Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:18:14.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Latin American Silent Cinema: Triangulation and the Politics of Criollo Aesthetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Paul A. Schroeder Rodríguez
Paul A. Schroeder Rodríguez*
Affiliation:
University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Despite its important role in the construction of imagined communities throughout the region, the study of silent cinema in Latin America has barely gone beyond an initial stage of unearthing national and regional cinemas to a more comparative and critical study of trends and ideologies from a transnational perspective. This essay outlines such a comparative history by using the spatiotemporal metaphor of triangulation as a framework for theorizing the politics of criollo aesthetics, and by combining a diachronic examination of major trends with synchronic close readings of paradigmatic films. The periodization and selection of films respond, in turn, to a broader consideration of how ideology, aesthetics, and economics intersect in the evolution of filmic practices in Latin America during the silent era. Finally, in the conclusion, I argue that the most important legacy of this period of Latin American cinema on subsequent filmmaking in the region is not so much the elaboration of a criollo aesthetics, which would not survive beyond the silent period, but rather the development of the strategy of triangulation, whereby Latin American filmmakers navigated a global cinematic landscape from a position of marginality.

Resumo

Resumo

A pesar de la importancia que tuvo el cine mudo latinoamericano en la formación de comunidades imaginadas en el continente, el estudio de este cine se ha mantenido en una fase inicial de desenterrar y analizar cines nacionales y regionales. Este ensayo pretende dar el próximo paso en la historiografía del cine mudo latinoamericano, con un estudio comparado y crítico que usa la metáfora espacio-temporal de la triangulación como punto de partida para teorizar la política de la estética criolla que caracteriza este cine. El ensayo combina un estudio diacrónico de las principales tendencias con lecturas sincrónicas de películas paradigmáticas. La periodización y la selección de las películas responden, a la vez, a una consideración más amplia de la relación entre ideología, estética y economía en la evolución de las prácticas fílmicas en América Latina durante el periodo mudo. Por último, concluye con una discusión de cómo el principal legado de este cine en la subsiguiente producción de cine latinoamericano no es tanto la elaboración de una estética criolla, pues ésta no sobrevivirá más allá del periodo mudo, sino más bien el desarrollo de la estrategia de triangulación, a través de la cual los directores y productores de cine aprendieron a navegar un terreno cinematográfico global desde una posición de marginalidad.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , 2008 , pp. 33 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by the University of Texas Press

References

Arrom, Juan José 1951 “Criollo: Definición y matices de un concepto.” Hispania 34 (2): 172–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, Timothy 1996 “Nobleza gaucha.” In South American Cinema: A Critical Filmography, 1915–1994, edited by Barnard, Timothy and Rist, Peter, 3–4. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Consuelo, Jorge Miguel 1969/2001 José Agustín Ferreyra, un cine por instinto. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Altamira.Google Scholar
Eckkrammer, Eva Martha 2003 “On the Perception of ‘Creole’ Language and Identity in the Netherlands Antilles.” In A Pepper-Pot of Cultures: Aspects of Creolization in the Caribbean, edited by Collier, Gordon and Fleischman, Ulrich, 85–108. New York: Editions Rodopi.Google Scholar
Fundación del Cine Latinoamericano 1992 Cine latinoamericano: 1896–1930. Caracas: CONAC, FONCINE, Fundacine-UC.Google Scholar
Gumicio-Dagrón, Alfonso 1996 “Warawara.” In South American Cinema: A Critical Filmography, 1915–1994, edited by Barnard, Timothy and Rist, Peter, 85–87. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
López, Ana M. 1993 “Tears and Desire: Women and Melodrama in the ‘Old’ Mexican Cinema.” In Mediating Two Worlds: Cinematic Encounters in the Americas, edited by King, John, López, Ana M., and Alvarado, Manuel, 147–163. London: BFI Publishing.Google Scholar
López, Ana M. 2000 “Early Cinema and Modernity in Latin America.” Cinema Journal 40 (1): 48–78.Google Scholar
Malmié, Stephan 2006 “Creolization and Its Discontents.” Annual Review of Anthropology 35:433–456.Google Scholar
Paranaguá, Paulo Antonio 1981 “Brésil.” In Les cinémas de VAmérique latine, edited by Hennebelle, Guy and Gumicio-Dagrón, Alfonso, 93–189. Paris: Nouvelles Éditions Pierre Lherminier.Google Scholar
Paranaguá, Paulo Antonio 1984 Cinema na America Latina: Longe de Deus e perto de Hollywood. São Paulo: L&PM.Google Scholar
Paranaguá, Paulo Antonio 2003 Tradición y modernidad en el cine de América Latina. Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Económica de España.Google Scholar
Pearson, Roberta 1996 “Transitional Cinema.” In The Oxford History of World Cinema, edited by Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey, 13–42. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramirez Berg, Charles 2000 “El automóvil gris and Mexican Classicism.” In Visible Nations: Latin American Cinema and Video, edited by Noriega, Chon A., 3–32. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Reyes, Aurelio de los, ed. 1996 A cien años del cine en México. Mexico City: IMCINE.Google Scholar
Salles Gomes, Paulo Emilio 1974 Humberto Mauro, Cataguases, Cinearte. São Paulo: Editora Perspectiva.Google Scholar
Schnitman, Jorge A. 1984 Film Industries in Latin America: Dependency and Development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Schvarzman, Sheila 2003 Humberto Mauro e as imagens do Brasil. São Paulo: Fundação Editora da UNESP.Google Scholar
Sommer, Doris 1991 Foundational Fictions. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stam, Robert 1993 “Cross-cultural Dialogisms: Race and Multiculturalism in Brazilian Cinema.” In Mediating Two Worlds: Cinematic Encounters in the Americas, edited by King, John, López, Ana M., and Alvarado, Manuel, 175–191. London: BFI Publishing.Google Scholar
Stam, Robert 1998 “Hybridity and the Aesthetics of Garbage: The Case of Brazilian Cinema.” EIAL: Estudios Interdisciplinarios de América Latina y el Caribe 9 (1) (accessed September 28, 2007, at http://wwwl.tau.ac.il/eial.old/IX_l/stam.html).Google Scholar
Thompson, Kristin 1985 “From Primitive to Classical.” In The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960, edited by Bordwell, David, Staiger, Janet, and Thompson, Kristin, 157–173. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Woll, Allen L. 1980 The Latin Image in American Film. Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American Center Publications.Google Scholar