Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:38:51.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bolsa Família and the Shift in Lula's Electoral Base, 2002–2006: A Reply to Bohn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Cesar Zucco  and
Timothy J. Power
Cesar Zucco
Affiliation:
Rutgers University and Fundação Getúlio Vargas-EBAPE
Timothy J. Power
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a recent article published in the Latin American Research Review, Simone Bohn analyzed electoral results and survey data from Brazil to contest several theses concerning the reelection of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva in 2006. In particular, Bohn asserted that beneficiaries of Bolsa Família, a conditional cash transfer program that was reaching eleven million families at the time of the 2006 election, were already supporters of Lula in 2002, and therefore the program could not have contributed to the change in Lula's constituency between his election in 2002 and his reelection in 2006. We show that these claims are based on voter recall data collected between nine and fifty-seven months after the elections, and that these data grossly overestimate actual electoral support for Lula—probably as a result of well-known reporting biases. Reanalysis of Bohn's data as well as analysis of more reliable surveys suggest that there were indeed significant changes in voting patterns between 2002 and 2006, and that Bolsa Família did play an important role in the 2006 elections.

Resumo

Resumo

Em um artigo recentemente publicado na LARR, Simone Bohn analisou resultados eleitorais e pesquisas de opinião brasileiras para questionar diversas teses sobre a reeleição do Presidente Lula, em 2006. Em particular, Bohn afirma que beneficiários do Bolsa Família, um programa de transferência de renda que alcançava 11 milhões de famílias no ano da eleição, já tinham sido eleitores de Lula em 2002, e que portanto, o programa não pode ter contribuído para a mudança na composição do eleitorado de Lula entre sua primeira eleição em 2002 e reeleição em 2006. Neste artigo, mostramos que tais afirmações se baseiam e declarações de voto feitas entre 9 e 57 meses depois das eleições, e que os resultados destas pesquisas de opinião dramaticamente superestimam o apoio eleitoral de Lula. A re-análise do dados de Bohn, bem como a análise de pesquisas mais confiáveis sugerem que houve mudanças significativas nos padrões de votação para Lula entre 2002 e 2006, e que o Bolsa Família teve sim impacto nas eleições de 2006.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , 2013 , pp. 3 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by the Latin American Studies Association

Footnotes

We thank Wendy Hunter, David Doyle, David Samuels, and the anonymous LARR reviewers for comments, the Latin American Public Opinion Project (Vanderbilt University) for conducting and making available its surveys, and the Center for the Study of Public Opinion at the University of Campinas (CESOP-UNICAMP) for cataloging and making available a wealth of public opinion data. Replication materials and a web appendix to this article with extended results are available at http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/18350. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

Anderson, Perry 2011 “Lula's Brazil.” London Review of Books 33, no. 7 (March 31): 3–12.Google Scholar
Baker, Andy, Ames, Barry, and Rennó, Lucio R. 2006 “Social Context and Campaign Volatility in New Democracies: Networks and Neighborhoods in Brazil's 2002 Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balbachevsky, Elisabeth, and Holzhacker, Denilde 2007 “Classe, ideologia e política: Uma interpretação dos resultados das eleições de 2002 e 2006.” Opinião Pública 13 (2): 283–306.Google Scholar
Benewick, R. J., Birch, A. H., Blumler, J. G., and Ewbank, Alison 1969 “The Floating Voter and the Liberal View of Representation.” Political Studies 17 (2): 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohn, Simone R. 2011 “Social Policy and Vote in Brazil: Bolsa Família and the Shifts in Lula's Electoral Base.” Latin American Research Review 46 (1): 54–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Janvry, Alain, Finan, Frederico, and Sadoulet, Elisabeth 2008 “Local Electoral Accountability and Decentralized Program Performance.” Unpublished manuscript. http://are.berkeley.edu/~sadoulet/papers/Bolsa7–08.pdf.Google Scholar
Dex, Shirley 1995 “The Reliability of Recall Data: A Literature Review.” Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 49 (December): 58–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, Tracy Beck 2009 “Avoiding Governors: The Success of Bolsa Família.” Latin American Research Review 44 (1): 102–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Little, Thomas C. 1997 “Poststratification into Many Categories Using Hierarchical Logistic Regression.” Survey Methodology 23 (2): 127–135.Google Scholar
Hall, Anthony 2006 “From Fome Zero to Bolsa Família: Social Policies and Poverty Alleviation under Lula.” Journal of Latin American Studies 38 (4): 689–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmelweit, Hilde T., Biberian, Marianne Jaeger, and Stockdale, Janet 1978 “Memory for Past Vote: Implications of a Study of Bias in Recall.” British Journal of Political Science 8 (3): 365–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Daniel E., Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth 2007 “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.” Political Analysis 15 (3): 199–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Daniel E., Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth 2011 “Matchlt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference.” Journal of Statistical Software 42 (8): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Wendy, and Power, Timothy J. 2007 “Rewarding Lula: Executive Power, Social Policy, and the Brazilian Elections of 2006.” Latin American Politics and Society 49 (1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Robert W. 1987 “Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies.” American Political Science Review 81 (2): 405–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S., Niemi, Richard G., and Newman, David 1980 “Reconstructing Past Partisanship in Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 10 (4): 505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary 1997 A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, and Scheve, Kenneth 2001 “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review 95 (1): 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason 2000 “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lício, Elaine Cristina, Rennó, Lucio, and Castro, Henrique 2009 “Bolsa Família e voto nas eleições presidenciais de 2006: Em busca do elo perdido.” Opinião Pública 15 (1): 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolau, Jairo, and Peixoto, Vitor 2007 “Uma disputa em três tempos: Uma análise das bases municipais das eleições presidenciais de 2006.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research and Postgraduate Studies in Social Sciences (ANPOCS), Caxambu, Minas Gerais, Brazil, October 22–26.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Katz, Richard S., and Newman, David 1980 “Reconstructing Past Partisanship: The Failure of the Party Identification Recall Questions.” American Journal of Political Science 24 (4): 633–651.:CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plumb, Elizabeth 1986 “Validation of Voter Recall: Time of Electoral Decision Making.” Political Behavior 8 (4): 302–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, Timothy J. 2009 “Compulsory for Whom? Mandatory Voting and Electoral Participation in Brazil, 1986–2006.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 1 (1): 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presser, Stanley, and Traugott, Michael 1992 “Little White Lies and Social Science Models: Correlated Response Errors in a Panel Study of Voting.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56 (1): 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2002 Observational Studies. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David 2006 “Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil.” Latin American Politics and Society 48 (2): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheatsley, Paul B., and Feldman, Jacob J. 1965 “A National Survey on Public Reactions and Behavior.” In The Kennedy Assassination and the American Public, edited by Greenberg, Bradley S. and Parker, Edwin B., 149–177. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, André 2009 “Raízes sociais e ideológicas do lulismo.” Novos Estudos 85 (3): 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, André 2010 “O lulismo e seu futuro.” Revista Piauí, no. 49 (October).Google Scholar
Singer, André 2012 Os sentidos do lulismo. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
Soares, Gláucio, and Terron, Sonia 2008 “Dois Lulas: A geografía eleitoral da reeleição (explorando conceitos, métodos e técnicas de análise geoespacial).” Opinião Pública 14 (2): 269–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucco, Cesar 2008 “The President's ‘New’ Constituency: Lula and the Pragmatic Vote in Brazil's 2006 Presidential Elections.” Journal of Latin American Studies 40 (1): 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucco, Cesar 2013 “When Payouts Pay Off: Conditional Cash Transfers and Voting Behavior in Brazil, 2002–2010.” American Journal of Political Science. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar