Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:19:10.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Union Affiliation and Civic Engagement: Teachers in Bogotá, Colombia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2021

Christopher Chambers-Ju Open the ORCID record for Christopher Chambers-Ju [Opens in a new window]  and
R. Douglas Hecock Open the ORCID record for R. Douglas Hecock [Opens in a new window]
Christopher Chambers-Ju
Affiliation:
Christopher Chambers-Ju is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Texas, Arlington, TX, USA. [email protected].
R. Douglas Hecock
Affiliation:
R. Douglas Hecock is an associate professor of political science at Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA, USA. [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Do labor unions still motivate their members to participate in politics, or have social and economic changes undermined their political importance? This question is important to revisit, as globalization and economic reform have weakened many popular sector organizations in Latin America, reducing some to mere patronage machines. This article examines the case of the teachers’ union in Bogotá, Colombia to assess whether and how labor unions are able to promote the political activation of their members. Employing a multimethod research design that begins with a quantitative analysis of a survey of Colombian teachers, this study finds that union affiliation is associated with higher levels of motivation to vote. It then uses evidence from interviews to show how union advocacy and internal elections for leadership positions shape political behavior, contributing to civic engagement. This research engages with broader debates about democratic quality and political representation in contemporary Latin America.

Keywords

Labor unionsclientelismcivic engagementeducation politicsdemocracy
Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 63 , Issue 4 , November 2021 , pp. 1 - 21
Copyright
© The Authors 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the University of Miami

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: Authors Christopher Chambers-Ju and R. Douglas Hecock declare no conflicts of interest.

References

Anzia, Sarah F. 2011. Election Timing and the Electoral Influence of Interest Groups. Journal of Politics 73, 2: 412–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F. 2014. Timing and Turnout: How Off-cycle Elections Favor Organized Groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Archila, Mauricio. 2012. Luchas laborales y violencia contra el sindicalismo en Colombia, 2002–2010. ¿Otro daño colateral de la seguridad democrática? Revista Controversia 198: 163–213.Google Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., and Gregory W. Saxton. 2019. Working-Class Legislators and Perceptions of Representation in Latin America. Political Research Quarterly 72, 4: 910–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belli, Robert F., Traugott, Michael W., Margaret, Young, and McGonagle, Katherine A.. 1999. Reducing Vote Overreporting in Surveys: Social Desirability, Memory Failure, and Source Monitoring. Public Opinion Quarterly 63, 1: 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensusán, Graciela. 2019. Trade Unions and Politics in Latin America. In The Oxford Encyclopedia of Latin American Politics, ed. Harry, E. Vanden and Prevost, Gary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blanc, Eric. 2019. Red State Revolt: The Teachers’ Strike Wave and Working-Class Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Boas, Taylor C. 2005. Television and Neopopulism in Latin America: Media Effects in Brazil and Peru. Latin American Research Review 40, 2: 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Taylor C., and F. Daniel Hidalgo. 2011. Controlling the Airwaves: Incumbency Advantage and Community Radio in Brazil. American Journal of Political Science 55, 4: 869–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and David, Collier. 1979. Inducements versus Constraints: Disaggregating “Corporatism.” American Political Science Review 73, 4: 967–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and David, Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eaton, Kent. 2020. Bogotá’s Left Turn: Counter-Neoliberalization in Colombia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 44, 1: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavin, Patrick, and Benjamin, Radcliff 2011. Labor Union Membership and Voting Across Nations. Electoral Studies 30, 4: 633–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francia, Peter L., and Susan Orr. 2014. Labor Unions and the Mobilization of Latino Voters: Can the Dinosaur Awaken the Sleeping Giant? Political Research Quarterly 67, 4: 943–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garay, Candelaria. 2009. Associational Linkages to Labor Unions and Political Parties. In Reorganizing Popular Politics: Participation and the New Interest Regime in Latin America, ed. Ruth Berins Collier and Samuel Handlin. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 260–90.Google Scholar
Gray, Mark, and Miki, Caul. 2000. Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950–1997: The Effects of Declining Group Mobilization. Comparative Political Studies 33, 9: 1091–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecock, R. Douglas. 2014. Democracy, Education Reform, and the Mexican Teachers’ Union. Latin American Research Review 49, 1: 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Kelly, and Miguel, Angel Centeno. 2003. The Lopsided Continent: Inequality in Latin America. Annual Review of Sociology 29, 1: 363–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Alisha C., and Brian, Palmer-Rubin. 2015. Beyond the Machine: Clientelist Brokers and Interest Organizations in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 48, 9: 11861223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus J. 2004. The Dilemmas of Democracy in the Open Economy: Lessons from Latin America. World Politics 56, 2: 262–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larreguy, Horacio, Montiel Olea, Cesar E., and Pablo, Querubín. 2017. Political Brokers: Partisans or Agents? Evidence from the Mexican Teachers’ Union. American Journal of Political Science 61, 4: 877–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, Jan E., and Jonathan Nagler. 2007. Unions, Voter Turnout, and Class Bias in the US Electorate, 1964-2004. Journal of Politics 69, 2: 430^1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2018. Democratic Survival and Weakness. Journal of Democracy 26, 4: 10213.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Roberts, Kenneth M., eds. 2011. The Resurgence of the Latin American Left. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma. Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1996. American Political Science Review 91, 1: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, Trow, Martin A., and James Samuel, Coleman. 1956. Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Londoño, Rocio, and Javier, Sáenz. 2011. Perfiles de los docentes del sector público en Bogotá. Bogotá: Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá, Instituto para la Investigación Educativa y el Desarrollo Pedagógico.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. and Wiborg, Susanne, eds. 2017. The Comparative Politics of Education: Teachers Unions and Education Systems Around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan-García, Kimberly A., and Inclán, María. 2017. Union Affiliation, Socialization, and Political Identities: The Case of Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society 59, 2: 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Theory of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pachón, Monica, Carroll, Royce, and Barragán, Hernando. 2017. Ballot Design and Invalid Votes: Evidence from Colombia. Electoral Studies 48: 98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer-Rubin, Brian. 2019. Evading the Patronage Trap: Organizational Capacity and Demand Making in Mexico. Comparative Political Studies 52, 13–14: 2097–2134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer-Rubin, Brian, Garay, Candelaria, and Poertner, Mathias. 2020. Incentives for Organizational Participation: A Recruitment Experiment in Mexico. Comparative Political Studies 54, 1: 110–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Paul W., Viviana, Patroni, and Jean, François Mayer. 2018. Labor Politics in Latin America: Democracy and Worker Organization in the Neoliberal Era. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Radcliff, Benjamin. 2001. Organized Labor and Electoral Participation in American National Elections. Journal of Labor Research 22, 2: 405–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliff, Benjamin, and Patricia, Davis. 2000. Labor Organization and Electoral Participation in Industrial Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 44, 1: 132–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2014. Changing Course in Latin America: Party Systems in the Neoliberal Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secretaría de Cultura, Recreación y Deporte. 2009. Encuesta bienal de culturas. Bogotá: Acaldía Mayor de Bogotá D.C. www.culturarecreacionydeporte.gov.co/es/cultura-ciuda-dana/observatorio-de-culturas/encuesta-bienal-de-culturas/encuesta-2009Google Scholar
Silva, Eduardo, and Rossi, Federico, eds. 2018. Reshaping the Political Arena in Latin America: From Resisting Neoliberalism to the Second Incorporation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Matthew M., and Tafoya, Gabriela Ramalho. 2020. Voter Behavior in Latin America. In The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, ed. William R. Thompson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C., Thad, Dunning, Marcelo, Nazareno, and Valeria, Brusco. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szwarcberg, Mariela. 2015. Mobilizing Poor Voters: Machine Politics, Clientelism, and Social Networks in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman H., and Kim, Jae-on. 1978. Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villarreal, M. Angeles. 2019. USMCA and Mexico’s New Labor Law (IN11123). Congressional Research Service Insight, May 22.Google Scholar
Zarazaga, Rodrigo. 2014. Brokers Beyond Clientelism: A New Perspective Through the Argentine Case. Latin American Politics and Society 56, 3: 23^5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zechmeister, Elizabeth J., and Noam, Lupu, eds. 2019. Pulse of Democracy. Nashville: LAPOP.Google Scholar
Zullo, Roland. 2008. Union Membership and Political Inclusion. ILR Review 62, 1: 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar