Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:29:03.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gender and Attitudes Toward Justice System Bias in Central America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Lee Demetrius Walker*
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

What interests of Latin American women create distinctive attitudes toward justice system equality that differ from those of Latin American men? Building on recent work on general justice system bias and using 2003 Latinobarómetro data, I test this question in three Central American countries (Costa Rica, El Salvador, and Nicaragua) using two sets of attitudes toward justice system performance (equal punishment and equal treatment). Women are significantly more likely to believe that the criminal justice system provides unequal treatment before the law than are men, while women and men express the same level of belief that the justice system provides equal punishment. Evidence indicates that women connect unequal treatment to economic factors and follow a conflict model of criminal justice, which posits these attitudinal differences as a function of the group's subordinate position in society.

Resumo

Resumo

¿Cuáles intereses de las mujeres latinoamericanas crean actitudes particulares respecto a la igualdad en el sistema de justicia diferentes de aquellas de los hombres? Con base en trabajos recientes sobre los bieses generales de los sistemas de justicia y utilizando datos de Latinobarómetro de 2003, el artículo enfrenta esta pregunta en tres países centroamericanos (Costa Rica, El Salvador y Nicaragua) usando dos tipos de actitudes hacia el desempeño de sistemas de justicia (igualdad de castigos e igualdad en el trato). Las mujeres son significativamente más propensas que los hombres a creer que el sistema de justicia ofrece tratamiento desigual ante la ley, mientras que mujeres y hombres expresan el mismo nivel de creencia en que la justicia proporciona igualdad en el castigo. La evidencia indica que las mujeres conectan el tratamiento desigual con factores económicos y siguen un modelo de conflicto sobre la justicia criminal, que parte del supuesto de que estas diferencias de actitud son una función de la posición subordinada del grupo.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

*

This article was written with support from University of Kentucky, University of South Carolina, and a resident fellowship at the Institute for Quantitative Social Science at Harvard University. I also wish to thank Leslie Anderson, Jeff Gill, Philip J. Williams, Richard Waterman, Gary King, James L. Gibson, Andrew Martin, Christopher Zorn, the political science departments of the University of Kentucky and University of South Carolina, and LAR's anonymous reviews.

References

Atkeson, Lonna Rae 2003Not All Cues Are Created Equal: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 10401061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthauer, L. M., and Leventhal, J. M. 1999Prevalence and Effects of Child Sexual Abuse in a Poor, Rural Community in El Salvador: A Retrospective Study of Women after 12 Years of Civil War.” Child-Abuse and Neglect 23:11171126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benesh, Sara C. 2006Understanding Public Confidence in American Courts.” Journal of Politics 68 (3): 697707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, Thomas J. 1981The Distinction between Conflict and Radical Criminology.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 72 (1): 1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blandón, María Teresa 2001The Coalición Nacional de Mujeres: An Alliance of Left-Wing Women, Right-Wing Women, and Radical Feminists in Nicaragua.” In Radical Women in Latin America: Left and Right, edited by González, Victoria and Kampwirth, Karen, 111132. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Bonger, Willem 1916 Criminality and Economic Conditions. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Booth, John A. 1998 Costa Rica: Quest for Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, R. W., and Burnham, Helen 1999 United Nations World Surveys on Crime Trends and Criminal Justice Systems, 1970–1994: Restructured Five-Wave Data. Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Call, Charles T. 2003Democratisation, War and State-Building: Constructing the Rule of Law in El Salvador.” Journal of Latin American Studies 35:827862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canache, Damarys, Mondak, Jeffery J., and Seligson, Mitchell A. 2001Meaning and Measurement in Cross-national Research on Satisfaction with Democracy.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65:506528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casper, J. D. 1978Having Their Day in Court: Defendant Evaluations of the Fairness of Their Treatment.” Law and Society Review 12:237251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinchilla, Laura 2003Experiences with Citizen Participation in Crime Prevention in Central America.” In Crime and Violence in Latin America: Citizen Security, Democracy, and the State, edited by Frühling, Hugo, Tulchin, Joseph S., and Golding, Heather A., 205232. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cupples, Julie 2005Love and Money in an Age of Neoliberalism: Gender, Work, and Single Motherhood in Postrevolutionary Nicaragua.” Environment and Planning 37:305322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Charles L., Camp, Roderic Ai, and Coleman, Kenneth M. 2004The Influence of Party Systems on Citizens' Perceptions of Corruption and Electoral Response in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 37:677703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Olmo, Rosa 1990The Economic Crisis and the Criminalization of Latin-American Women.” Social Justice 17:4053.Google Scholar
Dietz, Henry 1998 Urban Poverty, Political Participation and the State: Lima 1970–1990. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downe, P. J. 1999Laughing When It Hurts: Humor and Violence in the Lives of Costa Rican Prostitutes.” Women's Studies International Forum 22:6378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellsberg, Mary, Peña, Rodolfo, Herrea, Andrés, Lijestrand, Jerker, and Winkvist, Anna 2000Candies in Hell: Women's Experiences of Violence in Nicaragua.” Social Science and Medicine 51:15951610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foglesong, Todd S., and Soloman, H. Jr. 2001 Crime, Criminal Justice, and Criminolog in Post-Soviet Ukraine. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Fossati, Thomas E., and Meeker, James W. 1997Evaluations of Institutional Legitimacy and Court System Fairness: A Study of Gender Differences.” Journal of Criminal Justice 25 (2): 141154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1977 Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan 2003State Feminism and Women's Movements: The Impact of Chile's Servicio Nacional de la Mujer on Women's Activism.” Latin American Research Review 38 (1): 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, Venessa, and Liqun, Cao 2005Race and Satisfaction with the Police in a Small Town.” Journal of Criminal Justice 33:191199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert 1977Introduction to the Comparative Study of Urban Public Order.” In The Politics of Crime and Conflict: A Comparative History of Four Cities, edited by Gurr, Ted, Grabosky, Peter, and Hula, Richard, 334. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Guy, Donna J. 1998The Politics of Pan-American Cooperation; Materialist Feminism and the Child Rights Movement, 1913–1960.” Gender History 10:449469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaquette, Jane 1986Jails and Justice in Nicaragua.” Envío 64 (5): 2335.Google Scholar
Jaquette, Jane 1994 The Women's Movement in Latin America: Participation and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, L. A. 1990The Anti-Politics of Identity.” Socialist Review 20:6780.Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A. 1999Survey Research.” Annual Review of Psychology 50:537567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luciano, Dinys, Esim, Simel, and Duvvury, Nata 2005How to Make the Law Work? Budgetary Implications of Domestic Violence Laws in Latin America, Central America, and the Caribbean.” Journal of Women Politics & Policy 27:123133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MaClure, Richard, and Sotelo, Melvin 2003Children's Rights as Residual Social Policy in Nicaragua: State Priorities and the Code of Childhood and Adolescence.” Third World Quarterly 24 (4): 681703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, William, and Rose, Richard 1994Support for Parliaments and Regimes in the Transition toward Democracy in Eastern Europe.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19:532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molyneux, Maxine 1985Mobilization without Emancipation? Women's Interests, the State, and Revolution in Nicaragua.” Feminist Studies 11:227254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery, and Anderson, Mary 2004The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political Knowledge.” Journal of Politics 66:492512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montoya, Rosario 2003House, Street, Collective: Revolutionary Geographies and Gender Transformation in Nicaragua, 1979–99.” Latin American Research Review 38:6193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murguialday, Clara 1990 Nicaragua, revolución y feminismo, 1977–1989. Madrid: Editorial Revolución. Noonan, Rita K.Google Scholar
Murguialday, Clara 2002Gender and the Politics of Needs: Broadening the Scope of Welfare State Provision in Costa Rica.” Gender and Society 16 (2): 216239.Google Scholar
Núñez de Escorcia, Vilma 1985Justice and the Control of Crime in the Sandinista Popular Revolution.” Crime and Social Justice 23:528.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo 1999Polyarchies and the (Un)Rule of Law in Latin America: A Partial Conclusion.” In The (Un)Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America, edited by Mendez, Juan E., O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Pinheiro, Paulo Sergio. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Pérez, Orlando J. 2003–2004Democratic Legitimacy and Public Insecurity: Crime and Democracy in El Salvador and Guatemala.” Political Science Quarterly 118 (4): 627644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prillaman, William C. 2000 The Judiciary and Democratic Decay in Latin America: Declining Confidence in the Rule of Law. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, S. A. 1999Latina Labour: Restructuring of Work and Renegotiations of Gender Relations in Contemporary Latin America.” Environment and Planning A 31:196208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richman, Kimberly D. 2002Women, Poverty, and Domestic Violence: Perceptions of Court and Legal Aid Effectiveness.” Sociological Inquiry 72 (2): 318344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Julian V., and Stalans, Loretta J. 1997 Public Opinion, Crime, and Criminal Justice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon 1995 “The Role of Gender in Descriptive Representation. Political Research Quarterly 48 (4): 599611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Stephens, Evelyne Huber, and Stephens, John D. 1992 Capitalist Development & Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sagot, Montserrat 2005The Critical Path of Women Affected by Violence in Latin America.” Violence against Women 11:12921318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanbonmatsu, Kira 2003Gender-Related Political Knowledge and the Descriptive Representation of Women.” Political Behavior 25 (4): 367388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santacruz-Giralt, Maria L., and Concha-Eastman, Alberto 2001 Barrios adentro: La solidaridad violenta de las pandillas. San Salvador: Salvador Press.Google Scholar
Stalans, Loretta J., and Lurigio, Arthur J. 1996Editors' Introduction: Public Opinion about the Creation, Enforcement, and Punishment of Criminal Offenses.” American Behavioral Scientist 39 (4): 369378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990 Why People Follow the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., and Rasinski, Kenneth 1991Legitimacy and Acceptance of Unpopular Supreme Court Decisions: A Question of Causality.” Law & Society Review 25:621630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Development Programme 2004 Human Development Report: Cultural Liberty in Today's Diverse World. New York: United Nations Human Development Programme. (Available at http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr/2004.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Burns, Nancy, and Schlozman, Kay Lehman 1997Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 59 (4): 10511072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villanueva, Zarela 1999Legislative and Judicial Reforms Regarding Domestic Violence: Costa Rica.” In Too Close to Home: Domestic Violence in the Americas, edited by Morrison, Andrew R. and Biehl, María Loreto, 153157. Baltimore: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Waylen, Georgina 1994Women and Democratization: Conceptualizing Gender Relations in Transition Politics.” World Politics 46 (3): 327354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Philip J. 1994Dual Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Popular and Electoral Democracy in Nicaragua.” Comparative Politics 26 (2): 169185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Richard J. 1991Criminal Justice in Revolutionary Nicaragua: Intimations of the Adversarial in Socialist and Civil Law Traditions.” University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 23 (2): 269389.Google Scholar