Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:02:11.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conditional Cash Transfers and the Effect on Recent Murder Rates in Brazil and Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Justin Earl Lance*
Affiliation:
Presbyterian College. [email protected]

Abstract

This article examines whether conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs have had a significant effect on reducing murder rates in Mexico and Brazil, using time-series municipal-level data on murders in both countries. The findings, over the period 2005–8, show that the greater the proportion of beneficiaries enrolled in a CCT program in each municipality, the lower the number of murders. There are, however, important differences between the two countries, with a much larger effect in Brazil than in Mexico. This holds even when controlling for GDP and levels of development.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahnen, Ronald E. 2007. The Politics of Police Violence in Democratic Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 49, 1 (Spring): 141–64.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary. 1974. Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. In Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment, ed. Becker, Gary S. and Landes, William M.. New York: Columbia University Press. 154.Google Scholar
Behrman, Jere R., Sengupta, Piyali, and Todd, Petra E.. 2005. Progressing through Progresa: an Impact Assessment of a School Subsidy Experiment in Rural Mexico. Economic Development and Cultural Change 54, 1: 237–75.Google Scholar
Behrman, Jere R., Parker, Susan W., and Todd, Petra E.. 2009. Medium-Term Impacts of the Oportunidades Conditional Cash Transfer Program on Rural Youth in Mexico. In Poverty, Inequality, and Policy in Latin America, ed. Klasen, Stephan and Nowak-Lehmann, Felicitas. Cambridge: MIT Press. 219–70.Google Scholar
Carvalho, José R., and Lavor, Sylvia C.. 2008. Repeat Criminal Victimization and Income Inequality In Brazil. Niterói: ANPEC. Google Scholar
Colvin, Mark, Cullen, Francis, and Vanderven, Thomas. 2002. Coercion, Social Support, and Crime: an Emerging Theoretical Consensus. Criminology 40, 1: 1942.Google Scholar
Cortés, Fernando. 2006. La incidencia de la pobreza y la concentración del ingreso en México. In La situación del trabajo en México, ed. de la Garza, Enrique and Salas, Carlos. Mexico: UAM. 91123.Google Scholar
Davis, Diane E. 2006. Undermining the Rule of Law: Democratization and the Dark Side of Police Reform in Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society 48, 1 (Spring): 5586.Google Scholar
Di Tella, Rafael, Edwards, Sebastian, and Schargrodsky, Ernesto. 2010. The Economics of Crime: Lessons for and from Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Estudo Eleitoral Brasileiro (ESEB). 2002. Brazilian National Election Study. 01838-ESEB-2002. Banco de Dados do Centro de Estudos de Opinião Pública (CESOP), Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
Estudo Eleitoral Brasileiro (ESEB). 2006. Brazilian National Election Study. 02489-ESEB-2006. Banco de Dados do Centro de Estudos de Opinião Pública (CESOP), UNICAMP.Google Scholar
Fajnzylber, Pablo, Lederman, Daniel, and Loayza, Norman. 1998. Determinants of Crime Rates in Latin America and the World. Washington, DC: World Bank. Google Scholar
Fajnzylber, Pablo. 2002. What Causes Violent Crime? European Economic Review 46, 7: 1323–57.Google Scholar
Fiszbein, Ariel, and Schady, Norbert. 2009. Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank. Google Scholar
Garay, Aldo, Hashimoto, Elizabeth, Ortega, Edwin, and Lachos, Víctor. 2011. On Estimation and Influence Diagnostics for Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Regression Models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 55, 3: 1304–18.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, Juan Pablo, Bautista, Sergio, Gertler, Paul, Hernández Avila, Mauricio, and Bertozzi, Stefano M.. 2005. Impacto de Oportunidades en la morbilidad y el estado de salud de la población beneficiaria y en la utilización de los servicios de salud. In Evaluación externa de impacto del programa Oportunidades 2004, Tomo 2: Salud, ed. Hernández Prado, Bernardo and Hernández Avila, Mauricio. Cuernavaca: INSP. 1774.Google Scholar
Hirschi, Travis. 1969. Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
International Labor Organization (ILO). 2009. Bolsa Família in Brazil: Context, Concept and Impacts. Geneva: ILO. Google Scholar
Krahn, Harvey, Hartnagel, Timothy, and Gantrell, John W.. 1986. Income Inequality and Homicide Rate: Cross-National Data and Criminological Theories. Criminology 24, 2: 269–94.Google Scholar
Levy, Santiago. 2006. Progress Against Poverty: Sustaining Mexico's Progresa-Oportunidades Program. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar
Long, J. Scott, and Freese, Jeremy. 2003. Regression Models for Categorical Outcomes Using Stata. Revised 1st ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
López-Calva, Luis Felipe, and Lustig, Nora. 2010. Declining Inequality in Latin America: A Decade of Progress? New York/Washington, DC: United Nations Development Program/Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome (MDS). 2013. Programa Bolsa Família (Pbf): número de benefícios em dezembro. http://www.ipeadata.gov.br/. Accessed April 11, 2013.Google Scholar
Ouimet, Marc. 2012. A World of Homicides: the Effect of Economic Development, Income Inequality, and Excess Infant Mortality on the Homicide Rate for 165 Countries in 2010. Homicide Studies 16, 3: 238–58.Google Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon. 2004. Interdependence Theory and the Measurement of International Conflict. Journal of Politics 66 (February): 247–66.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro, and Hoffman, Kelly. 2003. Latin American Class Structures: Their Composition and Change during the Neoliberal Era. Latin American Research Review 38, 1: 4182.Google Scholar
Sampson, Robert. 1993. The Community Context of Violent Crime. In Sociology and the Public Agenda, ed. Julius Wilson, William. Newbury Park: Sage. 259–86.Google Scholar
Sampson, Robert, Raudenbush, Stephen, and Earls, Felton. 1997. Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: a Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy. Science 277, 5328: 918–24.Google Scholar
Schultz, Paul. 2000a. Impact of PROGRESA on School Attendance Rates in the Sampled Population. Report. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. Google Scholar
Schultz, Paul. 2000b. The Impact of PROGRESA on School Enrollments: Final Report. Washington, DC: IFPRI. Google Scholar
Secretaría de Desarrollo Social (SEDESOL). 2010. Oportunidades, a Program of Results. Mexico City: Programa de Desarrollo Humano Oportunidades. Google Scholar
Skoufias, Emmanuel, and Parker, Susan W.. 2001. Conditional Cash Transfers and Their Impact on Child Work and Schooling: Evidence from the Progresa Program in Mexico. Economía 2, 1: 4596.Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2011. World Drug Report. Vienna: UNODC. Google Scholar
Vaitsman, Jeni, and Paes-Sousa, Rômulo. 2007. Evaluation of MDS Policies and Programs. Brasília: Ministry of Social Development. Google Scholar
Veras Soares, Fábio, Pérez Ribas, Rafael, and Guerreiro Osório, Rafael. 2010. Evaluating the Impact of Brazil's Bolsa Família: Cash Transfer Programs in Comparative Perspective. Latin American Research Review 45, 2: 173–90.Google Scholar
Veras Soares, Fábio, Soares, Sergei, Medeiros, Marcelo, and Guerreiro Osório, Rafael. 2006. Cash Transfer Programmes in Brazil: Impacts on Inequality and Poverty. Brasília: International Poverty Center. Google Scholar
World Bank. 2011. Brazil Country Brief. http://web.worldbank.org. Accessed February 29, 2011.Google Scholar