Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:48:45.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partisan Attachment and Democracy in Mexico: Some Cautionary Observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

D. Xavier Medina Vidal ,
Antonio Ugues Jr. ,
Shaun Bowler  and
Jonathan Hiskey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Party identification is a central concept in studies of parties and elections. Drawing from an extensive literature linking the concept of party identification to the understanding of Mexico's electoral politics, this article explores how the Mexican experience informs the understanding of party identification in general, especially in emerging democracies. There, voters' attachments to political parties are usually seen both as essential to and a positive sign of democratic development. This study finds evidence consistent with these arguments in the Mexican case but also identifies aspects of Mexican party identification that are not so clearly supportive of democratic politics; that indeed may delay or even undermine democratization. These findings illustrate the relevance of the Mexican experience to the wider literature on parties and elections, particularly the well-documented relationship between party identifications and democratization.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , Spring 2010 , pp. 63 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel, and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Democracy and Attitudes in Five Nations. Princeton : Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., and Mendes, Silvia. 2006. Learning to Lose: Election Outcomes, Democratic Experience and Political Protest Potential. British Journal of Political Science 36: 91–111.Google Scholar
Arvizu Arriora, Juan. 2006. 2006: crispación política y social El Universal [Mexico City], December 25.Google Scholar
Baker, Andy. 2006. Why Is Voting Behavior so Regionalized in Mexico? Political Discussion and Electoral Choice in 2006. Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 31–September 3.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen, and Greene, Kenneth F.. 2007. Elite Polarization Meets Mass Moderation in Mexico's 2006 Elections. PS: Political Science and Politics 40, 1: 33–38.Google Scholar
Buendía, Jorge. 2004. The Changing Mexican Voter, 1991–2000. In Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico, ed. Middlebrook, Kevin J.. London : Institute of Latin American Studies. 108–29.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 2004. Citizen Attitudes toward Democracy and Vicente Fox's Victory in 2000. In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Candidates, Voters, and the Presidential Campaign of 2000, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chappell. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 25–46.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 2007. Politics in Mexico: The Democratic Consolidation. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Catterberg, Gabriela, and Moreno, Alejandro. 2003. The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established Democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18, 1: 31–48.Google Scholar
Cleary, Matthew R., and Stokes, Susan C.. 2006. Democracy and the Culture of Skepticism: Political Trust in Argentina and Mexico. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 1999. Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. In Critical Citizens, ed. Norris, Pippa. Oxford : Oxford University Press. 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2007. Partisan Mobilization, Cognitive Mobilization and the Changing American Electorate. Electoral Studies 26, 2: 274–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., and Weldon, Steven. 2005. Partisanship and Party System Institutionalization. Paper prepared for the conference on “Political Parties and Political Development,” National Democratic Institute, Washington, DC, August 31.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., and Weldon, Steven. 2007. Partisanship and Party System Institutionalization. Party Politics 13, 2: 179–96.Google Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Magaloni, Beatriz, and Weingast, Barry. 2003. Tragic Brilliance: Equilibrium Hegemony and Democratization in Mexico. Unpublished mss. Stanford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., and McCann, James A.. 1995. Shaping Mexico's Electoral Arena: the Construction of Partisan Cleavages in the 1988 and 1991 National Elections. American Political Science Review 89, 1: 34–48.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., and McCann, James A.. 1996. Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choice. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., and Lawson, Chappell. 2004. Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Candidates, Voters, and the Presidential Campaign of 2000. Stanford : Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Estrada, Luis. 2005. Party Identification in Mexico. Ph.D. diss., political science, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Estrada, Luis, and Poiré, Alejandro. 2007. The Mexican Standoff: Taught to Protest, Learning to Lose. Journal of Democracy 18, 1: 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, Todd A. 2003. Thinking outside the (Ballot) Box: Informal Electoral Institutions and Mexico's Political Opening. Latin American Politics and Society 45, 1 (Spring): 25–54.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry E. 2006. Why Not Parties in Russia? Democracy, Federalism, and the State. New York : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2006. Stuck in the Mud: Parties and Party Systems in Democratic Southeast Asia. Taiwan Journal of Democracy 2, 2: 23–46.Google Scholar
Huber, John D., Kernell, Georgia, and Leoni, Eduardo L.. 2005. Institutional Context, Cognitive Resources and Party Attachments across Democracies. Political Analysis 13: 365–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, Abby. 2002. Party Competition in Postcommunist Europe: the Great Electoral Lottery. Comparative Politics 35, 1: 85–104.Google Scholar
Jasiewicz, Krzysztof. 2007. Poland: Party System by Default. In Webb and White 2007. 85–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey A., and Banducci, Susan A.. 2007. Party Mobilization and Political Participation in New and Old Democracies. Party Politics 13, 2: 217–34.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven I.. 2007. Citizen-Politician Linkages: An Introduction. In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, ed. Kitschelt, and Wilkinson, . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 1–49.Google Scholar
Klesner, Joseph L. 2004. The Structure of the Mexican Electorate: Social, Attitudinal, and Partisan Bases of Vicente Fox's Victory. In Domínguez and Lawson 2004. 91–122.Google Scholar
Klesner, Joseph L. 2005. Electoral Competition and the New Party System in Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society 47, 2 (Summer): 103–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klesner, Joseph L. 2007a. Does the Collapse of Single-Party Rule in Central and Eastern Europe Reveal the Path down Which Mexico Is Headed International Studies Review 9: 326–37.Google Scholar
Klesner, Joseph L. 2007b. The 2006 Mexican Election and Its Aftermath: Editor's Introduction. PS: Political Science and Politics 40, 1: 11–14.Google Scholar
Klesner, Joseph L. 2007c. The 2006 Mexican Elections: Manifestations of a Divided Society PS: Political Science and Politics 40, 1: 27–32.Google Scholar
Langston, Joy. 2007a. Strong Parties in a Struggling Party System. In Webb and White 2007. 243–73.Google Scholar
Langston, Joy. 2007b. The Pri's Electoral Debacle. PS: Political Science and Politics 40, 1: 21–25.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell. 2007. How Did We Get Here? Mexican Democracy after the 2006 Elections. PS: Political Science and Politics 40, 1: 45–48.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell, et al. 2007. The Mexico 2006 Panel Study. Wave 2. <http://web.mit.edu/polisci/research/mexico06>..>Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 1999. Fujimori and Post-Party Politics in Peru. Journal of Democracy 10, 3: 78–92.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2005. Argentina: Democratic Survival Amidst Economic Failure. In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, ed. Hagopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott P.. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 63–89.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2002. Elections without Democracy: the Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 13, 2: 51–65.Google Scholar
Levy, Daniel C., Bruhn, Kathleen, and Zebadua, Emilio. 2006. Mexico: The Struggle for Democratic Development, 2nd ed. Berkeley : University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Paul G. 2001. The “Third Wave” of Democracy in Eastern Europe: Comparative Perspectives on Party Roles and Political Development. Party Politics 7, 5: 543–65.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, Díaz-Cayeros, Alberto, and Estévez, Federico. 2007. Clientelism and Portfolio Diversification: A Model of Electoral Investment with Applications to Mexico. In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Stephen I.. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 182–205.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Torcal, Mariano. 2006. Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization. In Handbook of Party Politics, ed. Katz, R. S. and Crotty, W.. London : Sage. 204–27.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy. 1995. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford : Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, María Bejarano, Ana, and Pizarro, Eduardo. 2006. The Crisis of Democratic Representation in the Andes. Stanford : Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, James A., and Lawson, Chappell. 2003. An Electorate Adrift? Public Opinion and the Quality of Democracy in Mexico. Latin American Research Review 38, 3: 60–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, James A., and Domínguez, Jorge I.. 1998. Mexicans React to Electoral Fraud and Political Corruption: an Assessment of Public Opinion and Voting Behavior. Electoral Studies 17, 4: 483–503.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 1999. Political Cleavages: Issues, Parties, and the Consolidation of Democracy. Boulder : Westview Press.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 2003. El votante mexicano: democracia, actitudes políticas y conducta electoral. 1st ed. Mexico City : Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 2006a. Changing Ideological Dimensions of Party Competition in Mexico, 1990–2006. Paper prepared for presentation at the MIT Department of Political Science Work in Progress Colloquium, November 30.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 2006b. The Coalition for Change: Voters and Parties in the 2000 Mexican Elections. In The Elections of 2000: Politics, Culture, and Economics in North America, ed. Kirtz, Marcus, Kasoff, Mark J., Farmer, Rick, and Green, John C.. Akron : University of Akron Press. 21–49.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 2007. The 2006 Mexican Presidential Election: the Economy, Oil Revenues, and Ideology. PS: Political Science and Politics 40, 1: 15–19.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jana. 2007. Partisanship during the Collapse of Venezuela's Party System. Latin American Research Review 42, 1: 78–98.Google Scholar
Morris, Stephen D. 1991. Corruption and Politics in Contemporary Mexico. Tuscaloosa : University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Stephen D. 1999. Corruption and the Mexican Political System: Continuity and Change. Third World Quarterly 20, 3: 623–43.Google Scholar
Piattoni, Simona. 2001. Clientelism in Historical and Comparative Perspective. In Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation: The European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective, ed. Piattoni, . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 1–30.Google Scholar
Ramos Pérez, Jorge. 2006a. Presenta el Prd impugnación a proceso electoral. El Universal, July 10.Google Scholar
Ramos Pérez, Jorge. 2006b. López Obrador preve que se extienda resistencia civil. El Universal, August 14.Google Scholar
Reforma (Mexico City). 2008. Baja al 35% el nivel de satisfacción con la democracia [Level of satisfaction with democracy falls to 35%]. August 27. (Face-to-face interviews with 1,515 Mexican adults, conducted August 16 and 17.) <http://web.mit.edu/polisci/research/mexico06>..>Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2006. Do Parties Matter? Lessons from the Fujimori Experience. In The Fujimori Legacy: The Rise of Electoral Authoritarianism in Peru, ed. Carrión, Julio F.. University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press. 81–101.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2007. Latin America's Populist Revival. SAIS Review 27, 1: 3–15.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, and Mishler, William. 1998. Negative and Positive Party Identification in Post-Communist Countries. Electoral Studies 17, 2 (June): 217–34.Google Scholar
Samuels, David. 2006. Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 48, 2 (Summer): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabad, Goldie, and Slomczynski, Kazimierz M.. 2002. The Emergence of Career Politicians in Post-Communist Democracies: Poland and the Czech Republic. Legislative Studies Quarterly 27, 3: 333–59.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2007. Political Clientelism. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Boix, Carles and Stokes, . Oxford : Oxford University Press. 604–27.Google Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2005. The Development of Stable Party Support: Electoral Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe. American Journal of Political Science 49, 2: 283–98.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Jacques, ed. 2006. The European Voter. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mexicana, Transparencia. 2001. Encuesta nacional de corrupción y buen gobierno [National Survey on Corruption and Good Governance]. <http://www.transparenciamexicana.org.mx/ENCBG> Accessed April 22, 2009.+Accessed+April+22,+2009.>Google Scholar
Trinkunas, Harold A. 2005. Crafting Civilian Control of the Military in Venezuela: A Comparative Perspective. Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, Paul. 2002. Conclusion: Parties and Democratic Control in Advanced Industrial Societies. In Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, ed. Webb, David Farrell, and Holliday, Ian. Oxford : Oxford University Press. 438–60.Google Scholar
Webb, Paul, and White, Stephen. 2007. Political Parties in New Democracies. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, Stephen. 2007. Russia's Client Party System. In Webb and White 2007. 21–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Andrew, and Birch, Sarah. 2007. Political Parties in Ukraine: Virtual and Representational. In Webb and White 2007. 53–83.Google Scholar