero, Vidal 2005 “Misaligned Interests and Commitment Problems: A Study of Presidents and Their Parties with Application to the Mexican Presidency and Privatization in Latin America.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Rosas, Guillermo 2005 “The Ideological Organization of Latin American Legislative Parties: An Empirical Analysis of Elite Policy Preferences.” Comparative Political Studies 38 (7): 824–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosas, Guillermo, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth 1999 “Ideological Dimensions and Left-Right Semantics in Latin American Legislatures.” Working paper, Duke University.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth F. 2000 “Comparative Context and Public Preferences over Regional Economic Integration.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew 2001 Free Trade and the Perceptions of American Workers. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell A. 1999 “Popular Support for Regional Economic Integration in Latin America.” Journal of Latin American Studies 31 (1): 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell A. 2007 “The Rise of Populism and the Left in Latin America.” Journal of Democracy 18 (3): 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirley, Mary, and Walsh, Patrick 2000 “Public versus Private Ownership: The Current State of Debate.” Working paper, Development Research Group, World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallings, Barbara, and Peres, Wilson 2000 Growth, Employment, and Equity: The Impact of the Economic Reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 1996 “Public Opinion and Market Reforms: The Limits of Economic Voting.” Comparative Political Studies 29 (5): 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2001a “Introduction: Public Opinion of Market Reforms: A Framework.” In Public Support for Market Reforms in New Democracies, edited by Stokes, Susan, 1–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2001b Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt 1998 “The Political Fate of Market Reforms in Latin America, Africa, and Eastern Europe.” International Studies Quarterly 42 (4): 645–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Adrian 1997 “Openness and Wage Inequality in Developing Countries: The Latin American Challenge to East Asian Conventional Wisdom.” The World Bank Economic Review 11 (1): 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zechmeister, Elizabeth 2002 “The Political Significance of ‘Left’ and ‘Right’ in Latin America.” Working paper, Duke University.Google Scholar