Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:39:24.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Drug Wars Collateral Damage: US Counternarcotic Aid and Human Rights in the Americas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Horace A. Bartilow
Horace A. Bartilow*
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Existing case-study research suggests that the recent increase in human rights violations in Latin America is attributed to the US-funded drug war. This narrative, which is referred to as the collateral damage perspective, stands in contrast to US human rights law, which makes governments' respect for human rights a precondition to receive aid. The apparent endogeneity between aid and human rights introduces bias that casts serious doubts on the validity of the collateral damage narrative. In addressing endogeneity, this article presents a simultaneous instrumental variable analysis of the human rights effects of US counternarcotic aid in the Americas. The results show that while counternarcotic aid to regimes increases overall violations of human rights, this effect is greater among democracies than autocracies. And with the exception of torture, this finding is consistent when disappearances, political imprisonment, and extrajudicial killings are also considered. The implication of this research suggests that policy makers in Washington risk losing regional support for US drug control policies if US laws that govern the allocation of aid are not effectively implemented.

Resumen

Resumen

La investigación de los estudios de caso actuales sugieren que el reciente aumento de las violaciones de los derechos humanos en América Latina se atribuye a la guerra contra las drogas, financiada por los Estados Unidos. Este relato, que se conoce como la perspectiva de daños colaterales, está en contraste con la ley de derechos humanos estadounidense, la cual hace que el respecto de los derechos humanos por parte de los gobiernos es una condición previa para recibir ayuda económica. La aparente endogeneidad entre la ayuda y los derechos humanos introduce sesgos que arrojan serias dudas sobre la validez del relato de los daños colaterales. A la hora de abordar la endogeneidad, este artículo presenta un análisis simultáneo de variables instrumentales de los efectos en los derechos humanos de la ayuda relacionada a “la guerra contra las drogas” por las Américas. Los resultados muestran que mientras luchar contra las drogas ayuda a los regímenes a aumentar las violaciones de los derechos humanos, este efecto es mayor entre las democracias que en las autocracias. Y, a excepción de la tortura, este hallazgo es consistente cuando las desapariciones, el encarcelamiento por motivos políticos y las ejecuciones extrajudiciales también se toman en consideración. Esta investigación sugiere que los responsables de las políticas de Washington corren el riesgo de perder el apoyo regional para las políticas de fiscalización de drogas de los Estados Unidos si las leyes estadounidenses que rigen la asignación de la ayuda no se aplican de manera efectiva.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , 2014 , pp. 24 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by the Latin American Studies Association

References

Amnesty International 2008 Leave Us in Peace! Targeting Civilians in Colombia's Internal Armed Conflict. London: Amnesty International Publications.Google Scholar
Amnesty International and Fellowship of Reconciliation 2008 Assisting Units That Commit Extrajudicial Killings: A Call to Investigate US Military Policy toward Colombia. AI Index: AMR 23/016/2008. New York: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Bagley, Bruce M. 1992 “Myths of Militarization: Enlisting Armed Forces in the War on Drugs.” In Drug Policy in the Americas, edited by Smith, Peter H., 129–50. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Baltagi, Badi H. 2005 Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bartilow, Horace A., and Eom, Kihong 2009a “Busting Drugs While Paying with Crime: The Collateral Damage of U.S. Drug Enforcement in Foreign Countries.” Foreign Policy Analysis 5 (2): 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartilow, Horace A., and Eom, Kihong 2009b “Free Traders and Drug Smugglers: The Effects of Trade Openness on States' Ability to Combat Drug Trafficking.” Latin American Politics and Society 51 (2): 117–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, Shannon Lindsey 2000 “Promoting Human Rights and Democracy in the Developing World: U.S. Rhetoric Versus U.S. Arms Exports.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, Shannon Lindsey 2005 “Foreign Policy in Transition? Human Rights, Democracy, and U.S. Arms Exports.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (4): 647–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, Sabine C. 2010 “The Use of Repression as a Response to Domestic Dissent.” Political Studies 58 (1): 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingranelli, David L., and Pasquarello, Thomas E. 1985 “Human Rights Practices and the Distribution of U.S. Foreign Aid to Latin American Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (3): 539–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingranelli, David L., and Richards, David L. 1999a “Measuring the Level, Pattern, and Sequence of Government Respect for Physical Integrity Rights.” International Studies Quarterly 43 (2): 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingranelli, David L., and Richards, David L. 1999b “Respect for Human Rights after the End of the Cold War.” Journal of Peace Research 36 (5): 511–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Richard B. 1980 “Human Rights and Mexico's Anti-Drug Campaign.” Social Science Quarterly 60:691–701.Google Scholar
Crandall, Russell 2008 Driven by Drugs: U.S. Policy toward Colombia. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dakolias, Maria 1996 The Judicial Sector in Latin America and the Caribbean: Elements of Reform. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Christian 1991 “The Dynamics of State Repression: A Cross-National Time-Series Examination of Domestic Political Processes.” PhD diss., State University of New York at Binghamton.Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian 1995 “Multi-Dimensional Threat Perception and State Repression: An Inquiry into Why States Apply Negative Sanctions.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 683–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Christian 1996 “Constitutional Promises and Repressive Reality: A Cross-National Time-Series Investigation of Why Political and Civil Liberties Are Suppressed.” Journal of Politics 58 (3): 627–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Christian, and Armstrong, David A. II 2004 “Democracy and the Violation of Human Rights: A Statistical Analysis from 1976 to 1996.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 538–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Russell, and MacKinnon, James G. 2004 Econometric Theory and Methods. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fein, Helen 1995 “More Murder in the Middle: Life-Integrity Violations and Democracy in the World, 1987.” Human Rights Quarterly 17 (1): 170–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleck, Robert K., and Kilby, Christopher 2006 “How Do Political Changes Influence U.S. Bilateral Aid Allocations? Evidence from Panel Data.” Review of Development Economics 10 (2): 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, David P. 1987 “Congress and Human Rights in U.S. Foreign Policy: The Fate of General Legislation.” Human Rights Quarterly 9 (3): 382–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Laurie, and Sierra, Jorge Luis 2005 “Mexico: The Militarization Trap.” In Drugs and Democracy in Latin America: The Impact of U.S. Policy, edited by Youngers, Coletta A. and Rosin, Eileen, 263–302. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Gibney, Mark, and Dalton, Mathew 1996 “The Political Terror Scale.” Policy Studies in Developing Nations 4:73–84.Google Scholar
Gupta, Dipak K., Singh, Harinder, and Sprague, Tom 1993 “Government Coercion of Dissidents: Deterrence of Provocation?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (2): 301–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted 1986a “Persistent Patterns of Repression and Rebellion: Foundations for a General Theory of Political Coercion.” In Persistent Patterns and Emergent Structures in a Waning Century, edited by Karns, Margaret, 149–170. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted 1986b “The Political Origins of State Violence and Terror: A Theoretical Analysis.” In Government Violence and Repression: An Agenda for Research, edited by Stohl, Michael and Lopez, George A., 45–65. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, Conway W. 1993 “Population Pressures and Political Repression.” Social Science Quarterly 74:322–333.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. Jr. 1973 Mass Political Violence: A Cross-National Causal Analysis. Comparative Studies in Behavioral Science. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hoover, Dean, and Kowalewski, David 1992 “Dynamic Models of Dissent and Repression.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (1): 150–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch 2008 Targeting Blacks: Drug Law Enforcement and Race in the United States. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1964 The Soldier and the State. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Jaccard, James J., and Turrisi, Robert 2003 Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, Linda Camp 1999 “The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Does It Make a Difference in Human Rights Behavior?” Journal of Peace Research 36 (1): 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, Linda Camp 2002 “Constitutional Provisions for Individual Human Rights (1977–1966): Are They More Than Mere Window Dressing?” Political Research Quarterly 55 (1): 111–143.Google Scholar
Keith, Linda Camp 2011 Political Repression: Courts and the Law. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney 1994 Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, John C. 1998 “Repression, Domestic Threat, and Interactions in Argentina and Chile.” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 26 (2): 191–211.Google Scholar
Lai, Brian 2003 “Examining the Goals of U.S. Foreign Assistance in the Post-Cold War Period, 1991–96.” Journal of Peace Research 40 (1): 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, George 1986 “National Security Ideology as an Impetus to State Violence and State Terror.” In Government Violence and Repression: An Agenda for Research, edited by Stohl, Michael and Lopez, George A., 73–96. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Lupsha, Peter A. 1989 “Towards an Etiology of Drug Trafficking and Insurgent Relations: The Phenomeon of Narco-Terrorism.” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Ciminal Justice 13 (2): 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madani, Hamed 1992 “Socioeconomic Development and Military Policy Consequences of Third World Military and Civilian Regimes, 1965–1985.” PhD diss., University of North Texas.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. 1992 Introduction to Econometrics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Gurr, Ted Robert, and Jaggers, Keith 2013 “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2012.” Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.Google Scholar
McKinlay, Robert D., and Cohan, Alvin S. 1976 “Performance and Instability in Military and Nonmilitary Regimes.” American Political Science Review 70 (3): 850–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Neil J., and McCormick, James M. 1988 “Economic and Political Explanations of Human Rights Violations.” World Politics 40 (4): 476–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molzahn, Cory, Ríos, Viridiana, and Shirk, David A. 2012 Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis through 2011. San Diego, CA: Trans-Border Institute and Joan B. Kroc School of Peace Studies.Google Scholar
Nadelmann, Ethan A. 1993 Cops across Borders: The Internationalization of U.S Criminal Law Enforcement. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
ONDCP (Office of National Drug Control Policy) 2003 “Federal Drug Control Programs.” In The Budget for Fiscal Year 2003, edited by the Office of National Drug Control Policy, 375–380. www.csdp.org/research/bud32.pdf. Washington, DC: ONDCP.Google Scholar
Poe, Steven C. 1991 “Human Rights and the Allocation of US Military Assistance.” Journal of Peace Research 28 (2): 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poe, Steven C., and Meernik, James 1995 “U.S. Military Aid in the 1980s: A Global Analysis.” Journal of Peace Research 32 (4): 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poe, Steven C., and Tate, C. Neal 1994 “Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis.” American Political Science Review 88 (4): 853–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poe, Steven C, Tate, C. Neal, and Keith, Linda Camp 1999 “Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Cross-National Study Covering the Years 1976–1993.” International Studies Quarterly 43 (2): 291–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Margaret 2001 “Efforts to Enhance Judicial Independence in Latin America: A Comparative Perspective.” In Guidance for Promoting Judicial Independence and Impartiality, edited by USAID, 100–132. Washington, DC: Office of Democracy and Governance.Google Scholar
Regan, Patrick M., and Henderson, Errol A. 2002 “Democracy, Threats and Political Repression in Developing Countries: Are Democracies Internally Less Violent?” Third World Quarterly 23 (1): 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sentencing Project, and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers 2007 Racial Disparity in Criminal Court Processing in the United States. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.Google Scholar
Smith, Phillip 2012a “Historic Challenge to Drug War Looms at Cartagena Summit.” Drug War Chronicle, no. 729, April 11, 2012.Google Scholar
Smith, Phillip 2012b “Obama Addressess Drug Legalization at Cartagena Summit.” Drug War Chronicle, no. 730, April 15, 2012.Google Scholar
Staiger, Douglas, and Stock, James H. 1997 “Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments.” Econometrica 65 (3): 557–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stohl, Michael, and Lopez, George A., eds. 1984 The State as Terrorist: The Dynamics of Governmental Violence and Repression. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles 1978 From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Walker, Stephen G., and Lang, S. Ivy 1988 “The Garrison State Syndrome in the Third World: A Research Note.” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 16 (1): 105–116.Google Scholar
Youngers, Coletta A. 2005 “The Collateral Damage of the U.S War on Drugs: Conclusions and Recommendations.” In Drugs and Democracy in Latin America: The Impact of U.S. Policy, edited by Youngers, Coletta A. and Rosin, Eileen, 339–366. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Zanger, Sabine C. 2000 “A Global Analysis of the Effects of Political Regime Changes on Life Integrity Violations, 1977–93.” Journal of Peace Research 37 (2): 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar