Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T17:48:48.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Voting for Democracy: Campaign Effects in Chile's Democratic Transition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Taylor C. Boas
Taylor C. Boas*
Affiliation:
Boston University. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a global context in which authoritarian regimes often hold elections, defeating dictators at the polls can play a key role in transitions to democracy. When the opposition is allowed to campaign for votes in such elections, there are strong reasons to believe that its efforts will be more persuasive than those of the authoritarian incumbent. This article examines the effect of televised campaign advertising on vote choice in the 1988 plebiscite that inaugurated Chile's transition to democracy. Using matching to analyze postelectoral survey data, it shows that the advertising of the opposition's no campaign made Chileans more likely to vote against dictator Augusto Pinochet, whereas the advertising of the government's yes campaign had no discernible effect. These findings suggest that the no campaign played an important causal role in the change of political regime.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , Summer 2015 , pp. 67 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angell, Alan, and Pollack, Benny. 1990. The Chilean Elections of 1989 and the Politics of the Transition to Democracy. Bulletin of Latin American Research 9, 1: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Gerber, Alan. 1994. The Mismeasure of Campaign Spending: Evidence from the 1990 U.S. House Elections. Journal of Politics 56, 4: 1106–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Andy, Ames, Barry, and Renno, Lucio R.. 2006. Social Context and Campaign Volatility in New Democracies: Networks and Neighborhoods in Brazil's 2002 Elections. American Journal of Political Science 50, 2: 382–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Patrick S. 2000. Chile's Transformed Party System and the Future of Democratic Stability. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 42, 3: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N.. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Birch, Sarah. 2002. The 2000 Elections in Yugoslavia: the “Bulldozer Revolution”. Electoral Studies 21: 499–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Taylor C. 2005. Television and Neopopulism in Latin America: Media Effects in Brazil and Peru. Latin American Research Review 40, 2: 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Taylor C. 2013. Mass Media and Politics in Latin America. In Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Shifter, Michael. 4th ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 48–77.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie J., and Wolchik, Sharon L.. 2010. Defeating Dictators: Electoral Change and Stability in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes. World Politics 62, 1: 43–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Cavarozzi, Marcelo. 1992. Patterns of Elite Negotiation and Confrontation in Argentina and Chile. In Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe, ed. Higley, John and Gunther, Richard. New York: Cambridge University Press. 208–36.Google Scholar
Cea, José Luís. 1987. Chile's Difficult Return to Constitutional Democracy. PS 20, 3: 665–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centro de Estudios de la Realidad Contemporánea (CERC). 1988. Estudio Np55. October.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP). 1990. Cuestionario: estudio social y de opinión pública, junio 1990. Documento de trabajo 136, August.Google Scholar
Chateau, Jorge, and Rojas, Sergio. 1989. Antecedentes electorales. Vol. 1, Información sobre población, electores y resultados del plebiscito de 1988. Santiago: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Christian, Shirley. 1988. Early Polls Suggest a Close Contest in Chile Vote on Pinochet. New York times, March 27.Google Scholar
CIS (CED: Centro de Estudios del Desarrollo; ILET: Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Transnacionales; SUR: Centro de Estudios Sociales y Educación). 1988. La demanda de los indecisos. Informe no. 14. June. Internal document.Google Scholar
CIS (CED: Centro de Estudios del Desarrollo; ILET: Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Transnacionales; SUR: Centro de Estudios Sociales y Educación). 1989. La campaña del no vista por sus creadores. Santiago: Ediciones Melquiades.Google Scholar
CIS (CED: Centro de Estudios del Desarrollo; ILET: Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Transnacionales; SUR: Centro de Estudios Sociales y Educación). n.d. Memorandum: Mensajes. Internal document.Google Scholar
Constable, Pamela, and Arturo Valenzuela. 1989. Chile's Return to Democracy. Foreign Affairs 68: 169–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constable, Pamela, and Valenzuela, Arturo. 1991. A Nation of Enemies: Chile Under Pinochet. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1962. Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 26, 4: 578–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Alexis, and Sekhon, Jasjeet S.. 2013. Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects: a General Multivariate Matching Method for Achieving Balance in Observational Studies. Review of Economics and Statistics 95, 3: 932–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2009. Forward. In Lindberg 2009. xiii–xix.Google Scholar
Facultad Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO). 1989. Informe preliminar de encuesta nacional sobre elección presidencial. Informe de encuesta no. 5. Santiago: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 1988. Informe de encuesta sobre temas de la transición a la democracia. Informe de encuesta no. 3. Santiago: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 1990–91. Democratic Inauguration in Chile: from Pinochet to Aylwin. Third World Quarterly 12, 3–4: 64–80.Google Scholar
Godoy Arcaya, Oscar. 1999. La transición chilena a la democracia: pactada. Estudios Públicos 74: 79–106.Google Scholar
Greene, Kenneth F. 2011. Campaign Persuasion and Nascent Partisanship in Mexico's New Democracy. American Journal of Political Science 55, 2: 398–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, Linda Luz B., and Mangahas, Mahar. 2004. The Philippines. In Public Opinion and Polling Around the World: A Historical Encyclopedia, ed. Geer, John G.. Vol. 2. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. 689–96.Google Scholar
Hartlyn, Jonathan. 1998. Political Continuities, Missed Opportunities, and Institutional Rigidities: Another Look at Democratic Transitions in Latin America. In Politics, Society, and Democracy: Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Valenzuela, Arturo. Boulder: Westview Press. 101–20.Google Scholar
Hirmas, María Eugenia. 1989. La franja: entre la alegría y el miedo. In La política en pantalla, ed. Portales, Diego, Sunkel, Guillermo, Eugenia Hirmas, María, Hopenhayn, Martín, and Hidalgo, Paulo. Santiago: ILET/CESOC. 107–55.Google Scholar
Hirmas, María Eugenia. 1993. The Chilean Case: Television in the 1988 Plebiscite. In Television, Politics, and the Transition to Democracy in Latin America, ed. Skidmore, Thomas E.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 82–96.Google Scholar
Ho, Daniel E., Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth A.. 2007. Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference. Political Analysis 15: 199–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Sallie, and Lawson, Chappell. 2005. The Barriers to Media Opening in Latin America. Political Communication 22: 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1978. The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections. American Political Science Review 72, 2: 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1986. Imposing Consent? Electoralism versus Democratization in El Salvador. In Elections and Democratization in Latin America, 1980–85, ed. Drake, Paul and Silva, Eduardo. San Diego: Center for Iberian and Latin American Studies, University of California. 9–36.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1990. Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America. Comparative Politics 22, 1: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1991. Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe. International Social Science Journal 128: 269–84.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus J. 2004. Free Market Democracy and the Mexican and Chilean Countryside. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Chappell, and McCann, James A.. 2005. Television News, Mexico's 2000 Elections and Media Effects in Emerging Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 35: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I. 2006. Democracy and Elections in Africa. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I., ed. 2009. Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Méndez, Roberto, Godoy, Oscar, Barros, Enrique, and Fontaine Talavera, Arturo. 1989. ¿Por qué ganó el no? Estudios Públicos 33: 83–134.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 2004. The Effects of Negative Campaigns on Mexican Voters. In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Candidates, Voters, and the Presidential Campaign of 2000, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chappell. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 243–68.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1992. Transitions, Continuities, and Paradoxes. In Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, ed. Scott Mainwaring, O'Donnell, and Samuel Valenzuela, J.. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 17–56.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rabkin, Rhoda. 1992-93. The Aylwin Government and “Tutelary” Democracy: a Concept in Search of a Case? Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 34, 4 (Winter): 119–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohter, Larry. 2013. One Prism on the Undoing of Pinochet: Oscar-Nominated “No” Stirring Debate in Chile. New York times, February 8.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Tina. 1988. Chile: Once So Proud. Mother Jones 13, 4: 19–26.Google Scholar
Samuels, David. 2006. Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 48, 2 (Summer): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2009. Sources of Competition under Electoral Authoritarianism. In Lindberg 2009. 179–201.Google Scholar
Stratmann, Thomas. 2005. Some Talk: Money in Politics. a (Partial) Review of the Literature. Public Choice 124, 1–2: 135–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teorell, Jan, and Hadenius, Axel. 2009. Elections as Levers of Democratization: a Global Inquiry. In Lindberg 2009. 77–100.Google Scholar
Thompson, Mark R., and Kuntz, Philipp. 2004. Stolen Elections: the Case of the Serbian October. Journal of Democracy 15, 4 (October): 159–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Mark R., and Kuntz, Philipp. 2006. After Defeat: When Do Rulers Steal Elections? In Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, ed. Schedler, Andreas. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tironi, Eugenio, and Sunkel, Guillermo. 2000. The Modernization of Communications: The Media in the Transition to Democracy in Chile. In Democracy and the Media: A Comparative Perspective, ed. Gunther, Richard and Mughan, Anthony. New York: Cambridge University Press. 165–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1999. Chile: Origins and Consolidation of a Latin American Democracy. In Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America, ed. Diamond, Larry, Hartlyn, Jonathan, Linz, Juan J., and Martin Lipset, Seymour. 2nd ed. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. 191–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, J. Samuel, and Scully, Timothy R.. 1997. Electoral Choices and the Party System in Chile: Continuities and Changes at the Recovery of Democracy. Comparative Politics 29, 4: 511–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1996. The Myth of Massive Media Impact Revived: New Support for a Discredited Idea. In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, ed. Mutz, Diana C., Sniderman, Paul M., and Brody, Richard A.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 17–78.Google Scholar