Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:50:33.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policymaking by Referendum in Presidential Systems: Evidence from the Bolivian and Colombian Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Anita Breuer
Anita Breuer*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of Cologne. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Government-initiated referendums (GIRs) have so far been neglected by the debate on the effects of institutions on policymaking in presidential systems. The literature on Latin American politics has focused on isolated cases of GIRs, which are largely interpreted as epiphenomenal to a regional trend toward personalistic neopopulism. This article provides a conceptual framework for the systematic comparative study of GIRs. It argues that presidents' propensity to promote legal changes through referendums and their concomitant capacity to dominate policymaking are subject to the interaction of two institutional variables (constitutional rules regulating the competences of elected officials in GIR processes and minimum turnout requirements) and two political variables (preference distribution in the legislature and the position of the median voter). These propositions are tested through a comparative analysis of referendum experiences in Colombia and Bolivia, two cases with similar political settings and significant variation in each of the institutional variables.

Type
Research
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , Winter 2008 , pp. 59 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abromeit, Heidrun. 1998. Democracy in Europe: Legitimising Politics in a Non-State Polity. Oxford: Berghan Books.Google Scholar
Altman, David. 2002. Popular Initiatives in Uruguay: Confidence Votes on Government or Political Loyalties? Electoral Studies 21, 4: 617–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, David. 2005. Democracia directa en el continente americano: ¿auto-legitimación gubernamental o censura ciudadana? Política y Gobierno 12, 2: 203–32.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2004. Report 2004: Bolivia. <http://web.amnesty.org/report2005/bol-summary-eng> Accessed November 26, 2007.+Accessed+November+26,+2007.>Google Scholar
Apoyo Opinión y Mercado Bolivia. 2004. Monthly reports, October 2003–January 2004.Google Scholar
Apoyo Opinión y Mercado Bolivia, eds. 2003. Opinión data: resumen de encuestas a la opinión pública. Various issues.Google Scholar
Archer, Ronald. 1995. Party Strength and Weakness in Colombia's Besieged Democracy. In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R.. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 164–99.Google Scholar
Arrarás, Astrid, and Deheza, Grace. 2005. Referéndum del gas en Bolivia 2004: mucho más que un referéndum. Revista de Ciencia Política 25, 2: 161–72.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barczak, Monica. 2001. Representation by Consultation? the Rise of Direct Democracy in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society 43, 3 (Fall): 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beetham, David, ed. 2002. International IDEA Handbook on Democracy Assessment. Stockholm: IDEA.Google Scholar
Bolivia. Corte Nacional Electoral. 2004. Election results. <http://www.cne.org.bo> Accessed October 20, 2008.+Accessed+October+20,+2008.>Google Scholar
Botero, Felipe. 2007. Colombia: ¿democracia, paracracia o simplemente desgracia? Revista de Ciencia Política 27 (Special Issue): 97–112.Google Scholar
Breuer, Anita. 2007. Institutions of Direct Democracy and Accountability in Latin America's Presidential Democracies. Democratization 14, 4: 554–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, Anita. 2008. The Problematic Relation between Direct Democracy and Accountability in Latin America: Evidence from the Bolivian Case. Bulletin of Latin American Research 27, 1: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, David, and Ranney, Austin. 1994. Referendums Around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Washington, DC: AEI Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Charles M. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1998. Executive Decree Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, José A. 2002. Minority Governments, Deadlock Situations and the Survival of Presidential Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 35: 284–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombia. Consejo Nacional Electoral. n.d. Election returns. <http://www.cne.gov.co> Accessed October 20, 2008.+Accessed+October+20,+2008.>Google Scholar
Colombia. Corte Constitucional. 2003. Sentencia C-551–03. July 9. <http://elabedul.net/Documentos/Leyes/2003/C-551-03_sentencia.pdf> Accessed October 18, 2008.+Accessed+October+18,+2008.>Google Scholar
Correo del Sur (Sucre). 2004. Instituciones de Santa Cruz rechazan referéndum del gas. May 19.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Morgenstern, Scott. 2001. Latin America's Reactive Assemblies and Proactive Presidents. Comparative Politics 33, 2: 171–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellner, Steve. 2003. The Contrasting Variants of the Populism of Hugo Chávez and Alberto Fujimori. Journal of Latin American Studies 35, 1: 139–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evaristo, Tomás A. 2006. Colombia entre la crisis de la representatividad y la democracia directa. Paper presented at the International Conference on Direct Democracy in Latin America, Research Center on Direct Democracy, Buenos Aires, March 14–15.Google Scholar
Ferrer, Yadira. 2002. Uribe's Reforms Tilt Political Balance. In Ashville Global Report 190 (August 5). <http://www.theglobalreport.org/issues/190/index.html> Accessed October 18, 2008. Accessed October 18, 2008.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ferrer,+Yadira.+2002.+Uribe's+Reforms+Tilt+Political+Balance.+In+Ashville+Global+Report+190+(August+5).++Accessed+October+18,+2008.>Google Scholar
Financial times (London). 2003. Baffled Colombians Look On as Uribe Pulls Out All Stops. October 22.Google Scholar
Fornos, Carolina A., Power, Timothy J., and Garand, James C.. 2004. Explaining Voter Turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000. Comparative Political Studies 37, 8: 909–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaceta del Congreso Colombiano. 2002a. Proyecto de ley 47 de 2002. No. 396, September 3.Google Scholar
Gaceta del Congreso Colombiano. 2002b. Ponencia para segundo debate al proyecto de ley 47 de 2002 en el Senado. No. 439, October 24.Google Scholar
Gaceta del Congreso Colombiano. 2002c. Acta Plenaria 26 del 20 de Noviembre 2002. No. 548, November 28.Google Scholar
Gross, Andreas, and Kaufmann, Bruno. 2002. IRI Europe Country Index on Citizen Lawmaking 2002. In Report on Design and Rating of the I&R Requirements and Practices of 32 European States, ed. Gross, and Kaufmann, . Amsterdam: Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and McCubbins, Matthew D., eds. 2001. Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy. The Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk. 2003. Populism in Venezuela: the Rise of Chavismo. Third World Quarterly 24, 6: 1137–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, Javier, Razafindrakoto, Mireille, and Roubaud, François. 2005. Governance, Democracy and Poverty Reduction: Lessons Drawn from Household Surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. Paris: Ministère des Affaires Etrangères, Direction Générale de la Coopération Internationale et du Dévelopment.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA). 2004. Issues Relating to the Referendum Mechanism: an Electoral Processes Team Working Paper.Google Scholar
Latin American Weekly Report (London). 2002a. Uribe Starts with Congress behind Him; Liberals Seek to Reclaim Him, No Real Opposition. June 11.Google Scholar
Latin American Weekly Report (London). 2002b. Minister Says the State is Bankrupt. October 15.Google Scholar
Latinnews Daily (London). 2003. Uribe Tries to Reverse Referendum Result. December 19.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1991. Divided Government: America Is Not Exceptional. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 4, 3: 250–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphardt, Arend J. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linder, Wolf. 1998. Swiss Democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 2006. The Crisis of Representation in the Andes. Journal of Democracy 17, 3: 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America: Rethinking the Terms of the Debate. In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Shugart, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 12–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayorga, René. 2002. Outsiders and Neopopulism: The Road to Plebiscitarian Authoritarianism. Paper presented at the conference “The Crisis of Democratic Representation in the Andes,” University of Notre Dame, May 13–14.Google Scholar
Muggah, Robert, Restrepo, Jorge, Krause, Keith, and Spagat, Michael. 2005. Colombia's Chimaera: Reflections on Human Security and Armed Violence. Human Security Bulletin (December).Google Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel. 2004. Government Capacities and Policy Making by Decree in Latin America: the Cases of Brazil and Argentina. Comparative Political Studies 37: 531–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. Delegative Democracy. Journal of Democracy 5: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Prensa (La Paz). 2003. Petrobras y Repsol controlan las mayores reservas de gas. June 15.Google Scholar
La Razón (La Paz). 2004. Los grupos radicales dan pelea al referéndum y el gobierno se esfuerza en dar explicaciones. May 21.Google Scholar
Salazar, Elena R. 2006. Bolivia: el referéndum. Paper presented at the International Conference on Direct Democracy in Latin America, Research Center on Direct Democracy, Buenos Aires, March 14–15.Google Scholar
Samuels, David J., and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 2003. Presidentialism, Elections and Representation. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15, 1: 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Phillipe C. 2000. How to Democratize the Euro-Polity and Why Bother. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
La Semana (Bogotá). 2002a. Ahora lo mas dificil. August 5.Google Scholar
La Semana (Bogotá). 2002b. Ramos defiende legitimidad del Congreso, que Uribe quiere disolver. August 5.Google Scholar
La Semana (Bogotá). 2002c. Arranca la campaña. December 7.Google Scholar
La Semana (Bogotá). 2003. Referendo: el voto de Semana. October 20.Google Scholar
Setälä, Maija. 2006. On the Problems of Responsibility and Accountability. European Journal of Political Research 45: 699–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew, and Archer, Ronald. 1997. The Unrealized Potential of Presidential Dominance in Colombia. In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Shugart, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 110–59.Google Scholar
Smith, Gordon. 1976. The Functional Properties of the Referendum. European Journal of Political Research 4: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sproule-Jones, Mark. 1993. Governments at Work: Canadian Parliamentary Federalism and Its Public Policy Effects. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suksi, Marku. 1993. Bringing in the People: A Comparison of Constitutional Forms and Practices of the Referendum. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhof.Google Scholar
Los Tiempos (Cochabamba). 2004. April 21.Google Scholar
Uleri, Pier V. 1996. Introduction. In The Referendum Experience in Europe, ed. Gallagher, M. and Uleri, . New York: Macmillan. 1–19.Google Scholar
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2006. 2005 Global Refugee Trends. Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
Van Cott, Donna Lee. 2000. Party System Development and Indigenous Populations in Latin America: the Bolivian Case. Party Politics 6, 2: 155–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Joseph F. 1986. Participatory Democracy: Populism Revived. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Zovatto Garetto, Daniel. 2007. Las instituciones de la democracia directa a nivel nacional en América Latina: un balance comparado 1978–2007. Paper presented at the Seminar on the Referendum in Costa Rica, San José, May 25.Google Scholar