Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:39:02.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The New Federalism in Mexico and Foreign Economic Policy: An Alternative Two-Level Game Analysis of the Metalclad Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Arturo Borja Tamayo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines, through a two-level game model, the case of the first investment dispute under NAFTA between a private U.S. firm and the Mexican government. It argues that the clue to understanding why the Mexican president could not cooperate with the U.S. president lies in Mexico's domestic “ratification” process. The analysis yields two theoretical propositions. First, federalism represents an important variable in explaining foreign economic policy. Second, two-level game logic should not be applied only to formal international negotiation situations; instead, by specifying the dependent variable as cooperation or noncooperation, these models connecting domestic and international politics can be productively applied to study foreign economic policy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , Winter 2001 , pp. 67 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borja, Arturo. 1998. Niveles, divisiones y falsos dilemas. El futuro de la teoría de relaciones internacionales. Estudios Internacionales 31, 123–24 (July–December): 119–34.Google Scholar
Borja, Arturo, and Imtiaz, Hussain. 1997. Settling Disputes and Supranationalism: a Comparative Study of Investment and Trade under Nafta. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Toronto. March.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. 1979. Civilization and Capitalism, 15th–18th Century. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Cabrero, Enrique, ed. 1998. Las políticas descentralizadoras en México (1983–1993): logrosy desencantos. Mexico City: CIDE-Miguel Angel Porrúa.Google Scholar
Cabrero, Enrique, and Carlos, Gil García. 2000. El Municipio de San Luis Potosí (1989–1999). Gestión municipal en un contexto de alternancias e ingovernabilidad. Mexico City: Documento de Trabajo, División de Administratión Pública, Cide.Google Scholar
Calvillo, Tomás. 1986. El navismo o los motivos de la dignidad San Luis Potosí. Mexico City: Talleres Litograficos.Google Scholar
Calvillo, Tomás, and Isabel, Monroy. 1997. Breve historia de San Luis Potosí. Mexico City: El Colegio de México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell, and Brian, Tomlin. 2000. The Making of NAFTA: How the Deal Was Done. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Caporaso, James A. 1997. Across the Great Divide: Integrating Comparative and International Politics. International Studies Quarterly 41: 563–92.Google Scholar
Castro Rea, Julián, and Paz, Márquez-Padilla. 2000. El nuevo federalismo en América del Norte. Mexico City: UNAM-CISAN.Google Scholar
Díaz, Alberto. 1995. Desarrollo económico e inequidad regional: hacia un nuevo pacto federal en México. Mexico City: CIDAC-Miguel Angel Porrúa.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. Case Study and Theory in Political Science. In Handbook of Political Science, ed. Fred, Greenstein and Nelson, Polsby. Vol. 7: Strategies of Inquiry. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 79–137.Google Scholar
Enciso, Angélica. 1995. El confinamiento de Guadalcázar iniciará operaciones en dos meses. La Jornada (Mexico City). November 26: 41.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B. 1993. Building an Integrative Approach to International and Domestic Politics: Reflections and Projections. Chapter 13 in Evans et al. 1993. 397–430.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B., Harold, K. Jacobson, and Robert, D. Putnam, eds. 1993. Double-Edged Diplomacy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
El Financiero (Mexico City). 1999. Insistirá Canadá en reformar el capitulo 11 del Tlc. August 21: 29.Google Scholar
Hernández, Alicia, ed. 1996. Hacia un nuevo federalismo? Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Economica-El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Instituto Federal Electoral (IFE). 1994. Constitución política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Mexico City: IFE.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1993. Two-Level Strategies and Developing Countries. in Evans et al. 1993. 363–94.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, and Joseph, Nye. 2001. Power and Interdependence. 3d edition. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Robert, Keohane, and Sidney, Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kuri, Maximo. 2001. Interviene Canadá en disputa del Tlcan. Reforma (Mexico City). February 19.Google Scholar
Los Angeles Times . 2000. Nafta Panel Sides with Metalclad on Claim. August 31: 3C.Google Scholar
Martínez Assad, Carlos. 1985. Nava: de la rebelión de los coheteros al juicio político. In Municipios en conflicto, ed. Martínez, Assad. Mexico City: GV Editores.Google Scholar
Mayer, Frederick. 1998. Interpreting NAFTA: The Science and Art of Political Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Medellín, Pedro. 1996. General Coordinator of Ecology, State of San Luis Potosí. Author interview. San Luis Potosí, September 18.Google Scholar
Medellín, Pedro. 1998. Author interview. San Luis Potosí, December 3.Google Scholar
Metalclad Corporation. 1995a. Letter to Metalclad shareholders signed by Grant S. Kesler, President. Newport Beach, California. March 6.Google Scholar
Metalclad Corporation. 1995b. Corporate Profile. Brochure. Newport Beach, California.Google Scholar
Millman, Joel. 1997. Metalclad Suit Is First against Mexico under Nafta Foreign Investment Rules. Wall Street Journal. October 14: A2.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen. 1998. Rationalizing Politics: the Emerging Synthesis among International, American, and Comparative Politics. International Organization 52, 4 (Autumn): 759–86.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. Introduction: Integrating International and Domestic Theories of International Bargaining. Chapter 1 in Evans et al. 1993. 3–42.Google Scholar
Odell, John S. 2000. Negotiating the World Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Paulín, María Luisa. 1995. Confinamiento político. El Heraldo (San Luis Potosí). December 18.Google Scholar
Procuraduria Federal de Protectión Ambiental (PROFEPA). 1995. Dictamenes técnicos del confinamiento de residuos peligrosos ubicado en Guadalcázar, S. L. P. [Technical Review of the Hazardous Waste Landfill of Guadalcázar, S. L. P.]. Mexico City: PROFEPA.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Two-Level Games. Appendix to Evans et al. 1993. 431–68. [Originally published in International Organization 42 (Summer 1988): 427–60.].Google Scholar
Quinones, Sam. 1999. Mexico's Wastelands. Mb magazine. April. 38–46.Google Scholar
Rodarte, Humberto. 1997. Director-General of Ecosistemas del Potosí, one of the companies owned by Metalclad in Mexico. Author interview. Mexico City, January 15.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria, ed. 1997. Decentralization in Mexico: From Reforma Municipal to Solidaridad to Nuevo Federalismo. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Antonio. 2001. Declina corte a fallo definitivo. Reforma. May 4: 3A.Google Scholar
Santos, Gonzalo N. 1986. Memorias. Mexico City: Grijalvo.Google Scholar
Santos Zavala, José. 1990. La administratión pública en San Luis Potosí: una agenda para el cambio. Master's thesis, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE).Google Scholar
El Sol de San Luis Potosí . 1995. Empieza a operar “la Pedrera.” November 25: 1.Google Scholar
El Sureste de Tabasco (Villahermosa). 2001. Inician audiencias sobre fallo de panel del Tlcan. February 20. InfoLatina.Google Scholar
Torres, Blanca. 1990. Interdependencia. Un enfoque útilpara el analisis de las relaciones México-Estados Unidos? Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Villa de Mebius, Rosa. 1988. San Luis Potosí. Una historia compartida. Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Dr. Jose Maria Luis Mora.Google Scholar