Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T18:44:57.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining Electoral Volatility in Latin America: Evidence at the Party Level

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Yen-Pin Su
Yen-Pin Su*
Affiliation:
Political Science at the University of Pittsburgh. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many existing explanations of electoral volatility have been tested at the country level, but they are largely untested at the individual party level. This study reexamines theories of electoral volatility through the use of multilevel models on party-level data in the lower house elections of 18 Latin American countries from 1978 to 2012. Testing hypotheses at different levels, it finds that irregular institutional alteration increases electoral volatility for all the parties in a country, but the effect is more significant for the presidential party. At the party level, the results show that while a party that is more ideologically distinctive than other parties tends to experience lower electoral volatility, party age is not a statistically significant factor for explaining party volatility.

Type
Research
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , Summer 2014 , pp. 49 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alemán, Eduardo, and Tsebelis, George. 2011. Political Parties and Government Coalitions in the Americas. Journal of Politics in Latin America 3, 1: 3–28.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry, García-Sánchez, Miguel, and Erica Smith, Amy. 2012. Keeping up with the Souzas: Social Influence and Electoral Change in a Weak Party System, Brazil 2002– 2006. Latin American Politics and Society 54, 2 (Summer): 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2006. The Presidential Calculus: Executive Policy Making and Cabinet Formation in the Americas. Comparative Political Studies 39, 4: 415–40.Google Scholar
Baker, Andy, and Greene, Kenneth F.. 2011. The Latin American Left's Mandate: Free-Market Policies and Issue Voting in New Democracies. World Politics 63: 43–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Andy, Ames, Barry, and Rennó, Lucio R.. 2006. Social Context and Campaign Volatility in New Democracies: Networks and Neighborhoods in Brazil's 2002 Elections. American Journal of Political Science 50, 2: 382–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano, and Mair, Peter. 1990. Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Birch, Sarah. 2003. Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Birnir, Jóhanna Kristín, and Lee Van Cott, Donna. 2007. Disunity in Diversity: Party System Fragmentation and the Dynamic Effect of Ethnic Heterogeneity on Latin American Legislatures. Latin American Research Review 42, 1: 99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bischoff, Carina S. 2013. Electorally Unstable by Supply or Demand? an Examination of the Causes of Electoral Volatility in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Public Choice 156, 3–4: 537–61.Google Scholar
Bonvecchi, Alejandro, and Scartascini, Carlos. 2011. The Presidency and the Executive Branch in Latin America. IDB Working Paper no. IDB-WP-283. New York: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Dix, Robert H. 1992. Democratization and the Institutionalization of Latin American Political Parties. Comparative Political Studies 24, 4: 488–511.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Echegaray, Fabián. 2005. Economic Crises and Electoral Responses in Latin America. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Epperly, Brad. 2011. Institutions and Legacies: Electoral Volatility in the Postcommunist World. Comparative Political Studies 44, 7: 829–53.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 2003. Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country. Journal of Economic Growth 8, 2: 195–222.Google Scholar
Ferree, Karen. 2010. The Social Origins of Electoral Volatility in Africa. British Journal of Political Science 40, 4: 759–79.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Michael, and Mitchell, Paul, eds. 2008. The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gherghina, Sergiu Marian. 2012. Explaining Electoral Volatility in Central and Eastern Europe: a Party Organizational Approach. Ph.D. diss., Department of Political Science, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.. 1996. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 44, 5: 936–57.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon, and Marsh, Michael. 2007. Punishment or Protest? Understanding European Parliament Elections. Journal of Politics 69, 2: 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuenzi, Michelle, and Lambright, Gina. 2001. Party System Institutionalization in 30 African Countries. Party Politics 7, 4: 437–68.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus J., and Brooks, Sarah M.. 2008. Embedding Neoliberal Reform in Latin America. World Politics 60, 2: 231–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laakso, Markku, and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. Effective Number of Parties: a Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12, 1: 3–27.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 1998. Crisis, Party Adaptation and Regime Stability in Argentina: the Case of Peronism, 1989–1995. Party Politics 4, 4: 445–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Stegmaier, Mary. 2000. Economic Determinants of Election Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 3: 183–219.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments. In Party Systems and Voter Alignments, ed. Lipset, and Rokkan, . New York: Free Press. 1–64.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam, and Stokes, Susan C.. 2010. Democracy, Interrupted: Regime Change and Partisanship in Twentieth-Century Argentina. Electoral Studies 29, 1: 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madrid, Raúl. 2005a. Ethnic Cleavages and Electoral Volatility in Latin America. Comparative Politics 38, 1: 1–20.Google Scholar
Madrid, Raúl. 2005b. Indigenous Parties and Democracy in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society 47, 4 (Winter): 161–79.Google Scholar
Madrid, Raúl. 2005c. Indigenous Voters and Party System Fragmentation in Latin America. Electoral Studies 24, 4: 689–707.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: the Difficult Combination. Comparative Political Studies 26, 2: 198–228.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Zoco, Edurne. 2007. Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition. Party Politics 13, 2: 155–78.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Torcal, Mariano. 2006. Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization. In Handbook of Party Politics, ed. Katz, Richard S. and Crotty, William. London: Sage. 204–27.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Soberg Shugart, Matthew, eds. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy R., eds. 1995. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, Gervasoni, Carlos, and España-Nájera, Annabella. 2010. The Vote Share of New and Young Parties. Kellogg Institute Working Paper 368. Notre Dame: Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Peter Rosendorff, B.. 2000. Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade. American Political Science Review 94, 2: 305–21.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2011. Polity Iv Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2010. www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm. Accessed January 5, 2012.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott, and Potthoff, Richard. 2005. The Components of Elections: District Heterogeneity, District-Time Effects, and Volatility. Electoral Studies 24: 17–40.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott, Javier Negri, Juan, and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2008. Parliamentary Opposition in Non-Parliamentary Regimes: Latin America. Journal of Legislative Studies 14, 1–2: 160–89.Google Scholar
Mustillo, Thomas, and Mustillo, Sarah A.. 2012. Party Nationalization in a Multilevel Context: Where's the Variance? Electoral Studies 31, 2: 422–33.Google Scholar
Nohlen, Dieter, ed. 2005. Elections in the Americas: A Data Handbook. Vols. 1–2. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, J. Mark, Zovatto, Daniel, Carrillo Flórez, Fernando, and Allamand Zavala, Andrés. 2002. Democracies in Development: Politics and Reform in Latin America. 1st ed. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Mogens. 1983. Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility in European Party Systems, 1948–1977. In Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, ed. Daalder, Hans and Mair, Peter. Beverly Hills: Sage. 29–66.Google Scholar
Powell, Eleanor Neff, and Tucker, Joshua A.. 2014. Revisiting Electoral Volatility in Post-Communist Countries: New Data, New Results and New Approaches. British Journal of Political Science 44, 1: 123–47.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Sprague, John. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. 1991. The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin America in the 1980s. American Political Science Review 85, 3: 777–800.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. 1993. The Political Economy of Elections in Latin America, 1980–1991. American Political Science Review 87, 2: 393–407.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joseph W., and Hunter, Lance Y.. 2012. Impact of Electoral Volatility and Party Replacement on Voter Turnout Levels. Party Politics 18, 6: 919–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2013. Market Reform, Programmatic (De)alignment, and Party System Stability in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 46, 11: 1422–52.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M., and Wibbels, Erik. 1999. Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: a Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations. American Political Science Review 93, 3: 575–90.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1968. Representation Systems. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 13, ed. Sills, David L.. New York: Macmillan. 470–75.Google Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco R., and Jones, Bradford S.. 2002. Modeling Multilevel Data Structures. American Journal of Political Science 46, 1: 218–37.Google Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2005. The Development of Stable Party Support: Electoral Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe. American Journal of Political Science 49, 2: 283–98.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1999. Neoliberal Populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics 31, 4: 379–401.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2011. World Development Indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators. Accessed March 9, 2012.Google Scholar