Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:16:49.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Judicial Performance and the Rule of Law in the Mexican States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Caroline C. Beer
Caroline C. Beer*
Affiliation:
University of Vermont
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What determines how judicial institutions perform? Prominent theoretical approaches, such as international political economy, institutional rational choice, social capital, and structural theories, suggest that international economic actors, political competition, political participation, and poverty may all be important forces driving institutional behavior. This study analyzes these various theoretical approaches and uses qualitative and statistical analysis to compare judicial performance in the Mexican states. It provides evidence to support the institutional rational choice hypothesis that political competition generates judicial independence. Poverty, political participation, and an export-oriented economy seem to influence judicial access and effectiveness.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , Autumn 2006 , pp. 33 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amnesty International. 2003. Mexico. Unfair Trials: Unsafe Convictions. Ai Index Amr 41/007/2003. Available at http:web.amnesty.orglibrary/IndexPrint/ENGAMR410072003?open. Accessed March 26, 2003.Google Scholar
Beer, Caroline C., and Neil, J. Mitchell. 2004. Democracy and Human Rights: Elections or Social Capital International Studies Quarterly 48, 2: 1–312.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel. 2003. Informal Institutions and the Rule of Law: the Judicial Response to State Killings in Buenos Aires and São Paulo in the 90s. Comparative Politics 36, 1: 1–19.Google Scholar
Campbell, Monica. 2004. Fox Bids to Reform Mexican Justice. Christian Science Monitor , April 6.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, Jaime F. 1999. El poder judicial en transición. In La ciencia política en México, ed. Mauricio, Merino. Mexico City: Consejo Nacional para la Culture y Las Artes, Fondo de Cultura Económica. 1–137.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios Estratégicos del Sistema Tecnológico de Monterrey (CEE). 1999. La competitividad de los estados mexicanos. Monterrey: Sistema Tecnológico de Monterrey.Google Scholar
Centro Mexicano para la Filantropía (CEMEFI). 2002. Directorio de instituciones filantrópicas. Available at http:www.cemefi.org Accessed March 23, 2003.Google Scholar
Concha Cantú, Hugo A., and José, Antonio 2002. La reforma judicial en las entidades federativas. In Estado de derecho y transición jurídica, ed. José, Ma. and Caballero, Juárez Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas. Serie Doctrina Jurídica no. 95. 1–90.Google Scholar
Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO). 2001. Indices de marginación 2000. Mexico City: CONAPO. http:www.conapo.gob.mxpublicacionesindice2000.htm.Google Scholar
Dakolias, Maria. 2001. Legal and Judicial Reform: The Role of Civil Society in the Reform Process. In The Rule of Law in Latin America: The International Promotion of Judicial Reform, ed. Pilar, Domingo. and Rachel, Sieder. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London. 1–98.Google Scholar
Domingo, Pilar. 2000. Judicial Indpendence: the Politics of the Supreme Court in Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies 32, 3: 1–35.Google Scholar
Economist 2003. Crime in Mexico: Wakey Wakey June 28: 1–34.Google Scholar
Finkel, Jodi. 1999. Judicial Reform in Latin America: Market Economies, Self-Interested Politicians, and Judicial Power. Paper presented at the conference of the Organization for the Scientific Study of the Courts, College Station, Texas, October 15.Google Scholar
Finkel, Jodi. 2003. Supreme Court Decisions on Electoral Rules after Mexico's 1994 Judicial Reform: an Empowered Court. Journal of Latin American Studies 35, 3: 1–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frühling, Hugo. 1998. Judicial Reform and Democratization in Latin America. In Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America, ed. Felipe, Agüero and Jeffrey, Stark. Coral Gables: North-South Center Press. 1–62.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politician's Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1996. Initiation of New Democratic Institutions in Eastern Europe and Latin America. In Institutional Design in New Democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America, ed. Arend, Lijphart. and Carlos, H. Waisman. Boulder: Westview Press. 1–41.Google Scholar
Gómez, Elva A. 1994. Cosyddhac: inventorio de vida, seis años de lucha por los derechos humanos. Chihuahua: Comisión de Solidaridad y Defensa de los Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar
González Casanova, Pablo. 1970 [1965]. Democracy in Mexico. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2002. The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina under Dictatorship and Democracy. American Political Science Review 96, 2: 1–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2003. Checks and Balances by Other Means: Strategic Defection and Argentina's Supreme Court in the 1990s. Comparative Politics 35, 2: 1–30.Google Scholar
Human, Rights Watch 1999. Systemic Injustice: Torture, “Disappearance,” and Extrajudicial Execution in Mexico. Available at http:www.hrw.orgreports1999mexico Accessed July 2, 2003.Google Scholar
Iaryczower, Matías, Pablo, T. Spiller, and Mariano, Tommasi. 2002. Judicial Independence in Unstable Environments: Argentina 1935–1998. American Journal of Political Science 46, 4: 1–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R. 1999. Approaches to the Study of State Reform in Latin America and Postsocialist Countries. Comparative Politics 31, 3: 1–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R. 2003. The Comparative Politics of Administrative Reform: Some Implications for Theory and Practice. In Reinventing Leviathan: The Politics of Administrative Reform in Developing Countries, ed. Ben, Ross Schneider and Blanca, Heredia. Coral Gables: North-South Center Press. 1–302.Google Scholar
Larkins, Christopher. 1998. The Judiciary and Delegative Democracy in Argentina. Comparative Politics 30, 4: 1–42.Google Scholar
Magalhães, Pedro C. 1999. The Politics of Judicial Reform in Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics 32, 1: 1–62.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2003. Authoritarianism, Democracy, and the Supreme Court: Horizontal Exchange and the Rule of Law in Mexico. In Democratic Accountability in Latin America, ed. Scott, Mainwaring. and Christopher, Welna. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1–305.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Guillermo, Zepeda. 2004. Democratization, Judicial and Law Enforcement Institutions, and the Rule of Law in Mexico. In Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico, ed. Kevin, J. Middlebrook. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London. 1–97.Google Scholar
Mahon, James E. Jr. 2003. Reforms in the Administration of Justice in Latin America: Overview and Emerging Trends. In Reinventing Leviathan: The Politics of Administrative Reform in Developing Countries, ed. Ben, Ross Schneider and Blanca, Heredia. Coral Gables: North-South Center Press. 1–80.Google Scholar
Manager, Instituto de Capacitación de Poder Judicial del Estado de Aguas-calientes. 2004. Author interview. Aguascalientes, August.Google Scholar
Márquez, Algara, María, Guadalupe. 1999. Historia de la administración de justicia en Aguascalientes Aguascalientes: Instituto de Capacitación de Poder Judicial, Supremo Tribunal de Justicia Estado de Aguascalientes.Google Scholar
Maxfield, Sylvia. 1997. Gatekeepers of Growth: The International Political Economy of Central Banking in Developing Countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mexico. Presidencia de la República. 2004. Iniciativa de reforma al sistema de seguridad pública y justicia penal. March 24. http:seguridadyjusticia.presidencia.gob.mx. Accessed January 12, 2005.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, Yemile. 1994. Rebels without a Cause?the Politics of Entrepreneurs in Chihuahua. Journal of Latin American Studies 26, 1: 1–59.Google Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel, and Mark, Ungar. 1997. Independencia del poder judicial y estado de derecho en América Latina: los casos de Argentina y Venezuela. Política y Gobierno 4, 1: 1–114.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poder Judicial del Estado de Guanajuato (PJEG). 19832001. Informe de Labores. Annual report, internal document. Guanajuato: PJEG.Google Scholar
Prillaman, William C. 2000. The Judiciary and Democratic Decay in Latin America: Declining Confidence in the Rule of Law. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rios-Figueroa, Julio. 2003. A Minimum Condition for the Judiciary to Become an Effective Power: the Mexican Supreme Court, 1994–2002. Paper presented at the 24th meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Dallas, March 1–29.Google Scholar
Rossiter, Clinton ed. 1961. The Federalist Papers: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Scribner, Druscilla. 2003. Sincere and Strategic Judicial Behavior on the Chilean Supreme Court. Paper presented at the 61st Annual Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 1–5.Google Scholar
SourceMex, 2002a. Supreme Court Says President Vicente Fox's Plan to Encourage Private Sales of Electricity to State Violated Constitution. Latin American Database May 1. http:ladb.unm.edu.Google Scholar
SourceMex, 2002b. Mexican Congress Approves Legislation to Open Government Documents to General Public. Latin American Database May 8. http:ladb.unm.edu.Google Scholar
SourceMex, 2002c. Sluggish Economy, Crime Deter Foreign Investment in Mexico. Latin American Database October 2. http:ladb.unm.edu.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2004a. When Judges Go Public: the Selective Promotion of Case Results on the Mexican Supreme Court. Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego. http:repositories.cdlib.orgusmexstaton_j. Accessed June 28, 2004.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2004b. Judicial Policy Implementation in Mexico City and Mérida. Comparative Politics 37, 1: 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Kevin. 2002a. In Mexico Hinterland, Life beyond the Law: Man Buried Alive on Elders' Order. Washington Post, March 15: A1.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Kevin. 2002b. Kidnapping Is Growth Industry in Mexico. Washington Post , September 17: A1.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Kevin, and Mary, Jordan. 2002. Disparate Justice Imprisons Mexico's Poor: as Police Focus on Petty Crime, Major Offenders Often Go Unpunished. Washington Post , July 6: A1.Google Scholar
Taylor, Michael C. 1997. Why No Rule of Law in Mexico?Explaining the Weakness of Mexico's Judicial Branch. New Mexico Law Review 27 (Winter): 1–67.Google Scholar
Transparencia, Mexicana. 2002. Encuesta nacional de corrupción y buen gobierno 2001. Available at http:www.transparenciamexicana.org.mxencuesta_nacional.html Accessed June 23, 2003.Google Scholar
United Nations. Commission on Human Rights. 2002. Report on the Mission to Mexico. E/Cn.4/2002/72/Add.1. January 24.Google Scholar
Weldon, Jeffrey. 1997. Political Sources of Presidencialismo in Mexico. In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Scott, Mainwaring. and Matthew, Soberg Shugart Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zalpa, Genaro. 2003. Iglesias en Aguascalientes: panorama de la diversidad religiosa en el estado. Aguascalientes: Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Multidisciplinarios de Aguascalientes.Google Scholar