Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:05:05.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Latin America and the Dollar Bloc in the Twenty-first Century: To Dollarize or Not?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Kenneth P. Jameson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The choice of exchange rate regime is a continuing challenge to Latin American policymakers, who currently face pressure to dollarize their economies. The constraints imposed by the “dollar bloc,” the informal but powerful currency bloc that ties Latin America to the dominant currency, are central to that choice. Current weak economic performance has called the bloc's norms and principles into question and has made the exchange rate an open issue. Ecuador's full official dollarization is one possible strategy for countries with political stability but poor economic performance to gain access to needed dollar resources. Most of Latin America, however, will continue with variants of managed floating exchange rates, and the periodic foreign exchange crises will provide access to official dollar resources and facilitate renegotiation of the terms of outstanding debt.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , Winter 2001 , pp. 1 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altimir, Oscar, and Robert, Devlin. 1992. An Overview of Debt Moratoria in Latin America. Working Paper 6. Santiago, Chile: ECLAC. June.Google Scholar
Bank for International Settlements (BIS). 1999. Annual Report. Basel: BIS.Google Scholar
Bogetic, Zeljko. 2000. Full Dollarization: Fad of Future Challenge 43, 2 (March–April): 17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, Michael, Michael, Edelstein, and Hugh, Rockoff. 1999. Was Adherence to the Gold Standard a “Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval” During the Interwar Period? Working Paper 7186. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). June.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, George W., President, . 2001. Relief and Reconstruction Assistance for El Salvador. March 2. http:www.whitehouse.govnewreleases20010320010302-9.html (accessed March 3, 2001).Google Scholar
Calvo, Guillermo, and Carmen, Reinhart. 1999. Capital Flow Reversals, the Exchange Rate Debate, and Dollarization. Finance and Development 36, 3 (September): 13–15.Google Scholar
Carlson, John, and Benjamin, Keen. 1996. Where Is All the U.S. Currency Hiding?Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Economic Commentary. April 15: 4.Google Scholar
Christiano, Lawrence J., and Terry, J. Fitzgerald. 2000. Understanding the Fiscal Theory of the Price Level. Economic Review 36, 2: 1–38.Google Scholar
Devlin, Robert, and Michael, Mortimer. 1983. Los bancos transnacionales, el estado y el endeudamiento externo en Bolivia. Santiago, Chile: United Nations.Google Scholar
Drake, Paul. 1989. The Money Doctor in the Andes: the Kemmerer Missions, 1923–1933. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economic Commission for Latin American and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 19841999. Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean. http:www.eclac.clespanolPublicacionesanu99balanceII.pdf (accessed August 14, 2000).Google Scholar
Economic Commission for Latin American and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 1999. Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago, Chile: ECLAC.Google Scholar
Economic Commission for Latin American and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 2000. Inversion extranjera en America Latina y el Caribe: informe 1999. Santiago, Chile: ECLAC.Google Scholar
Edwards, Sebastian. 1999. The Imf is Panama's Lender of First Resort. Wall Street Journal, September 24: A15.Google Scholar
Edwards, Sebastian, ed. 2000. Introduction. In Capital Flows and the Emerging Economies: Theory, Evidence, and Controversies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldstein, Martin. 1997. The Political Economy of the European Economic and Monetary Union: Political Sources of an Economic Liability. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11, 4 (Fall): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraga, Arminio. 2000. Monetary Policy during the Transition to a Floating Exchange Rate: Brazil’s Recent Experience. Finance and Development 39, 2 (March): 16–18.Google Scholar
Frankel, Jeffrey A., and Shang-Jin, Wei. 1995. Emerging Currency Blocks. In The International Monetary System, ed. Hans, Genberg. New York: Springer Verlag. 111–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenkel, Jacob, and Morris, Goldstein. 1991. The Macroeconomic Policy Implications of Trade and Currency Zones. In Symposium: Policy Implications of Trade and Currency Zones. Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. 157–211.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffrey, and Ernesto, Stein. 2001. The Currency Game: Exchange Rate Politics in Latin America. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Glade, William P. 1969. The Latin American Economies: A Study of Their Institutional Evolution. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Guillaumont, Patrick G., Sylviane, Guillaumont, and Patrick, Plane. 1988. Participating in African Monetary Unions: an Alternative Evaluation. World Development 16, 5: 569–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoogvelt, Anki. 1997. Globalization and the Postcolonial World: The New Political Economy of Development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). 19851998. Economic and Social Progress in Latin America. Washington, DC: IDB.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). 1998. Facing Up to Inequality. Washington, DC: IDB.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 19801999. International Financial Statistics (monthly). Various years. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 1997. International Capital Markets: Developments, Prospects, and Key Policy Issues. Washington, DC: IMF. November.Google Scholar
Jameson, Kenneth P. 1990. Dollar Bloc Dependency in Latin America: beyond Bretton Woods. International Studies Quarterly 34: 519–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korzeniewicz, Roberto, and William, C. Smith. 2000. Poverty, Inequality, and Growth in Latin America: Searching for the High Road to Globalization. Latin American Research Review 35, 3: 7–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuczynski, Pedro-Pablo. 1988. Latin American Debt. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
LeBaron, Blake, and Rachel, McCulloch. 2000. Floating, Fixed, or Super-fixed? Dollarization Joins the Menu of Exchange-Rate Options. American Economic Review 90, 2 (May): 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerrick, Adam. 2001. When Is a Haircut Not a Haircut? When the Imf Is the Barber. Wall Street Journal. February 23: A15.Google Scholar
Mahon, James. 1996. Mobile Capital and Latin American Development. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Ronald. 1993. The Rules of the Game: International Money in Historical Perspective. Journal of Economic Literature 31, 1 (March): 1–44.Google Scholar
Milverton, Damian. 2000. Imf Official Cites Benefits of Dollarization. Wall Street Journal. May 17: B13.Google Scholar
Mundell, Robert. 1972. The Future of the International Financial System, in Bretton Woods Revisited, ed. Keith Acheson, A. L., John, F. Chant, and Martin, F. J. Prachowny. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundell, Robert. 1998. What Makes a Great Currency? Paper presented to the Fourth Dubrovnick Conference on the Transition Economies, June 23–26.Google Scholar
Noticen, . 2000. Latin American Database. December 14. http:ladb.unm.edu (accessed February 2001).Google Scholar
Notisur, . Latin American Database, http:ladb.unm.edu (accessed February 2001).Google Scholar
Notisur. 1999a September 3.Google Scholar
Notisur. 1999b October 1.Google Scholar
Notisur. 2000 January 14.Google Scholar
Notisur. 2001 May 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orrenius, Pia, and Alan, Viard. 2000. The Second Great Migration: Economic and Policy Implications. Southwest Economy (May–June): 1–8. Dallas: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.Google Scholar
Porter, Richard, and Ruth, Judson. 1996. The Location of U.S. Currency: How Much is Abroad Federal Reserve Bulletin 82, 10 (October): 883–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockoff, Hugh. 2000. How Long Did It Take the United States to Become an Optimal Currency Area? Working Paper H124. Cambridge, MA: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolnick, Arthur. 1999. Interview with Stanley Fischer. The Region (December): 1–11. Minneapolis: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. 20–32.Google Scholar
Sachs, Jeffrey, and Felipe, Larrain. 1999. Why Dollarization Is More Straitjacket than Salvation. Foreign Policy 116 (Fall): 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt-Grohe, Stephanie, and Martin, Uribe. 2000. Políticas de estabilización y los costos de dolarizar. Cuestiones Económicas (Quito) 17, 2 (segundo trimestre): 109–48.Google Scholar
Sesit, Michael. 2000. Battered Euro Gains Favor in Financing Developing Countries. Wall Street Journal. July 14: A23.Google Scholar
Szekely, Miguel, and Marianne, Hilgert. 1999. The 1990s in Latin America: Another Decade of Persistent Inequality. Manuscript. Washington, DC: IDB. December.Google Scholar
Thorp, Rosemary. 1998. Progress, Poverty, and Exclusion: An Economic History of Latin America in the 20th Century. Washington, DC: IDB.Google Scholar
United States Senate. 1999. Encouraging Official Dollarization in Emerging Markets. Joint Economic Committee Staff Report. Washington, Dc. April. http:www.senate.govjecdollarization.htm (accessed July 24, 1999).Google Scholar
Williamson, John. 1993. Democracy and the “Washington Consensus. World Development 21, 8: 1329–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, John, ed. 1990. Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Wise, Carol, and Riordan, Roett, eds. 2000. Exchange Rate Politics in Latin America. Washington, D.C. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 19841994. World Development Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar