Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:10:41.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Natália Sátyro, Eloísa del Pino, and Carmen Midaglia, eds., Latin American Social Policy Developments in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. Figures, tables, acronyms, notes, bibliography, index, 371 pp.; hardcover $119.99, ebook $89.

Review products

Natália Sátyro, Eloísa del Pino, and Carmen Midaglia, eds., Latin American Social Policy Developments in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. Figures, tables, acronyms, notes, bibliography, index, 371 pp.; hardcover $119.99, ebook $89.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2021

Jorge Hernández-Moreno*
Affiliation:
Spanish National Research Council

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
© The Author, 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the University of Miami

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cruz-Martínez, Gibrán, ed. 2019. Welfare and Social Protection in Contemporary Latin America. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gough, Ian, and Wood, Geof. 2004. Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2008. Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Martínez, Franzoni, Juliana. 2008. Welfare Regimes in Latin America: Capturing Constellations of Markets, Families, and Policies. Latin American Politics and Society 50, 2: 67100.Google Scholar