Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:23:01.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The European Union and Democracy in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Richard Youngs
Richard Youngs*
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute for International Relations (NUPI) in Oslo and at the University of Portsmouth in the United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The European Union has developed a significant range of democracy promotion initiatives in Latin America since the 1990s. The E.U.'s approach to democracy building has been seen to possess a number of strengths relative to U.S. policy, especially in connection with grassroots developmental imperatives. European policy itself, however, has a number of limitations. It has inadequately conceptualized the linkages between economic and political dimensions; it has insufficiently recognized the potential benefits of balancing bottom-up and top-down approaches. The E.U.'s influence over Latin American governments has remained more nebulous than that of the United States. European and U.S. policies in Latin America have both rivaled and complemented each other. Understanding this might inform both actors' democracy promotion efforts in the region.

Type
Policy Issues
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , Fall 2002 , pp. 111 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2002

References

Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional-United Nations Development Program (AECI-UNDP). 1998. Democratic Governance in Central America. Madrid, Aeci.Google Scholar
Agence Europe. (Brussels). 1994 1718 (October): 7.Google Scholar
Agence Europe. (Brussels). 1997 March 22: 7.Google Scholar
Agence Europe. (Brussels). 1998a November 6: 11.Google Scholar
Agence Europe. (Brussels). 1998b December 5: 12.Google Scholar
Agence Europe. (Brussels). 1999a February 13: 10.Google Scholar
Agence Europe. (Brussels). 1999b May 1718: 13.Google Scholar
Agence Europe. (Brussels). 1999 December 10: 5.Google Scholar
Barahona de Brito, Alexandra. 1998. Promoting Democracy in Cuba? The European Union and Helms-Burton. In Integratión económica y democratizatión en América Latina y Cuba, ed. Pilar Alamos, Mauricio Font, José, Augusto, Guilhon, Albuquerque, and Francisco, León. Santiago: Instituto de Estudios Internacionales.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 1997. Civil Society, Good Government and Neo-Liberal Reforms. In Good Government and Law. Legal and Institutional Reform in Developing Countries, ed. Faúndez, J.. Basingstoke: Macmillan. 77–91.Google Scholar
Bulmer-Thomas, Victor, and Sheila, Page. 1999. Trade Relations in the Americas: MERCOSUR, the Free Trade Area of the Americas and the European Union. In Latin America and the United States: The New Agenda, ed. Bulmer, Thomas and James, Dunkerley. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London. 75–99.Google Scholar
Burnell, Peter. 1994. Good Government and Democratization: a Sideways Look at Aid and Political Conditionality. Democratization 1, 3: 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnell, Peter, ed. 2000. Democracy Assistance: International Co-operation for Democratization. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 1999. Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Ciurlizza, J. 2000. Judicial Reform and International Legal Technical Assistance in Latin America. Democratization 7, 2: 211–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (Commission). 1991. Official Bulletin of the European Communities. Brussels: Commission.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (Commission). 1996. Report from the Commission on the Implementation of Measures Intended to Promote Observance of Human Rights and Democratic Principles (for 1995). COM (96)672. Brussels: Commission.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (Commission). 1999. European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights. Report. Brussels: Commission.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (Commission). 2000. Follow-up to the Rio Summit: Communication to the Council and the European Parliament. Brussels: Commission.Google Scholar
Cox, A., and Chapman, J.. 1999. Les programmes de cooperation exterieure de la Communauté Européene. Brussels: Commission.Google Scholar
Cox, A., and Koning, A.. 1997. Understanding European Community Aid. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Crawford, G. 2001. Foreign Aid and Political Reform. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danida, . 1999. Danish Support to Promotion of Human Rights and Democratisation: Guatemala. Copenhagen: Danida.Google Scholar
De Lalglesia, Juan Pablo. 1997. El proceso de paz en Guatemala: el papel de Espanña. Síntesis no. 27–28: 157–73.Google Scholar
De León, I., and Morales, M.. 1997. From Aid to Trade: a New Appraisal of the Economic Relations between the European Union and Latin America. European Foreign Affairs Review no. 2: 63–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 1996. Democracy in Latin America: Degrees and Issues, and Directions for Consolidation. in Farer 1996.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I. 1998. Free Politics and Free Markets in Latin America, Journal of Democracy 9, 4: 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Economist. 2000a May 6: 76.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2000b August 5: 58.Google Scholar
Farer, Tom, ed. 1996. Beyond Sovereignty: Collectively Defending Democracy in the Americas. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Financial times (London). 2000 June 14: 11.Google Scholar
Forsythe, D. 1996. The United Nations, Democracy, and the Americas. in Farer 1996.Google Scholar
Freres, Christian. 1999. European Actors in Global Change: The Role of European Civil Societies in Democratization. In Democracy Without Borders, ed. Jean, Grugel. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gomes Saraiva, M. 1996. Politíca exterior europea: el caso de los diálogos grupo a grupo con América Latina de 1984 a 1992. Buenos Aires: Nuevohacer.Google Scholar
Grilli, E. 1993. The European Community and the Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grugel, Jean. 1996. Supporting Democratization: a European View. European Political Parties and Latin America. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 60 (June): 87–104.Google Scholar
Grugel, Jean. 1999. European NGOs and Democratization in Latin America: Policy Networks and Transnational Ethical Networks. In Democracy Without Borders, ed. Grugel, . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Institute for European-Latin American Relations (IRELA). 1994. Diez años del proceso San José. Madrid: IRELA.Google Scholar
Institute for European-Latin American Relations (IRELA). 1997. La Unión Europea y México: una nueva relación política y económica. Madrid: IRELA.Google Scholar
Institute for European-Latin American Relations (IRELA). 1998. Cooperation with Latin America: The Leading Role of Europe. Madrid: IRELA.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary. 1999. Transnational Civil Society. In Human Rights in Global Politics, ed. Tim, Dunne and Nicholas, J. Wheeler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, C. 1997. Mexico's New Politics: the Elections of 1997. Journal of Democracy 8, 4: 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecomte, J. 1997. Las relaciones entre la Ue y México: tres generaciones de acuerdos de cooperación. in Irela 1997.Google Scholar
Montobbio, M. 1998. La política exterior española y las relaciones Unión Europea-América Latina. Revista Española de Desarrollo y Cooperación 3.Google Scholar
Nairn, Moisés. 1993. Latin America: Post-Adjustment Blues. Foreign Policy 92: 133–50.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. 1992. Encouraging Democracy: What Role for Conditioned Aid? Policy Essay No. 4. Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council.Google Scholar
Nelson, J., and Eglington, S.. 1996. The International Donor Community: Conditioned Aid and the Promotion and Defense of Democracy. in Farer 1996.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1998. Development Co-operation Efforts and Policies of the Members of the Development Assistance Committee: 1998 Report. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Development Assistance Committee. 2000. Oecd Dac Online Statistics. http:www.oecd.orgdacstats.Google Scholar
El País (Madrid). 1997 November 12: 23.Google Scholar
El País (Madrid). 1999 June 29: 2.Google Scholar
El País Digital. 1999 November 22. http:www.elpais.es.Google Scholar
El País Económico (Madrid). 1999 August 1: 4.Google Scholar
Pearce, J. 1997. Civil Society, the Market, and Democracy in Latin America. Democratization 4, 2: 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. 2000. Building Civil Society for the Outside: The Problematic Democratization of Central America. In Democracy and International Relations: Critical Theories/Problematic Practices, ed. Smith, H.. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pridham, Geoffrey. 1991. International Influences and Democratic Transition: Problems of Theory and Practice in Linkage Politics. In Encouraging Democracy: The International Context of Regime Transition in Southern Europe, ed. Pridham, . Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Pridham, Geoffrey. 1994. The International Dimension of Democratisation: Theory, Practice and Inter-regional Comparisons. In Building Democracy? The International Dimension of Democratisation in Eastern Europe, ed. Pridham, Eric Herring, and George, Sanford. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, et al. 1995. Sustainable Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Steven, C. Ropp, and Katherine, Sikkink, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M. 1995. Strengthening Civil Society in Africa: the Role of Foreign Political Aid. IDS Bulletin 26, 2: 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, William I. 1996. Promoting Polyarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Katherine. 1993. Human Rights, Principled Issue Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America. International Organization 47, 3: 411–41.Google Scholar
Síntesis (Madrid). 1993. El apoyo internacional a la democracia en América Latina. Special issue. No. 21.Google Scholar
Smith, H. 1995. European Union Foreign Policy and Central America. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spain. Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores (MAE). 1999. Estrategia para la cooperación española. Madrid: MAE.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. 1995. Aid and Political Conditionality: Core Issues and State of the Art. In Aid and Political Conditionality, ed. Stokke, . London: Frank Cass. 1–88.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. 1995. The Concept of Civil Society. In Toward a Global Civil Society, ed. Walzer, . Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. 1993. On “Reform of the State” and “Regulation of the Market. World Development 21, 8: 1371–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. 1996. On International Support for Democracy in the South. In Democratization in the South: The Jagged Wave, ed. Luckham, R. and White, G.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. 1997. Bowling in the Bronx: The Uncivil Interstices Between Civil and Political Society. In Civil Society: Democratic Perspectives, ed. Fine, R. and Rai, S.. London: Frank Cass. 94–115.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. 1999. The European Union and the Americas. In Latin America and the United States: The New Agenda, ed. Bulmer, Thomas and James, Dunkerley. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London. 51–75.Google Scholar
Youngs, Richard. 2000. Spain, Europe and Latin America: The Complex Interaction of Regionalism and Cultural Identification. In Spain: The European and International Challenges, ed. Gillespie, R. and Youngs, . London: Frank Cass. 107–29.Google Scholar
Youngs, Richard. 2001. Democracy Promotion: The Case of European Union Strategy. Working Paper no. 167. Brussels: Center for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar