Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:37:17.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preauthoritarian Institutions and Postauthoritarian Outcomes: Labor Politics in Chile and Uruguay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Paul G. Buchanan
Paul G. Buchanan*
Affiliation:
U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey; the Institute of International Studies, University of Arizona; New College; and the University of Auckland. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article argues that preauthoritarian institutions have strongly influenced postauthoritarian labor politics in Chile and Uruguay. The nature of preauthoritarian labor administration—state corporatist in Chile, pluralist in Uruguay—had a strong impact on postauthoritarian collective outcomes, whether or not they were modified by the dictators or the ideological disposition of the postauthoritarian governments. Variation in preauthoritarian labor politics between Chile and Uruguay gave historical foundation to different union fortunes in the postauthoritarian era. That result points to the contemporary influence of preauthoritarian institutions, with or without authoritarian modifiers.

Type
Research
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , Spring 2008 , pp. 59 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acuña, Eduardo. 1994. Irracionalidad en sindicatos chilenos. Estudios Sociales 79: 177–205.Google Scholar
Alexander, Robert. 1962. Labor Relations in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile. New York : McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Barrera, Manuel. 1995. La negociación colectiva en Chile, una decentralización excesiva. Estudios Sociales 86: 181–207.Google Scholar
Barrett, Patrick. 2001. Labor Policy, Business-Business Relations and the Transition to Democracy in Chile. Journal of Latin American Studies 33, 2 (August): 561–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergquist, Charles. 1986. Labor in Latin America: Comparative Essays on Chile, Argentina, Colombia, and Venezuela. Stanford : Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Paul G. 1985. State Corporatism in Argentina: Labor Administration under perón and Ongania. Latin American Research Review 20, 1 (Spring): 61–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Paul G. 1995. State, Labor Capital: Democratizing Class Relations in the Southern Cone. Pittsburgh : University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, Katrina. 2004. Parties and Unions in the New Global Economy. Pittsburgh : University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraway, Teri L. 2006. Freedom of Association: Battering Ram or Trojan Horse Review of International Political Economy 13, 2 (May): 210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassoni, Adriana, Allen, Steven G., and Labadie, Gaston J.. 2000. Unions and Employment in Uruguay. Latin American Research Network Working Paper R-392 (May). Washington, DC : Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Centro Interamericano de Administración de Trabajo. 1982. Reunión técnica regional sobre el convenio 150 y la recomendación 158 de la OIT relativos a la administración de trabajo. Lima : OIT/PNUD.Google Scholar
Chile Concertación de Partidos por la Democracia. 1989. Programa de Gobierno. Santiago : Concertación.Google Scholar
Chile. Ministerio de Trabajo y Previsión Social. 2000. Reseña de actividades. Santiago : Dirección de Trabajo.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Collier, Ruth Berins. 1979. Inducements versus Constraints: Disaggregating “Corporatism.” American Political Science Review 73, 4 (October): 967–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, María Lorena. 2002. Labor Reform and Dual Transitions in Brazil and the Southern Cone. Latin American Politics and Society 44, 1 (Spring): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2005. Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Oxford : Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diario Oficial (Uruguay). 1978. June 21.Google Scholar
Drake, Paul 1996. Labor Movements and Dictatorships: The Southern Cone in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLAC). 2000. Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean, 1998–99. New York : ECLAC.Google Scholar
Epstein, Edward. 1993. Labor and Political Stability in the New Chilean Democracy: Three Illusions. Economía y Trabajo 1, 2 (July-December): 47–64.Google Scholar
Etchemendy, Sebastián 2004. Repression, Exclusion, and Inclusion: Government-Union Relations and Patterns of Labor Reform in Liberalizing Economies. Comparative Politics 36, 2 (April): 273–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, eds. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Volker. 2002. The Elusive Goal in Democratic Chile: Reforming the Pinochet Labor Legislation. Latin American Politics and Society 44, 1 (Spring): 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frías, Patricio. 1995. Sindicalismo y desarrollo de acción contestaria. Economía y Trabajo en Chile 1994-95. Informe Anual no. 5. Santiago : Progama de Economía y Trabajo. 57–74.Google Scholar
Gargiulo, Martín. 1986. El movimiento sindical uruguayo en los 1980: ¿concertación o confrontación? in El sindicalismo latinoamericano en los ochenta, ed. Clacso, Santiago : Comisión de Movimientos Laborales. 167–80.Google Scholar
Haagh, Louise. 2002) The Emperor's New Clothes: Labor Reform and Social Democratization in Chile. Studies in Comparative International Development 37, 1 (Spring): 86–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heguey Terra, Enrique 1979. Estudios sobre la administración del trabajo en Uruguay. 2 vols. Montevideo : MTSS/Universidad de la República.Google Scholar
Henríquez, Helia 1986. La reconstitución del sindicalismo durante el régimen militar: analísis de algunos sectores urbanos. In El sindicalismo latinoamericano en los ochenta, ed. Clacso, Santiago : Comisión de Movimientos Laborales. 245–64.Google Scholar
Informes Relasur. 1994. Las relaciones laborales en Chile. Madrid : Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social/OIT.Google Scholar
International Labor Organization (ILO) 1987. Relaciones laborales en Uruguay. Geneva : ILO.Google Scholar
International Labor Organization (ILO). 2002a. Strikes and Lockouts by Economic Activity. (table 9A). Geneva : Laborsta. <http://laborsta.ilo.org> Accessed February 25, 2006.+Accessed+February+25,+2006.>Google Scholar
International Labor Organization (ILO). 2002b. Workers Involved by Economic Activity (table 9B). Geneva : Laborsta. <http://laborsta.ilo.org> Accessed February 25, 2006.+Accessed+February+25,+2006.>Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, Diego 1995. El proyecto de reforma laboral: avances y desafíos. In Economía y trabajo en Chile 1994–95. Informe Anual no. 5. Santiago : Programa de Economía y Trabajo. 95–114.Google Scholar
Malloy, James, ed. 1977. Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh : University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl 1869 (1852). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. 2nd ed. Trans. Padover, Saul K. Hamburg. <http://marx.eserver.org/1852-eighteenthbrumaire/part1.txt>Accessed December 29, 2007.Accessed+December+29,+2007.>Google Scholar
Monroe, Kristin R. 2001. Paradigm Shift: from Rational Choice to Perspective. International Political Science Review 22, 2 (June): 151–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, María Victoria. 2001. Labor Unions, Partisan Coalitions and Market Reforms in Latin America. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, Maria Victoria, and Schrank, Andrew. 2005. With a Little Help from My Friends: External and Domestic Allies and Labor Rights in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 38, 8 (October): 971–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo 1977. Corporatism and the Question of the State. In Malloy 1977. 47–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patomaki, Heikke, and Teivainen, Teivo. 2002. Critical Responses to Neoliberal Globalization in the Mercosur Region: Roads toward Cosmopolitan Democracy Review of International Political Economy 9, 1 (March): 37–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patroni, Viviana 2001. The Decline and Fall of Corporatism? Labour Legislation Reform in Mexico and Argentina during the 1990s. Canadian Journal of Political Science 34, 2 (June): 249–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Programa Modernización de las Relaciones Laborales. 2000. Relaciones laborales en 1999 y tendencias de los últimos cinco años. Montevideo : Universidad Católica.Google Scholar
Real de Azúa, Carlos. 1971. Política, poder y partidos en el Uruguay de hoy. In Uruguay de hoy, ed. Benvenuto, Carlos et al. Mexico City : Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2002. Social Inequalities without Class Cleavages: Party Systems and Labor Movements in Latin America's Neoliberal Era. Studies in Comparative International Development 36, 4 (Winter): 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1974. Still the Century of Corporatism Review of Politics 36, 1 (March): 85–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1992. The Consolidation of Democracy and the Representation of Social Groups. American Behavioral Scientist 35, 4–5 (March): 422–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stillerman, Joel 2004. Disciplined Workers and Avid Consumers: Neoliberal Policy and the Transformation of Work and Identity Among Chilean Metalworkers. In Victims of the Chilean Miracle? Chilean Workers and Neoliberalism in the Pinochet Era, 1973-2002, ed. Winn, Peter Durham : Duke University Press. 164–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uruguay Instituto Nacional de Estadística. 2001. Indice medio de salarios (IMS 2, 87). February.Google Scholar
Weeks, John. 1999. Wages, Employment, and Worker's Rights in Latin America, 1970–98. International Labour Review 138, 2 (June): 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt 2004. Neoliberalism and Democracy in Latin America: a Mixed Record. Latin American Politics and Society, 46, 1 (Spring): 135–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiarda, Howard. 1976. The Corporative Origins of the Iberian and Latin American Labor Relations System. Amherst : University of Massachusetts Labor Relations and Research Center.Google Scholar