Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:14:53.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Socioeconomic Implications of Dollarization in El Salvador

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Abstract

This study argues that the costs associated with El Salvador's dollarization clearly outweigh the benefits and that the decision to dollarize was prompted not only by the need to promote economic growth, but also by the impluse to serve the interests of the financial sector and the large entrepreneurs who control the ruling ARENA party. Although the policy facilitates investment and international financial transactions, it has a negative effect on the poor by increasing inequality. To develop this argument, the authors discuss the socioeconomic and political situation in El Salvador at the time of dollarization, examine the Law of Monetary Integration, and analyze die effect of the dollarization policy on the poor.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfaro, Jorge. 2002. Comité Nacional de Micro y Pequeño Empresa (Conamype, National Commission for the Micro and Small Business). Author interview. San Salvador, July.Google Scholar
Bogetic, Zeljko. 2000. Full Dollarization: Fad or Future Challenge 43, 2 (March-April): 17–49.Google Scholar
Calcagno, Alfredo, and Sandra, Manuelito. 2001. Argentine Convertibility: Is It a Relevant Precedent for the Dollarization Process in Ecuador? Working paper. Santiago de Chile: ECLAC, Statistics and Economic Projections Division. July.Google Scholar
Chang, Roberto. 2000. Dollarization: a Scorecard. Economic Review 85, 3 (July): 1.Google Scholar
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 2002. El Salvador. The World Factbook 2002. <http://www.odci.govciapublicationsfactbookgoeses.html>..>Google Scholar
The Economist. 2002. Dollarization in Latin America: El Salvador Learns to Love the Greenback. September 28: 34.Google Scholar
Elton, Catherine. 2000. El Dolar Wins Fans in Latin America. Christian Science Monitor. December 19: 1–3. <http://www.csmonitorcomdurable20001219p6sl.htm>..>Google Scholar
Fischer, Stanley. 2001. Exchange Rate Regimes: Is the Bipolar View Correct? Paper. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, <http://www.imf.orgexternalnpspeeches200101060a.htm>.Google Scholar
Fundacion Nacional para el Desarrollo Economico (FUNDE). 2002. La Funde ante la dolarizacion. San Salvador: Funde. <http://www.funde.orgactualidades.htm>..>Google Scholar
vonFurstenberg, George. 2000. A Case against U.S. Dollarization. Challenge 43, 4 (July): 108–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto Universitario de Opinión Publica (IUDOP). 2002. Los salvadoreños evalúan el tercer año del gobierno de Francisco Flores. Año 17, no.2. San Salvador: IUDOP.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2000. Ecuador: Selected Issues and Statistical Annex. IMF Staff Country Report no. 00/125. Washington, DC: IMF. October.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2002. International Financial Statistics. Washington, DC: IMF. August.Google Scholar
López, Nelson. 2002. Pesadillas verdes. Diario Co Latino (San Salvador), June 23: 12.Google Scholar
Maldonado, Engelberto. 2002. Situación económica sin mejorar para empresarios. Diario Co Latino, July 23: 2.Google Scholar
Marcouiller, Douglas, de Castilla, Veronica Ruiz, and Christopher, Woodruff. 1995. Formal Measures of the Informal Sector Wage Gap in Mexico, El Salvador, and Peru. <http:fmwww.bc.eduEc-PWP294.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Medrano, Jaime. 2002. Cdc: tres años de gobierno de Flores con aumentos tarifarios. Diario Co Latino, July.Google Scholar
Naranjo Chiriboga, Marco P. 2000. Hacia la dolarización oficial en Ecuador: su aplicación en un contexto de crisis. Quito: Banco Central de Ecuador.Google Scholar
Ochoa, Maria Eugenia. 2002. Economist, Funde. Author interview. San Salvador, July.Google Scholar
Petras, James. 1997. El Salvador Elections: Polarization in the Post-Peace Accord Period. Z Magazine, July. <http://www.zmag.orgZMagarticlespetrasjuly97.html>..>Google Scholar
Proceso-Informativo Semanal (San Salvador). 2000a. No. 915, August 23.Google Scholar
Proceso-Informativo Semanal (San Salvador). 2000b. No. 932, December 20.Google Scholar
Proceso-Informativo Semanal (San Salvador). 2001. No. 933, January 3.Google Scholar
Proceso-Informativo Semanal (San Salvador). 2002a. No. 986, February 13.Google Scholar
Proceso-Informativo Semanal (San Salvador). 2002b. No. 1030, December 25.Google Scholar
Proceso-Informativo Semanal (San Salvador). 2003. No. 1023, February 6.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Gloria. 2002. Fed presentará análisis sobre economía. La Prensa Gráfica (San Salvador): June 25.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Balza, Rafael. 2002. El Salvador. Inter-American Development Bank, situación económica y prospectos. October, <http://www.iadb.orregionsre2sepes-sep.htm>..>Google Scholar
Sachs, Jeffrey, and Felipe, Larrain. 2000. iquestPor qué la dolarización es más una camisa de fuerza que una salvación? In Dolarización: informe urgente, ed. Alberto, Acosta and José, Juncosa. Quito: ILDIS Abya/Yala UPS. 229–43.Google Scholar
Saget, Catherine. 2001. Is the Minimum Wage an Effective Tool to Promote Decent Work and Reduce Poverty? the Experience of Selected Less Developed Countries. International Labor Organization Employment Paper 2001/13. Washington, Dc: Ilo. <http://www.ilo.orgpublicenglishemploymentstratpublep01-13.htm>..>Google Scholar
Schuldt, Jurgen. 1999. Dolarización oficial de la economía: un debate en once actos. Lima: Universidad del Pacifico.Google Scholar
Statistical Abstract of Latin America . 2000. Vol. 36. University of California, Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American Center Publications.Google Scholar
Statistical Abstract of Latin America . 2001. Vol. 37. University of California, Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American.Google Scholar
Center Publications.Google Scholar
Truman, Edwin M. 2000. Prepared Testimony of the Honorable Edwin M. Truman, Assistant Secretary for International Affairs, United States Treasury, before the Senate Banking Committee, Subcommittee on Economic Policy, Hearing on bill S.1879, the International Monetary Stability Act. February 8. <http://www.senate.gov-banking00_02hrg020800truman.htm>..>Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 2002. Background Note: El Salvador. <http://www.state.govrpaeibgn2033.htm>..>Google Scholar
World Bank. 2000. World Development Indicators 2000. Washington, DC: World Bank. March.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2002. World Development Indicators 2002. Washington, DC: World Bank. June.Google Scholar