Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:58:32.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Idealism, Impatience, and Pessimism: Recent Studies of Democratization in Latin America

Review products

ORDINARY PEOPLE IN EXTRAORDINARY TIMES: THE CITIZENRY AND THE BREAKDOWN OF DEMOCRACY. By BermeoNancy. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003. Pp. 288. $19.95 paper.)
FUJIMORI'S COUP AND THE BREAKDOWN OF DEMOCRACY IN LATIN AMERICA. By KenneyCharles D. (Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 2004. Pp. 379. $30.00 paper.)
DEMOCRACY IN LATIN AMERICA. By PhilipGeorge. (Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2003. $62.95 cloth, $27.95 paper.)

Show more reviewed productsShow more reviewed products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2022

Leslie E. Anderson
Leslie E. Anderson*
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essays
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , 2005 , pp. 390 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by the University of Texas Press

References

Anderson, Leslie E., and Dodd, Lawrence C. 2005 Learning Democracy: Citizen Engagement and Electoral Choice in Nicaragua, 1990–2001. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1956 A Preface To Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971 Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2002 Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. 3rd ed. New York: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C. 1976 Coalitions in Parliamentary Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrmann, Henry W. 1983 Politics in France. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981 Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1996 Divided Government, 2nd ed. Needham Hights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy 2004 Culture War?: The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Genovese, Michael 2001 The Power of the American Presidency, 1789–2000. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968 Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1955 “A Theory of Critical Elections.” The Journal of Politics 17: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1966 The Responsible Electorate. New York: Vintage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1984 Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press. Originally published in 1949 by Alfred A. Knoph.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E., and Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 1999 Sizing Up the Senate. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1994 “Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?” in The Failure of Presidential Democracy, Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela, eds. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin 1959 “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53: 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin 1960 Political Man: The Social Bases of Politic. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. Expanded edition; Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin 1963 The First New Nation: The United States in Historical and Comparative Perspective. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mayhow, David R. 1996 Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking and Investigations, 1946–1990. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Hans 1996 The Rise and Fall of Weimar Democracy. Translated by Forster, Elborg and Larry Eugene Jones. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1968 “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives,” American Political Science Review 62:144–68 Sartori, GiovanniCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1976 Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1972 Comparative Political Corruption. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard, and Tetlock, Philip E. 1991 Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, Elaine K. 1996 The Making of an American Senate: Reconstitutive Change in Congress, 1787–1841. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen, and Steinmo, Sven 1992 “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics,” in Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism Comparative Analysis, Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen, and F. Longstreth, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Alan 1998 One Nation, After All: What Middle-class Americans Really Think About God, Country, Family, Racism, Welfare, Immigration, Homosexuality, Work, The Right, The Left, And Each Other. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Young, James Sterling 1966 The Washington Community, 1800–1826. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar