Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:24:58.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive Images and Support for International Economic Agreements with the United States Among Mexican Citizens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Charles L. Davis  and
Horace A. Bartilow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 1995 survey shows that Mexican citizens depend on their cognitive and affective orientations toward the United States in forming opinions about economic agreements between the two countries. The degree to which respondents utilized general feelings toward the United States rather than images of the United States varies by educational level and across the two agreements that were examined, NAFTA and the Clinton economic stabilization package of 1995. Whether respondents utilized an image of U.S. economic imperialism or of racial discrimination against people of Mexican origin in forming their opinions also depends on the level of education attained and on the policy domain of the agreement. The cognitive processes respondents utilized to form opinions about these economic agreements also differ across educational levels and policy domains. The findings have important implications for the capacity of Mexican elites to mobilize support for agreements with the United States and more generally for U.S.-Mexican relations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , Summer 2007 , pp. 123 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alarcón, Diana. 2003. Income Distribution and Poverty Alleviation in Mexico: a Comparative Analysis. In Middlebrook and Zepeda 2003. 447–86.Google Scholar
Bartilow, Horace. 2001. Diplomatic Victory Misunderstood: a Two-Level Game Analysis of U.S. Diplomacy toward Haiti. Security Studies 10, 3: 116–53.Google Scholar
Beltrán, Ulises. 2001. Estados Unidos y el espejo ajeno. Nexos 24, 288: 26–34.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance. 1980. Public Opinion in American Politics. New York: Har-court Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Chen, Jie. 2001. Urban Chinese Perceptions of Threats from the United States and Japan. Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 254–66.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Feldman, Stanley 1986. Emotional Reactions to the Economy: I'm Mad as Hell and I'm Not Going to Take It Anymore. American Journal of Political Science 30, 1: 50–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Charles L., and Bartilow, Horace 2004. The Effects of Perceived U.S. Racial Discrimination on Mexican Attitudes toward Economic Cooperation with the United States. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 15–18.Google Scholar
Davis, Charles L., and Langley, Ronald E. 1995. Presidential Popularity in a Context of Economic Crisis and Political Change: the Case of Mexico. Studies in Comparative International Development 30, 3: 24–48.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., and Lawson, Chappell H., eds. 2004. Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Candidates, Voters, and the Presidential Campaign of 2000. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., and Taylor, Shelley E., eds. 1991. Social Cognition. 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J. 1998. Interests and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Garza, Elizondo Humberto. 1996. La política exterior de México: entre la dependencia y la diversificación. Foro Internacional 36, 4: 641–66.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Dennis. 2003. Emiliano Zapata: Textbook Hero. Mexican Studies 19, 1: 127–60.Google Scholar
Global Views 2004: U.S. and Mexican Public Comparative Topline Report. 2004. Chicago/Mexico City: Chicago Council of Foreign Relations/Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económias and Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales.Google Scholar
González, Guadalupe, Minushkin, Susan, and Shapiro, Robert Y., eds. 2004. México y El Mundo: Mexican Public Opinion and Foreign Policy. Mexico City: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard. 1988. The Empirical Challenge of the Cognitive Revolution: a Strategy for Drawing Inferences about Perceptions. International Studies Quarterly 32: 175–203.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard, and Fischerkeller, Michael P. 1995. Beyond the Enemy Image and Spiral Model: Cognitive-Strategic Research after the Cold War. International Organization 49, 3: 415–50.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard, Voss, Janes F., Schooler, Tonya Y. E., and Ciarrochi, Joseph 1997. Images in International Relations: an Experimental Test of Cognitive Schemata. International Studies Quarterly 41: 403–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hurwitz, Jon, and Peffley, Mark 1990. Public Images of the Soviet Union: the Impact on Foreign Policy Attitudes. Journal of Politics 52, 1: 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald F., Nevitte, Neil, and Basañez, Miguel 1996. The North American Trajectory: Cultural, Economic, and Political Ties Among the United States, Canada, and Mexico. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R., and Zuckerman, Leo 1998. Attitudes toward Economic Reform in Mexico: the Role of Political Mediations. American Political Science Review 92, 2: 359–76.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell. 2004. Building the Fourth Estate: Media Opening and Democratization in Mexico. In Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico, ed. Middlebrook, Kevin J.. London: Institute of Latin American Studies. 373–402.Google Scholar
Los Angeles Times Poll #381: Mexico 1996. (MXLAT 1996–381). Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
McCann, James A. 1998. The Changing Mexican Electorate: Political Interest, Expertise, and Party Support in the 1980s and 1990s. In Governing Mexico: Political Parties and Elections, ed. Serrano, Mónica. London: Institute of Latin American Studies. 15–37.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin J., and Zepeda, Eduardo, eds. 2003. Confronting Development: Assessing Mexico's Economic and Social Policy Challenges. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 2002. Mexican Public Opinion Toward NAFTA and the FTAA. In NAFTA in the New Millennium, ed. Chambers, Edward J. and Smith, Peter H.. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego. 167–84.Google Scholar
Morris, Stephen D. 2005. Gringolandia: Mexican Identity and Perceptions of the United States. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Morris, Stephen D., and Passé-Smith, John 2001. What a Difference a Crisis Makes: Nafta, Mexico, and the United States. Latin American Perspectives 28, 3: 124–49.Google Scholar
Pastor, Robert A., and Castañeda, Jorge G. 1988. Limits to Friendship: The United States and Mexico. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Peffley, Mark, and Hurwitz, Jon 1992. International Events and Foreign Policy Beliefs: Public Response to Changing Soviet-U.S. Relations. American Journal of Political Science 36, 2: 431–61.Google Scholar
Peters, Enrique Dussel. 2003. Industrial Policy, Regional Trends, and Structural Change in Mexico's Manufacturing Sector. In Middlebrook and Zepeda 2003. 241–76.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of the Two-level Game. International Organization 43, 3: 427–60.Google Scholar
Salas, Carlos, and Zepeda, Eduard 2003. Employment and Wages: Enduring the Costs of Liberalization and Economic Reform. In Middlebrook and Zepeda 2003. 522–60.Google Scholar
Skonieczny, Amy. 2001. Constructing Nafta: Myth, Representation, and the Discursive Construction of U.S. Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly 45, 3: 433–54.Google Scholar
Time/CNN/Yankelovich Poll. 1995. Mexico. MXYANK 1995–95004. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Vega, Gustavo, and María de la Mora, Luiz 2003. Mexico's Trade Policy: Financial Crisis and Economic Recovery. In Middlebrook and Zepeda 2003. 163–94.Google Scholar
Weintraub, Sidney. 2000. Financial Decision-Making in Mexico. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 2002. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar