Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:02:24.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Indian Movement and Political Democracy in Ecuador

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Leon Zamosc
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the implications of the Ecuadorian Indian movement for democratic politics. During the 1990s, the movement successfully fostered indigenous and popular participation in public life, influenced government policies, and became a contender in power struggles. But in the institutional domain, the participatory breakthrough had mixed effects. While the movement fulfilled functions of interest representation and control of state power, its involvement in a coup attempt demonstrated that its political socialization had not nurtured a sense of commitment to democracy. The evidence is discussed by reference to the proposition that civil society actors may or may not contribute to democracy. The article argues that the study of the democratic spinoffs of civil activism requires a context-specific approach that considers the particularistic orientations of civil associations and pays attention to their definition of means and ends, the institutional responses evoked by their initiatives, and the unintended consequences of their actions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , Fall 2007 , pp. 1 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, Ileana, and Arrobo, Nidia. 2002. Ecuador: Informe final. Report of the LatAutonomy project. Vienna: Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Contemporary Research on Latin America.Google Scholar
Andolina, Robert. 2003. The Sovereign and Its Shadow: Constituent Assembly and Indigenous Movement in Ecuador. Journal of Latin American Studies 35, 4: 721–51.Google Scholar
Barreda, Mikel, Marc, Marcx, Alamo, Oscar del, Macías, Inigo, Navarro, Marc, and Torres, Pere. 2005. Perfil de gobernabilidad de Ecuador. Barcelona: Institut Internacional de Governabilitat de Catalunya.Google Scholar
Beck, Scott. H., and Kenneth, J. Mijeski. 2001. Barricades and Ballots: Ecuador's Indians and the Pachakutik Political Movement. Ecuadorian Studies 1. http://www.yachana.orgecuatorianistasjournal1beckbeck.htm.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1951. Social Movements. In New Outline of the Principles of Sociology, 2nd ed. rev., ed. Lee, A. M.. New York: Barnes and Noble. 199–220.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto. 1987. The Future of Democracy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1985. The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. Richardson, J. G.. New York: Greenwood Press. 241–58.Google Scholar
Cameron, John D. 2005. Municipal Democratization in Rural Latin America: Methodological Insights from Ecuador. Bulletin of Latin American Research 24, 3: 367–90.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 1999. Civil Society. Foreign Policy, Winter: 18–29.Google Scholar
Carrasco, Hernán. 1993. Democratización de los poderes locales y levantamiento indígena. In Sismo étnico en el Ecuador: varias perspectivas, ed. Almeida, José et al. Quito: Abya-Yala. 29–69.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios y Datos (Cedatos). 2000a. Los acontecimientos nacionales del 21 de enero. Estudios y Datos 25: 173.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios y Datos (Cedatos). 2000b. Reacciones frente al cambio de gobierno. Estudios y Datos 25: 173.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L., and Arato, Andrew. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2002a. La centro-izquierda lucha por su unidad. May 30.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2002b. Sin mayores resultados la cita de centro-izquierda. February 27.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2002c. Tres factores jugaron en favor de Lucio Gutiérrez. July 10.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2002d. Gutiérrez: el pinchazo va. December 13.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2003a. Pachakutik se quedó fuera del poder. August 7.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2003b. La alianza de Gobierno cayó por su propio peso en 6 meses. August 10.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2003c. La Conaie y Pachakutik con una táctica defensiva. August 16.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2003d. La relación Conaie-Pachakutik está en crisis. September 3.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2003e. Lucio Gutiérrez gana un “round” a la Conaie. October 18.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2004a. La Conaie pone pausa a su protesta contra el gobierno. January 12.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2004b. Los amazónicos en paz. January 20.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2004c. La Feine hace la paz con Gutiérrez. February 1.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2004d. Indígenas suspenden las protestas. February 17.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2004e. En las movilizaciones se evidenció la crisis de la Conaie. February 21.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2004f. Presidente Gutiérrez posesionó a Vargas. May 31.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2004g. Dirigencia de la Conaie prepara levantamiento. June 6.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Quito). 2004h. La Conaie y Pachakutik se critican por el fracaso del levantamiento. June 11.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Catherine. 1989. Ecuador: the Politics of Locos. Hemisphere 1, 1: 13–15.Google Scholar
Confederación de Nacionalidades Indígenas del Ecuador (CONAIE). 1988. Memorias del segundo congreso de la Conaie.Google Scholar
Confederación de Nacionalidades Indígenas del Ecuador (CONAIE). 1993. Proyecto político de las nacionalidades y pueblos del Ecuador.Google Scholar
Confederación de Nacionalidades Indígenas del Ecuador (CONAIE). 1995. Resoluciones de la asamblea extraordinaria. December 3.Google Scholar
Confederación de Nacionalidades Indígenas del Ecuador (CONAIE). 2003. Resoluciones de la asamblea. February 18.Google Scholar
Consejo de Nacionalidades y Pueblos Indígenas del Ecuador (CODENPE). 2000. Nuestros derechos en la constitución. Quito: Génesis.Google Scholar
Coordinadora Agraria Nacional (CAN). 1993a. Por la tierra, la paz y el desarrollo. March 10.Google Scholar
Coordinadora Agraria Nacional (CAN). 1993b. Proyecto de ley agraria integral. July 5.Google Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dávila Loor, Jorge. 2000. El salto al vacío y el asalto al cielo: reflexión sobre los acontecimientos del viernes 21 y sábado 22 de enero del 2000. Ecuador Debate, 49.Google Scholar
De la Torre, Carlos. 1997. Populism and Democracy: Political Discourses and Cultures in Contemporary Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives 24, 3: 12–25.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella, and Diani, Mario. 1999. Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dieterich, Heinz. 2001. La cuarta vía al poder. Bogotá: Desde Abajo.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald M. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ecuarunari—Confederación de Pueblos de la Nacionalidad Quichua. 2003. Resoluciones de la asamblea extraordinaria. February 14.Google Scholar
Edwards, Bob, and Foley, Michael W.. 1998. Civil Society and Social Capital beyond Putnam. American Behavioral Scientist 42, 1: 124–40.Google Scholar
Escobar, Arturo, and Alvarez, Sonia E.. 1992a. Introduction: Theory and Protest in Latin America Today. In The Making of Social Movements in Latin America: Identity, Strategy, and Democracy, ed. Escobar, and Alvarez, . Boulder: Westview Press. 1–15.Google Scholar
Escobar, Arturo, and Alvarez, Sonia E.. 1992b. Conclusion: Theoretical and Political Horizons of Change in Contemporary Latin American Social Movements. In The Making of Social Movements in Latin America: Identity, Strategy, and Democracy, ed. Escobar, and Alvarez, . Boulder: Westview Press. 317–29.Google Scholar
Forbrig, Joerg. 2002. The Nexus Between Civil Society and Democracy. In Political Priorities Between East and West: Europe's Rediscovered Wealth, ed. Reichel, W.. Vienna: Institut für den Donauraum und Mitteleuropa. 79–103.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. 2003. Bridging Institutionalized and Noninstitutionalized Politics. In States, Parties, and Social Movements, ed. Jack, A. Goldstone. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. Civil Disobedience: Litmus Test for the Democratic Constitutional State. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 30, 96–116.Google Scholar
Heberle, Rudolf. 1951. Social Movements: An Introduction to Political Sociology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1996. Models of Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hernández, José, Aráuz, Marco, Rodríguez, Byron, and Bejarano, Leonel. 2000. 21 de enero: la vorágine que acabo con Mahuad. Quito: El Comercio.Google Scholar
Ibarra, A. 1987. Los indígenas y el estado en el Ecuador. Quito: Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. (INEC). 2001. Sexto censo nacional de población, 2001. Quito: INEC.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Anita. 1993. Military Rule and Transition in Ecuador, 1972–92. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Kipu—el mundo indígena en la prensa ecuatoriana. Press reports. 1993. Press reports on the mobilization to defend the rural health service. January 9–18.Google Scholar
Kipu—el mundo indígena en la prensa ecuatoriana. Press reports. 1994. Press reports on protest mobilizations. May 7-July 16.Google Scholar
Kipu—el mundo indígena en la prensa ecuatoriana. Press reports. 1996. Press reports on Pachakutik's electoral results. May 20–30.Google Scholar
Kipu—el mundo indígena en la prensa ecuatoriana. Press reports. 1998. Press reports on protest mobilizations. September 9-October 21.Google Scholar
Kipu—el mundo indígena en la prensa ecuatoriana. Press reports. 1999a. Press reports on protest mobilizations. March 11–25.Google Scholar
Kipu—el mundo indígena en la prensa ecuatoriana. Press reports. 1999b. Press reports on protest mobilizations. July 7-August 3.Google Scholar
Korovkin, Tanya. 2001. Reinventing the Communal Tradition: Indigenous Peoples, Civil Society, and Democratization in Andean Ecuador. Latin American Research Review 36, 3: 37–77.Google Scholar
Larrea, Fernando, and Larrea, Ana M.. 1998. Participación ciudadana, relaciones interétnicas y construcción del poder local en Saquisilí. Paper presented at the conference “Gobiernos Locales y Desarrollo Rural en los Andes,” Lima, September 14.Google Scholar
Latinobarómetro. 2004. Informe resumen: una década de mediciones, 1996–2004. Santiago de Chile: Corporación Latinobarómetro.Google Scholar
León, Jorge. 1991. Las organizaciones indígenas: igualdad y diferencia. In Indios: una reflexión sohre el levantamiento indígena de 1990, ed. Cornejo Menacho, D.. Quito: Abya-Yala, 373–418.Google Scholar
León, Jorge. 1994. De campesinos a ciudadanos diferentes: el levantamiento indígena. Quito: Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
León Guzmán, Mauricio. 2003. Etnicidad y exclusión en el Ecuador: una mirada a partir del censo de población de 2001. Internal memo. Quito: Sistema Integrado de Indicadores Sociales del Ecuador.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown, and Reequilibration. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lluco, Miguel. 2000. El movimiento indígena y la construcción de una democracia radical. Boletín del Instituto Científico de Culturas Indígenas 10.Google Scholar
Lora, Eduardo. 1997. A Decade of Structural Reforms in Latin America. Working Paper Green Series 348. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Lucas, Kintto. 2000. La rebelión de los indios. Quito: Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
Lucero, José A. 2001. Crisis and Contention in Ecuador. Journal of Democracy 12, 2: 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macas, Luis. A. 2004. Democracia e interculturalidad. Boletín del Instituto Cientifico de Culturas Indígenas 63.Google Scholar
Markoff, John. 2004. Contention and the Troubled History of Democracy. Paper presented at the Workshop on Contentious Politics, Binghamton University, April 18.Google Scholar
Marx, Gary T., and McAdam, Douglas. 1994. Collective Behavior and Social Movements: Process and Structure. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
McAdam, Douglas, Tarrow, Sidney, and Charles, Tilly. 1996. To Map Contentious Politics. Mobilization 1, 1: 17–34.Google Scholar
Melucci, Alberto. 1994. A Strange Kind of Newness: What's “New” in New Social Movements? In New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity, ed. Laraña, Enrique, Johnston, Hank, and Gusfield, Joseph R.. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. 101–30.Google Scholar
Morley, Samuel A., Machado, Roberto, and Pettinato, Stefano. 1999. Indexes of Structural Reform in Latin America. Economic Reform Series 12. Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.Google Scholar
Moya, Ruth A. 1990. A Decade of Bilingual Education and Indigenous Participation in Ecuador. Prospects 20, 3: 331–43.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 1994. President Durán Battles Congress over Constitutional Reforms. October 21.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 1995. President Sixto Durán Suffers Defeat in Referendum on Constitutional Reforms. December 1.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 1996. Controversy Permeates President Abdalá Bucaram's Tumultuous First Three Months in Office. November 15.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 1997a. Government Economic Plan Continues to Generate Broad Opposition. January 10.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 1997b. Congress Votes to Oust President Abdalá Bucaram. February 7.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 1998a. President-Elect Jamil Mahuad Must Walk Political and Economic Tightrope. July 24.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 1998b. President Jamil Mahuad Introduces Unpopular Economic Measures. September 18.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 1999a. President Jamil Mahuad Says Country Is in Financial Crisis. January 22.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 1999b. Ecuador Devalues Its Currency as Crisis Continues. February 26.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 1999c. Congress Approves President Jamil Mahuad's Economic Package. April 30.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 1999d. President Jamil Mahuad Battered by Protests. July 16.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 1999e. International Monetary Fund Approves Standby Loan. September 3.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 1999f. Crises Plague Administration. November 5.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 2000a. Cabinet Resigns after President Jamil Mahuad Adopts Dollar as Local Currency amid Protests. January 14.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 2000b. Indian Protests Topple Presidency of Jamil Mahuad, vice President Gustavo Noboa Takes over. January 28.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 2002a. Economy Minister Resigns amid Scandal. June 28.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 2002b. Presidential Elections Go to Runoff. October 25.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 2002c. Lucio Gutiérrez Wins Presidency in Runnoff. December 6.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 2003a. Lucio Gutiérrez Takes Office as President. January 17.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 2003b. Indigenous Cabinet Members Walk Tightrope between Administration and Communities. February 14.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 2003c. President Lucio Gutiérrez Hit by More Strikes, Dissention within Coalition Government. June 20.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 2003d. Narco-Scandal Threatens Government of President Lucio Gutiérrez. December 5.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 2004a. Miss Universe Contest, Oas Summit Draw Protests to Quito. June 11.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 2004b. President Lucio Gutiérrez Overcomes Impeachment Effort. November 19.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 2005a. Constitutional Crisis Erupts after President Lucio Gutiérrez and Parliament Remove Supreme Court. January 7.Google Scholar
NotiSur—South American Political and Economic Affairs (newsletter). 2005b. Congress Removes President Lucio Gutiérrez. April 22.Google Scholar
Oxhorn, Philip. 2003. Social Inequality, Civil Society, and the Limits of Citizenship in Latin America. In What Justice? Whose Justice? Fighting for Fairness in Latin America, ed. Eckstein, Susan and Wickham-Crowley, Timothy. Berkeley: University of California Press. 35–63.Google Scholar
Pachakutik—Movimiento de Unidad Plurinacional Pachakutik. 1999. Hacia el nuevo milenio: base ideológica y programática. Boletín El Churo MUPP 2.Google Scholar
Pachano, Simón. 1996. Democracia sin sociedad. Quito: ILDIS.Google Scholar
Piven, Francis F., and Cloward, Richard A.. 1977. Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, Alessandro. 1978. Political Exchange and Collective Identity in Industrial Conflict. In The Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe since 1968, ed. Crouch, Colin and Pizzorno, Alessandro. London: Macmillan. 277–98.Google Scholar
Ponce, Javier. 2000. La madrugada los sorprendió en el poder. Quito: Planeta.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro. 1998. Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 24, 1: 1–25.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, Sarah A., Nina, Laurie, and Robert, Andolina. 2002. Re-territorialised Space and Ethnic Political Participation: Indigenous Municipalities in Ecuador. Space and Polity 6, 3: 289–305.Google Scholar
Ramón, Galo. 1981. La comunidad indígena ecuatoriana. In Comunidad andina: alternativas políticas de desarrollo, ed. Guerrero, A. et al. Quito: CAAP. 65–86.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
República del Ecuador. 1998. Constitución política de la República del Ecuador. Quito: República del Ecuador.Google Scholar
Rona Tas, Akos. 1998. Path Dependence and Capital Theory: Sociology of the Post-Communist Economic Transformation. East European Politics and Societies 12, 1: 107–32.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy L., and Robert, C. Post. 2002. Introduction. In Civil Society and Government, ed. Rosenblum, and Post, . Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1–26.Google Scholar
Sánchez Parga, José. 1986. La trama del poder en la comunidad andina. Quito: CAAP.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1976. Critique of Dialectical Reason. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Suzana. 1997. The 1992 Indian Mobilization in Lowland Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives 24, 3: 65–83.Google Scholar
Scholte, Jan A. 2004. Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance. Government and Opposition 39, 2: 211–33.Google Scholar
Scott, Richard. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1988. Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tamayo, Eduardo. 1996. Movimientos sociales: la riqueza de la diversidad. Quito: ALAI.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1998. Social Movements and (All Sorts of) Other Political Interactions. Theory and Society 27, 4: 453–80.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain. 1981. The Voice and the Eye: An Analysis of Social Movements. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain. 1988. Return of the Actor: Social Theory in Postindustrial Society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Viteri Díaz, Galo. 1998. Las políticas de ajuste: Ecuador 1982–1996. Quito: Corporación Editora Nacional.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 2002. Equality and Civil Society. In Alternative Conceptions of Civil Society, ed. Chambers, S. and Kymlicka, W.. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 35–49.Google Scholar
Zamosc, Leon. 1994. Agrarian Protest and the Indian Movement in the Ecuadorian Highlands. Latin American Research Review 29, 3: 37–68.Google Scholar
Zamosc, Leon. 2004. The Indian Movement in Ecuador: From Politics of Influence to Politics of Power. In The Struggle for Indigenous Rights in Latin America, ed. Postero, N. G. and Zamosc, . Brighton: Sussex Academic Press. 131–57.Google Scholar
Zhingri, Patricio. 2002. Democracia y pueblos indígenas. Boletín del Instituto Científico de Culturas Indígenas 35.Google Scholar