Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:30:42.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Candidate Recruitment and Selection in Latin America: A Framework for Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Peter M. Siavelis  and
Scott Morgenstern
Peter M. Siavelis
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University. [email protected]
Scott Morgenstern
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article provides a theoretical framework for analyzing the recruitment and selection of legislative candidates in Latin America. It argues that political recruitment and candidate selection are undertheorized for Latin America yet have determinative impacts on political systems, often overriding the influence of more commonly studied institutional variables. The article elucidates a typology of legislative candidates based on the legal and party variables that lead to the emergence of particular selection methods, as well as the patterns of loyalty generated by those methods. It analyzes the recruitment and selection processes as independent and dependent variables, underscoring the significant effect these procedures have on the incentive structure and subsequent behavior of legislators. Those factors, in turn, have important consequences for democratic governability and the performance of presidentialism.

Type
Research
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , Winter 2008 , pp. 27 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Gordon. 1972. A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives. American Political Science Review 66, 1: 144–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buquet, Daniel. 2001. Selección de candidatos y fraccionalización partidaria en Uruguay (1942–1999). Paper presented at the 23rd Conference of the Latin American Studies Association. Washington, DC, September 26–28.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 1995. Political Recruitment Across Two Centuries: Mexico, 1884–1991. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M. 1998. Term Limits and Legislative Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., and Shugart, Matthew. 1995. Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: a Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas. Electoral Studies 14, 4: 417–39.Google Scholar
Chhibber, Pradeep, and Kollman, Ken. 2004. The Formation of National Party Systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Czudnowski, Moshe. 1975. Political Recruitment. In Handbook of Political Science: Micropolitical Theory, vol. 2, ed. Greenstein, Fred and Polsby, Nelson. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 155–242.Google Scholar
Davis, James W. 1988. Leadership Selection in Six Western Democracies. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Escobar-Lemmon, María, and Moreno, Erika. 2004. Mejor solo que mal acompañado: Political Entrepreneurs in Colombia. Paper presented at the conference “Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Democracy in Latin America,” Wake Forest University, April 3–4.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Michael, and Marsh, Michael. 1988. The Secret Garden of Politics: Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hazan, Reuven. 2002. Candidate Selection. In Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting, ed. Leduc, Lawrence, Niemi, Richard G., and Norris, Pippa. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 108–26.Google Scholar
Hazan, Reuven, and Voerman, Gerrit. 2006. Electoral Systems and Candidate Selection. Acta Politica 41, 2: 146–62.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Levitsky, Steven. 2004. Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: a Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics 2, 4: 725–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles. 1994. The Presidency in a Separated System. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark. 2004. The Recruitment and Selection of Legislative Candidates in Argentina. Paper presented at the conference “Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Democracy in Latin America,” Wake Forest University, April 3–4.Google Scholar
Keynes, Edward, Tobin, Richard, and Danziger, Robert. 1979. Institutional Effects on Elite Recruitment. American Politics Quarterly 7, 3: 283–302.Google Scholar
Langston, Joy. 2001. Why Rules Matter: Changes in Candidate Selection in Mexico's Pri, 1988–2000. Journal of Latin American Studies 33, 3: 485–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langston, Joy. 2001. 2004. Legislative Recruitment in Mexico. Paper presented at the conference “Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Democracy in Latin America,” Wake Forest University, April 3–4.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan, and Valenzuela, Arturo, eds. 1994. The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Vols. 1 and 2. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Loewenberg, Gerhard, and Patterson, Samuel. 1979. Comparing Legislatures. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Lyne, Mona. 2008. The Voter's Dilemma and Democratic Accountability: Explaining the Democracy-Development Paradox. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1997. Presidentialism in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvick, Dwaine. 1968. Political Recruitment and Careers. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. Sills, David. New York: Macmillan. 273–92.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 2002. Divided We Govern. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Moraes, Juan Andres. 2004. Why Factions? Candidate Selection and Legislative Politics in Uruguay. Paper presented at the conference “Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Democracy in Latin America,” Wake Forest University, April 3–4.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott. 2004. Patterns of Legislative Politics: Roll-call Voting in Latin America and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio. 2004. Legislative Candidate Selection in Chile. Paper presented at the conference “Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Democracy in Latin America,” Wake Forest University, April 3–4.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1996. Legislative Recruitment. In Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, ed. Leduc, Lawrence, Niemi, Richard G., and Norris, . Thousand Oaks: Sage. 184–215.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1997. Introduction: Theories of Recruitment. In Passages to Power, ed. Norris, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–14.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. Delegative Democracy. Journal of Democracy 5, 1: 55–69.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson. 1968. The Institutionalization of the House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 62, 1: 144–68.Google Scholar
Prewitt, Kenneth. 1970. The Recruitment of Political Leaders. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Ryden, David. 1996. Representation in Crisis. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, David. 1999. Incentives to Cultivate a Party Vote in Candidate Centric Electoral Systems. Comparative Political Studies 32, 4: 487–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David. 2004. Political Ambition, Candidate Recruitment, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. Paper presented at the conference “Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Democracy in Latin America,” Wake Forest University, April 3–4.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew S. 1995. The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Presidential Government. American Political Science Review 89, 2: 327–43.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew S., and Carey, John. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter M. 2002. The Hidden Logic of Candidate Selection for Chilean Parliamentary Elections. Comparative Politics 34, 2: 419–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siavelis, Peter M., and Morgenstern, Scott. 2008. Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar