Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:30:38.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decentralization's Nondemocratic Roots: Authoritarianism and Subnational Reform in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Kent Eaton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study challenges the common view of authoritarianism as an unambiguously centralizing experience by investigating the subnational reforms that military governments actually introduced in Latin America. It argues that the decision by military authorities to dismiss democratically elected mayors and governors opened a critical juncture for the subsequent development of subnational institutions. Once they centralized political authority, the generals could contemplate changes that expanded the institutional, administrative, and governing capacity of subnational governments. This article shows how cross-national variation in the content and consistency of the generals' economic goals led to quite distinct subnational changes; in each case, these reforms profoundly shaped the democracies that reemerged in the 1980s and 1990s.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , Spring 2006 , pp. 1 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abalos, José Antonio. 1994. La descentralización en Chile: antecedentes históricos y reformas actuales. Serie Azul 4, 1–36. Santiago: Institute de Estudios Urbanos, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
Abranches, Sérgio Henrique, ed. 1980. A empresa pública no Brasil: uma abordagem multidisciplinar. Brasilia: Instituto de Planejamento Econômico e Social.Google Scholar
Abrucio, Fernando, and David, Samuels. 2000. The New Politics of the Governors: Subnational Politics and the Brazilian Transition to Democracy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 30, 1: 1–28.Google Scholar
Azpiazu, Daniel, and Eduardo, M. Basualdo. 1990. Cara y contracara de los grupos económicos: estado y promotion industrial en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Cántaro Editores.Google Scholar
Boisier, Sergio. 1994. Perspectivas político-administrativas en Chile. In Regionalización, descentralización y desarrollo regional. Valparaiso: Centro de Estudios y Asistencia Legislativa. 15–38.Google Scholar
Britto, Alvares Affonso, Rui, De. 1995. A federação no Brasil: impasses e perspectivas. In A federação en perspectiva, ed. DeBritto Alvares, Affonso and Pedro Luiz Barros, Silva. São Paulo: FUNDAP. 57–75.Google Scholar
Camargo, Aspasia. 1993. La federación sometida: nacionalismo desarrollista e inestabilidad democrática. In Federalismos latinoamericanos: Mexico/Brasil/Argentina, ed. Marcello, Carmagnani. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica. 300–62.Google Scholar
Caro, Jorge. 2001. Chief, Division of Regionalization Policy, Subsecretariat for Regional Development, Chile. Author interview. Santiago, August 24.Google Scholar
Collier, David, ed. 1979. The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2000. Developing Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dias, Luciano. 2002. Researcher, Fundação Getulio Vargas. Author interview. Rio de Janeiro, January 25.Google Scholar
Dornbusch, Rudiger, and Sebastian, Edwards. 1990. Macroeconomic Populism. Journal of Development Economics 32: 247–77.Google Scholar
Eaton, Kent. 2001. The Logic of Congressional Delegation: Argentine Economic Reform. Latin American Research Review 36, 2: 97–117.Google Scholar
Eaton, Kent. 2004. Politics Beyond the Capital: The Design of Subnational Institutions in South America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1979. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Foxley, Alejandro. 1983. Latin American Experiments in Neoconservative Economics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fundación de Investigaciones Económicas Latinoamericanas (FIEL). 1993. Hacia una nueva organización del federalismo fiscal en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Latinomericanas.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward. 1996. Class and Conservative Parties: Argentina in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gleisner, Hagen. 1988. Centralismo en Latinoamérica y descentralización en Chile. Concepción: G. A. T.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 1993. After Regime Change: Authoritarian Legacies, Political Representation, and the Democratic Future of South America. World Politics 45, 3: 464–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 1996. Traditional Politics and Regime Change in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Patrick. 2001. Moving the State: the Politics of Democratic Decentralization in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto Alegre. Politics and Society 29, 1: 131–63.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert. 1979. The Turn to Authoritarianism in Latin America and the Search for Its Economic Determinants. in Collier 1979. 61–98.Google Scholar
Hutchcroft, Paul. 2001. Centralization and Decentralization in Administration and Politics: Assessing Territorial Dimensions of Authority and Power. Governance 14, 1: 23–53.Google Scholar
Kugelmas, Eduardo. 2001. A evolução recente do regime federativo no Brasil. In Federalismo na Alemanha e no Brasil, ed. Wilhelm, Hofmeister and José, Mário, Brasiliense, Cameiro. São Paulo: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. 29–49.Google Scholar
Kugelmas, Eduardo. 2002. Professor, Universidade de São Paulo. Author interview. São Paulo, January 31.Google Scholar
Lewis, Paul. 1990. The Crisis of Argentine Capitalism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Lopreato, Francisco Luiz. 1997. Um novo caminho do federalismo no Brasil?Economia e Sociedade (Universidade de Campinas) 9: 95–114.Google Scholar
Luna, Félix. 1975. Argentina: De Perón a Lanusse, 1943–1973. Buenos Aires: Biblioteca Universal Planeta.Google Scholar
Macón, Jorge. 1985. Finanzas públicas argentinas. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Macchi.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1997. Multipartism, Robust Federalism, and Presidentialism in Brazil. In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, and Matthew, Shugart. New York: Cambridge University Press. 55–109.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Manor, James. 1999. The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Marcel, Mario. 1994. Decentralization and Development: The Chilean Experience. In En Route to Modern Growth: Essays in Honor of Carlos Díaz-Alejandro, ed. Gustav, Ranis. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press. 79–121.Google Scholar
McGuire, James. 1997. Peronism Without Perón: Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Migdal, Joel. 1988. Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred P. 2002. Shifting States in Global Markets: Subnational Industrial Policy in Contemporary Brazil and Spain. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred P., and David, Samuels, eds. 2003. Decentralization and Democracy in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Núñez Minana, Horacio, and Alberto, Porto. 1982. Coparticipación federal de impuestos: distributión primaria. Jornadas de Finanzas Publicas 15: 1–73.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
Parker, Andrew. 1995. Decentralization: The Way Forward for Rural Development? World Bank Policy Research Paper no. 1475. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Peralta-Ramos, Mónica. 1990. The Political Economy of Argentina. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Prado, Sergio. 1996. Aspectos federativos do investimento estatal. In Empresas estatais e federaĉão, ed. Rui deBritto Alvares, Affonso and Pero Luiz Barros, Silva. São Paulo: Fundação do Desenvolvimento Administrative 11–71.Google Scholar
Rezende, Fernando. 1980. A empresa pública e a intervenção do estado na economia. in Abranches 1980. 31–85.Google Scholar
Rezende, Fernando. 1996. Federalismo fiscal en Brasil. In Hacia un nuevo federalismo? ed. Alicia Hernández, Chávez. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica. 45–73.Google Scholar
Rondinelli, Dennis. 1989. Decentralizing Public Services in Developing Countries: Issues and Opportunities. Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies 14, 1: 77–97.Google Scholar
Saiegh, Sebastian, and Mariano, Tommasi. 1998. Argentina's Federal Fiscal Institutions. Buenos Aires: Centra de Estudios para el Desarrollo Institutional.Google Scholar
Sallum, Brasilio. 1996. Labirintos: dos generals a Nova República. São Paulo: Editora Hucitec.Google Scholar
Samuels, David. 2003. Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schamis, Hector. 1991. Reconceptualizing Latin American Authoritarianism in the 1970s: from Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism to Neoconservatism. Comparative Politics 23, 2: 201–20.Google Scholar
Schwartzman, Simon. 1982. Bases do autoritarismo brasileiro. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campus.Google Scholar
Seabra Fagundes, Miguel. 1997. Aspectos da trajetória histórica do regime fed-erativo no Brasil. In Reforma constitucional, ed. Mario Brockmann, Machado. Rio de Janeiro: Rui Barbosa. 105–35.Google Scholar
Selcher, Wayne. 1989. A New Start toward a More Decentralized Federalism in Brazil Publius: The Journal of Federalism 19: 167–83.Google Scholar
Shah, Anwar. 1991. The New Fiscal Federalism in Brazil. World Bank Discussion Papers 124. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Smith, William C. 1989. Authoritarianism and the Crisis of the Argentine Political Economy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Afred. 1973. Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies, and Future. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Subsecretaría de Desarrollo Regional y Administrative (SUBDERE). 2001. El Chile descentralizado que queremos: unproyecto de todos. Santiago: SUBDERE.Google Scholar
Tendler, Judith. 1968. Electric Power in Brazil: Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tobar, Manuel. 2001. President, National Association of Regional Councilors, Chile. Author interview. Valparaíso, August 20.Google Scholar
Trebat, Thomas. 1983. Brazil̂s State-Owned Enterprises: A Case Study of the State as Entrepreneur. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1977. Political Brokers in Chile: Local Government in a Centralized Polity. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Esteban. 1999. Alegato histórico regionalista. Santiago: Ediciones Sur.Google Scholar
Villela, Annibal. 1984. Empresas do governo como instrumento de política econômica. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Planejamento Econômico e Social.Google Scholar
Werneck, Rogério. 1987. Empresas estatais e politica macroeconômica. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campus.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1993. Argentina: From Insolvency to Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Yáñez, José, and Leonardo, Letelier. 1995. Chile. In Fiscal Decentralization in Latin America, ed. Ricardo López, Murphy. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank. 137–88.Google Scholar
Zavala, Jaime. 2001. Director of Municipal Administration, Subsecretariat for Regional Development (1984–90), Chile. Author interview. Las Condes, August 22.Google Scholar