Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T01:02:11.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Poverty of Democracy: Neoliberal Reforms and Political Participation of the Poor in Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Claudio A. Holzner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Twenty years after governments across Latin America began implementing neoliberal reforms in earnest, concern is growing about their impact on the quality of democracy in the region. This article examines this issue in the case of Mexico by exploring how patterns of political participation, especially among the rural and urban poor, have changed since the implementation of free market reforms. It asks whether the institutional innovations associated with free market reforms make it easier or more difficult for the poor to participate in Mexico's political process. The answer is not encouraging. Despite democratic openings, the new linkages between the state and citizens established as a result of the transition to a free market development model stifle the voice of the poor not through the threat of force or coercion, but by creating obstacles and disincentives for political mobilization that affect the poor more severely than other groups.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , Summer 2007 , pp. 87 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel, and Verba, Sidney 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltvinik, Julio. 2003. Welfare, Equality, and Poverty in Mexico, 1970–2000. In Confronting Development: Assessing Mexico's Economic and Social Policy, ed. Middlebrook, Kevin J. and Zepeda, Eduardo Stanford: Stanford University Press. 385–446.Google Scholar
Enrique, Cabrero Mendoza 1998. Las políticas descentralizadoras en México, 1983–1993: logros y desencantos. México: Porrúa.Google Scholar
Campbell, Tim. 2003. The Quiet Revolution: Decentralization and the Rise of Political Participation in Latin American Cities. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL) 2000. Panorama social de América Latina. Santiago, Chile: United Nations.Google Scholar
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES). 19972003. <http:www.cses.org>..>Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A. 1974. Urbanization and Political Demand Making: Political Participation among the Migrant Poor in Latin American Cities. American Political Science Review 68 (3): 1125–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Ann L., and Cornelius, Wayne A. 1980. Political Culture in Mexico: Continuities and Revisionist Interpretations. In The Civic Culture Revisited, ed. Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Díaz-Cayeros, Alberto. 2004. Decentralization, Democratization and Federalism in Mexico. In Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico, ed. Middlebrook, Kevin J. London/La Jolla: Institute of Latin American Studies/Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego. 198–234.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., and Poiré, Alejandro, eds. 1999. Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., and Lawson, Chappell, eds. 2004. Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Candidates, Voters, and the Presidential Campaign of 2000. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., and McCann, James A. 1996. Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Eaton, Kent. 2004. Politics Beyond the Capital: The Design of Subnational Institutions in South America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Susan. 1977. The Poverty of Revolution: The State and the Urban Poor in Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fairris, David, and Levine, Edward 2004. Declining Union Density in Mexico, 1984–2000. Monthly Labor Review (September): 10–17.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 1993. The Politics of Food in Mexico: State Power and Social Mobilization, Pood Systems and Agrarian Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, Luis, and Fox, Jonathan 1992. Mexico's Difficult Democracy: Grassroots Movements, Ngos and Local Government. Alternatives 17: 165–208.Google Scholar
Giugale, Marcelo M., Lafourcade, Olivier, and Nguyen, Vinh H., eds. 2001. Mexico: A Comprehensive Development Agenda for the New Era. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Grindle, Merilee. 1986. State and Countryside: Development Policy and Agrarian Politics in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Grindle, Merilee. 1995. Reforming Land Tenure in Mexico: Peasants, the Market, and the State. In The Challenge of Institutional Reform in Mexico, ed. Roett, Riordan. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, Matthew C. 2002. The Romance of Democracy: Compliant Defiance in Contemporary Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R. 1992. The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Nora. 1982. The Limits of State Autonomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hellman, Judith Adler. 1994. Mexican Popular Movements, Clientelism, and the Process of Democratization. Latin American Perspectives 21 (2): 124–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzner, Claudio A. 2004. End of Clientelism? Strong and Weak Networks in a Mexican Squatter Movement. Mobilization: An International Journal 9 (3): 223–40.Google Scholar
Houtzager, Peter, and Kurtz, Marcus J. 2000. The Institutional Roots of Popular Mobilization. Comparative Studies of Society and History 42 (2): 394–424.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Solt, Fred 2004. Successes and Failures of Neoliberalism. Latin American Research Review 39 (3): 150–64.Google Scholar
Instituto Federal Electoral (IFE) and Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales de la Universidad Autónoma de México (UNAM). 2003. Encuesta nacional de cultura política. La naturaleza del compromiso cívico: capital social y cultura política en México. <http:www.ife.org.mx>..>Google Scholar
Klesner, Joseph, and Lawson, Chappell 2000. Adiós to the Pri? Changing Voter Turnout in Mexico's Political Transition. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 17 (1): 17–39.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus J. 2004. Free Market Democracy and the Chilean and Mexican Countryside. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Chappell, and Klesner, Joseph 2004. Political Reform, Electoral Participation, and the Campaign of 2000. In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Stanford: Stanford University Press. 67–87.Google Scholar
Lindbloom, Charles. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin J. 1995. The Paradox of Revolution: Labor, the State, and Authoritarianism in Mexico. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 2003. Democracia, actitudes políticas y conducta electoral. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Nie, Norman H. Jr., Powell, G. Bingham, and Prewitt, Kenneth 1969a. Social Structure and Political Participation: Developmental Relationships. Part 1. American Political Science Review 63 (2): 361–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, Norman H. Jr., Powell, G. Bingham, and Prewitt, Kenneth 1969b. Social Structure and Political Participation: Developmental Relationships. Part 2. American Political Science Review 63 (3): 808–32.Google Scholar
Olvera, Alberto J. 2004. Civil Society in Mexico at Century's End. In Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico, ed. Middlebrook, Kevin J. London: Institute of Latin American Studies/Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies. 403–39.Google Scholar
Pastor, Manuel Jr., and Wise, Carol 2003. A Long View of Mexico's Political Economy: What Changed? What Are the Challenges? In Mexico's Politics and Society in Transition, ed. Tulchin, Joseph S. and Selee, Andrew D.. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. 179–213.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro, and Hoffman, Kelly 2003. Latin American Class Structures: Their Composition and Change during the Neoliberal Era. Latin American Research Review 38 (1): 41–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez Sáiz, Juan Manuel. 1986. El movimiento urbano popular en México. Mexico City: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 1999. Deepening Democracy? The Modern Left and Social Movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria Elizabeth. 1997. Decentralization in Mexico: From Reforma Municipal to Solidaridad to Nuevo Federalismo. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark 1993. Mobilization, Participation and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Samstad, James G. 2002. Corporatism and Democratic Transition: State and Labor during the Salinas and Zedillo Administrations. Latin American Politics and Society 44 (2): 1–28.Google Scholar
Shadlen, Kenneth C. 2000. Neoliberalism, Corporatism, and Small Business Political Activism in Contemporary Mexico. Latin American Research Review 35 (2): 73–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadlen, Kenneth C. 2002. Orphaned by Democracy: Small Industry in Contemporary Mexico. Comparative Politics 35 (1).Google Scholar
Snyder, Richard. 2001. Politics After Neoliberalism: Reregulation in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 1995. Cultures in Conflict: Social Movements and the State in Peru. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movement. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teichman, Judith A. 1997. Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Mexican Authoritarianism. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 13 (1): 121–47.Google Scholar
Teichman, Judith A. 2001. The Politics of Freeing Markets in Latin America: Chile, Argentina, and Mexico. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Teichman, Judith A. 2004. The World Bank and Policy Reform in Mexico and Argentina. Latin American Politics and Society 46 (1): 40–74.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman H., and Kim, Jae-on 1978. Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1996. Democracy Without Equity: Failures of Reform in Brazil. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2004. Neoliberalism and Democracy in Latin America: a Mixed Record. Latin American Politics and Society 46 (1): 136–57.Google Scholar
Willis, Eliza, Garman, Christopher, and Haggard, Stephan 1999. The Politics of Decentralization in Latin America. Latin American Research Review 34 (1): 7–56.Google Scholar
Wise, Carol. 2003. Post-Stabilization Politics in Latin America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2002. World Development Report 2002. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Values Survey. 1981–2000. <http:www.worldvaluessurvey.org>..>Google Scholar