Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:22:59.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethnicity and Economy in Rural Mexico: A Critique of the Indigenista Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2022

Scott Cook  and
Jong-Taick Joo
Scott Cook
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Jong-Taick Joo
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The ethnic question has been central to the historical process of nation-state building or “nationalization” in Mexico (Adams 1967). To a significant degree, this process has been a criollo and a mestizo project (Aguirre Beltrán 1976; compare Anderson 1983, 1988). Accordingly, indígena identity has been imposed on the non-criollo and non-mestizo population by the Mexican state, with the identification process historically displaying arbitrariness and inconsistency across a range of biological identifiers (especially phenotype) or cultural identifiers (especially language) or both (Marino Flores 1967). Following colonial precedents and in step with the evolving structure of political economy and society, the process of ethnic identification in postcolonial Mexico associated Hispanicity (via white skin color or Spanish descent or Spanish language) with the more valued locations higher in the ethno-class hierarchy and indígena identity with the lower, less-valued locations. In postrevolutionary Mexico, thanks to the contribution of anthropologist Manuel Gamio, the concept of mestizaje was stripped of biological content and culturized.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , 1995 , pp. 33 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

∗

This article has undergone several revisions, thanks to a battery of anonymous reviewers. We are especially grateful for the many thoughtful and constructive reviewer comments and suggestions that led to the present version and hope that we have done justice to them

References

ADAMS, RICHARD N. 1967 “Nationalization.” In M. NASH 1967, 469–89.Google Scholar
ADAMS, RICHARD N. 1990 “Ethnic Images and Strategies in 1944.” In Guatemalan Indians and the State, 1540 to 1988, edited by Smith, Carol, 141–62. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
AGUIRRE BELTRAN, GONZALO 1970 “Los símbolos étnicos de la identidad nacional.” Anuario Indigenista, no. 30 (Dec.):101–40.Google Scholar
AGUIRRE BELTRAN, GONZALO 1976 Obra polémica. Mexico City: Secretaría de Educación Pública and Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
ALBRITTON, ROBERT 1993 “Marxian Political Economy for an Age of Postmodern Excess.” Rethinking Marxism 6, no. 1:24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANDERSON, BENEDICT 1983 Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
ANDERSON, BENEDICT 1988 “Afterword.” In GUIDIERI, PELLIZZI, AND TAMBIAH 1988, 402–6.Google Scholar
ARIZPE, LOURDES 1989 Cultura y desarrollo: una etnografía de las creencias de una comunidad mexicana. Mexico City: Colegio de México.Google Scholar
AYRE, LINDA, AND VARESE, STEFANO 1978 La población zapoteca en el estado de Oaxaca según el censo de 1970: análisis preliminar. Estudios de Antropología e Historia no. 10. Oaxaca: Centro Regional del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
BARABAS, ALICIA, AND BARTOLOME, MIGUEL 1986 Etnicidad y pluralismo cultural: la dinámica en Oaxaca. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
BARRY, TOM, ED. 1992 Mexico: A Country Guide. Albuquerque, N.M.: Inter-Hemispheric Education Resource Center.Google Scholar
BARTH, FREDRIK, ED. 1969 Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Cultural Difference. Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
BARTOLOME, MIGUEL, AND BARABAS, ALICIA 1986 “La pluralidad desigual en Oaxaca.” In BARABAS AND BARTOLOME 1986, 15–95.Google Scholar
BARTRA, ROGER 1987 La jaula de la melancolía. Mexico City: Grijalbo.Google Scholar
BINFORD, LEIGH, AND CAMPBELL, HOWARD 1993 “Introduction.” In Zapotec Struggles: Histories, Politics, and Representations from Juchitán, Oaxaca, edited by Campbell, Howard, Binford, Leigh, Bartolomé, Miguel, and Barabas, Alicia, 1–21. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
BONFIL BATALLA, GUILLERMO 1981 “Utopía y revolución: el pensamiento político contemporáneo de los indios en América Latina.” In Utopía y revolución, edited by Batalla, Guillermo Bonfil. Mexico City: Nueva Imagen.Google Scholar
CAMPBELL, HOWARD 1990 “Juchitán: The Politics and Cultural Revivalism in an Isthmus Zapotec Community.” Latin American Anthropology Review 2, no. 2:47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CARRASCO, PEDRO 1951 “Las culturas indígenas de Oaxaca, Mexico.” América Indígena 11:99–114.Google Scholar
CASO, ALFONSO 1948 “Definición del indio y lo indio.” América Indígena 8:239–47.Google Scholar
CASO, ALFONSO, ET AL. 1954 Métodos y resultados de la política indigenista en México. Vol. 4 of Memorias del Instituto Nacional Indigenista. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional Indigenista.Google Scholar
CHANCE, JOHN 1986 “La dinámica étnica en Oaxaca colonial.” In BARABAS AND BARTOLOME 1986, 143–72.Google Scholar
COOK, SCOTT 1974 “Economic Anthropology: Problems in Theory, Method, and Analysis.” In Handbook of Social and Cultural Anthropology, edited by Honigmann, John J., 795–860. Chicago, Ill.: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
COOK, SCOTT 1981 “Crafts, Capitalist Development, and Cultural Property in Oaxaca, Mexico.” Inter-American Economic Affairs 35, no. 3:53–68.Google Scholar
COOK, SCOTT 1982 Zapotec Stoneworkers: The Dynamics of Rural Simple Commodity Production in Modern Mexican Capitalism. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
COOK, SCOTT 1983 “Mestizo Palm Weavers among the Zapotec: A Critical Re-Examination of the ‘Albarradas’ Enigma.” Notas Mesoamericanas no. 9 (Fall):39–46 (published by the Universidad de las Américas in Puebla).Google Scholar
COOK, SCOTT 1984 “Peasant Economy, Rural Industry, and Capitalist Development in the Oaxaca Valley, Mexico.” Journal of Peasant Studies 12, no. 1:3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COOK, SCOTT 1993 “Toward a New Paradigm for Anthropology in Mexican Studies.” Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 9, no. 2:303–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COOK, SCOTT, AND BINFORD, LEIGH 1990 Obliging Need: Rural Petty Industry in Mexican Capitalism. Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COOK, SCOTT, AND DISKIN, MARTIN, EDS. 1975 Markets in Oaxaca. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
DE LA CRUZ, VICTOR 1986 “Reflexiones acerca de los movimientos etnopolíticos contemporáneos en Oaxaca.” In BARABAS AND BARTOLOME 1986, 423–46.Google Scholar
DE LA FUENTE, JULIO 1967 “Ethnic Relationships.” In M. NASH 1967, 432–48.Google Scholar
DE LA GARZA, RODOLFO, ET AL. n.d. “Will the Real American Please Stand Up: A Comparison of Political Values among Mexicans, Cubans, Puerto Ricans, and Anglos in the United States.” Manuscript.Google Scholar
DIAZ-POLANCO, HECTOR 1987 Etnia, nación y política. Mexico City: Juan Pablos.Google Scholar
DISKIN, MARTIN 1986 “La economía de la comunidad étnica en Oaxaca.” In BARABAS AND BARTOLOME, 257–98.Google Scholar
EBER, CHRISTINE, AND ROSENBAUM, BRENDA 1993 “That We May Serve Beneath Your Hands and Feet: Women Weavers in Highland Chiapas, Mexico.” In J. NASH, ED., 1992, 155–80.Google Scholar
FOWERAKER, JOE, AND CRAIG, ANN L., EDS. 1990 Popular Movements and Political Change in Mexico. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
FRIEDLANDER, JUDITH 1975 Being Indian in Hueyapan: A Study of Forced Identity in Contemporary Mexico. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, JONATHAN 1993 “Order and Disorder in Global Systems: A Sketch.” Social Research 60, no. 2:205–34.Google Scholar
GEERTZ, CLIFFORD 1973 The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
GRAHAM, RICHARD, ED. 1990 The Idea of Race in Latin America, 1870–1940. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
GRINSPUN, RICARDO, AND CAMERON, MAXWELL A. 1993 “The Political Economy of North American Integration: Diverse Perspectives, Converging Criticisms.” In The Political Economy of North American Free Trade, edited by Grinspun, Ricardo and Cameron, Maxwell A., 3–26. New York: St. Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GUIDIERI, REMO, PELLIZZI, FRANCESCO, AND TAMBIAH, STANLEY J., EDS. 1988 Ethnicities and Nations: Processes of Interethnic Relations in Latin America, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific. Austin: University of Texas Press (for the Rothko Chapel).Google Scholar
HARRIS, MARVIN 1980 Cultural Materialism: The Struggle for a Science of Culture. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
HARVEY, DAVID 1989 The Condition of Postmodernity. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
HERNANDEZ DIAZ, JORGE 1991 “Ethnic and Class Relations in Oaxaca, Mexico.” Ph.D. diss., University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
HERNANDEZ DIAZ, JORGE 1992 Los chatinos, etnicidad y organización social. Colección “Del Nuestro Barro,” no. 2. Oaxaca: Instituto de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Universidad Autónoma “Benito Juárez” de Oaxaca: Instituto de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Universidad Autónoma “Benito Juárez” de Oaxaca.Google Scholar
KAPLAN, FLORA S. 1993 “Mexican Museums in the Creation of a National Image in World Tourism.” In J. NASH, ED., 1993, 103–25.Google Scholar
KNIGHT, ALAN 1990 “Racism, Revolution, and Indigenismo: Mexico, 1910–1940.” In GRAHAM 1990, 71–113.Google Scholar
LEON-PORTILLA, MIGUEL 1979 “Etnias indígenas y cultura nacional mestiza.” América Indígena 39, no. 3:601–21.Google Scholar
LEWIS, OSCAR 1960 Tepoztlán, Village in Mexico. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
LEWIS, OSCAR 1963 Life in a Mexican Village: Tepoztlán Restudied. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
LEWIS, OSCAR 1970 Anthropological Essays. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
LITTLE, DANIEL K. 1993 “Evidence and Objectivity in the Social Sciences.” Social Research 60, no. 2:363–96.Google Scholar
LOMNITZ-ADLER, CLAUDIO 1979 “Clase y etnicidad en Morelos: una nueva interpretación.” América Indígena 39, no. 3:439–75.Google Scholar
LOMNITZ-ADLER, CLAUDIO 1992 Exits from the Labyrinth: Culture and Ideology in the Mexican National Space. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARGOLIES, BARBARA L. 1975 Princes of the Earth: Subcultural Diversity in a Mexican Municipality. AAA Special Publication no. 2. Washington, D.C.: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
MARINO FLORES, ANSELMO 1967 “Indian Population and Its Identification.” In M. NASH 1967, 12–25.Google Scholar
MURPHY, ARTHUR D., AND STEPICK, ALEX 1991 Social Inequality in Oaxaca: A History of Resistance and Change. Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
NAGENGAST, CAROLE, AND KEARNEY, MICHAEL 1990 “Mixtec Ethnicity: Social Identity, Political Consciousness, and Political Activism.” LARR 25, no. 2:61–91.Google Scholar
NASH, JUNE 1993a “Introduction: Traditional Arts and Changing Markets in Middle America.” In J. NASH, ED., 1993, 1–22.Google Scholar
NASH, JUNE 1993b “Maya Household Production in the World Market: The Potters of Amatenango del Valle, Chiapas, Mexico.” In J. NASH, ED., 1993, 127–54.Google Scholar
NASH, JUNE, ED. 1993 Crafts in the World Market: The Impact of Global Exchange on Middle American Artisans. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
NASH, MANNING, ED. 1967 Social Anthropology. Vol. 6 of Handbook of Middle American Indians, general editor, Robert Wauchope. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
NOLASCO ARMAS, MARGARITA 1972 Oaxaca indígena. Serie Investigaciones no. 1. Oaxaca: Instituto de Investigación e Integración Social del Estado de Oaxaca.Google Scholar
NOVELO, VICTORIA 1976 Artesanías y capitalismo en México. Mexico City: Secretaría de Educación Pública and Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
NUTINI, HUGO G. 1976 “Introduction.” In Essays on Mexican Kinship, edited by Nutini, Hugo G., Carrasco, Pedro, and Taggart, James, 3–28. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
RIDING, ALAN 1984 Distant Neighbors: A Portrait of the Mexicans. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
ROYCE, ANYA PETERSON 1993 “Music, Dance, and Fiesta: Definitions of Isthmus Zapotec Community.” Latin American Anthropology Review 3, no. 2:51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHRYER, FRANZ J. 1990 Ethnicity and Class Conflict in Rural Mexico. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCOTT, GEORGE M. JR. 1990 “A Resynthesis of the Primordial and Circumstantial Approaches to Ethnic Group Solidarity: Towards an Explanatory Model.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 13, no. 2:147–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SMITH, ANTHONY D. 1981 The Ethnic Revival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
STEPHEN, LYNN 1991 Zapotec Women. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
STEPHEN, LYNN 1993 “Weaving in the Fast Lane: Class, Ethnicity, and Gender in Zapotee Craft Commercialization.” In J. NASH, ED., 1993, 25–58.Google Scholar
STOLCKE, VERENA 1991 “Conquered Women.” NACLA Report on the Americas 24, no. 5:23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VARESE, STEPHAN 1988 “Multiethnicity and Hegemonic Construction: Indian Plans and the Future.” In GUIDIERI, PELLIZZI, AND TAMBIAH 1988, 57–77.Google Scholar
WAGLEY, CHARLES, AND HARRIS, MARVIN 1974 “A Typology of Latin American Subcultures.” In Contemporary Cultures and Societies of Latin America, 2d ed., edited by Heath, Dwight, 35–58. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
WHITECOTTON, JOSEPH 1977 The Zapotees: Princes, Priests, and Peasants. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
WOLF, ERIC 1956 “Aspects of Group Relations in a Complex Society: Mexico.” American Anthropologist 58:1056–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WOLF, ERIC 1958 “The Virgin of Guadalupe: A Mexican National Symbol.” Journal of American Folklore 71, no. 279:34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WORSLEY, PETER 1984 The Three Worlds: Culture and World Development. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar