Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:25:44.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ELITE POLARIZATION AND THE ELECTORAL IMPACT OF LEFT-RIGHT PLACEMENTS: Evidence from Latin America, 1995-2009

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Matthew Singer
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

While political polarization may lead to gridlock and other negative policy outcomes, representation is likely to be enhanced when parties differentiate themselves from each other and make it easier for voters to see the connection between their personal ideologies and the electoral offerings. These differences between parties may be especially important in developing democracies, where voters are still learning parties' priorities and where parties do not always emphasize issues when campaigning. To test this proposition, I develop a measure of elite polarization in Latin America since the early 1990s based on legislative surveys. Individual-level voting patterns from mass survey data confirm that the connection between voters' self-placement on the left-right scale and their electoral choice is stronger in polarized party systems, even when controlling for other party system factors like the age of the party system or electoral fragmentation. This effect on voting behavior is not immediate, however, as voters take time to recognize the new cues being provided by the changing party system.

Resumen

RESUMEN

Mientras que la polarización política puede conducir a parálisis en el Congreso y otros resultados negativos, muestro que la representación política tiene mayores probabilidades de mejorar cuando los partidos se diferencian unos de otros. Esta diferenciación facilita que los votantes vean las conexiones entre sus ideologías políticas personales y la oferta electoral disponible. Las diferencias entre partidos pueden ser especialmente importantes en las democracias en desarrollo, donde los votantes todavía están aprendiendo sobre las prioridades de los partidos e identificando cuando estos no enfatizan cuestiones programáticas al hacer campaña. Para probar esta proposición, este trabajo desarrolla una medida de polarización en América Latina desde la década de 1990 basada en encuestas legislativas. Encuestas de opinión púbica confirman que la conexión entre la auto identificación personal del votante en un espectro ideológico de derecha a izquierda y su voto son más fuertes cuando se experimenta una polarización en el sistema de partidos políticos. Esto sucede aun controlando por otros factores como la edad del sistema de partidos o la fragmentación electoral. Pero este efecto sobre el comportamiento electoral no es inmediato, pues los votantes se llevan un tiempo en reconocer los atajos de información que el sistema de partidos en constante proceso de cambio les proporciona.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , 2016 , pp. 174 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

I thank Ryan Carlin, Russell Dalton, and Elizabeth Zechmeister for their comments on previous drafts of the article, and the collectors of the elite surveys used here for making their data available. All interpretations of that data and errors are my responsibility.

References

REFERENCES

Adams, James, Ezrow, Lawrence, and Somer-Topcu, Zeynep 2011 “Is Anybody Listening? Evidence That Voters Do Not Respond to European Parties' Policy Statements during Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 370–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James, and Somer-Topcu, Zeynep 2009 “Moderate Now, Win Votes Later: The Electoral Consequences of Parties' Policy Shifts in Twenty-Five Postwar Democracies.” Journal of Politics 71 (2): 678–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcántara, Manuel 2012 Proyecto de Elites Parlamentarias Latinoamericanas (PELA). Universidad de Salamanca (1994-2005).Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan 2004 “Party System Compactness: Measurement and Consequences.” Political Analysis 12 (1): 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Jason, and Samuels, David J. 2011 “Latin America's Left Turn? Evidence from Public Opinion: A Conceptual and Theoretical Overview.” In The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, edited by Levitsky, Steven and Roberts, Kenneth, 35–51. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Andy, and Greene, Kenneth F. 2011 “The Latin American Left's Mandate: Free Market Policies and Issue Voting in New Democracies.” World Politics 63 (1): 43–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Thorsten, Clarke, George, Groff, Alberto, Keefer, Philip, and Walsh, Patrick 2001 “New Tools and New Tests in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions.” World Bank Economic Review 15 (1): 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, Ryan E., Singer, Matthew M., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth 2015 The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conaghan, Catherine 1995 “Politicians against Parties: Discord and Disconnection in Ecuador's Party System.” In Building Democratic Institutions in Latin America, edited by Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R., 434–458. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael 1998 “The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems.” Party Politics 4 (4): 547–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael 2007 “Continuity and Change in Latin American Party Systems.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 3 (2): 119–149.Google Scholar
Curini, Luigi, and Hino, Airo 2012 “Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter.” Journal of Politics 74 (2): 460–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2008 “The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarization, Its Measurement, and Its Consequences.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (7): 899–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2011 “Left-Right Orientations, Context, and Voting Choices.” In Citizens, Context, and Choice: How Context Shapes Citizens' Electoral Choices, edited by Dalton, Russell J. and Anderson, Christopher J., 103–125. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., and Anderson, Christopher J. 2011 Citizens, Context, and Choice: How Context Shapes Citizens' Electoral Choices. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., Farrell, David M., and McAllister, Ian 2011 Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boef, Suzanna, and Keele, Luke 2008 “Taking Time Seriously.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dix, Robert H. 1989 “Cleavage Structures and Party Systems in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 22 (1): 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony 1957 An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M., and Stevenson, Randolph T. 2008 The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Robert A., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A. 2002 The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Esteban, Joan, and Schneider, Gerald 2008 “Polarization and Conflict: Theoretical and Empirical Issues.” Journal of Peace Research 45 (2): 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey 1999 The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey, and de Graaf, Nan Dirk 2013 Political Choice Matters: Explaining the Strength of Class and Religious Cleavages in Cross-National Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezrow, Lawrence 2007 “The Variance Matters: How Party Systems Represent the Preferences of Voters.” Journal of Politics 69 (1): 182–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Donald A., and Sigelman, Lee 1984 “Comparing Party Systems: A Multidimensional Approach.” Comparative Politics 16 (4): 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handlin, Samuel 2013 “Social Protection and the Politicization of Class Cleavages during Latin America's Left Turn.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (12): 1582–1609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbers, Imke, de Vries, Catherine E., and Steenbergen, Marco R. 2013 “Attitude Variability among Latin American Publics: How Party System Structuration Affects Left/Right Ideology.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (8): 947–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, Philip 2007 “Clientelism, Credibility, and the Policy Choices of Young Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 804–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert 2000 “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities.” Comparative Political Studies 33 (6/7): 845–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Freeze, Kent 2010 “Programmatic Party System Structuration: Developing and Comparing Cross-National and Cross-Party Measures with a New Global Data Set.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 2-5. http://sites.duke.edu/democracylinkage/files/2014/12/Kitschelt_Freeze.pdf.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Hawkins, Kirk A., Luna, Juan Pablo, Rosas, Guillermo, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J. 2010 Latin American Party Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laakso, Markku, and Taagepera, Rein 1979 “‘Effective’ Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachat, Romain 2008 “The Impact of Party Polarization on Ideological Voting.” Electoral Studies 27 (4): 687–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachat, Romain 2011 “Electoral Competitiveness and Issue Voting.” Political Behavior 33 (4): 645–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. 2010 “Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters: A Benefit of Elite Polarization.” Political-Behavior 32 (1): 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Roberts, Kenneth M., eds. 2011 The Resurgence of the Latin American Left. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven 2013 “Peru: The Challenge of Democracy Without Parties.” In Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America, 4th ed., edited by Domínguez, Jorge and Shifter, Michael, 282–513. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan P., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J. 2005 “Political Representation in Latin America: A Study of Elite-Mass Congruence in Nine Countries.” Comparative Political Studies 38 (4): 388–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Noam 2013 “Party Brands and Partisanship: Theory with Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Argentina.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Torcal, Mariano 2006 “Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory after the Third Wave of Democratization.” In Handbook of Political Parties, edited by Katz, Richard S. and Crotty, William, 204–227. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan 2007 “The Policy Consequences of Political Polarization.” In The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism, edited by Pierson, Paul and Skocpol, Theda, 223–255. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Jana, Hartlyn, Jonathan, and Espinal, Rosario 2011 “Dominican Party System Continuity amid Regional Transformations: Economic Policy, Clientelism and Migration Flows.” Latin American Politics and Society 53 (1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa 2004 Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, Timothy, and Zucco, Cesar Jr. 2012 “Elite Preferences in a Consolidating Democracy: The Brazilian Legislative Surveys, 1990-2009.” Latin American Politics and Society 54 (4): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard 1999 Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2002 “Social Inequalities without Class Cleavages in Latin America's Neoliberal Era.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (4): 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosas, Guillermo 2005 “The Ideological Organization of Latin American Legislative Parties.” Comparative Political Studies 38 (7): 824–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Shane P. 2010 “Contextual Influences on the Decision Calculus: A Cross-National Examination of Proximity Voting.” Electoral Studies 29 (3): 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2001 Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomassen, Jacques 2005 The European Voter: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tverdova, Yuliya V. 2011 “Follow the Party or Follow the Leader? Candidate Evaluations, Party Evaluations, and Macropolitical Context.” In Citizens, Context, and Choice: How Context Shapes Citizens' Electoral Choices, edited by Dalton, Russell J. and Anderson, Christopher J., 126–148. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiesehomeier, Nina, and Benoit, Kenneth 2009 “Presidents, Parties and Policy Competition.” Journal of Politics 71 (4): 1435–1447.Google Scholar
Wood, Elizabeth J. 2005 “Challenges to Political Democracy in El Salvador.” In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, edited by Hagopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott, 179–201. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zechmeister, Elizabeth 2006 “What's Left and Who's Right? A Q-Method Study of Individual and Contextual Influences on the Meaning of Ideological Labels.” Political Behavior 28 (2): 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zechmeister, Elizabeth 2013 “Left-Right Identifications and the Latin American Voter.” Paper presented at the Workshop on the Latin American Voter, Vanderbilt University, May 17–18.Google Scholar
Zechmeister, Elizabeth, and Corral, Margarita 2013 “Individual and Contextual Constraints on Ideological Labels in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (6): 675–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar