Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:56:27.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revolution or Contribution? Rational Choice Approaches in the Study of Latin American Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Evelyne Huber  and
Michelle Dion
Evelyne Huber
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Michelle Dion
Affiliation:
Sam Nunn School of International Affairs at Georgia Technological Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article assesses the contributions of studies in the rational choice (RC) tradition to scholarly understanding of Latin American politics. It groups some representative works according to their use of RC assumptions, and also reviews some of the major works in the institutionalist tradition. It argues that works in the RC tradition have neither forced a major rethinking of established theories nor filled major lacunae, although they have illuminated some phenomena that were only partly understood. The RC approach works best for narrow questions in which power relations and structural constraints are stable, whereas its essential assumptions become untenable in questions that involve shifting power relations among social groups and the state over time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , Fall 2002 , pp. 1 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, Robert P. 1996. The Secret Existence of Expressive Behavior. in Friedman 1996b. 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James E., and Kenneth, A. Shepsle. 1990. Editors' Introduction. In Perspectives on Positive Political Economy, ed. Alt, and Shepsle, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–5.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry. 1987. Political Survival: Politicians and Public Policy in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H. 1987. Agrarian Politics. In Understanding Political Development, ed. Samuel, Huntington and Jonathan, Wiener. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Boylan, Delia. 1998. Preemptive Strike: Central Bank Reform in Chile's Transition from Authoritarian Rule. Comparative Politics 30, 4 (July): 443–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calmfors, Lars, and John, Driffill. 1988. Bargaining Structure, Corporatism and Macroeconomic Performance. Economic Policy 3 (April): 13–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, and Enzo, Faletto. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M. 1996. Term Limits and Legislative Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., and Matthew Soberg, Shugart, eds. 1998. Executive Decree Authority. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Youssef. 1994. Radicals, Reformers, and Reactionaries: The Prisoner's Dilemma and the Collapse of Democracy in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collier, David, ed. 1979. The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Deborah, L. Norden. 1992. Strategic Choice Models of Political Change in Latin America. Comparative Politics 24, 2 (January): 229–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and David, Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Mathew, D. McCubbins. 2001. The Institutional Determinants of Economic Policy Outcomes. In Haggard and McCubbins 2001. New York: Cambridge University Press. 21–63.Google Scholar
Crescenzi, Mark J. C. 1999. Violence and Uncertainty in Transitions. Journal of Conflict Resolution 43, 2 (April): 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Brian. 2000. Democratic Institutional Design: The Powers and Incentives of Venezuelan Politicians and Interest Groups. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1979. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1991. Rationality and Interpretation: Parliamentary Elections in Early Stuart England. In The Economic Approach to Politics: A Critical Reassessment of the Theory of Rational Action, ed. Kristen Renwick, Monroe. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1996. Rational Choice, Empirical Contributions, and the Scientific Enterprise. in Friedman 1996b. 85–94.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry, Manuel, Pastor Jr., and Michael, Tomz. 2000. Modern Political Economy and Latin America: Theory and Policy. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Jeffrey. 1996a. Introduction: Economic Approaches to Politics. in Friedman 1996b. 1–24.Google Scholar
Friedman, Jeffrey, ed. 1996b. The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gates, Scott, and Brian, D. Humes. 2000. Games, Information, and Politics: Applying Game Theoretic Models to Political Science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politician's Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1995. Uses and Limitations of Rational Choice. In Latin America in Comparative Perspective: New Approaches to Methods and Analysis, ed. Peter, H. Smith. Boulder: Westview Press. 81–108.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1996. Initiation of New Democratic Institutions in Eastern Europe and Latin America. in Lijphart and Waisman 1996. 15–41.Google Scholar
Gill, Anthony. 1998. Rendering unto Caesar: The Catholic Church and the State in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Ian, Shapiro. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Mathew, D. McCubbins, eds. 2001. Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Robert, R. Kaufman. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Rosemary, C. R. Taylor. 1996. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 44, 5 (December): 936–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Wendy. 1997. Eroding Military Influence in Brazil: Politicians Against Soldiers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy. 1998. Negotiating Civil-Military Relations in Post-Authoritarian Argentina and Chile. International Studies Quarterly 42, 2 (June): 295–318.Google Scholar
Immergut, Ellen M. 1998. The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism. Politics and Society 26, 1 (March): 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 1996. Power, Flexibility, and the Breakdown of Centralized Wage Bargaining. Comparative Politics 28 (July): 399–436.Google Scholar
Lange, Peter. 1984. Unions, Workers, and Wage Regulation: The Rational Bases of Consent. In Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism: Studies in the Political Economy of Western European Nations, ed. John, H. Goldthorpe. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 98–123.Google Scholar
Lewin, Leif. 1991. Self-Interest and Public Interest in Western Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend, and Carlos, H. Waisman, eds. 1996. Institutional Design in New Democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Alfred, Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Matthew Soberg, Shugart, eds. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maxfield, Sylvia. 1997. Gatekeepers of Growth: The International Political Economy of Central Banking in Developing Countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moene, Karl Ove, and Michael, Wallerstein. 1999. Social Democratic Labor Market Institutions: A Retrospective Analysis. In Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, ed. Herbert, Kitschelt, Peter, Lange, Gary, Marks, and John, D. Stephens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 231–60.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott. Forthcoming. Conclusion: Explaining Legislative Politics in Latin America. In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Gary, W. Cox and Morgenstern, . Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo. n.d. Game Theory and Comparative Politics: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives. Unpublished mss.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo. 2001. Game Theory and Comparative Politics: New Perspectives and Old Concerns. World Politics 53 (January): 173–204.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1999a. Counterpoints: Selected Essays on Authoritarianism and Democratization. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1999b. Polyarchies and the (Un)Rule of Law in Latin America: A Partial Conclusion. In The (Un)Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America, ed. Juan, E. Méndez O'Donnell, and Paulo Sérgio, Pinheiro. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 303–37.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Philippe, C. Schmitter. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter C. 1990. The Emerging Discipline of Political Economy. in Alt and Shepsle 1990. 9–30.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1988. Public Choice and Peasant Organization. In Toward a Political Economy of Development, ed. Robert, H. Bates. Berkeley: University of California Press. 245–71.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Michael, Wallerstein. 1982. The Structure of Class Conflict in Democratic Capitalist Societies. American Political Science Review 76: 215–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and John, D. Stephens. 1997. Comparing Historical Sequences–a Powerful Tool for Causal Analysis. Comparative Social Research 16: 55–72.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Evelyne Huber, Stephens, and John, D. Stephens. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and John, M. Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Stephan, Haggard. 2001. Institutions and Public Policy in Presidential Systems. in Haggard and McCubbins 2001. 64–102.Google Scholar
Snyder, Richard. 1999. After Neoliberalism: the Politics of Reregulation in Mexico. World Politics 51, 2 (January): 173–204.Google Scholar
Snyder, Richard. 2001. Politics After Neoliberalism: Reregulation in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soskice, David. 2000. Macroeconomic Analysis and the Political Economy of Unemployment. In Unions, Employers, and Central Banks: Macroeconomic Coordination and Institutional Change in Social Market Economies, ed. Torben, Iversen, Jonas, Pontusson, and Soskice, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 38–74.Google Scholar
Wantchekon, Leonard. 1999. On the Nature of First Democratic Elections. Journal of Conflict Resolution 43, 2 (April): 245–58.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1996. Democracy Without Equity: Failures of Reform in Brazil. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1998. Beyond the Washington Consensus: Institutions Matter. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar