Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:53:47.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labor Reform and Dual Transitions in Brazil and the Southern Cone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

María Lorena Cook
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The sequencing of transitions to democracy and to a market economy shaped the outcome of labor law reform and prospects for expanded labor rights in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile. Argentina and Brazil experienced democratic transitions before market economic reforms were consolidated in the 1990s. During the transition, unions obtained prolabor reforms and secured rights that were enshrined in labor law. In posttransition democratic governments, market reforms coincided with efforts to reverse earlier labor protections. Unable to block many harmful reforms, organized labor in Argentina and Brazil did conserve core interests linked to organizational survival and hence to future bargaining leverage. In Chile this sequence was reversed. Market economic policies and labor reform were consolidated under military dictatorship. During democratic transition, employers successfully resisted reforms that would expand labor rights. This produced a limited scope of organizational resources for Chilean unions and reduced prospects for future improvements.

Type
Research
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , Spring 2002 , pp. 1 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acuña, Carlos H. 1996. Politics and Economics in the Argentina of the Nineties (Or, Why the Future No Longer Is What It Used to Be). In Democracy, Markets, and Structural Reform in Latin America, ed. Acuna, William C. Smith, and Gamarra, Eduardo A. Coral Gables: North-South Center Press. 31–74.Google Scholar
Adler, Glenn, and Eddie, Webster, eds. 2000. Trade Unions and Democratization in South Africa, 1985–1997. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Amadeo, Edward, Ricardo Paese, Barros, José Márcio, Camargo, and Rosane, Mendonca. 1995. Brazil. In Reforming the Labor Market in a Liberalized Economy, ed. Gustavo, Márquez Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Angell, Alan. 1972. Politics and the Labour Movement in Chile. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barrera, Manuel. 1998. Macroeconomic Adjustment in Chile and the Politics of the Popular Sectors. In What Kind of Democracy? What Kind of Market? Latin America in the Age of Neoliberalism, ed. Philip, D. Oxhorn and Graciela, Ducatenzeiler. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 127–49.Google Scholar
Barrera, Manuel, and Samuel Valenzuela, J.. 1986. The Development of Labor Movement Opposition to the Military Regime. In Military Rule in Chile: Dictatorship and Oppositions, ed. Samuel Valenzuela, J. and Arturo, Valenzuela. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 230–69.Google Scholar
Bensusán Areous, Graciela, and Maria Lorena, Cook. Forthcoming. Political Transition and Labor Revitalization in Mexico. In Labor Revitalization, Vol. 11: Research in the Sociology of Work, ed. Daniel, Cornfield and Holly, McCammon. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Bensusán Areous, Graciela, and von Bülow, Marisa 1997. La reforma institucional del corporativismo sindical: las experiencias de Brasil y México. Perfiles Latinoamericanos año 6, no. 11 (December). 185–229.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 1994. Sacrifice, Sequence, and Strength in Successful Dual Transitions: Lessons from Spain. Journal of Politics 56, 3: 601–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsall, Nancy, Carol, Graham, and Richard, H. Sabot. 1998. Virtuous Circles in Latin America's Second Stage of Reforms. In Beyond Trade-Offs: Market Reform and Equitable Growth in Latin America, ed. Birdsall, Graham, and Sabot, . Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank/Brookings Institution Press. 1–28.Google Scholar
Brazil. Bureau of National Affairs. 1996. Privatization, Automation Weaken Once-Powerful Labor Unions in Brazil. Daily Labor Report no. 142 (July 24).Google Scholar
Bronstein, Arturo S. 1995. Societal Change and Industrial Relations in Latin America: Trends and Prospects. International Labour Review 134, 2: 163–86.Google Scholar
Bronstein, Arturo S. 1997. Labor Law Reform in Latin America: between State Protection and Flexibility. International Labour Review 136, 1: 5–26.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Paul G. 1995. State, Labor, and Capital: Democratizing Class Relations in the Southern Cone. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Richard. 1989. The Future of Brazilian Labor Law under the Federal Constitution of 1988. Comparative Labor Law Journal 10, 2: 214–42.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Adalberto Moreira. 1999. Sindicatos, trabalhadores e a coqueluche neoliberal, a era Vargas acabou? Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fundacao Getulio Vargas.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Adalberto Moreira. 2000. Brazilian Central Union Federations at the Crossroads. Paper prepared for the workshop “National Labor Confederations in Brazil and South Korea,” University of California, Berkeley, May 13–14.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and David, Collier. 1979. Inducements versus Constraints: Disaggregating “Corporatism. American Political Science Review 73, 4: 967–86.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and David, Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, María Lorena. 1998. Toward Flexible Industrial Relations? Neo-Liberalism, Democracy, and Labor Reform in Latin America. Industrial Relations 27, 3 (July): 311–36.Google Scholar
Córdova, Efrén. 1989. From Corporatism to Liberalisation: the New Directions of the Brazilian System of Industrial Relations. Labour and Society 14, 3: 251–69.Google Scholar
Córdova, Efrén. 1996. The Challenge of Flexibility in Latin America. Comparative Labor Law Journal 17, 2: 314–37.Google Scholar
Cortázar, René, Nora, Lustig, and Richard, H. Sabot. 1998. Economic Policy and Labor Market Dynamics. in Birdsall et al. 1998. 183–212.Google Scholar
Crivelli, Ericson. 1998. O projeto da Cut para a transiçáo da estrutura sindical corporativa. Presentation to the seminar “a política da Cut para conquistar um sistema democrático de relaçôes de trabalho,” Cut-Nacional, Sâo Paulo, Brazil, March 16–17.Google Scholar
Drake, Paul W. 1996. Labor Movements and Dictatorships: The Southern Cone in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Alejandra Cox. 1997. Labor Market Regulation in Latin America: an Overview. in Edwards and Lustig 1997. 127–50.Google Scholar
Edwards, Sebastian, and Nora Claudia, Lustig, eds. 1997. Labor Markets in Latin America: Combining Social Protection with Market Flexibility. Washington, DC: Brooking Institution Press.Google Scholar
Ellner, Steve. 1993. Organized Labor in Venezuela, 1958–1991: Behavior and Concerns in a Democratic Setting. Wilmington: Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
Epstein, Edward C. 1993. Labor and Political Stability in the New Chilean Democracy: Three Illusions. Economía y Trabajo 1, 2 (July-December): 45–64.Google Scholar
Erickson, Kenneth P. 1977. The Brazilian Corporative State and Working Class Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Etchemendy, Sebastián. 1995. Límites al decisionismo? El poder ejecutivo y la formulation de la legislation laboral (1983–1994). In Politica y sociedad en los años del menemismo, ed. Ricardo, Sidicero and Jorge, Mayer. Buenos Aires: Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Buenos Aires. 127–54.Google Scholar
Etchemendy, Sebastián, and Vicente, Palermo. 1997. Conflicto y concertación. Gobierno, congreso y organizaciones de interes en la reforma laboral del primer gobierno de Menem. Working Paper No. 41, Universidad Torcuato di Telia, Buenos Aires. June..Google Scholar
Frank, Volker K. 2000. Labor Movement Strategies in Democratic Chile: the Struggle for Contested Spaces, 1990–1999. Paper presented to the 22d International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Miami, March 16–18.Google Scholar
Frundt, Henry J. 1998. Trade Conditions and Labor Rights: U.S. Initiatives, Dominican and Central American Responses. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Gacek, Stanley A. 1994. Revisiting the Corporatist and Contractualist Models of Labor Law Regimes: a Review of the Brazilian and American Systems. Cardozo Law Review 16, 1: 21–110.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1995. The Politics of Economic Liberalization. Latin American Research Review 30, 2: 195–214.Google Scholar
Haagh, Louise. Forthcoming. the Emperor's New Clothes: Labor Reform and Social Democratization in Chile. Studies in Comparative International Development.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Robert, R. Kaufman. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy. 1998. Civil-Military Relations in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile: Present Trends, Future Prospects. In Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America, ed. Felipe, Agüero and Jeffrey, Stark. Coral Gables: North-South Center Press. 299–322.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). 1998. Facing Up to Inequality in Latin America. Economic and Social Progress in Latin America: 1998–1999 Report. Washington, DC: IDB.Google Scholar
International Labour Organisation (ILO). 1999. Report of the Director General, 14th American Regional Meeting. Lima, Peru, August 24–27. http:www.oitamericas99.org.pe.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 1997. Evaluating Argentina's Presidential Democracy, 1983–1995. In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Scott, Mainwaring and Matthew Soberg, Shugart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 259–99.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. 1989. The New Unionism in the Brazilian Transition. In Democratizing Brazil, ed. Alfred, Stepan. New York: Oxford University Press. 252–96.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Report—Southern Cone (Lark). 1995a June 8.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Report—Southern Cone (Lark). 1995b July 13.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Report—Southern Cone (Lark). 1996 October 17.Google Scholar
Latin America Weekly Report (Lawr). 1997a January 7.Google Scholar
Latin America Weekly Report (Lawr). 1997b January 14.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan, A. Way. 1998. Between a Shock and a Hard Place: the Dynamics of Labor-Backed Adjustments in Poland and Argentina. Comparative Politics 30, 2: 171–92.Google Scholar
Lora, Eduardo, and Carmen, Pagés. 1997. La legislatión en el proceso de reformas estructurales de América Latina y el Caribe. Documentos del Trabajo, Oficina del Economista Jefe, Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Washington, DC: IDB.Google Scholar
Madrid, Raúl. 2000. Laboring against Neoliberalism: Explaining Patterns of Policy Reform in Latin America. Paper presented at the 22d International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Miami, March 16–18.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1997. Multipartyism, Robust Federalism, and Presidentialism in Brazil. In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, and Matthew Soberg, Shugart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 55–109.Google Scholar
Márquez, Gustavo, and Carmen, Pagés. 1998. Ties That Bind: Employment Protection and Labor Market Outcomes in Latin America. Paper prepared for the seminar “Employment in Latin America: What is the Problem and How to Address It?” Annual Meetings of the Board of Governors, Inter-American Development Bank and Inter-American Investment Corporation, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, March 15. Washington, DC: Office of the Chief Economist, Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Martins, Filho, da Silva, Ives Gandra 1999. Special adviser to the Presidency in Juridical Affairs. Author interview. Brasília, August 27.Google Scholar
McGuire, James W. 1997. Peronism Without Peron: Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, James O. 1966. Elites, Intellectuals, and Consensus: A Study of the Social Question and the Industrial Relations System in Chile. Cornell International Industrial and Labor Relations Report No. 1. Ithaca: New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L. 1998. Authoritarianism and Democratization: Soldiers and Workers in Argentina, 1976–1983. University Park: Perm State University Press.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. Victoria. 1997. Union Politics, Market-Oriented Reforms, and the Reshaping of Argentine Corporatism. In The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America, ed. Douglas, A. Chalmers, Carlos, M. Vilas, Katherine, Hite, Scott, B. Martin, Kerianne, Piester, and Monique, Segarra. New York: Oxford University Press. 72–94.Google Scholar
Nelson, Joan M., Jacek, Kochanowicz, Kálmán, Mizsei, and Oscar, Muñoz. 1994. Intricate Links: Democratization and Market Reforms in Latin America and Eastern Europe. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
Oficina Internacional del Trabajo (OIT). 1995. Las relaciones laborales en el Cono Sur: estudio comparado. Informe Relasur, Coleccion Informes OIT no. 44. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social.Google Scholar
Oficina Internacional del Trabajo (OIT). 2000. La reforma laboral en América Latina: un análisis comparado. No. 123. Lima: Oficina Regional de la OIT para America Latina y el Caribe.Google Scholar
Paiva, Paulo. 2000. Vice President, Inter-American Development Bank; former minister of labor, Brazil (January 1995-March 1998). Author interview. Washington, Dc., March 22.Google Scholar
Payne, Leigh A. 1995. Brazilian Business and the Democratic Transition: New Attitudes and Influence. In Business and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Ernest, Bartell and Payne, . Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 217–56.Google Scholar
Pier, Carol. 1998. Labor Rights in Chile and Nafta Labor Standards: Questions of Compatibility on the Eve of Free Trade. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 19, 2 (Winter): 185–277.Google Scholar
Pozzi, Pablo A. 1988. Argentina 1976–1982: Labour Leadership and Military Government. Journal of Latin American Studies 20: 111–38.Google Scholar
Ranis, Peter. 1995. Class, Democracy, and Labor in Contemporary Argentina. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
Recalde, Hector. 1999. Legal adviser, Movimiento de Trabajadores Argentinos. Author interview. Buenos Aires, November 1.Google Scholar
Sereno, Marcelo. 1999. National Secretary of Organization, Central Unica dos Trabalhadores. Author interview. Sâo Paulo, August 24.Google Scholar
Silva, Eduardo. 1998. Organized Business, Neoliberal Economic Restructuring, and Redemocratization in Chile. In Organized Business, Economic Change, and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Francisco, Durand and Silva, . Coral Gables: North-South Center Press. 217–52.Google Scholar
Smith, Russell E. 1995. The 1988 Brazilian Constitution: Continuity or Change in the Industrial Relations System? Latin American Labor Occasional Paper no. 23. Miami: Center for Labor Research and Studies, Florida International University.Google Scholar
Tomada, Carlos. 1999. Labor lawyer; professor of labor relations at the Universidad de Buenos Aires. Author interview. Buenos Aires, November 5.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, , Samuel, J., 1989. Labor Movements in Transitions to Democracy: a Framework for Analysis. Comparative Politics 21 (July): 445–72.Google Scholar
Von Bülow, Marisa. 1998. Reforma trabalhista em um contexto de integraçâo hemisférica: o caso do Brasil. Paper presented at the 21st International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago, September 24–26.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1998. The Fragmentation of Business in Brazil. In Organized Business, Economic Change, and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Francisco, Durand and Eduardo, Silva. Coral Gables: North-South Center Press. 73–98.Google Scholar