Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:47:12.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studying Political Economy in Latin America: Gaps and Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Ben Ross Schneider
Ben Ross Schneider*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Luna, Murillo, and Schrank (LMS) do our field a very valuable service by raising questions on the state of research on the political economy in Latin America and where it should be going. They cover a lot of ground in a short space, leaving a smorgasbord of issues to mull over, question, or endorse. To my mind, some of the most promising critiques in the memo are that there are gaps in the field and that those gaps are due in part to methodological fashion. Yet the discussion of gaps in LMS is somewhat ungrounded and underspecified. Closing the essay with a call for more research on democracy, development, state formation, inequality, and international linkages seems to miss the fact that most recent research is actually related to these five topics. Many readers probably would react by saying to themselves that they have been conducting some research in one or more of these areas.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , Spring 2014 , pp. 20 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, Barry, Carreras, Miguel, and Schwartz, Cassilde. 2012. What's Next? Reflections on the Future of Latin American Political Science. In Handbook of Latin American Politics, ed. Kingstone, Peter and Yashar, Deborah. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boas, Taylor, Daniel Hidalgo, F., and Richardson, Neal. Forthcoming. The Spoils of Victory: Campaign Donations and Government Contracts in Brazil. Journal of Politics.Google Scholar
Bull, Benedicte, Castellacci, Fulvio, and Kasahara, Yuri. Forthcoming. Business Groups and Transnational Capitalism in Central America: Economic and Political Strategies. International Political Economy Series. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
Colpan, Asli, Hikino, Takashi, and Lincoln, James, eds. 2010. Oxford Handbook on Business Groups. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha. 2013. The Politics of Revenue-raising Tax Reform in Latin America. Unpublished mss.Google Scholar
Griner, Steve, and Zovatto, Daniel, eds. 2004. De las normas a las buenas prácticas. El desafío del financiamiento político en América Latina. San José, Costa Rica: OAS/IDEA. Google Scholar
Karcher, Sebastian, and Schneider, Ben Ross. 2012. Business Politics in Latin America: Investigating Structures, Preferences, and Influence. In Handbook of Latin American Politics, ed. Kingstone, Peter and Yashar, Deborah. New York: Routledge. 273–85.Google Scholar
North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2013. Power and Path Dependence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September.Google Scholar
Samuels, David. 2001. Money, Elections, and Democracy in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 43, 2 (Summer): 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar